Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units

Organization Science

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1024-1039

  Tortoriello, Marco ^a   Reagans, Ray ^b   McEvily, Bill ^c  

^a IESE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Spain)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Knowledge management; Organizational boundaries; Social networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867055509     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0688     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Allen, T. J., S. I. Cohen. 1969. Information flow in research and development laboratories. Admin. Sci. Quart. 14(1) 12-19.
2. Ancona, D. G., D. F. Caldwell. 1992. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4) 634-665.
3. Anjos, F., R. Reagans. 2012. Commitment, learning and alliance performance: A formal analysis using an agent-based network formation model. J. Math. Sociol. Forthcoming.
4. Argote, L. 1999. Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
5. Argote, L., B. McEvily, R. Reagans. 2003. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. 49(4) 571-582.
6. Azoulay, P., C. C. Liu, T. E. Stuart. 2011. Social influence given (partially) deliberate matching: Career imprints in the creation of academic entrepreneurs. HBS Working Paper 09-136, Harvard Business School, Boston.
7. Baum, J. A. C., B. McEvily, T. J. Rowley. 2012. Better with age? Tie longevity and the performance implications of bridging and closure. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 529-546.
8. Bechky, B. A. 2003. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of knowledge on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3) 312-330.
9. Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, L. C. Freeman. 2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA.
10. Brandes, U., D. Fleischer. 2005. Centrality measures based on current flow. V. Diekert, B. Durand, eds. Proc. 22nd Symp. Theoret. Aspects Comput. Sci. (STACS 2005). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3404. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 533-544.
11. Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Carlile, P. R. 2002. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4) 442-455.
13. Carlile, P. R. 2004. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5) 555-568.
14. Cohen, W. M., D. A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1) 128-152.
15. Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(SUPPLEMENT) S95-S120.
16. Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Cross, R., N. Nohria, A. Parker. 2002. Six myths about informal networks-And how to overcome them. Sloan Management Rev. 43(3) 67-76.
18. Crozier, M. 1964. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Tavistock Publications, London.
19. Cummings, J. L., B.-S. Teng. 2003. Transferring R&D knowledge: The key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. J. Engrg. Tech. Management 20(1-2) 39-68.
20. Dougherty, D. 1992. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2) 179-202.
21. Gargiulo, M., M. Benassi. 2000. Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organ. Sci. 11(2) 183-196.
22. Gargiulo, M., G. Ertug, C. Galunic. 2009. The two faces of control: Network closure and individual performance among knowledge workers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(2) 299-333.
23. Gould, R. V. 1991. Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 56(6) 716-29.
24. Gould, R. V., R. M. Fernandez. 1989. Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Soc. Methodol. 19 89-126.
25. Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6) 1360-1380.
26. Granovetter, M. S. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3) 481-510.
27. Hansen, M. T. 1999. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1) 82-111.
28. Hargadon, A. 2003. How Breakthroughs Happen: The Surprising Truth About How Companies Innovate. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
29. Hargadon, A., R. I. Sutton. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4) 716-749.
30. Ibarra, H., M. Kilduff, W. Tsai. 2005. Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organ. Sci. 16(4) 359-371.
31. Kane, A. A., L. Argote, J. M. Levine. 2005. Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(1) 56-71.
32. Katz, R., T. J. Allen. 1982. Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrom: A look at performance, tenure and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management 12(1) 7-19.
33. Katz, R., M. Tushman. 1982. An investigation into the managerial roles and career paths of gatekeepers and project supervisors in a major R&D facility. R&D Management 11(3) 103-110.
34. Krackhardt, D. 1987. QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness. Soc. Networks 9 171-186.
35. Krackhardt, D. 1988. Predicting with networks: A multiple regression approach to analyzing dyadic data. Soc. Networks 10 359-381.
36. Krackhardt, D. 1999. The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. S. B. Andrews, D. Knoke, eds. Networks In and Around Organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 16. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 183-210.
37. Laumann, E. O., P. V. Marsden, D. Prensky. 1983. The boundary specification problem in network analysis. R. S. Burt, M. J. Minor, eds. Applied Network Analysis. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 18-34.
38. Leonard-Burton, D. 1995. Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
39. McEvily, B., V. Perrone, A. Zaheer. 2003. Trust as an organizing principle. Organ. Sci. 14(1) 91-103.
40. Perry-Smith, J. E. 2006. Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Management J. 49(1) 85-101.
41. Portes, A., J. Sensenbrenner. 1993. Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(6) 1320-1350.
42. Reagans, R., 2011. Close encounters: Analyzing how social similarity and propinquity contribute to strong network connections. Organ. Sci. 22(4) 835-849.
43. Reagans, R., B. McEvily. 2003. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2) 240-267.
44. Reagans, R., B. McEvily. 2008. Contradictory or compatible? Reconsidering the " trade-off" between brokerage and closure on knowledge sharing. J. A. C. Baum, T. J. Rowley, eds. Network Strategy: Advances in Strategy Management, Vol. 25. Emerald Publishing Group, Bingley, UK, 275-314.
45. Reagans, R., E. W. Zuckerman. 2001. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12(4) 502-517.
46. Reagans, R. E., E. W. Zuckerman. 2008. All in the family: Reply to Burt, Podolny, and van de Rijt, Ban, and Sarkar. Indust. Corporate Change 17(5) 979-999.
47. Reason, J. 2008. The Human Condition: Unsafe Acts, Accidents and Heroic Recoveries. Ashgate Publishing, Surrey, UK.
48. Seidel, V., S. O'Mahony. 2010. Translating novel concepts to novel products: Coordination totems in practice. Working paper, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
49. Sgourev, S. V, E. W. Zuckerman. 2011. Breaking up is hard to do: Irrational inconsistency in commitment to an industry peer network. Rationality Soc. 23(1) 3-34.
50. Simon, H. A. 1991. Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1) 125-134.
51. Simpson, W. 2001. The quadratic assignment procedure (QAP). North American Stata Users' Group Meetings 2001, StataCorp, College Station, TX, Paper 1.2. http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:asug01:1.2.
52. Smith, S. S. 2005. " Don't put my name on it" : Social capital activation and job-finding assistance among the black urban poor. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(1) 1-57.
53. Smith, E. B., T. Menon, L. Thompson. 2012. Status differences in the cognitive activation of social networks. Organ. Sci. 23(1) 67-82.
54. Stephenson, K., M. Zelen. 1989. Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples. Soc. Networks 11(1) 1-37.
55. Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(1) 27-43.
56. Tortoriello, M., D. Krackhardt. 2010. Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Acad. Management J. 53(1) 167-181.
57. Tushman, M. L., R. Katz. 1980. External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeeper. Management Sci. 26(11) 1071-1085.
58. Tushman, M. L., T. J. Scanlan. 1981. Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Acad. Management J. 24(2) 289-305.
59. Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance or organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4) 674-698.
60. Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1) 35-67.
61. Wu, L., B. Waber, S. Aral, E. Brynjolfsson. 2011. Water cooler networks: Performance implications of informal face-to-face interaction structures in information intensive work. Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.