Pros and cons of ion-torrent next generation sequencing versus terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism T-RFLP for studying the rumen bacterial community

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2014, Pages

  De La Fuente, Gabriel ^a   Belanche, Alejandro ^a   Girwood, Susan E ^a   Pinloche, Eric ^a   Wilkinson, Toby ^a   Newbold, C Jamie ^a  

^a ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; BACTEROIDES; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; ION TORRENT NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; MICROBIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEIC ACID ANALYSIS; PARASITE IDENTIFICATION; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; PREVOTELLA; PROTOZOAL COUNT; RUMEN MICROORGANISM; RUMINOBACTER; SHEEP; SPECIES RICHNESS; TERMINAL RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ANIMAL; CILIATE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; DOMESTIC SHEEP; FERMENTATION; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MICROBIOLOGY; MICROFLORA; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; RUMEN;

BACTERIAL DNA;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CILIOPHORA; DNA, BACTERIAL; FERMENTATION; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; MICROBIOTA; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH; RUMEN; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SHEEP, DOMESTIC;

EID: 84904667281     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101435     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Steinhoff U (2005) Who controls the crowd? New findings and old questions about the intestinal microflora. Immunol Lett 99: 12-16.
2. Theron J, Cloete T (2000) Molecular techniques for determining microbial diversity and community structure in natural environments. Crit Rev Microbiol 26: 37-57. (Pubitemid 30205383)
3. Morgavi DP, Kelly WJ, Janssen PH, Attwood GT (2013) Rumen microbial (meta) genomics and its application to ruminant production. Animal 7: 184-201.
4. Michelland R, Monteils V, Zened A, Combes S, Cauquil L, et al. (2009) Spatial and temporal variations of the bacterial community in the bovine digestive tract. J Appl Microbiol 107: 1642-1650.
5. Kittelmann S, Janssen PH (2011) Characterization of rumen ciliate community composition in domestic sheep, deer, and cattle, feeding on varying diets, by means of PCR-DGGE and clone libraries. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 75: 468-481.
6. Yanez-Ruiz DR, Macias B, Pinloche E, Newbold CJ (2010) The persistence of bacterial and methanogenic archaeal communities residing in the rumen of young lambs. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 72: 272-278.
7. Guan LL, Nkrumah JD, Basarab JA, Moore SS (2008) Linkage of microbial ecology to phenotype: correlation of rumen microbial ecology to cattle's feed efficiency. FEMS Microbiol Lett 288: 85-91.
8. Suen G, Weimer PJ, Stevenson DM, Aylward FO, Boyum J, et al. (2011) The complete genome sequence of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 reveals a cellulolytic and metabolic specialist. PloS One 6: e18814.
9. Raes J, Bork P (2008) Molecular eco-systems biology: towards an understanding of community function. Nat Rev Microbiol 6: 693-699.
10. Pilloni G, Granitsiotis MS, Engel M, Lueders T (2012) Testing the limits of 454 pyrotag sequencing: reproducibility, quantitative assessment and comparison to T-RFLP fingerprinting of aquifer microbes. PloS One 7: e40467.
11. Novais R, Thorstenson Y (2011) The evolution of Pyrosequencing® for microbiology: from genes to genomes. J Microbiol Methods 86: 1-7.
12. Petrosino JF, Highlander S, Luna RA, Gibbs RA, Versalovic J (2009) Metagenomic pyrosequencing and microbial identification. Clin Chem 55: 856-866.
13. DeSantis TZ, Brodie EL, Moberg JP, Zubieta IX, Piceno YM, et al. (2007) High-density universal 16S rRNA microarray analysis reveals broader diversity than typical clone library when sampling the environment. Microb Ecol 53: 371-383. (Pubitemid 46716624)
14. Parameswaran P, Jalili R, Tao L, Shokralla S, Gharizadeh B, et al. (2007) A pyrosequencing-tailored nucleotide barcode design unveils opportunities for large-scale sample multiplexing. Nucleic Acids Res 35: e130.
