Organisational theory perspective on process capability measurement scales

Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 243-254

  McBride, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Measurement; Organisational theory; Process assessment; Process capability; Process coordination

Indexed keywords

CAPABILITY MODEL; MATURITY MODEL; MEASUREMENT SCALE; PROCESS ASSESSMENT; PROCESS ASSESSMENTS; PROCESS CAPABILITIES; PROCESS COORDINATION; SERVICE MANAGEMENT; WORK PRODUCTS;

PRODUCTION ENGINEERING;

PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 77953200027     PISSN: 1532060X     EISSN: 15320618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/spip.440     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Brechner E. 2005. Journey of enlightenment: The evolution of development at microsoft. International Conference on Software Engineering. ACM Press: St Louis, MO.
2. Eisenhardt KM. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14(1):57-74.
3. ISO 15504-5. 2006. Information Technology-Process Assessment-Part 5: An exemplar Process Assessment Model, in 15504, vol. 3.
4. ISO 12207. 2008. Information technology-Software life cycle processes, in 12207.
5. ISO 15288. 2008. Systems engineering-System life cycle processes, in 15288.
6. Mintzberg H. 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
7. Ouchi WG. 1979. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science 25(9):833-848.
8. SEI 2006. CMMI® for Development. Version 1.2, CMU/SEI-2006-TR-008.
9. Smith KG, Mitchell TR, Summer CE. 1985. Top level management priorities at different stages of the organizational life cycle. Academy of Management Journal 28(4):799-820.
10. Ward A, Liker JK, Cristiano JJ, Sobek DKI. 1995. The second toyota paradox: how delaying decisions can make better cars faster. Sloan Management Review 36(3):43-59.