Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research: A review of evidence and practice

International Journal of Nursing Studies

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 298-315

  Smith, Elizabeth ^a   Ross, Fiona ^b   Donovan, Sheila ^b   Manthorpe, Jill ^a   Brearley, Sally ^a   Sitzia, John ^c   Beresford, Peter ^d  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ST GEORGE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UK   (United Kingdom)

^d BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Participative research; Service user involvement; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MIDWIFE; NURSING; NURSING RESEARCH; UNITED KINGDOM;

COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GREAT BRITAIN; MIDWIFERY; NURSING; NURSING RESEARCH;

EID: 38049062514     PISSN: 00207489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Agrawal M. Voluntariness in clinical research at the end of life. Journal of Pain Symptom Management 25 4 (2003) S25-S32
2. Alabaster, E., Allen, D., Fothergill, A., Hanks, C., Hannigan, B., Lowes, L., Lyne, P., Northway, R., Papanikolaou, P., Poole, K., Ryan, J., Webber, I., Whale, Z., 2000. User involvement in user-focused research? Working Paper 2000/2, Nursing, Health and Social Care Research Centre, Cardiff.
3. Almond P. What is consumerism and has it had an impact on health visiting provision? A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 35 6 (2001) 893-901
4. Arnstein S. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners (AIP Journal) 35 4 (1969) 216-224
5. Barnes M. The People's Health Service? (1997), The University of Birmingham, Birmingham
6. Barnes D. Partnerships with service users in interprofessional education for community mental health: a case study. Journal of Interprofessional Care 14 2 (2000) 189-200
7. Barnes M., and Walker A. Consumerism versus empowerment: a principled approach to the involvement of older service users. Policy and Politics 24 4 (1996) 375-394
8. Baxter, L., Thorne, L., Mitchell, A., 2001. Small voices big noises. Lay involvement in health research: lessons from other fields. Available from 〈http://www.invo.org.uk〉
9. Bennett L., and Baikie K. The client as educator: learning about mental illness through the eyes of the expert. Nurse Education Today 23 2 (2003) 104-111
10. Beresford P. User involvement in research and evaluation: liberation or regulation?. Social Policy & Society 1 2 (2002) 95-105
11. Beresford P. User involvement in research: exploring the challenges. Nursing Times Research 8 1 (2003) 36-46
12. Beresford P. 'Service user': regressive or liberatory terminology?. Disability and Society 20 4 (2005) 469-477
13. Beresford P., and Campbell J. Disabled people, service users, user involvement and representation. Disability & Society 9 3 (1994) 315-325
14. Boote J., Telford R., and Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy 61 2 (2002) 213-236
15. Britten N., Campbell R., Pope C., Donovan J., and Morgan M. Using meta ethnography to synthesis qualitative research: a worked example. Journal of Health Service Research and Policy 7 (2002) 209-215
16. Browne N., Grocott P., Cowley S., Cameron J., Dealey C., Keogh A., Lovatt A., Vowden K., and Vowden P. Woundcare Research for Appropriate Products (WRAP): validation of the TELER method involving users. International Journal of Nursing Studies 41 5 (2004) 559-571
17. Cahill J. Patient participation: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 24 3 (1996) 561-571
18. Cambridge P., and Forrester-Jones R. Using individualised communication for interviewing people with intellectual disability: a case study of user-centred research. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 28 1 (2003) 5-23
19. Chalmers I. What do I want from health research and researchers when I am a patient?. British Medical Journal 310 (1995) 1315-1318
20. Chalmers K.I., and Bramadat I.J. Community development: theoretical and practical issues for community health nursing in Canada. Journal of Advanced Nursing 24 4 (1996) 719-726
21. Clarke C., and Procter S. Practice development: ambiguity in research and practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing 30 4 (1999) 975-982
22. Cody W.K. Paternalism in nursing and healthcare: central issues and their relation to theory. Nursing Science Quarterly 16 4 (2003) 288-296
23. Coghlan D., and Casey M. Action research from the inside: issues and challenges in doing action research in your own hospital. Journal of Advanced Nursing 35 5 (2001) 674-682
24. Coulter A. Paternalism or partnership?. British Medical Journal 319 7212 (1999) 719-720
25. Crawford M., Rutter D., Manley C., Weaver T., Bhui K., Fulop N., and Tyrer P. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. British Medical Journal 325 (2002) 1263-1265
26. Crawford, M., Rutter, D., Thelwall, S., 2003. User involvement in change management: a review of the literature. Report to NHS Service Delivery and Organisation Research and Development Programme (NHS SDO).
