The unbearable lightness of the curriculum: What drives the assessment practices of a teacher of English as a Foreign Language in a Chinese secondary school?

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 286-305

  Gu, Peter Yongqi ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

assessment practices; China; curriculum implementation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904539771     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2013.836076     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National Education Association. (1990). Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students. Retrieved from http://www.unl.edu/buros/bimm/html/article3.html
2. Arkoudis, S., & O'Loughlin, K. (2004). Tensions between validity and outcomes: Teacher assessment of written work of recently arrived immigrant ESL students. Language Testing, 21, 284-304.10.1191/0265532204lt285oa
3. Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Assessment Reform Group. Retrieved from http://www.assessment-reform-group.org/CIE3.PDF
4. Assessment Reform Group. (2006). The role of teachers in the assessment of learning. Assessment Reform Group. Retrieved from http://www.assessment-reform-group.org/ASF%20booklet%20English.pdf
5. Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36, 258-267.
6. Berry, R. (2011). Assessment trends in Hong Kong: Seeking to establish formative assessment in an examination culture. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18, 199-211.
7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5-31.10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
8. Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30, 3-12.10.1111/emip.2011.30.issue-1
9. Campbell, C., & Evans, J. A. (2000). Investigation of preservice teachers' classroom assessment practices during student teaching. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 350-355.10.1080/00220670009598729
10. Carless, D. (2011). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. New York, NY: Routledge.
11. Central Committee of the Communist Party & State Council of China. (1993). Framework for education reform and development in China. Retrieved from http://www.people.com.cn/item/flfgk/gwyfg/1993/112701199312.html
12. Chappuis, S., Chappuis, J., & Stiggins, R. (2009). Supporting teacher learning teams. Educational Leadership, 66, 56-60.
13. Cheng, L. (2003). Looking at the impact of a public examination change on secondary classroom teaching: A Hong Kong case study. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 38(1), 1-10.
14. Cheng, L., & Qi, L. (2006). Description and examination of the National Matriculation English Test. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal, 3, 53-70.10.1207/laq.2006.3.issue-1
15. Cheng, L., Rogers, T., & Hu, H. (2004). ESL/EFL instructors' classroom assessment practices: Purposes, methods, and procedures. Language Testing, 21, 360-389.10.1191/0265532204lt288oa
16. Cheng, L., Rogers, W. T., & Wang, X. (2008). Assessment purposes and procedures in ESL/EFL classrooms. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 9-32.
17. Collins, S., Reiss, M., & Stobart, G. (2010). What happens when high-stakes testing stops? Teachers' perceptions of the impact of compulsory national testing in science of 11-year-olds in England and its abolition in Wales. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17, 273-286.
18. Darling-Hammond, L., & McCloskey, L. (2008). Assessment for learning around the world: What would it mean to be internationally competitive? The Phi Delta Kappan, 90, 263-272.
19. Davison, C. (2004). The contradictory culture of teacher-based assessment: ESL teacher assessment practices in Australian and Hong Kong secondary schools. Language Testing, 21, 305-334.10.1191/0265532204lt286oa
20. Davison, C. (2007). Views from the chalkface: English language school-based assessment in Hong Kong. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal, 4, 37-68.
21. Davison, C., & Cummins, J. (2007). Introduction: Assessment and evaluation in ELT: Shifting paradigms and practices. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 415-420). New York, NY: Springer.
22. Davison, C., & Leung, C. (2009). Current issues in English language teacher-based assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 393-415.
23. Deng, X. (1983). Epigraph for Jingshan School. Beijing.
24. Eisner, E. W. (2002). From episteme to phronesis to artistry in the study and improvement of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 375-385.10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00004-5
25. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219-245.10.1177/1077800405284363
26. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
27. Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Falmer Press.
28. Goertz, M., & Duffy, M. (2003). Mapping the landscape of high-stakes testing and accountability programs. Theory into Practice, 42, 4-11.10.1207/s15430421tip4201_2
29. Gu, Y. (2012). English curriculum and assessment for basic education in China. In J. Ruan & C. Leung (Eds.), Perspectives on teaching and learning English literacy in China (pp. 35-50). Dordrecht: Springer.
30. Hamp-Lyons, L. (2009). Principles for large-scale classroom-based teacher assessment of English learners' language: An initial framework from school-based assessment in Hong Kong. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 524-529.
31. Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 169-207.
32. Heritage, M., & Niemi, D. (2006). Toward a framework for using student mathematical representations as formative assessments. Educational Assessment, 11, 265-282.
33. Hill, K., & McNamara, T. (2012). Developing a comprehensive, empirically based research framework for classroom-based assessment. Language Testing, 29, 395-420.10.1177/0265532211428317
34. Jin, Y. (2010). The place of language testing and assessment in the professional preparation of foreign language teachers in China. Language Testing, 27, 555-584.10.1177/0265532209351431
35. Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2005). The importance of pedagogical content knowledge in assessment for learning practices: A case-study of a whole-school approach. The Curriculum Journal, 16, 193-206.10.1080/09585170500136044
36. Kennedy, M. M. (2005). Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2012). The impact of high stakes testing: The Australian story. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19, 65-79.
