Hierarchical processing in music, language, and action: Lashley revisited

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1316, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 87-104

  Fitch, W Tecumseh ^a   Martins, Mauricio D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b INSTITUTO DE MEDICINA MOLECULAR   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Computation; Hierarchy; Language; Music; Syntax

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFUSION; DIAGONAL BAND OF BROCA; HIERARCHY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MIRROR NEURON; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MUSIC; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROIMAGING; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PREMOTOR CORTEX; SPEECH PERCEPTION; WORKING MEMORY;

COMPUTATION; HIERARCHY; LANGUAGE; MUSIC; SYNTAX;

ANIMALS; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MIRROR NEURONS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MUSIC;

EID: 84901387239     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: 17496632     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12406     Document Type: Article

References (165)

1. Lashley, K. 1951. The problem of serial order in behavior. In Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior the Hixon Symposium. L.A. Jeffress, Ed.: 112-146. New York: Wiley.
2. Rosenbaum, D.A., et al. 2007. The problem of serial order in behavior: Lashley's legacy. Hum. Mov. Sci. 26: 525-554.
3. Chomsky, N. 1959. A note on phrase structure grammars. Inform. Control. 2: 393-395.
4. Chomsky, N. 1968. Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
5. Upshall, M. 1993. Hutchinson Dictionary of Mathematics. London: Brockhampton Press.
6. Illingworth, V. 1983. Dictinary of Computing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Altmann, C.F., H.H. Bülthoff & Z. Kourtzi 2003. Perceptual organization of local elements into global shapes in the human visual cortex. Curr. Biol. 13: 342-349.
8. Aminoff, E., N. Gronau & M. Bar 2006. The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. Cereb. Cortex 17: 1493-1503.
9. Badre, D. 2008. Cognitive control, hierarchy, and the rostro-caudal organization of the frontal lobes. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12: 193-200.
10. Badre, D. & M. D'Esposito 2009. Is the rostro-caudal axis of the frontal lobe hierarchical? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10: 659-669.
11. Badre, D., et al. 2009. Hierarchical cognitive control deficits following damage to the human frontal lobe. Nat. Neurosci. 12: 515-522.
12. Kikuchi, Y., B. Horwitz & M. Mishkin 2010. Hierarchical auditory processing directed rostrally along the monkey's supratemporal plane. J. Neurosci. 30: 13021-13030.
13. Kourtzi, Z., et al. 2003. Integration of local features into global shapes: monkey and human fMRI studies. Neuron 37: 333-346.
14. Kravitz, D.J., et al. 2013. The ventral visual pathway: an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17: 26-49.
15. Krumbholz, K., et al. 2005. Hierarchical processing of sound location and motion in the human brainstem and planum temporale. Eur. J. Neurosci. 21: 230-238.
16. Mormann, F., et al. 2008. Latency and selectivity of single neurons indicate hierarchical processing in the human medial temporal lobe. J. Neurosci. 28: 8865-8872.
17. Kravitz, D.J., et al. 2011. A new neural framework for visuospatial processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12: 217-230.
18. Kumaran, D., H.L. Melo & E. Duzel 2012. The emergence and representation of knowledge about social and nonsocial hierarchies. Neuron 76: 653-666.
19. Schendan, H.E., et al. 2003. An fMRI study of the role of the medial temporal lobe in implicit and explicit sequence learning. Neuron 37: 1013-1025.
20. Meyer, P., et al. 2005. Language processing within the human medial temporal lobe. Hippocampus. 15: 451-459.
21. Opitz, B. & A.D. Friederici 2003. Interactions of the hippocampal system and the prefrontal cortex in learning language-like rules. Neuroimage. 19: 1730-1737.
22. Opitz, B. & A.D. Friederici 2007. Neural basis of processing sequential and hierarchical syntactic structures. Hum. Brain Mapping. 28: 585-592.
23. Eichenbaum, H., et al. 2012. Towards a functional organization of episodic memory in the medial temporal lobe. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36: 1597-1608.
24. Ranganath, C. 2010. A unified framework for the functional organization of the medial temporal lobes and the phenomenology of episodic memory. Hippocampus 20: 1263-1290.
25. Hassabis, D., et al. 2007. Patients with hippocampal amnesia cannot imagine new experiences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 104: 1726-1731.
26. Baddeley, A. 2000. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends Cogn. Sci. 4: 417-423.
27. Henke, K. 2010. A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11: 523-532.
28. Amunts, K., et al. 2010. Broca's region: novel organizational principles and multiple receptor mapping. PLoS Biol. 8: 1000489.
29. Friederici, A.D. 2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6: 78-84.