15. Bartram AK, Lynch MD, Stearns JC, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Neufeld JD (2011) Generation of multimillion-sequence 16S rRNA gene libraries from complex microbial communities by assembling paired-end Illumina reads. Appl Environ Microbiol 77: 3846-3852.
16. Kunin V, Engelbrektson A, Ochman H, Hugenholtz P (2010) Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ Microbiol 12: 118-123.
17. Zhou J, Wu L, Deng Y, Zhi X, Jiang Y-H, et al. (2011) Reproducibility and quantitation of amplicon sequencing-based detection. ISME J 5: 1303-1313.
18. Veira DM (1986) The role of ciliate protozoa in nutrition of the ruminant. J Anim Sci 63: 1547-1560.
19. Wolk A, Vessby B, Ljung H, Barrefors P (1998) Evaluation of a biological marker of dairy fat intake. Am J Clin Nutr 68: 291-295. (Pubitemid 28355645)
20. Williams AG, Coleman GS (1992) The rumen protozoa. New York, Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 441 p.
21. AFRC (1993) Agricultural and Food Research Council: Energy and protein requeriments of ruminant. An advisory manual prepared by the ARC technical Committee on response to nutrients. Wallingford. Oxon, U.K CAB International. 160 p.
22. Stewart CS, Duncan SH (1985) The effect of avoparcin on cellulolytic bacteria of the ovine rumen. J Gen Microbiol 131: 427-435. (Pubitemid 15101924)
23. Whitehead R, Cooke G, Chapman B (1967) Problems associated with the continuous monitoring of ammoniacal nitrogen in river water. Anal Chem 11: 337.
24. Dehority BA (1993) Laboratory manual for classification and morphology of ruminal ciliate protozoa, Boca Raton, FL, United States. CRC Press. 127 p.
25. De la Fuente G, Skirnisson K, Dehority BA (2006) Rumen ciliate fauna of Icelandic cattle, sheep, goats and reindeer. Zootaxa: 47-60. (Pubitemid 46007253)
26. Skřivanová E, Worgan HJ, Pinloche E, Marounek M, Newbold CJ, et al. (2010) Changes in the bacterial population of the caecum and stomach of the rabbit in response to addition of dietary caprylic acid. Vet Microbiol 144: 334-339.
27. Hongoh Y, Yuzawa H, Ohkuma M, Kudo T (2003) Evaluation of primers and PCR conditions for the analysis of 16S rRNA genes from a natural environment. FEMS Microbiol Lett 221: 299-304. (Pubitemid 41123078)
28. Li H, Zhang Y, Li D-s, Xu H, Chen G-x, et al. (2009) Comparisons of different hypervariable regions of rrs genes for fingerprinting of microbial communities in paddy soils. Soil Biol Biochem 41: 954-968.
29. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, et al. (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 7537-7541.
30. Li RW, Wu S, Li W, Li C (2012) Perturbation dynamics of the rumen microbiota in response to exogenous butyrate. PloS One 7: e29392.
31. Cole JR, Chai B, Marsh TL, Farris RJ, Wang Q, et al. (2003) The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): previewing a new autoaligner that allows regular updates and the new prokaryotic taxonomy. Nucleic acids Res 31: 442-443. (Pubitemid 36150424)
32. Anderson MJ, Willis TJ (2003) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84: 511-525. (Pubitemid 36893087)
33. Gihring TM, Green SJ, Schadt CW (2012) Massively parallel rRNA gene sequencing exacerbates the potential for biased community diversity comparisons due to variable library sizes. Environ Microbiol 14: 285-290.
34. Ter Braak CJ (1987) The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Theory and models in vegetation science: Springer. pp. 69-77.
35. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol: 1: 289-300.
36. Hess M, Sczyrba A, Egan R, Kim T-W, Chokhawala H, et al. (2011) Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen. Science 331: 463-467.
37. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, et al. (2010) A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464: 59-65.
38. Glenn TC (2011) Field guide to next-generation DNA sequencers Mol Ecol Resour 11: 759-769.
39. Logares R, Haverkamp TH, Kumar S, Lanzén A, Nederbragt AJ, et al. (2012) Environmental microbiology through the lens of High-Throughput DNA Sequencing: Synopsis of current platforms and bioinformatics approaches. J Microbiol Methods 91:106-113.
40. Marsh TL (1999) Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP): an emerging method for characterizing diversity among homologous populations of amplification products. Curr Opin Microbiol 2: 323-327.