38. Leung, C. (2005). Classroom teacher assessment of second language development: Construct as practice. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 869-888). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
39. Liu, Y. (2012, July 19). A fair, just and scientific selection of talent: Systematic implementation of educational assessment reform. MOE China Official Website. Retrieved July 25, 2012, from http://www.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_838/201207/139668.html
40. Lortie, D. C. (2002). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41. Mansell, W., & James, M. (2009). Assessment in schools: Fit for purpose? London: Economic and Social Research Council, Teaching and Learning Research Programme.
42. Mao, Z. (1957, February 27). The question about correctly processing the contradictions among the people. Keynote speech presented at the Eleventh Session (Enlarged) of the Supreme State Conference, Beijing, China.
43. Mertler, C. A., & Campbell, C. (2005, April). Measuring teachers' knowledge & application of classroom assessment concepts: Development of the 'assessment literacy inventory'. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, QC, Canada.
44. Ministry of Education China. (2001). English language curriculum standards for full-time compulsory education and senior secondary schools (trial version). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
45. Ministry of Education China. (2002). Announcement to actively promote the reform of evaluation and examination systems at primary and secondary levels. Retrieved from http://www.moe.edu.cn/edoas/website18/05/info405.htm
46. Ministry of Education China. (2003). English language curriculum standards for senior secondary schools (Experimental). Beijing: People's Education Press.
47. Ministry of Education China. (2010). Framework for national mid- to long-term educational reform and development planning (2010-2020). Retrieved September 13, 2013, from http://www.most.gov.cn/kjzc/gjkjzc/gjkjzczh/201308/P020130823574944373948.pdf
48. Ministry of Education China. (2011). English curriculum standards for compulsory education, version 2011. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
49. Plake, B. S., Impara, J. C., & Fager, J. J. (1993). Assessment competencies of teachers: A national survey. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12, 10-12, 39.
50. Popham, W. J. (2001). The truth about testing: An educator's call to action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
51. Popham, W. J. (2004a). Curriculum, instruction, and assessment: Amiable allies or phony friends? Teachers College Record, 106, 417-428.10.1111/tcre.2004.106.issue-3
52. Popham, W. J. (2004b). Why assessment illiteracy is professional suicide. Educational Leadership, 62, 82-83.
53. Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory into Practice, 48, 4-11.10.1080/00405840802577536
54. Qi, L. (2005). Stakeholders' conflicting aims undermine the washback function of a high-stakes test. Language Testing, 22, 142-173.
55. Qi, L. (2007). Is testing an efficient agent for pedagogical change? Examining the intended washback of the writing task in a high-stakes English test in China. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14, 51-74.
56. Qian, D. D. (2008). English language assessment in Hong Kong: A survey of practices, developments and issues. Language Testing, 25, 85-110.10.1177/0265532207083746
57. Qu, Y. (Ed.). (2010). 5-year UEE, 3-year practice tests, English. (For New Curriculum Standards). Beijing: Capital Normal University Press.
58. Queensland Studies Authority. (2009). Student assessment regimes: Getting the balance right for Australia. QTU Professional Magazine, 24, 20-26.
59. Rawlins, P. (2010). Student participation in formative assessment for NCEA. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 45, 3-16.
60. Rea-Dickins, P. (2001). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Identifying processes of classroom assessment. Language Testing, 18, 429-462.
61. Rea-Dickins, P. (2006). Currents and eddies in the discourse of assessment: A learning-focused interpretation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16, 163-188.10.1111/ijal.2006.16.issue-2
62. Rea-Dickins, P., & Gardner, S. (2000). Snares and silver bullets: Disentangling the construct of formative assessment. Language Testing, 17, 215-243.
63. Rex, L. A., & Nelson, M. C. (2004). How teachers' professional identities position high-stakes test preparation in their classrooms. Teachers College Record, 106, 1288-1331.10.1111/tcre.2004.106.issue-6
64. Scott, S., Webber, C. F., Aitken, N., & Lupart, J. (2011). Developing teachers' knowledge, beliefs, and expertise: Findings from the Alberta student assessment study. Educational Forum, 75, 96-113.10.1080/00131725.2011.552594
65. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.10.3102/0013189X015002004
66. Stiggins, R. J. (1999). Assessment, student confidence, and school success. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 191-198.
67. Stiggins, R. (2010). Essential formative assessment competencies for teachers and school leaders. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 233-250). New York, NY: Routledge.
68. Sykes, G., Bird, T., & Kennedy, M. (2010). Teacher education: Its problems and some prospects. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 464-476.10.1177/0022487110375804
69. Threlfall, J. (2005). The formative use of assessment information in planning: The notion of contingent planning. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53, 54-65.10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00283.x
70. Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22, 389-404.10.1080/0141192960220402
71. Wang, Q., & Editorial Group. (Eds.). (2009). Senior high English: An experimental textbook designed for the senior high school curriculum standards. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press; Pearson Education.
72. Wiliam, D. (2007). Changing classroom practice. Educational Leadership, 65, 36-42.
73. Xu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2009). Teacher assessment knowledge and practice: A narrative inquiry of a Chinese college EFL teacher's experience. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 493-513.
74. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.