Little things make big things happen: A summary of micropeptide encoding genes

EuPA Open Proteomics

Volumn 3, Issue , 2014, Pages 128-137

  Crappé, Jeroen ^a   Van Criekinge, Wim ^a   Menschaert, Gerben ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

(l)ncRNA; Bioactive peptide; Micropeptide; Peptidomics; Ribosome profiling; SORF

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA; MICROPEPTIDE DERIVATIVE; PEPTIDE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; BRICK1 GENE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PREDICTION; CYTOPLASM; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EARLY NODULIN 40 GENE; GENE; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC CONSERVATION; HUMAN; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MICROPEPTIDE GENE; MUS MUSCULUS; NONHUMAN; OPEN READING FRAME; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PLANT GENE; POLARIS GENE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN SECRETION; RIBOSOME; RIBOSOME PROFILING; RNA SEQUENCE; ROTUNDIFOLIA GENE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SARCOLAMBAN GENE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TARSAL LESS GENE; ZM401P10 GENE; ZM908P11 GENE;

EID: 84902515195     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22129685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.euprot.2014.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Fricker L.D. Neuropeptide-processing enzymes: applications for drug discovery. AAPS J 2005, 7:E449-E455.
2. Boonen K., Creemers J.W., Schoofs L. Bioactive peptides, networks and systems biology. BioEssays 2009, 31:300-314.
3. Fricker L.D. Analysis of mouse brain peptides using mass spectrometry-based peptidomics: implications for novel functions ranging from non-classical neuropeptides to microproteins. Mol BioSyst 2010, 6:1355-1365.
4. Nassel D.R., Winther A.M. Drosophila neuropeptides in regulation of physiology and behavior. Prog Neurobiol 2010, 92:42-104.
5. Hummon A.B., Amare A., Sweedler J.V. Discovering new invertebrate neuropeptides using mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev 2006, 25:77-98.
6. Baggerman G., Boonen K., Verleyen P., De Loof A., Schoofs L. Peptidomic analysis of the larval Drosophila melanogaster central nervous system by two-dimensional capillary liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom 2005, 40:250-260.
7. Kim S.K., Wijesekara I. Development and biological activities of marine-derived bioactive perptides: a review. J Funct Foods 2010, 2:1-9.
8. Sarmadi B.H., Ismail A. Antioxidative peptides from food proteins: a review. Peptides 2010, 31:1949-1956.
9. Rohrig H., Schmidt J., Miklashevichs E., Schell J., John M. Soybean ENOD40 encodes two peptides that bind to sucrose synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:1915-1920.
10. Casson S.A., Chilley P.M., Topping J.F., Evans I.M., Souter M.A., Lindsey K. The POLARIS gene of Arabidopsis encodes a predicted peptide required for correct root growth and leaf vascular patterning. Plant Cell 2002, 14:1705-1721.
11. Frank M.J., Smith L.G. A small, novel protein highly conserved in plants and animals promotes the polarized growth and division of maize leaf epidermal cells. Curr Biol 2002, 12:849-853.
12. Narita N.N., Moore S., Horiguchi G., Kubo M., Demura T., Fukuda H., et al. Overexpression of a novel small peptide ROTUNDIFOLIA4 decreases cell proliferation and alters leaf shape in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2004, 38:699-713.
13. Kondo T., Hashimoto Y., Kato K., Inagaki S., Hayashi S., Kageyama Y. Small peptide regulators of actin-based cell morphogenesis encoded by a polycistronic mRNA. Nat Cell Biol 2007, 9:660-665.
14. Galindo M.I., Pueyo J.I., Fouix S., Bishop S.A., Couso J.P. Peptides encoded by short ORFs control development and define a new eukaryotic gene family. PLoS Biol 2007, 5:e106.
15. Savard J., Marques-Souza H., Aranda M., Tautz D. A segmentation gene in tribolium produces a polycistronic mRNA that codes for multiple conserved peptides. Cell 2006, 126:559-569.
16. Magny E.G., Pueyo J.I., Pearl F.M., Cespedes M.A., Niven J.E., Bishop S.A., et al. Conserved regulation of cardiac calcium uptake by peptides encoded in small open reading frames. Science 2013, 341:1116-1120.