27. Croft S., and Beresford P. The politics of participation. In: Taylor D. (Ed). Critical Social Policy: A reader (1996), Sage, London 175-198
28. Department of Health (DH), 1999. Patient and public involvement in the NHS, Department of Health, London.
29. Department of Health (DH), 2000. The NHS Plan: a plan for investment a plan for reform, Department of Health, London.
30. Department of Health (DH), 2001a. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care, Department of Health, London.
31. Department of Health (DH), 2001b. Health and Social Care Act. Section 11: Public Involvement and Consultation, Department of Health, London.
32. Department of Health (DH), 2001c. The Report of the Royal Liverpool Children's Inquiry [the Alder Hey Inquiry], Department of Health, London.
33. Department of Health (DH), 2004. Patient and Public Involvement in Health: The Evidence for Policy Implementation, Department of Health, London.
34. Department of Health (DH), 2005. Creating a Patient-led NHS, Department of Health, London.
35. Department of Health (DH), 2006. Reward and Recognition, Department of Health, London.
36. Dixon P., Peart E., and Carr-Hill R. A Database of Examples of Consumer Involvement in Research (1999), University of York, York
37. Donovan J., Brindle L., and Mills N. Capturing users' experiences of participating in cancer trials. European Journal of Cancer Care 11 3 (2002) 210-214
38. Dougherty C., Nichol W., Dewhurst T., and Spertus J. Patient perspectives on participation in a clinical trial of angina management. Applied Nursing Research 12 2 (1999) 107-111
39. Edwards H., Courtney M., and O'Reilly M. Involving older people in research to examine quality of life in residential aged care. Quality in Ageing 4 4 (2003) 38-43
40. Elliott E., Watson A.J., and Harries U. Harnessing expertise: involving peer interviewers in qualitative research with hard-to-reach populations. Health Expectations 5 2 (2002) 172-178
41. Entwistle V., Renfrew M., Yearly S., Forrester J., and Lamont T. Lay perspectives: advantages for health research. British Medical Journal 316 (1998) 463-466
42. Entwistle V., Tritter J., and Calnan M. Researching experiences of cancer: the importance of methodology. European Journal of Cancer Care 11 3 (2002) 232-237
43. Erlen J., Sauder R., and Mellors M. Incentives in research: ethical issues. Orthopaedic Nursing 18 2 (1999) 84-87
44. Faulkner, A., 2004. Capturing the experiences of those involved in the TRUE Project: a story of colliding worlds. Available from: 〈http://www.invo.org.uk〉.
45. Felton A., and Stickley T. Pedagogy, power and service user involvement. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing 11 1 (2004) 89-98
46. Flaskerud J., and Anderson N. Disseminating the results of participant-focused research. Journal of Transcultural Nursing 10 4 (1999) 340-349
47. Fox J. Consumerism 2: pre registration nursing and midwifery curricula. British Journal of Nursing 12 6 (2003) 378-386
48. France, A., 2000. Youth Researching Youth: The Triumph and Success Research Project, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.
