An approach toward the development of core syllabuses for the anatomical sciences

Anatomical Sciences Education

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 302-311

  Moxham, Bernard John ^a   Plaisant, Odile ^b   Smith, Claire F ^c   Pawlina, Wojciech ^d   McHanwell, Stephen ^e  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^d Mayo Clinic College of Medicine   (United States)

^e NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anatomy curriculum; Core syllabus; Delphi Panels; Gross anatomy education; Medical curriculum; Medical education; Neuroanatomy education

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; CURRICULUM; DELPHI STUDY; EDUCATION; EUROPE; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MEDICINE; NEUROANATOMY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARDS; TRENDS;

ANATOMY; CURRICULUM; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; EUROPE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MEDICINE; NEUROANATOMY;

EID: 84903553667     PISSN: 19359772     EISSN: 19359780     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ase.1456     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abu-Hijleh MF. 2010. The place of anatomy in medical education: Guide supplement 41.1--viewpoint. Med Teach 32:601-603.
2. Ahmed K, Rowland S, Patel V, Khan RS, Ashrafian H, Davies DC, Darzi A, Athanasiou T, Paraskeva PA. 2010. Is the structure of anatomy curriculum adequate for safe medical practice? Surgeon 8:318-324.
3. Ahmed K, Rowland S, Patel VM, Ashrafian H, Davies DC, Darzi A, Athanasiou T, Paraskeva PA. 2011. Specialist anatomy: Is the structure of teaching adequate? Surgeon 9:312-317.
4. Chapuis P, Fahrer M, Eizenberg N, Fahrer C, Bokey L. 2010. Should there be a national core curriculum for anatomy? ANZ J Surg 80:475-477.
5. Collins JP. 2008. Modern approaches to teaching and learning anatomy. BMJ 337:665-667.
6. Craig S, Tait N, Boers D, McAndrew D. 2010. Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. ANZ J Surg 80:212-216.
7. DiLullo C, McGee P, Kriebel RM. 2011. Demystifying the Millennial student: A reassessment in measures of character and engagement in professional education. Anat Sci Educ 4:214-226.
8. Ellis H. 2002. Medico-legal litigation and its links with surgical anatomy. Surgery 20:i-ii.
9. Entwistle N. 2009. Teaching for Understanding at University: Deep Approaches and Distinctive Ways of Thinking (Universities Into the 21st Century). 1st Ed. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan. 224 p.
10. Finnerty EP, Chauvin S, Bonaminio G, Andrews M, Carroll RG, Pangaro LN. 2010. Flexner revisited: The role and value of the basic sciences in medical education. Acad Med 85:349-355.
11. Fitzgerald JE, White MJ, Tang SW, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, James DK. 2008. Are we teaching sufficient anatomy at medical school? The opinions of newly qualified doctors. Clin Anat 21:718-724.
12. GDC. 2012. General Dental Council. Preparing for Practice: Dental Team Learning Outcomes for Registration. 1st Ed. London, UK: General Dental Council. 104 p. URL: http://www.gdc-uk.org/aboutus/education/pages/learning-outcomes.aspx [accessed 10 June 2013].
13. GMC. 1993. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors: Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. 1st Ed. London, UK: General Medical Council. 28 p.
14. GMC. 2009. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors: Outcomes and Standards, for Undergraduate Medical Education. Regulating Doctors, Ensuring Good Medical Practice. 3rd Ed. London, UK: General Medical Council. 104 p.
15. Goodwin H. 2000. Litigation and surgical practice in the UK. Br J Surg 87:977-979.
16. Graham B, Regehr G, Wright JG. 2003. Delphi as a method to establish consensus for diagnostic criteria. J Clin Epidemiol 56:1150-1156.
17. Green B, Jones M, Hughes D, Williams A. 1999. Applying the Delphi technique in a study of GP's information requirements. Health Soc Care Comm 7:198-205.
18. Gregory JK, Lachman N, Camp CL, Chen LP, Pawlina W. 2009. Restructuring a basic science course for core competencies: An example from anatomy teaching. Med Teach 31:855-861.
19. Griffioen FMM, Drukker J, Hoogland PVJM, Godschalk M. 1999. General plan anatomy objectives of the teaching of anatomy/embryology in medical curricula in the Netherlands. Eur J Morphol 37:228-325.
20. Heylings DJ. 2002. Anatomy 1999-2000: The curriculum, who teaches it and how? Med Educ 36:702-710.
21. Irby DM, Cooke M, O'Brien BC. 2010. Calls for reform of medical education by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: 1910 and 2010. Acad Med 85:220-227.
22. Irby D. 2011. Educating physicians for the future: Carnegie's calls for reform. Med Teach 33:547-550.
23. Kahan SE, Goldman HB, Marengo S, Resnick MI. 2001. Urological medical malpractice. J Urol 165:1638-1642.
24. Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H. 2011. The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research. 1st Ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. 208 p.
