Reconceptualizing measuring, benchmarking for improving interoperability in smart ecosystems: The effect of ubiquitous data and crowdsourcing

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 31, Issue SUPPL.1, 2014, Pages

  Maheshwari, Devender ^a   Janssen, Marijn ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Benchmarking; Crowdsourcing; Design; Development; Improvement; Measurement; Organizational interoperability; Smart government

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905103525     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.009     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. ATHENA Consortium. Enterprise interoperability maturity model (EIMM). ATHENA IP (Advanced Technologies for interoperability of Heterogeneous Enterprise Networks and their Applications Integrated Project) 2004, (accessed: http://athena.modelbased.net/methodology/eimm.html).
2. Baldwin L.P., Irani Z., Love P.E.D. Outsourcing information systems: Drawing lessons from a banking case study. European Journal of Information Systems 2001, 10(1):15-24.
3. Bannister F. The curse of the benchmark: An assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons. International Review of Administrative Sciences 2007, 73(2):171-188.
4. Bertot J.C., Jaeger P.T., Grimes J.M. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: e-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27(3):264-271.
5. Beynon-Davies P., Williams M.D. Evaluating electronic local government in the UK. Journal of Information Technology 2003, 18(2):137-149.
6. Clark T., Jones R. Organisational interoperability maturity model for C2 1999.
7. Commission A New Zealand e-government interoperability framework (e-GIF) Retrieved from. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan006368.pdf.
8. Dawes S.S., Prefontaine L. Understanding new models of collaboration for delivering government services. Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM 2003, 46(1):40.
9. DeVellis R.F. Scale development: Theory and applications 2011, Vol. 26. Sage Publications, Incorporated.
10. Glassey O. Developing a one-stop government data model. Government Information Quarterly 2004, 21(2):156-169.
11. Goldkuhl G. The challenges of Interoperability in e-government: Towards a conceptual refinement. Statistics 2009, 10-10.
12. Gong Y., Janssen M. From policy implementation to business process management: Principles for creating flexibility and agility. Government Information Quarterly 2011, 29(1):61-71.
13. Gottschalk P. Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government. Government Information Quarterly 2009, 26(1):75-81.
14. Harrison T.M., Pardo T.A., Cook M. Creating open government ecosystems: A research and development agenda. Future internet 2012, 4(4):900-928.
15. Hjort-Madsen K. Enterprise architecture implementation and management: A case study on interoperability. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 2006. HICSS'06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on 2006.
16. Hu P.J.-H., Cui D., Sherwood A.C. Examining cross-agency collaborations in e-government initiatives. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06) - Track 6 2006, 75b. Computer Societry Press, Kauai.
17. IDABC, E. European interoperability framework for pan-European e-government services. European Communities 2004, (accessed on 05-01-2011 at: http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Docd552.pdf?id=19529).
18. IDABC, E. Draft document as basic of EIF version 2.0 European Communities: accessed on 02-01-2011 at. http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Docb0db.pdf?id=31597.
19. IEEE IEEE standard computer dictionary: A compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries 1990, IEEE, New York.
20. IEEE Standards information network IEEE 100 - The authoritative dictionary of IEEE standards terms 2000, IEEE, New York, NY. 7th ed.
21. Janssen M., Estevez E. Lean government and platform-based governance - Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly 2013, 30(supplemental):s1-s8.
22. Janssen M., Scholl H. Interoperability for electronic governance 2007.
23. Klievink B., Janssen M. Realizing joined-up government. Dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation. Government Information Quarterly 2009, 26(2):275-284.
24. Kubicek H., Cimander R. Three dimensions of organizational interoperability: Insights from recent studies for improving interoperability frame-works. European Journal of ePractice 2009, 6(2009):3-14.
25. Layne K.J.L., Lee J. Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly 2001, 18(2):122-136.
26. Lueders H. Interoperability and open standards for e-government services. Paper presented at the Proc. of 1st Intern. Conf. on Interoperability of Enterprise Software-Applications, Switzerland 2005.
27. Maheshwari D., Janssen M. Measuring organizational interoperability in practice: The case study of population welfare department of government of Sindh, Pakistan. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance 2012.
28. Maheshwari D., Janssen M. Measurement and benchmarking foundations: Providing support to organizations in their development and growth using dashboards. Government Information Quarterly 2013, 30(Supplement 1):S83-S93.
29. Maheshwari D., Veenstra A.F.v., Janssen M. Developing measures for benchmarking the interoperability of public organizations. 16-17 June, ECEG Ljubljani, Slovenia 2011.
30. McBride T. Organisational theory perspective on process capability measurement scales. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice 2010, 22(4):243-254.
31. Milward H.B., Provan K.G. Managing the hollow state: Collaboration and contracting. Public Management Review 2003, 5(1):1-18.
32. Moen W. Interoperability for information access: Technical standards and policy considerations. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2000, 26(2):129-132.
33. Napoli P.M., Karaganis J. On making public policy with publicly available data: The case of U.S. communications policymaking. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27(4):384-391.
34. Ouksel A.M., Sheth A. Semantic interoperability in global information systems. ACM Sigmod Record 1999, 28(1):5-12.
35. Pardo T.A., Burke G.B. Improving government interoperability: A capability framework for government managers 2008, Center for Technology in Government, Albany.
36. Pardo T.A., Burke G.B. IT governance capability: Laying the foundation for government interoperability. Center for Technology in Government Technical Report 2009.
37. Picot A., Reichwald R., Wigand R. Information, organization and management 2008, Springer Verlag.
38. Schekkerman J. Extended enterprise architecture maturity model (E2AMM) version 2.0 2006.
39. Scholl H., Klischewski R. e-government integration and interoperability: Framing the research agenda 2007, 30(8-9):889-920.
40. Surowiecki J. The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business economies, societies and nations 2004, Doubleday.
41. Tolk A., Muguira J. The levels of conceptual interoperability model 2003.
42. Tolk A., Turnitsa C., Diallo S., Winters L. Composable M&S web services for net-centric applications. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology 2006, 3(1):27.
43. Turnitsa C. Extending the levels of conceptual interoperability model 2005.
44. van der Veer H., Wiles A. Achieving technical interoperability 2008.
45. Weill P. Don't just lead, govern: How best performing organisations govern IT. MIS Quarterly Executive 2004, 3(1):1-17.
46. Wimmer M.A. Integrated service modeling for online one-stop government. EM - Electronic Markets, Special Issue on e-government 2002, 12(3):1-8.