Assessing the reliability of self- and peer rating in student group work

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 329-340

  Zhang, Bo ^a   Johnston, Lucy ^b   Kilic, Gulsen Bagci ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^c ABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 74949125671     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930701293181     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bagci Kilic, G., and M. Cakan. 2006. The analysis of the impact of individual weighting factor on individual scores. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 31, no. 6: 639-654.
2. Brennan, R.L. 2001. Generalizability theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
3. Brennan, R.L., and M.T. Kane. 1977. An index of dependability for mastery tests. Journal of Educational Measurement 14: 277-289.
4. Burke, R. 1969. Self-assessments and peer ratings. Journal of Educational Research 61: 444-448.
5. Cohen, J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20: 37-46.
6. Conway, R., D. Kember, A. Sivan, and M. Wu. 1993. Peer assessment of an individual's contribution to a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 18: 45-54.
7. Cronbach, L.J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16: 297-334.
8. Cronbach, L.J., G.C. Gleser, H. Nanda, and N. Rajaratnam. 1972. The dependability of behavioral measurements. New York: Wiley.
9. DeVellis, R.F. 1991. Scale development: theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Falchikov, N. 1991. Group process analysis: self and peer assessment of working together in a group. In Self and peer assessment, eds S. Brown and P. Dove (Paper No. 63, Standing Conference on Educational Development) Birmingham: SCED Publications.
11. Falchikov, N., and D. Boud. 1989. Student self-assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 59: 395-430.
12. Falchikov, N., and J. Goldfinch. 2000. Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research. 70, 287-322.
13. Gillies, R.M., and Ashman, A.F. eds. 2003. Co-operative learning: the social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
14. Goldfinch, J. 1994. Further developments in peer assessment of group projects. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 19: 29-35.
15. Goldfinch, J., and R. Raeside. 1990. Development of peer assessment technique for obtaining individual marks on a group project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 15: 210-225.
16. Goldman, R.L. 1994. The reliability of peer assessments, a meta-analysis. Evaluation and the Health Professions 17: 3-21.
17. Johnson, D.W., and R. Johnson. 1996. Meaningful and manageable assessment through cooperative learning. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
18. Johnston, L., and L. Miles. 2004. Assessing contributions to group assignments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29: 751-768.
19. Kagan, S. 1994. Cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publishing.
20. Kagan, S. 1995. Group grades miss the mark. Educational Leadership 52: 68-71.
21. Kerr, N.L., and S.E. Bruun. 1983. Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44: 78-94.
22. Krause, J.E., and N.G. Popovich. 1996. A group interaction peer/self assessment process in a pharmacy practice course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 60: 136-145.
23. Lejk, M., and M. Wyvill. 2001. The effect of the inclusion of self assessment with peer assessment of contributions to a group project: a quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 26: 551-561.
24. Lejk, M., and M. Wyvill. 2002. Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: student attitudes to holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27: 569-577.
25. Lejk, M., M. Wyvill, and S. Farrow. 1996. A survey of methods of deriving individual grades from group assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 21: 267-280.
26. Marcoulides, G.A. 1990. An alternative method for estimating variance components in generalizability theory. Psychological Reports 66: 379-386.
27. Nunnally, J. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
28. Ross, J.A., C. Rolheiser, and A. Hogaboam-Gray. 1998. Student evaluation in cooperative learning: teacher cognitions. Teachers and Teaching 4: 299-316.
29. Searle, S.R. 1987. Linear models for unbalanced data. New York: Wiley.
30. Shavelson, R.J., and N.M. Webb. 1991. Generalizability theory: a primer. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
31. Slavin, R.E. 1983. When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin 94: 429-445.
32. Slavin, R.E. 1995. Cooperative learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33. Swallow, W.H., and J. Monahan. 1984. Monte Carlo comparison of ANOVA, MIVQUE, REML, and ML estimators of variance components. Technometrics 26: 47-57.
34. Webb, N.M. 1995. Group collaboration in assessment: multiple objectives, processes and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17: 239-261.