17. Hashimoto Y., Kondo T., Kageyama Y. Lilliputians get into the limelight: novel class of small peptide genes in morphogenesis. Dev Growth Differ 2008, 50(Suppl. 1):S269-S276.
18. Slavoff S.A., Mitchell A.J., Schwaid A.G., Cabili M.N., Ma J., Levin J.Z., et al. Peptidomic discovery of short open reading frame-encoded peptides in human cells. Nat Chem Biol 2013, 9:59-64.
19. Lee R.C., Feinbaum R.L., Ambros V., The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell 1993, 75:843-854.
20. Kozomara A., Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: integrating microRNA annotation and deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:D152-D157.
21. Carninci P., Kasukawa T., Katayama S., Gough J., Frith M.C., Maeda N., et al. The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science 2005, 309:1559-1563.
22. Dinger M.E., Pang K.C., Mercer T.R., Mattick J.S. Differentiating protein-coding and noncoding RNA: challenges and ambiguities. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4:1-5.
23. Frith M.C., Forrest A.R., Nourbakhsh E., Pang K.C., Kai C., Kawai J., et al. The abundance of short proteins in the mammalian proteome. PLoS Genet 2006, 2:e52.
24. Hemm M.R., Paul B.J., Schneider T.D., Storz G., Rudd K.E. Small membrane proteins found by comparative genomics and ribosome binding site models. Mol Microbiol 2008, 70:1487-1501.
25. Hemm M.R., Paul B.J., Miranda-Ríos J., Zhang A., Soltanzad N., Storz G. Small stress response proteins in Escherichia coli: proteins missed by classical proteomic studies. J Bacteriol 2010, 192:46-58.
26. Boekhorst J., Wilson G., Siezen R.J. Searching in microbial genomes for encoded small proteins. Microb Biotechnol 2011, 4:308-313.
27. Hobbs E.C., Fontaine F., Yin X., Storz G. An expanding universe of small proteins. Curr Opin Microbiol 2011, 14:167-173.
28. Stern-Ginossar N., Weisburd B., Michalski A., Le V.T., Hein M.Y., Huang S.X., et al. Decoding human cytomegalovirus. Science 2012, 338:1088-1093.
29. van de Sande K., Pawlowski K., Czaja I., Wieneke U., Schell J., Schmidt J., et al. Modification of phytohormone response by a peptide encoded by ENOD40 of legumes and a nonlegume. Science 1996, 273:370-373.
30. Gultyaev A.P., Roussis A. Identification of conserved secondary structures and expansion segments in enod40 RNAs reveals new enod40 homologues in plants. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35:3144-3152.
31. Ulveling D., Francastel C., Hube F. When one is better than two: RNA with dual functions. Biochimie 2011, 93:633-644.
32. Bardou F., Merchan F., Ariel F., Crespi M. Dual RNAs in plants. Biochimie 2011, 93:1950-1954.
33. Chilley P.M., Casson S.A., Tarkowski P., Hawkins N., Wang K.L., Hussey P.J., et al. The POLARIS peptide of Arabidopsis regulates auxin transport and root growth via effects on ethylene signaling. Plant Cell 2006, 18:3058-3072.
34. Liu J., Mehdi S., Topping J., Friml J., Lindsey K. Interaction of PLS and PIN and hormonal crosstalk in Arabidopsis root development. Front Plant Sci 2013, 4:75.
35. Le J., Mallery E.L., Zhang C., Brankle S., Szymanski D.B. Arabidopsis BRICK1/HSPC300 is an essential WAVE-complex subunit that selectively stabilizes the Arp2/3 activator SCAR2. Curr Biol 2006, 16:895-901.
36. Djakovic S., Dyachok J., Burke M., Frank M.J., Smith L.G. BRICK1/HSPC300 functions with SCAR and the ARP2/3 complex to regulate epidermal cell shape in Arabidopsis. Development 2006, 133:1091-1100.
37. Ikeuchi M., Yamaguchi T., Kazama T., Ito T., Horiguchi G., Tsukaya H. ROTUNDIFOLIA4 regulates cell proliferation along the body axis in Arabidopsis shoot. Plant Cell Physiol 2011, 52:59-69.
38. Ma J., Yan B., Qu Y., Qin F., Yang Y., Hao X., et al. Zm401, a short-open reading-frame mRNA or noncoding RNA, is essential for tapetum and microspore development and can regulate the floret formation in maize. J Cell Biochem 2008, 105:136-146.
