Mycobacterium tuberculosis Hip1 Modulates Macrophage Responses through Proteolysis of GroEL2

PLoS Pathogens

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Naffin Olivos, Jacqueline L ^a   Georgieva, Maria ^b   Goldfarb, Nathan ^c   Madan Lala, Ranjna ^b   Dong, Lauren ^a   Bizzell, Erica ^b   Valinetz, Ethan ^a   Brandt, Gabriel S ^a,d   Yu, Sarah ^c   Shabashvili, Daniil E ^c   Ringe, Dagmar ^a   Dunn, Ben M ^c   Petsko, Gregory A ^a   Rengarajan, Jyothi ^b,e  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d FRANKLIN AND MARSHALL COLLEGE   (United States)

^e EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; CHAPERONIN 60; HIP1 PROTEIN, MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; SERINE PROTEINASE;

ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; CELL CULTURE; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION; IMMUNOLOGY; MACROPHAGE; MACROPHAGE ACTIVATION; METABOLISM; MOUSE; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION;

ANIMALS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CELLS, CULTURED; CHAPERONIN 60; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS; MACROPHAGE ACTIVATION; MACROPHAGES; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEOLYSIS; SERINE ENDOPEPTIDASES; SERINE PROTEASES;

EID: 84901663500     PISSN: 15537366     EISSN: 15537374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004132     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Philips JA, Ernst JD, (2012) Tuberculosis pathogenesis and immunity. Annu Rev Pathol 7: 353-384.
2. Ehrt S, Schnappinger D, (2009) Mycobacterial survival strategies in the phagosome: defence against host stresses. Cell Microbiol 11: 1170-1178.
3. Russell DG, (2001) Mycobacterium tuberculosis: here today, here tomorrow. Nature Reviews 2: 569-577.
4. Almeida Da Silva PE, Palomino JC, (2011) Molecular basis and mechanisms of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: classical and new drugs. J Antimicrob Chemother 66: 1417-1430.
5. Makinoshima H, Glickman MS, (2005) Regulation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell envelope composition and virulence by intramembrane proteolysis. Nature 436: 406-409.
6. Rengarajan J, Bloom BR, Rubin EJ, (2005) Genome-wide requirements for Mycobacterium tuberculosis adaptation and survival in macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 8327-8332.
7. Rengarajan J, Murphy E, Park A, Krone CL, Hett EC, et al. (2008) Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv2224c modulates innate immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 264-269.
8. Madan-Lala R, Peixoto KV, Re F, Rengarajan J, (2011) Mycobacterium tuberculosis Hip1 dampens macrophage proinflammatory responses by limiting toll-like receptor 2 activation. Infect Immun 79: 4828-4838.
9. Vandal OH, Roberts JA, Odaira T, Schnappinger D, Nathan CF, et al. (2009) Acid-susceptible mutants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis share hypersusceptibility to cell wall and oxidative stress and to the host environment. J Bacteriol 191: 625-631.
10. Flores AR, Parsons LM, Pavelka MS Jr, (2005) Characterization of novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium smegmatis mutants hypersusceptible to beta-lactam antibiotics. J Bacteriol 187: 1892-1900.
11. Binnie C, Butler MJ, Aphale JS, Bourgault R, DiZonno MA, et al. (1995) Isolation and characterization of two genes encoding proteases associated with the mycelium of Streptomyces lividans 66. J Bacteriol 177: 6033-6040.
12. Ferre F, Clote P, (2005) DiANNA: a web server for disulfide connectivity prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 33: W230-232.
13. Hedstrom L, (2002) Serine protease mechanism and specificity. Chem Rev 102: 4501-4523.
14. Master SS, Rampini SK, Davis AS, Keller C, Ehlers S, et al. (2008) Mycobacterium tuberculosis prevents inflammasome activation. Cell Host Microbe 3: 224-232.
15. Ferraris DM, Sbardella D, Petrera A, Marini S, Amstutz B, et al. (2011) Crystal structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis zinc-dependent metalloprotease-1 (Zmp1), a metalloprotease involved in pathogenicity. J Biol Chem 286: 32475-32482.
16. Small JL, O'Donoghue AJ, Boritsch EC, Tsodikov OV, Knudsen GM, et al. (2013) Substrate specificity of MarP, a periplasmic protease required for resistance to acid and oxidative stress in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Biol Chem 288: 12489-12499.
