The place of anatomy in medical education: Guide Supplement 41.1 Viewpoint

Medical Teacher

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 601-603

  Abu Hijleh, Marwan F ^a  

^a ARABIAN GULF UNIVERSITY   (Bahrain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; DISSECTION; EDUCATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; STANDARD;

ANATOMY; DISSECTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; HUMANS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING;

EID: 77954966440     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/01421591003680644     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Abu-Hijleh MF, Chakravarty M, Al-Shboul Q, Kassab S, Hamdy H. 2005a. Integrating applied anatomy in surgical clerkship in a problem-based learning curriculum. Surg Radiol Anat 27:152157.
2. Abu-Hijleh MF, Chakravarty M, Al-Shboul Q, Latif NA, Osman M, Bandaranayake R, Ganguly PK. 2005b. Structured problem-related anatomy demonstrations: Making order of random teaching events. Teach Learn Med 17:6973.
3. Abu-Hijleh MF, Habbal OA, Moqattash ST, Harris PF. 1995. Clinical anatomy and anatomical skills: An innovative course. Med Teach 17(3):283288.
4. Abu-Hijleh MF, Hamdi NA, Moqattash ST, Harris PF, Heseltine GFD. 1997. Attitudes and reactions of Arab medical students to the dissection room. Clin Anat 10:272278.
5. Aziz MA, Mckenzie JC, Wilson JS, Cowie RJ, Ayeni SA, Dunn BK. 2002. The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics. Anat Rec (New Anat) 269:2032.
6. Chakravarty M, Latif NA, Abu-Hijleh MF, Osman M, Dharap A, Ganguly PK. 2005. Assessment of anatomy in a problem-based curriculum. Clin Anat 18:131136.
7. Demiryurek D, Bayramoglu A, Ustacelebi S. 2002. Infective agents in fixed human cadavers: A brief review and suggested guidelines. Anat Rec 269:194-197.
8. Harris PF, Abu-Hijleh MF, Moqattash S. 1994. Teaching anatomy in the Middle East: Opportunities and challenges at a new medical school. Clin Anat 7:152155.
9. Horne DJ, Tiller JWG, Eizenberg N, Tashevska M, Biddle N. 1990. Reactions of first-year medical students to their initial encounter with a cadaver. Acad Med 65:645646.
10. Jones LS, Paulman LE, Thadani R, Terracio L. 2001. Medical student dissection of cadavers improves performance on practical exams but not on the NBME anatomy subject exam. Med Educ Online [serial online] 6:2. Available from: http://www.med-ed-online.org [Accessed 11 November 2009].
11. Lempp HK. 2005. Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school: Beyond learning about anatomy, a qualitative study. Med Educ 39:318-325.
12. Louw G, Eizenberg N, Carmichael SW. 2009. AMEE Guide 41: The place of anatomy in medical education. Med Teach 31(5):373-386.
13. McLachlan JC, Bligh J, Bradley P, Searle J. 2004. Teaching anatomy without cadavers. Med Educ 38:418-424.
14. Newell RLM. 1995. Follow the royal road: The case for dissection. Clin Anat 8:124-127.
15. Pandey P, Zimitat C. 2007. Medical students' learning of anatomy: Memorisation, understanding and visualization. Med Educ 41:7-14.
16. Turley BW. 2007. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(2):104-107.
17. Winkelmann A. 2007. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: A review of the evidence. Med Educ 41:15-22.
18. Yeager VL. 1996. Learning gross anatomy: Dissection or prosection. Clin Anat 9:57-59.