39. Wanga D.X., Lia C.X., Zhao Q., Zhao L.N., Wang M.Z., Zhu D.Y., et al. Zm401p10, encoded by an anther-specific gene with short open reading frames, is essential for tapetum degeneration and anther development in maize. Funct Plant Biol 2009, 36:73-85.
40. Dong X., Wang D., Liu P., Li C., Zhao Q., Zhu D., et al. Zm908p11, encoded by a short open reading frame (sORF) gene, functions in pollen tube growth as a profilin ligand in maize. J Exp Bot 2013, 64:2359-2372.
41. Tupy J.L., Bailey A.M., Dailey G., Evans-Holm M., Siebel C.W., Misra S., et al. Identification of putative noncoding polyadenylated transcripts in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:5495-5500.
42. Inagaki S., Numata K., Kondo T., Tomita M., Yasuda K., Kanai A., et al. Identification and expression analysis of putative mRNA-like non-coding RNA in Drosophila. Genes Cells 2005, 10:1163-1173.
43. Pueyo J.I., Couso J.P. The 11-aminoacid long Tarsal-less peptides trigger a cell signal in Drosophila leg development. Dev Biol 2008, 324:192-201.
44. Pi H., Huang Y.C., Chen I.C., Lin C.D., Yeh H.F., Pai L.M. Identification of 11-amino acid peptides that disrupt Notch-mediated processes in Drosophila. J Biomed Sci 2011, 18:42.
45. Kondo T., Plaza S., Zanet J., Benrabah E., Valenti P., Hashimoto Y., et al. Small peptides switch the transcriptional activity of Shavenbaby during Drosophila embryogenesis. Science 2010, 329:336-339.
46. Frank M.J., Cartwright H.N., Smith L.G. Three Brick genes have distinct functions in a common pathway promoting polarized cell division and cell morphogenesis in the maize leaf epidermis. Development 2003, 130:753-762.
47. Ghabrial A. Coding RNAs: separating the grain from the chaff. Nat Cell Biol 2007, 9:617-619.
48. Tour E., McGinnis W. Gap peptides: a new way to control embryonic patterning?. Cell 2006, 126(3):448-449.
49. Joliot A., Prochiantz A. Transduction peptides: from technology to physiology. Nat Cell Biol 2004, 6:189-196.
50. Neijssen J., Herberts C., Drijfhout J.W., Reits E., Janssen L., Neefjes J. Cross-presentation by intercellular peptide transfer through gap junctions. Nature 2005, 434:83-88.
51. Ludwig A.-K., Giebel B., Exosomes: small vesicles participating in intercellular communication. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2012, 44:11-15.
52. Chua C.E.L., Lim Y.S., Lee M.G., Tang B.L. Non-classical membrane trafficking processes galore. J Cell Physiol 2012, 227:3722-3730.
53. Kastenmayer J.P., Ni L., Chu A., Kitchen L.E., Au W.C., Yang H., et al. Functional genomics of genes with small open reading frames (sORFs) in S. cerevisiae. Genome Res 2006, 16:365-373.
54. Kessler M.M., Zeng Q., Hogan S., Cook R., Morales A.J., Cottarel G. Systematic discovery of new genes in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Genome Res 2003, 13:264-271.
55. Velculescu V.E., Zhang L., Vogelstein B. Serial analysis of gene expression. Science-AAAS-Weekly 1995.
56. Basrai M.A., Hieter P., Boeke J.D. Small open reading frames: beautiful needles in the haystack. Genome Res 1997, 7:768-771.
57. Olivas W.M., Muhlrad D., Parker R. Analysis of the yeast genome: identification of new non-coding and small ORF-containing RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25:4619-4625.
58. Blandin G., Durrens P., Tekaia F., Aigle M., Bolotin-Fukuhara M., Bon E., et al. Genomic exploration of the hemiascomycetous yeasts: 4. The genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae revisited. FEBS Lett 2000, 487:31-36.
59. Brachat S., Dietrich F.S., Voegeli S., Zhang Z., Stuart L., Lerch A., et al. Reinvestigation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome annotation by comparison to the genome of a related fungus: Ashbya gossypii. Genome Biol 2003, 4:R45.