17. Vandal OH, Pierini LM, Schnappinger D, Nathan CF, Ehrt S, (2008) A membrane protein preserves intrabacterial pH in intraphagosomal Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Med 14: 849-854.
18. Biswas T, Small J, Vandal O, Odaira T, Deng H, et al. (2010) Structural insight into serine protease Rv3671c that Protects M. tuberculosis from oxidative and acidic stress. Structure 18: 1353-1363.
19. White MJ, He H, Penoske RM, Twining SS, Zahrt TC, (2010) PepD participates in the mycobacterial stress response mediated through MprAB and SigE. J Bacteriol 192: 1498-1510.
20. White MJ, Savaryn JP, Bretl DJ, He H, Penoske RM, et al. (2011) The HtrA-like serine protease PepD interacts with and modulates the Mycobacterium tuberculosis 35-kDa antigen outer envelope protein. PLoS One 6: e18175.
21. Raju RM, Unnikrishnan M, Rubin DH, Krishnamoorthy V, Kandror O, et al. (2012) Mycobacterium tuberculosis ClpP1 and ClpP2 function together in protein degradation and are required for viability in vitro and during infection. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002511.
22. Personne Y, Brown AC, Schuessler DL, Parish T, (2013) Mycobacterium tuberculosis ClpP proteases are co-transcribed but exhibit different substrate specificities. PLoS One 8: e60228.
23. Ollinger J, O'Malley T, Kesicki EA, Odingo J, Parish T, (2012) Validation of the essential ClpP protease in Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a novel drug target. J Bacteriol 194: 663-668.
24. Rawlings ND, Barrett AJ, Bateman A, (2012) MEROPS: the database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D343-350.
25. Lun S, Bishai WR, (2007) Characterization of a novel cell wall-anchored protein with carboxylesterase activity required for virulence in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Biol Chem 282: 18348-18356.
26. Powers JC, Asgian JL, Ekici OD, James KE, (2002) Irreversible inhibitors of serine, cysteine, and threonine proteases. Chem Rev 102: 4639-4750.
27. Kuramochi H, Nakata H, Ishii S, (1979) Mechanism of association of a specific aldehyde inhibitor, leupeptin, with bovine trypsin. J Biochem 86: 1403-1410.
28. Umezawa H, (1976) Structures and activitites of protease inhibitors of microbial origin. Methods Enzymol 45: 678-695.
29. Kumar CM, Khare G, Srikanth CV, Tyagi AK, Sardesai AA, et al. (2009) Facilitated oligomerization of mycobacterial GroEL: evidence for phosphorylation-mediated oligomerization. J Bacteriol 191: 6525-6538.
30. Qamra R, Mande SC, Coates AR, Henderson B, (2005) The unusual chaperonins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 85: 385-394.
31. Cehovin A, Coates AR, Hu Y, Riffo-Vasquez Y, Tormay P, et al. (2010) Comparison of the moonlighting actions of the two highly homologous chaperonin 60 proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 78: 3196-3206.
32. Lewthwaite JC, Coates AR, Tormay P, Singh M, Mascagni P, et al. (2001) Mycobacterium tuberculosis chaperonin 60.1 is a more potent cytokine stimulator than chaperonin 60.2 (Hsp 65) and contains a CD14-binding domain. Infect Immun 69: 7349-7355.
33. Fujii R, Nakagawa Y, Hiratake J, Sogabe A, Sakata K, (2005) Directed evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipase for improved amide-hydrolyzing activity. Protein Eng Des Sel 18: 93-101.
34. Bachovchin DA, Cravatt BF, (2012) The pharmacological landscape and therapeutic potential of serine hydrolases. Nat Rev Drug Discov 11: 52-68.
35. Zhao Q, Xie J, (2011) Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteases and implications for new antibiotics against tuberculosis. Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression 21: 347-361.
36. Ribeiro-Guimaraes ML, Pessolani MC, (2007) Comparative genomics of mycobacterial proteases. Microb Pathog 43: 173-178.
37. Sturgill-Koszycki S, Schlesinger PH, Chakraborty P, Haddix PL, Collins HL, et al. (1994) Lack of acidification in Mycobacterium phagosomes produced by exclusion of the vesicular proton- ATPase. Science 263: 678-681.
38. Rohde K, Yates RM, Purdy GE, Russell DG, (2007) Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the environment within the phagosome. Immunological Reviews 219: 37-54.
39. Vandal OH, Nathan CF, Ehrt S, (2009) Acid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Bacteriology 191: 4714-4721.
40. Grinstein S, Swallow CJ, Rotstein OD, (1991) Regulation of cytoplasmic pH in phagocytic cell function and dysfunction. Clin Biochem 24: 241-247.
