Learning from people with long-term conditions: New insights for governance in primary healthcare

Health and Social Care in the Community

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 405-416

  Ross, Fiona ^a   Smith, Pam ^b   Byng, Richard ^c   Christian, Sara ^a   Allan, Helen ^d   Price, Linnie ^c   Brearley, Sally ^a  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c PLYMOUTH UNIVERSITY PENINSULA SCHOOLS OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United Kingdom)

^d MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Governance; Incentives; Long term conditions; Patient participation; Risk; Service user involvement

Indexed keywords

BOARD OF TRUSTEES; CHRONIC DISEASE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PSYCHOLOGY;

CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL GOVERNANCE; GOVERNING BOARD; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84902077333     PISSN: 09660410     EISSN: 13652524     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12097     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Allan H., Brearley S., Byng R. et al. (2014) People and teams matter in organisational change: professionals and managers experiences of changing governance and incentives in primary care. Health Services Research 49 (1), 93-112.
2. Ansell C. & Gash A. (2008) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4), 543-571.
3. Arnstein A. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4), 216-224.
4. Barber R., Beresford P., Boote J., Cooper C. & Faulkner A. (2011) Evaluating the impact of service user involvement on research: a prospective case study. International Journal of Consumer Studies 35 (6), 609-615.
5. Barber R., Boote J., Parry G., Cooper C., Yeeles P. & Cook S. (2012) Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study. Health Expectations 15 (3), 229-241.
6. Barnes M. & Cotterell P. (Eds) (2011) Critical Perspectives on User Involvement. The Policy Press, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
7. Bates P. & Robert G. (2006) Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Quality and Safety in Health Care 15, 307-310.
8. Beresford P. (2003) User involvement in research: exploring the challenges. Nursing Times Research 8 (1), 36-46.
9. Boote J., Telford R. & Cooper C. (2002) Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy 61 (2), 213-236.
10. Boote J., Baird W. & Beecroft C. (2010) Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy 95 (1), 10-23.
11. Braun V. & Clarke V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2), 77-101.
12. Casalino L. (2011) GP Commissioning in the NHS in England: Ten Suggestions from the United States. Nuffield Trust, London, UK.
13. Checkland K., Coleman A., Harrison S. & Hiroeh U. (2009) "We can't get anything done because...": making sense of "barriers" to Practice-based Commissioning. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 14, 20-26.
14. Coulter A. (2002) After Bristol - putting the patient at the centre. Quality and Safety in Health Care 11 (2), 186-188.
15. Davies C. (2007) Grounding governance in dialogue? Discourse, practice and the potential for a new public sector organisational form in Britain. Public Administration 85 (1), 47-66.
16. Davies C., Anand P., Artigas L., Holloway J., McConway K., Newman J., Story J. & Thompson G. (2005) Links Between Governance, Incentives and Outcomes: A Review of the Literature. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation Research and Development (NCCSDO), London.
17. nd ed.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
18. DH (2000) The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform. Department of Health, London.
19. DH (2002) Reforming NHS Financial Flaws: Payment by Results. Department of Health, London.
20. DH (2003) Quality and Outcomes Framework. Department of Health, London.
21. DH (2006) Best Research for Best Health. Department of Health, London.
22. DH (2010a) Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS. Department of Health, London.
23. DH (2010b) Ten things you need to know about long-term conditions. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/Longtermconditions/DH_084294 (accessed on 3/1/2014).
24. Dibben M. & Davies H. (2004) Trustworthy doctors in confidence building systems. Quality and Safety in Health Care 13 (2), 88-89.
25. Ferlie E. & Shortell S. (2001) Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. Milbank Quarterly 79 (2), 281-315.
26. Finch J. (1987) The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology 21, 105-114.
27. Fotaki M. (2011) Towards developing new partnerships in public services: users as consumers, citizens and/or co-producers in health and social care in England and Sweden. Public Administration 89 (3), 933-955.
28. Fung A. (2002) Collaboration and Countervailing Power: Making Participatory Governance Work. American Sociology Association, Chicago, IL.
29. Garside P. (2004) Are we suffering from change fatigue? Quality and Safety in Health Care 13 (2), 89-90.
30. Goodrich J. & Cornwell J. (2008) Seeing the Person in the Patient: The Point of Care Review Paper. Kings Fund, London.