49. Ghersi D. Making it happen: Approaches to involving consumers in Cochrane reviews. Evaluation & the Health Professions 25 3 (2002) 270-283
50. Glasby J., and Littlechild R. Inappropriate hospital admissions: patient participation in research. British Journal of Nursing 10 11 (2001) 738-741
51. Gray R., Fitch M., Davis C., and Phillips C. Challenges of participatory research: reflections on a study with breast cancer self-help groups. Health Expectations 3 4 (2000) 243-252
52. Greenhalgh T., Robert G., Macfarlane F., Bate P., and Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly 82 4 (2004) 581-629
53. Griffiths K., Jorm A., and Christensen H. Academic consumer researchers: a bridge between consumers and researchers. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 38 4 (2003) 191-196
54. Hanley, B., 2005. Research as Empowerment? Report of a Series of Seminars Organised by the Toronto Group, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
55. Hanley, B., Bradburn, J., Gorin, S., Barnes, M., Evans, C., 2000. Involving Consumers in Research and Development in the NHS, Briefing notes for researchers, The Help for Health Trust, Winchester.
56. Hanley B., Truesdale A., King A., Elbourne D., and Chalmers I. Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal 322 (2001) 519-523
57. Hickey G., and Kipping C. Exploring the concept of user involvement in mental health through a participation continuum. Journal of Clinical Nursing 7 1 (1998) 83-88
58. Higgins R. Citizenship and user-involvement in health provision. Senior Nurse 13 4 (1993) 14-16
59. Hudson P. The experience of research participation for family caregivers of palliative care cancer patients. International Journal of Palliative Nursing 9 3 (2003) 120-123
60. Hugman R. Power in Caring Professions (1994), Macmillan Press, London
61. Karim K. Conducting research involving palliative patients. Nursing Standard 15 2 (2000) 34-36
62. Kelley B. Community-based research: a tool for community empowerment and student learning. Journal of Nursing Education 34 8 (1995) 384-386
63. Kiernan C. Participation in research by people with learning disability: origins and issues. Mental Handicap 27 2 (1999) 43-47
64. Kuss T., Proulx-Girouard L., Lovitt S., Katz C., and Kennelly P. A public health nursing model. Public Health Nursing 14 2 (1997) 81-91
65. Liberty K., Laver A., and Sabatino D. Collaborative partnerships in evaluation and experimental rehabilitation research. Journal of Biomechanics 22 4 (1999) 283-290
66. Lilford, R., Richardson, A., Stevens, A., Fitzpatrick, R., Edwards, S., Rock, F., Hutton, J., 2001. Issues in methodological research: perspectives from researchers and commissioners, Health Technology Assessment, NHS R&D HTA Programme, vol. 5(8).
67. London Primary Care Studies Programme, 2005. The PC11 Report. An evaluation of consumer involvement in the Primary Care Studies Programme. Available from: 〈http://www.invo.org.uk/〉
68. Lowes, L., Hulatt, I., (Eds.), 2005. Involving service users in Health and Social Care Research. Routledge, London, 214p.
69. Matrice, D., Brown, V. (Eds.), 1992. Widening the research focus: consumer roles in public health research. Report of the National Workshop on Consumer Participation. In and Input Into Public Health Research. Health Forum of Australia Inc.
70. McClimens A. What difference does it make who is speaking? Audience ownership and authority in learning disability research. Journal of Learning Disabilities 8 1 (2004) 71-88
71. Mercer G. Emancipatory disability research. In: Barnes C., Oliver M., and Barton L. (Eds). Disability Studies Today (2002), Policy Press, Cambridge
72. Meyer M., Torres S., Cermeno N., MacLean L., and Monzon R. Immigrant women implementing participatory research in health promotion. Western Journal of Nursing Research 25 7 (2003) 815-834
73. Michael M. Comprehension, Apprehension, Prehension: Heterogeneity and the Public Understanding of Science. Science, Technology & Human Values 27 3 (2002) 357-378
74. Moore S. A need to try everything: patient participation in phase I trials. Journal of Advanced Nursing 33 6 (2001) 738-747
75. Nicolson, P., Beverley, C., Booth, A., Burr, J., Collins, K., Cooper, C., O'Cathain, A., Powell, J., 2001. Eliciting users' views of the processes of health care. Commissioned by Department of Health Service Delivery and Organisation Programme. Available from: 〈http://www.sdo.lshtm.ac.uk〉.
