Engaging Girls' Sociohistorical Identities in Science

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 392-446

  Thompson, Jessica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905754478     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2014.888351     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Avraamidou, L., & Osborne, J. (2009). The role of narrative in communicating science. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1683-1707.
2. Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2001). What mathematical language is entailed in teaching children to reason mathematically? In Mathematical Sciences Education Board (Ed.), Knowing and learning mathematics (pp. 26-34). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
3. Barton, A. C., Kang, H., Tan, E., O'Neill, T. B., Bautista-Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2013). Crafting a future in science: Tracing middle school girls' identity work over time and space. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 37-75.
4. Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2010). "We be burnin'!" Agency, identity, and science learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 187-229.
5. Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 68-103.
6. Basu, S. J., & Barton, A. C. (2007). Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 466-489.
7. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8. Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95, 639-669.
9. Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 441-458.
10. Brickhouse, N. W., & Potter, J. T. (2001). Young women's scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 965-980.
11. Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Brown, B. A. (2006). "It isn't no slang that can be said about this stuff": Language, identity, and appropriating science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 96-126.
13. Brown, B. A., Reveles, J. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education, 89, 779-802.
14. Carlone, H. B., Haun-Frank, J., & Webb, A. (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge- and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 459-485.
15. Cobb, P., & Hodge, L. L. (2002). A relational perspective on issues of cultural diversity and equity as they play out in the mathematics classroom. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 249-284.
16. Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 99-120.
17. Collins, A. (1998). Learning communities: A commentary on chapters by Brown, Ellery, Campione, & Riel. In J. G. Greeno & S. V. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 399-405). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
19. Costa, V. B. (1995). When science is "another world": Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79, 313-333.
20. Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
21. Engle, R. A. (2012). The productive disciplinary engagement framework: Origins, key concepts and developments. In D. Dai (Ed.), Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings: Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning (pp. 161-200). London, England: Taylor & Francis.
22. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399-483.
23. Esmonde, I. (2009). Mathematics learning in groups: Analyzing equity in two cooperative activity structures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 247-284.
24. Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban high school. Albany: State University of New York Press.
25. Ford, M. J. (2012). A dialogic account of sense-making in scientific argumentation and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 30, 207-245.
26. Fordham, S. (1996). Blacked out: Dilemmas of race, identity and success at Capital High. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.
28. Gamoran, A., & Nystrand, M. (1992). Taking students seriously. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 40-61). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
29. Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99-125.
30. Gilbert, A., & Yerrick, R. (2001). Same school, separate worlds: A sociocultural study of identity, resistance, and negotiation in a rural, lower track science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 574-598.
31. Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-López, P., Alvarez, H. H., & Chiu, M. M. (1999). Building a culture of collaboration through hybrid language practices. Theory Into Practice, 38, 87-92.
32. Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 524-549.
33. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 431-473.
34. Holland, D., & Lave, J. (2001). History in person: An introduction. In D. Holland & J. Lave (Eds.), History in person: Enduring struggles, contentious practice, intimate identities (pp. 3-33). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
35. Holland, D., Skinner, D., Lachicotte, W., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Horizon Research International. (2003). Special tabulations of the 2000-2001 LSC teacher questionnaire and classroom observation data. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
37. Huber, J., Whelan, K. K., & Clandinin, D. J. (2003). Children's narrative identity-making: becoming intentional about negotiating classroom spaces. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 303-318.
38. Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In D. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428-444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Johnson, A., Brown, J., Carlone, H., & Cuevas, A. K. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 339-366.
40. Kurth, L. A., Anderson, C. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2002). The case of Carla: Dilemmas of helping all students to understand science. Science Education, 86, 287-313.
41. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-63.
42. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
43. Lee, C. D. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 97-141.
44. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
45. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
46. Michaels, S., & O'Connor, C. (2012). Talk science primer. Cambridge, MA: TERC.
47. Michaels, S., O'Connor, C., & Resnick, L. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283-297.
48. Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). "Maestro, what is 'quality'?" Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 469-496.
49. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 3(2), 132-141.
50. Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
51. Nasir, N. S. (2002). Identity, goals and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 213-247.
52. Nasir, N. S. (2012). Racialized identities: Race and achievement among African American youth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
53. Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 143-179.
54. National Research Council. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
55. Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11-39). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
56. Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
57. Ogbu, J. U., & Fordham, S. (1986). Black students' school success: Coping with the burden of "acting White." The Urban Review, 18, 176-206.
58. Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) and D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception and language (5th ed., pp. 679-744). New York, NY: Wiley.
59. Rosebery, A. S., Ogonowski, M., DiSchino, M., & Warren, B. (2010). "The coat traps all your body heat": Heterogeneity as fundamental to learning, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 322-357.
60. Roth, W.-M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York, NY: Routledge.
61. Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students' scientific explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 5-51.
62. Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities-In search of an analytical tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14-22.
63. Stake, R. 1995. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. Thom, M. (2001). Balancing the equation: Where are women and girls in science, engineering and technology? New York, NY: National Council for Research on Women.
65. Thompson, J., & Windschitl, M. (2005). "Failing girls": Understanding connections among identity negotiation, personal relevance and engagement in science learning from underachieving girls. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 11(1), 1-26.
66. Varelas, M., Kane, J. M., & Wylie, C. D. (2011). Young African American children's representations of self, science, and school: Making sense of difference. Science Education, 95, 824-851.
67. Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. S. (1996). "This question is just too easy!" Students' perspectives on accountability in science. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 97-125). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
69. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70. Wortham, S. (2003). Curriculum as a resource for the development of social identity. Sociology of Education, 76, 228-246.
71. Yamakawa, Y., Forman, E. A., & Ansell, E. (2009). The role of positioning in constructing an identity in a third grade mathematics classroom. In K. Kumpulainen, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & M. Cesar (Eds.), Investigating classroom interaction: Methodologies in action (pp. 179-202). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.