25. Kelly AV. 2009. The Curriculum: Theory and Practice. 6th Ed. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd. 336 p.
26. Kidder TM. 2002. Malpractice considerations in endoscopic sinus surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 10:14-18.
27. Kilroy D, Driscoll P. 2006. Determination of the required anatomical knowledge for clinical practice in emergency medicine: National curriculum planning using a modified Delphi technique. Emerg Med J. 23:693-696.
28. Kilroy DA, Mooney JS. 2007. Determination of required pharmacological knowledge for clinical practice in emergency using a modified Delphi technique. Emerg Med J 24:645-647.
29. Leonard RJ, Acland RD, Agur A, Blevins CE, Cahill DR, Collins JD, Dalley AF II, Dolph J, Hagedoorn JP, Hoos PC, Jones DG, Mathers LH, McFee R, Mennin SP, Negulesco JA, Nelson ML, Olson TR, Page DW, Pawlina W, Petterborg LJ, Price JM, Spielman JE, Younoszai R. 1996. A clinical anatomy curriculum for the medical student of the 21st century: Gross anatomy. Clin Anat 9:71-99.
30. Leonard RJ, Hoos PC, Agur A, Gilroy AM, Lozanoff S, Nelson ML, Newman LM, Petterborg LJ, Rosenheimer J. 2000. A clinical anatomy curriculum for the medical student of the 21st century: Developmental anatomy. Clin Anat 13:17-35.
31. Lisk K, Flannery JF, Loh EY, Richardson D, Agur AM, Woods NN. 2014. Determination of clinically relevant content for a musculoskeletal anatomy curriculum for physical medicine and rehabilitation residents. Anat Sci Educ 7:135-143.
32. Louw G, Eizenberg N, Carmichael SW. 2009. The place of anatomy in medical education: AMEE guide no 41. Med Teach 31:373-386.
33. Lynn-Macrae AG, Lynn-Macrae RA, Emani J, Kern RC, Conley DB. 2004. Medicolegal analysis of injury during endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 114:1492-1495.
34. McCormick R, James M 1988. Curriculum Evaluation in Schools. 2nd ed. London: Croom Helm.
35. McHanwell S, Atkinson M, Davies DC, Dyball R, Morris J, Ockleford C, Parkin I, Standring S, Whiten S, Wilton J. 2007. A core syllabus in anatomy-adding common sense to need to know. Eur J Anat 11:S3-S18.
36. McKenna HP. 1994. The Delphi technique: A worthwhile research approach for nursing? J Adv Nurs 19:1221-1225.
37. McKernan J. 2008. Curriculum and Imagination: Process Theory, Pedagogy and Action Research. London and New York: Routledge.
38. Monkhouse WS, Farrell TB. 1999. Tomorrow's doctors: Today's mistakes? Clin Anat 12:131-134.
39. Morley L. 2003. Quality and Power in Higher Education. 1st Ed. Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK: Open University Press and Society for Research into Higher Education. 224 p.
40. Moxham BJ, Shaw H, Crowson R, Plaisant O. 2011. The future of clinical anatomy. Eur J Anat 15:29-46.
41. Older J. 2004. Anatomy: A must for teaching the next generation. Surgeon 2:79-90.
42. Orsbon CP, Kaiser RS, Ross CF. 2014. Physician opinions about an anatomy core curriculum: A case for medical imaging and vertical integration. Anat Sci Educ 7:251-261
43. Penciner R, Langhan T, Lee R, McEwen J, Woods RA, Bandiera G. 2011. Using a Delphi process to establish consensus on emergency medicine clerkship competencies. Med Teach 33:e333-e339.
44. Raftery AT. 2007. Anatomy teaching in the UK. Surgery 25:1-2.
45. Ramsden P. 2003. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. 2nd Ed. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge Falmer. 288 p.
46. Smith CF, Martinez-Álvarez C, McHanwell S. 2014. The context of learning anatomy, does it make a difference? J Anat 224:270-178.
47. Stenhouse L. 1975. An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. 1st Ed. London, UK: Heinemann Educational Publishers. 256 p.
48. Stritter FT, Tresolini CP, Reeb KG. 1994. The Delphi technique in curriculum development. Teach Learn Med 6:136-141.
49. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. 2010. The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ 3:83-93.
50. Sumsion T. 1998. The Delphi technique: An adaptive research tool. Br J Occup Ther 61:153-156.
51. Venne VL, Coleman D. 2010. Training the Millennial learner through experiential evolutionary scaffolding: Implications for clinical supervision in graduate education programs. J Genet Counsel 19:554-569.
52. Williams PL, Webb C. 1994. The Delphi technique: A methodological discussion. J Adv Nurs 19:180-186.
53. Yeates PJ, Stewart J, Barton JR. 2008. What can we expect of clinical teachers? Establishing consensus on applicable skills, attitudes and practices. Med Educ 42:134-142.
54. Young MFD. 2008. Bringing Knowledge Back In: From Social Constructivism to Social Realism in the Sociology of Education. 1st Ed. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge. 272 p.
55. Young M. 2009. What are schools for? In: Daniels H, Lauder H, Porter J (Editors). Knowledge, Values and Educational Policy: A Critical Perspective. 1st Ed. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge. p 10-18.