60. Cliften P., Sudarsanam P., Desikan A., Fulton L., Fulton B., Majors J., et al. Finding functional features in Saccharomyces genomes by phylogenetic footprinting. Science 2003, 301:71-76.
61. Kellis M., Patterson N., Endrizzi M., Birren B., Lander E.S. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 2003, 423:241-254.
62. Hanada K., Zhang X., Borevitz J.O., Li W.H., Shiu S.H. A large number of novel coding small open reading frames in the intergenic regions of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome are transcribed and/or under purifying selection. Genome Res 2007, 17:632-640.
63. Fickett J.W., Tung C.-S. Assessment of protein coding measures. Nucleic Acids Res 1992, 20:6441-6450.
64. Hanada K., Akiyama K., Sakurai T., Toyoda T., Shinozaki K., Shiu S.H. sORF finder: a program package to identify small open reading frames with high coding potential. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:399-400.
65. Hanada K., Higuchi-Takeuchi M., Okamoto M., Yoshizumi T., Shimizu M., Nakaminami K., et al. Small open reading frames associated with morphogenesis are hidden in plant genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:2395-2400.
66. Yang X.H., Tschaplinski T.J., Hurst G.B., Jawdy S., Abraham P.E., Lankford P.K., et al. Discovery and annotation of small proteins using genomics, proteomics, and computational approaches. Genome Res 2011, 21:634-641.
67. Guillen G., Diaz-Camino C., Loyola-Torres C.A., Aparicio-Fabre R., Hernandez-Lopez A., Diaz-Sanchez M., et al. Detailed analysis of putative genes encoding small proteins in legume genomes. Front Plant Sci 2013, 4:208.
68. Ladoukakis E., Pereira V., Magny E., Eyre-Walker A., Couso J.P. Hundreds of putatively functional small open reading frames in Drosophila. Genome Biol 2011, 12:R118.
69. Crappe J., Van Criekinge W., Trooskens G., Hayakawa E., Luyten W., Baggerman G., et al. Combining in silico prediction and ribosome profiling in a genome-wide search for novel putatively coding sORFs. BMC Genomics 2013, 14:648.
70. Ingolia N.T., Ghaemmaghami S., Newman J.R., Weissman J.S. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 2009, 324:218-223.
71. Ingolia N.T. Genome-wide translational profiling by ribosome footprinting. Methods Enzymol 2010, 470:119-142.
72. Guo H., Ingolia N.T., Weissman J.S., Bartel D.P. Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels. Nature 2010, 466:835-840.
73. Ingolia N.T., Brar G.A., Rouskin S., McGeachy A.M., Weissman J.S. The ribosome profiling strategy for monitoring translation in vivo by deep sequencing of ribosome-protected mRNA fragments. Nat Protoc 2012, 7:1534-1550.
74. Ingolia N.T., Brar G.A., Rouskin S., McGeachy A.M., Weissman J.S. Genome-wide annotation and quantitation of translation by ribosome profiling. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 2013, 4.18:1-19. Chapter 4: Unit418.
75. Ingolia N.T., Lareau L.F., Weissman J.S. Ribosome profiling of mouse embryonic stem cells reveals the complexity and dynamics of Mammalian proteomes. Cell 2011, 147:789-802.
76. Brar G.A., Yassour M., Friedman N., Regev A., Ingolia N.T., Weissman J.S. High-resolution view of the yeast meiotic program revealed by ribosome profiling. Science 2012, 335:552-557.
77. Fritsch C., Herrmann A., Nothnagel M., Szafranski K., Huse K., Schumann F., et al. Genome-wide search for novel human uORFs and N-terminal protein extensions using ribosomal footprinting. Genome Res 2012.
78. Lee S., Liu B., Huang S.X., Shen B., Qian S.B. Global mapping of translation initiation sites in mammalian cells at single-nucleotide resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012.
79. Menschaert G., Van Criekinge W., Notelaers T., Koch A., Crappe J., Gevaert K., et al. Deep proteome coverage based on ribosome profiling aids mass spectrometry-based protein and peptide discovery and provides evidence of alternative translation products and near-cognate translation initiation events. Mol Cell Proteomics 2013, 12:1780-1790.
80. Guttman M., Amit I., Garber M., French C., Lin M.F., Feldser D., et al. Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals. Nature 2009, 458:223-227.