41. Miyagawa E, Okuyama J, Handa Y, Sato K, Koiwa M, et al. (2007) Terminal restriction fragmentation length polymorphism analysis of 16S rRNA genes for the characterization of bacterial community structure in the rumen of sheep fed different diets. Journal of Rakuno Gakuen University, Natural Science 31: 173-184.
42. Liu L, Li Y, Li S, Hu N, He Y, et al. (2012) Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012. DOI 10.1155/2012/251364.
43. Shyu C, Soule T, Bent SJ, Foster JA, Forney LJ (2007) MiCA: a web-based tool for the analysis of microbial communities based on terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphisms of 16S and 18S rRNA genes. Microb Ecol 53: 562-570. (Pubitemid 46763842)
44. Wise MJ, Osborn AM. (2001) TRUFFLER: programs to study microbial community composition and flux from fluorescent DNA fingerprinting data; Bioinformatics and Bioengineering Conference, 2001. Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd International Symposium on pp. 129-135.
45. Kittelmann S, Seedorf H, Walters WA, Clemente JC, Knight R, et al. (2013) Simultaneous amplicon sequencing to explore co-occurrence patterns of bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic microorganisms in rumen microbial communities. PloS One 8: e47879.
46. Edgar RC (2013) UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nature Meth 10: 996-998.
47. Fromin N, Hamelin J, Tarnawski S, Roesti D, Jourdain-Miserez K, et al. (2002) Statistical analysis of denaturing gel electrophoresis (DGE) fingerprinting patterns. Environ Microbiol 4: 634-643. (Pubitemid 35442251)
48. Weaver W, Shannon CE (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Illinois: University of Illinois Press. 144 p.
49. Kocherginskaya SA, Aminov RI, White BA (2001) Analysis of the rumen bacterial diversity under two different diet conditions using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, random sequencing, and statistical ecology approaches. Anaerobe 7: 119-134. (Pubitemid 32928200)
50. Morgavi D, Jouany J, Martin C, Ranilla M. (2006) Archaeal community structure diversity in the rumen of faunated and defaunated sheep; International Congress Series 1293:127-130. (Pubitemid 44437133)
51. Yu ZT, Morrison M (2004) Comparisons of different hypervariable regions of rrs genes for use in fingerprinting of microbial communities by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 4800-4806.
52. Kurihara Y, Eadie JM, Hobson P, Mann S (1968) Relationship between bacteria and ciliate protozoa in the sheep rumen. J Gen Microbiol 51: 267-288.
53. Eugène M, Archimède H, Sauvant D (2004) Quantitative meta-analysis on the effects of defaunation of the rumen on growth, intake and digestion in ruminants. Livestock Production Science 85: 81-97. (Pubitemid 38086367)
54. Ushida K, Jouany JP, Thivend P (1986) Role of rumen protozoa in nitrogen digestion in sheep given two isonitrogenous diets. Br J Nutr 56: 407-419. (Pubitemid 16028128)
55. Ushida K, Jouany JP (1990) Effect of defaunation on fibre digestion in sheep given two isonitrogenous diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 29: 153-158.
56. Yáñez-Ruiz DR, Scollan ND, Merry RJ, Newbold CJ (2006) Contribution of rumen protozoa to duodenal flow of nitrogen, conjugated linoleic acid and vaccenic acid in steers fed silages differing in their water-soluble carbohydrate content. Br J Nutr 96: 861-869. (Pubitemid 46454562)
57. Belanche A, Abecia L, Holtrop G, Guada JA, Castrillo C, et al. (2011) Study of the effect of presence or absence of protozoa on rumen fermentation and microbial protein contribution to the chyme. J Anim Sci 89: 4163-4174.
58. Wallace RJ (1996) Ruminal microbial metabolism of peptides and amino acids. J Nutr 126: 1326S-1334S.
59. Dehority BA (2003) Rumen Microbiology. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press. 372 p.
60. Hook SE, Steele MA, Northwood KS, Dijkstra J, France J, et al. (2011) Impact of subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) adaptation and recovery on the density and diversity of bacteria in the rumen of dairy cows. FEMS Microbiol Ecol78: 275-284.
61. Nocker A, Burr M, Camper AK (2007) Genotypic microbial community profiling: a critical technical review. Microb Ecol 54: 276-289. (Pubitemid 47197901)
62. Barberán A, Bates ST, Casamayor EO, Fierer N (2011) Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities. ISME J 6: 343-351.