The connection between random sequences, everyday coincidences, and belief in the paranormal

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 17-34

  Bressan, Paola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COLLEGE STUDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIFE EVENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAPSYCHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0043185794     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.754     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bar-Hillel M. 1982. Studies of representativeness. In Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 69-83.
2. Bar-Hillel M, Wagenaar WA. 1993. The perception of randomness. In A Handbook for Data analysis in the Behavioral Sciences Keren G, Lewis C (eds). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ; 369-393.
3. Blackmore SJ. 1997. Probability misjudgement and belief in the paranormal: A newspaper survey. British Journal of Psychology 88: 683-689.
4. Blackmore S, Galaud K, Walker C. 1994. Psychic experiences as illusions of causality. In Research in Parapsychology 1991, Cook EW, Delanoy DL (eds). Scarecrow Press: Metuchen, NJ; 89-93.
5. Blackmore S, Moore R. 1994. Seeing things: visual recognition and belief in the paranormal. European Journal of Parapsychology 10: 91-103.
6. Blackmore S, Troscianko T. 1985. Belief in the paranormal: Probability judgements, illusory control, and the 'chance baseline shift'. British Journal of Psychology 76: 459-468.
7. Brugger P. 1997. Variables that influence the generation of random sequences: An update. Perceptual and Motor Skills 84: 627-661.
8. Brugger P, Graves RE. 1997. Testing vs believing hypotheses: Magical ideation in the judgement of contingencies. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 2: 251-272.
9. Brugger P, Landis T, Regard M. 1990. A 'sheep-goat effect' in repetition avoidance: Extra-sensory perception as an effect of subjective probability? British Journal of Psychology 81: 455-468.
10. Brugger P, Regard M, Landis T, Cook N, Krebs D, Niederberger J. 1993. 'Meaningful' patterns in visual noise: Effects of lateral stimulation and the observer's belief in ESP. Psychopathology 26 261-265.
11. Brugger P, Regard M, Landis T, Graves RE. 1995. The roots of meaningful coincidence. Lancet 345: 1306-1307.
12. Brugger P, Regard M, Landis T, Krebs D, Niederberger J. 1994. Coincidences: Who can say how 'meaningful' they are? In Research in Parapsychology 1991, Cook EW, Delanoy DL (eds). Scarecrow Press: Metuchen, NJ; 94-98.
13. Clarke D. 1995. Experience and other reasons given for belief and disbelief in paranormal and religious phenomena. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research 60: 371-384.
14. Cohen J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd edn). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
15. Falk R, Konold C. 1997. Making sense of randomness: implicit encoding as a basis for judgment. Psychological Review 104: 301-318.
16. Gallup GH, Newport F. 1991. Belief in paranormal phenomena among adult Americans. Skeptical Inquirer 15: 137-146.
17. Henry J. 1993. Coincidence experience survey. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research 59: 97-108.
18. Irwin HJ. 1991. The reasoning skills of paranormal believers. Journal of Parapsychology 55: 281-300.
19. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1972. Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology 3: 430-454.
20. Koestler A, Hardy A, Harvie R. 1973. The Challenge of Chance. Experiments and Speculations. Hutchinson: London.
21. Roberts MJ, Seager PB. 1999. Predicting belief in paranormal phenomena: A comparison of conditional and probabilistic reasoning. Applied Cognitive Psychology 13: 443-450.
22. Schmeidler GR. 1943. Predicting good and bad scores in a clarvoyance experiment: a preliminary report. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research 37: 103-110.
23. Thalbourne MA, Nofi O. 1997. Belief in the paranonnal, superstitiousness and intellectual ability. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research 61: 365-371.
24. Wierzbicki M. 1984. Reasoning errors and belief in the paranormal. Journal of Social Psychology 125: 489-494.