76. O'Donnell M., and Entwistle V. Consumer involvement in decisions about what health-related research is funded. Health Policy 70 3 (2004) 281-290
77. Oliver S. Users of health services: following their agenda. In: Hood S., Mayall B., and Oliver S. (Eds). Critical Issues in Social Research: Power and Prejudice (1999), Open University Press, Buckingham
78. Oliver S., Milne R., Bradburn J., Buchanan P., Kerridge L., Walley T., and Gabby J. Involving consumers in a needs-led research programme: a pilot project. Health Expectations 4 1 (2001) 18-28
79. Poulton B. User involvement in identifying health needs and shaping and evaluating services: is it being realised?. Journal of Advanced Nursing 30 6 (1999) 1289-1296
80. Ramon S. Participative mental health research: users and professional researchers working together. Mental Health Care 3 7 (2000) 224-227
81. Reed J., Weiner R., and Cook G. Partnership research with older people-moving towards making the rhetoric a reality. Journal of Clinical Nursing 13 3a (2004) 3-10
82. Reeve P., Cornell S., D'Costa B., Janzen R., and Ochocka J. From our perspective: consumer researchers speak about their experience in community mental health research project. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 25 4 (2002) 403-408
83. Rhodes T., Nocon A., Wright J., and Harrison S. Involving patients in research. Setting up a service users' advisory group. Journal of Management in Medicine 15 2 (2001) 167-171
84. Rodgers J. If consumer involvement in health services is to be more than notional, users need to be empowered, not just consulted. Health Service Journal 104 28 (1994)
85. Rodwell C. An analysis of the concept of empowerment. Journal of Advanced Nursing 23 2 (1996) 305-313
86. Ross F., Donovan S., Brearley S., Victor C., Cottee M., Crowther P., and Clark E. Involving older people in research: methodological issues. Health and Social Care in the Community 13 3 (2005) 268-275
87. Segal L. The importance of patient empowerment in health system reform. Health Policy 44 1 (1998) 31-44
88. Simpson E., and House A. Involving users in the delivery and evaluation of mental health services: systematic review. British Medical Journal 325 (2002) 1265
89. Smith, E., Ross, F., Donovan, S., Manthorpe, J., Brearley, S., Sitzia, J., Beresford, P., 2005a. User involvement in the design and undertaking of nursing, midwifery and health visiting research, Nursing Research Unit, King's College London, London. Full Report (Ref: SDO/69/2003) and annotated bibliography. Available from: 〈http://www.sdo.lshtm.ac.uk〉.
90. Smith E., Ross F., Mackenzie A., and Masterson A. Developing a service user framework to shape priorities for nursing and midwifery research. Journal of Research in Nursing 10 1 (2005) 107-118
91. Stainton M., Harvey S., McNeil D., Emmanuel E., and Johnson C. The transforming power of research on practice: involving practitioners in analysis. International Journal of Nursing Practice 4 4 (1998) 220-224
92. Stevens T., Wilde D., Hunt J., and Ahmedzai S. Overcoming the challenges to consumer involvement in cancer research. Health Expectations 6 1 (2003) 81-88
93. Telford R., Boote J., and Cooper C. What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expectations 7 3 (2004) 209-220
94. The Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry Final Report, 2001.The Report of the Public Inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995: Learning from Bristol. The Stationery Office, July 2001.
95. Thornton H., Edwards A., and Elwyn G. Evolving the multiple roles of 'patients' in health-care research: reflections after involvement in a trial of shared decision-making. Health Expectations 6 3 (2003) 189-197
96. Turner P., and Beresford P. User Controlled Research: Its Meanings and Potential (2005), Shaping Our Lives/Brunel University, London pp. 1-11
97. Wray J. Powerful sharing? Creating effective user groups. Practising Midwife 6 8 (2003) 18-19
98. Yates B., McEwan C., and Eadie D. How to involve hard to reach groups: a consumer-led project with lay carers of people with advanced HIV infection. Public Health 111 5 (1997) 297-303