31. Green A., Ross D. & Mirzoev T. (2007) Primary Health Care and England: the coming of age of Alma Ata? Health Policy 80 (1), 11-31.
32. Greenaway J., Salter B. & Hart S. (2007) How policy networks can damage democratic health: a case study in the government of governance. Public Administration 85 (3), 717-738.
33. Holloway I. & Todres L. (2003) The status of method: flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qualitative Research 3 (3), 345-357.
34. Hughes R. & Huby M. (2004) The construction and interpretation of vignettes in social research. Social Work and Social Sciences Review 11 (1), 36-51.
35. Kennedy A., Rogers A. & Gately C. (2005) From patients to providers: prospects for self-care skills trainers in the National Health Service. Health and Social Care in the Community 13 (5), 431-440.
36. McLaughlin C. (2004) Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Jones & Bartlett Learning, Sudbury, MA.
37. Morrow E., Boaz A., Brearley S. & Ross F. (2012) Handbook of Service User Involvement in Nursing and Healthcare Research. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
38. Morrow E., Cotterell P., Robert G., Ross F. & Grocott P. (2013) Mechanisms can help to use patient experiences of chronic disease in research and practice: an interpretive synthesis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 66 (8), 856-864.
39. Newman J. (2001) Modernizing Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society. Sage, London.
40. Newman J., Barnes M., Sullivan H. & Knops A. (2004) Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of Social Policy 33 (2), 203-223.
41. Pickard S., Sheaff R. & Dowling B. (2006) Exit, voice, governance and user-responsiveness: the case of English primary care trusts. Social Science and Medicine 63 (2), 373-383.
42. Rahman N. (1996) Caregivers' sensitivity to conflict: the use of vignette methodology. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect 8 (1), 35-47.
43. RCGP (2011) Care Planning: Improving the Lives of People with Long-Term Conditions. Royal College of General Practitioners, London.
44. Rhodes T., Nocon A., Wright J. & Harrison S. (2001) Involving patients in research. Setting up a service users' advisory group. Journal of Management in Medicine 15 (2), 167-171.
45. Richards S., Donovan S., Victor C. & Ross F. (2007) Standing secure amidst a falling world? Practitioner understandings of old age in response to a case vignette. Journal of Interprofessional Care 21 (3), 335-349.
46. Ross F., Donovan S., Victor C., Brearley S., Cottee M., Clarke E. & Crowther P. (2005) Involving older people in research: methodological issues. Health and Social Care in the Community 13 (3), 268-275.
47. Ross F., Christian S., Clayton J. et al. (2009) The Professional Experience of Governance and Incentives: Meeting the Needs of Individuals with Complex Conditions in Primary Care. SDO, London. HS&DR Project 08/1618/128. Available at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/64298/FR-08-1618-128.pdf (accessed on 30/1/2014).
48. Rummery K. (2009) Healthy partnerships, healthy citizens? An international review of partnerships in health and social care and patient/user outcomes. Social Science and Medicine 69 (12), 1797-1804.
49. Russell D., Hamilton W. & Luthra M. (2002) Research and consumer representation. British Journal of General Practice 52 (474), 58.
50. Smith E. & Ross F. (2007) Service user involvement and integrated care pathways. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 20 (3), 195-214.
51. Smith E., Ross F., Donovan S., Manthorpe J., Brearley S., Sitzia J. & Beresford P. (2005) User involvement in the design and undertaking of nursing, midwifery and health visiting research. HS&DR Project 08/1305/069. Available at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/projects/hsdr/081305069 (accessed on 30/1/2014).
52. Smith E., Ross F., Donovan S., Manthorpe J., Brearley S., Sitzia J. & Beresford P. (2008) Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research: a review of evidence and practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies 45, 298-315.
53. Smith E., Donovan S., Beresford P., Manthorpe J., Brearley S., Sitzia J. & Ross F. (2009) Getting ready for user involvement in a systematic review. Health Expectations 12, 197-208.
54. Smith P., Mackintosh M., Ross F. et al. (2012) Financial and clinical risk in health care reform: a view from below. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 17 (2), 11-17.
55. Staley K. (2009) Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. INVOLVE, Eastleigh, UK.
56. Taylor M. (2007) Community participation in the real world: opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces. Urban Studies 44 (2), 297-317.
57. Tritter J. & McCallum A. (2006) The snakes and ladders of user involvement. Moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy 76, 156-168.
58. Turner P. & Beresford P. (2005) User Controlled Research: Its Meanings and Potential, pp. 1-11. Shaping Our Lives/Brunel University, London.