41. Fan M, Rao T, Zacco E, Ahmed MT, Shukla A, et al. (2012) The unusual mycobacterial chaperonins: evidence for in vivo oligomerization and specialization of function. Mol Microbiol 85: 934-944.
42. Qamra R, Mande SC, (2004) Crystal structure of the 65-kilodalton heat shock protein, chaperonin 60.2, of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol 186: 8105-8113.
43. Qamra R, Srinivas V, Mande SC, (2004) Mycobacterium tuberculosis GroEL homologues unusually exist as lower oligomers and retain the ability to suppress aggregation of substrate proteins. J Mol Biol 342: 605-617.
44. Shahar A, Melamed-Frank M, Kashi Y, Shimon L, Adir N, (2011) The dimeric structure of the Cpn60.2 chaperonin of Mycobacterium tuberculosis at 2.8 A reveals possible modes of function. J Mol Biol 412: 192-203.
45. Horovitz A, Bochkareva ES, Girshovich AS, (1993) The N terminus of the molecular chaperonin GroEL is a crucial structural element for its assembly. J Biol Chem 268: 9957-9959.
46. Chen K, Lu J, Wang L, Gan YH, (2004) Mycobacterial heat shock protein 65 enhances antigen cross-presentation in dendritic cells independent of Toll-like receptor 4 signaling. J Leukoc Biol 75: 260-266.
47. Bulut Y, Michelsen KS, Hayrapetian L, Naiki Y, Spallek R, et al. (2005) Mycobacterium tuberculosis heat shock proteins use diverse Toll-like receptor pathways to activate pro-inflammatory signals. J Biol Chem 280: 20961-20967.
48. Lewthwaite JC, Clarkin CE, Coates AR, Poole S, Lawrence RA, et al. (2007) Highly homologous Mycobacterium tuberculosis chaperonin 60 proteins with differential CD14 dependencies stimulate cytokine production by human monocytes through cooperative activation of p38 and ERK1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinases. Int Immunopharmacol 7: 230-240.
49. Lee B, Horwitz MA, (1995) Identification of macrophage and stress-induced proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Invest 96: 245-249.
50. Dosanjh NS, Rawat M, Chung JH, Av-Gay Y, (2005) Thiol specific oxidative stress response in Mycobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 249: 87-94.
51. Starck J, Kallenius G, Marklund BI, Andersson DI, Akerlund T, (2004) Comparative proteome analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis grown under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Microbiology 150: 3821-3829.
52. Young DB, Garbe TR, (1991) Heat shock proteins and antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infection and Immunity 59: 3086-3093.
53. Yang H, Troudt J, Grover A, Arnett K, Lucas M, et al. (2011) Three protein cocktails mediate delayed-type hypersensitivity responses indistinguishable from that elicited by purified protein derivative in the guinea pig model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Infect Immun 79: 716-723.
54. Cho YS, Dobos KM, Prenni J, Yang H, Hess A, et al. (2012) Deciphering the proteome of the in vivo diagnostic reagent "purified protein derivative" from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proteomics 12: 979-991.
55. Hickey TB, Thorson LM, Speert DP, Daffe M, Stokes RW, (2009) Mycobacterium tuberculosis Cpn60.2 and DnaK are located on the bacterial surface, where Cpn60.2 facilitates efficient bacterial association with macrophages. Infect Immun 77: 3389-3401.
56. Hickey TB, Ziltener HJ, Speert DP, Stokes RW, (2010) Mycobacterium tuberculosis employs Cpn60.2 as an adhesin that binds CD43 on the macrophage surface. Cell Microbiol 12: 1634-1647.
57. Ingmer H, Brondsted L, (2009) Proteases in bacterial pathogenesis. Res Microbiol 160: 704-710.
58. Zhong G, (2011) Chlamydia trachomatis secretion of proteases for manipulating host signaling pathways. Front Microbiol 2: 14 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00014. eCollection 02011.
59. Sklar JG, Makinoshima H, Schneider JS, Glickman MS, (2010) M. tuberculosis intramembrane protease Rip1 controls transcription through three anti-sigma factor substrates. Mol Microbiol 77: 605-617.
60. Mukherjee P, Sureka K, Datta P, Hossain T, Barik S, et al. (2009) Novel role of Wag31 in protection of mycobacteria under oxidative stress. Mol Microbiol 73: 103-119.
61. Ohol YM, Goetz DH, Chan K, Shiloh MU, Craik CS, et al. (2010) Mycobacterium tuberculosis MycP1 protease plays a dual role in regulation of ESX-1 secretion and virulence. Cell Host Microbe 7: 210-220.
62. Singh A, Mai D, Kumar A, Steyn AJ, (2006) Dissecting virulence pathways of Mycobacterium tuberculosis through protein-protein association. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 11346-11351.