81. Guttman M., Garber M., Levin J.Z., Donaghey J., Robinson J., Adiconis X., et al. Ab initio reconstruction of cell type-specific transcriptomes in mouse reveals the conserved multi-exonic structure of lincRNAs (vol. 28, pp. 503, 2010). Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28:756-766.
82. Brannan C.I., Dees E.C., Ingram R.S. The product of the H19 gene may function as an RNA. Mol Cell Biol 1990, 10(1):28-36.
83. Cai X.Z., Cullen B.R. The imprinted H19 noncoding RNA is a primary microRNA precursor. RNA 2007, 13:313-316.
84. Li Y.M., Franklin G., Cui H.M., Svensson K., He X.B., Adam G., et al. The H19 transcript is associated with polysomes and may regulate IGF2 expression in trans. J Biol Chem 1998, 273:28247-28252.
85. Guttman M., Rinn J.L. Modular regulatory principles of large non-coding RNAs. Nature 2012, 482:339-346.
86. Volders P.-J., Helsens K., Wang X., Menten B., Martens L., Gevaert K., et al. LNCipedia: a database for annotated human lncRNA transcript sequences and structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:D246-D251.
87. Struhl K. Transcriptional noise and the fidelity of initiation by RNA polymerase II. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007, 14:103-105.
88. Banfai B., Jia H., Khatun J., Wood E., Risk B., Gundling W.E.J., et al. Long noncoding RNAs are rarely translated in two human cell lines. Genome Res 2012, 22:1646-1657.
89. Derrien T., Johnson R., Bussotti G., Tanzer A., Djebali S., Tilgner H., et al. The GENCODE v7 catalog of human long noncoding RNAs: analysis of their gene structure, evolution, and expression. Genome Res 2012, 22:1775-1789.
90. Jackson R.J., Hellen C.U.T., Pestova T.V. The mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation and principles of its regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010, 11:113-127.
91. Guttman M., Russell P., Ingolia N.T., Weissman J.S., Lander E.S. Ribosome profiling provides evidence that large noncoding RNAs do not encode proteins. Cell 2013, 154:240-251.
92. Bernstein B.E., Birney E., Dunham I., Green E.D., Gunter C., Snyder M. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 2012, 489:57-74.
93. Dinger M.E., Gascoigne D.K., Mattick J.S. The evolution of RNAs with multiple functions. Biochimie 2011, 93:2013-2018.
94. Kageyama Y., Kondo T., Hashimoto Y. Coding vs. non-coding: translatability of short ORFs found in putative non-coding transcripts. Biochimie 2011, 93:1981-1986.
95. Oyama M., Kozuka-Hata H., Suzuki Y., Semba K., Yamamoto T., Sugano S. Diversity of translation start sites may define increased complexity of the human short ORFeome. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007, 6:1000-1006.
96. Do J.H., Choi D. Computational approaches to gene prediction. J Microbiol 2006, 44(2):137-144.
97. Sleator R.D. An overview of the current status of eukaryote gene prediction strategies. Gene 2010, 461:1-4.
98. Cheng H., Chan W.S., Li Z., Wang D., Liu S., Zhou Y. Small open reading frames: current prediction techniques and future prospect. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2011, 12:503-507.
99. Lin M.F., Deoras A.N., Rasmussen M.D., Kellis M. Performance and scalability of discriminative metrics for comparative gene identification in 12 Drosophila genomes. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4:e1000067.
100. Lin M.F., Jungreis I., Kellis M., PhyloCSF: a comparative genomics method to distinguish protein coding and non-coding regions. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:i275-i282.
101. Schwaid A.G., Shannon D.A., Ma J., Slavoff S.A., Levin J.Z., Weerapana E., et al. Chemoproteomic discovery of cysteine-containing human sORFs. J Am Chem Soc 2013, 135(45):16750-16753.
102. Larkin M.A., Blackshields G., Brown N.P., Chenna R., McGettigan P.A., McWilliam H., et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2947-2948.
103. Goujon M., McWilliam H., Li W., Valentin F., Squizzato S., Paern J., et al. A new bioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:W695-W699.
104. Sievers F., Wilm A., Dineen D., Gibson T.J., Karplus K., Li W., et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 2011, 7:539.