30. Friederici, A.D. 2011. The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. Physiol. Rev. 91: 1357-1392.
31. Petersson, K.M., C. Forkstam & M. Ingvar 2004. Artificial syntactic violations activate Broca's region. Cogn. Sci. 28: 383-407.
32. Forkstam, C., et al. 2006. Neural correlates of artificial syntactic structure classification. Neuroimage 32: 956-967.
33. Koelsch, S., et al. 2013. Processing of hierarchical syntactic structure in music. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 110: 15443-15448.
34. Brown, S., M.J. Martinez & L.M. Parsons 2006. Music and language side by side in the brain: a PET study of the generation of melodies and sentences. Eur. J. Neurosci. 23: 2791-2803.
35. Fadiga, L., L. Craighero & A. D'Ausilio 2009. Broca's area in language, action, and music. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 1169: 448-458.
36. Koelsch, S., B. Maess & A.D. Friederici 2000. Musical syntax is processed in the area of Broca: an MEG study. Neuroimage. 11: 56.
37. Maess, B., et al. 2001. Musical syntax is processed in Brocas area: an MEG study. Nat.Neurosci. 4: 540-545.
38. Patel, A.D., et al. 2008. Musical syntactic processing in agrammatic Broca's aphasia. Aphasiology 22: 776-789.
39. Sammler, D., S. Koelsch & A.D. Friederici 2011. Are left fronto-temporal brain areas a prerequisite for normal music-syntactic processing? Cortex 47: 659-673.
40. Bahlmann, J., et al. 2009. Neural circuits of hierarchical visuo-spatial sequence processing. Brain Res. 1298: 161-170.
41. Luria, A.R. 1966. Higher Cortical Functions in Man. New York: Basic Books.
42. Shallice, T. 1982. Specific impairments of planning. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 298: 199-209.
43. Baddeley, A.D. 1986. Working Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
44. Passingham, R.E. 1993. The frontal lobes and voluntary action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
45. Conway, C.M. & M.H. Christiansen 2001. Sequential learning in non-human primates. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5: 539-546.
46. Passingham, R.E. 1981. Broca's area and the origins of human vocal skill. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 292: 167-175.
47. Bookheimer, S. 2002. Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 25: 151-188.
48. Friederici, A.D. 2009. Pathways to language: fiber tracts in the human brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13: 175-181.
49. Zurif, E.R., A. Caramazza & R. Myerson 1972. Grammatical judgments of agrammatic aphasics. Neuropsychologia 10(4): 405-417.
50. Hagoort, P. 2005. On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9: 416-423.
51. Hickok, G. & D. Poeppel 2007. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8: 393-402.
52. Pulvermüller, F. 2010. Brain embodiment of syntax and grammar: discrete combinatorial mechanisms spelt out in neuronal circuits. Brain Lang. 112: 167-179.
53. Pallier, C., A.-D. Devauchelle & S. Dehaene 2011. Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 108: 2522-2527.
54. Fazio, P., et al. 2009. Encoding of human action in Broca's area. Brain 132: 1980-1988.
55. Thompson-Schill, S.L. 2005. Dissecting the language organ: a new look at the role of Broca's area in language processing. In Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones. A. Cutler, Ed.: 173-190. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56. Thompson-Schill, S.L., et al. 1997. Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 94: 14792-14797.
57. Patel, A.D. 2013. Sharing and nonsharing of brain resources for language and music. In Language, Music, and the Brain: A Mysterious Relationship. M.A. Arbib, Ed.: 329-355. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
58. Koelsch, S. 2013. Neural correlates of music perception. In Language, Music, and the Brain: A Mysterious Relationship, Vol. 10. M.A. Arbib, Ed.: 141-172. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
59. Janata, P. & L.M. Parsons 2013. Neural mechanisms of music, singing, and dancing. In Language, Music, and the Brain: A Mysterious Relationship, Vol. 10. M.A. Arbib, Ed.: 307-328. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
60. Herholz, S.C., A.R. Halpern & R.J. Zatorre 2012. Neuronal correlates of perception, imagery, and memory for familiar tunes. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 24: 1382-1397.
61. Peretz, I. & M. Coltheart 2003. Modularity of music processing. Nat. Neurosci. 6: 688-691.
62. Patel, A.D. 1998. Syntactic processing in language and music: different cognitive operations, similar neural resources? Musical Percept. 16: 27-42.
63. Koelsch, S., et al. 2005. Interaction between syntax processing in language and in music: an ERP study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17: 1565-1577.
64. Slevc, L.R., J.C. Rosenberg & A.D. Patel 2009. Making psycholinguistics musical: self-paced reading time evidence for shared processing of linguistic and musical syntax. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16: 374-381.
65. Steinbeis, N. & S. Koelsch 2008. Shared neural resources between music and language indicate semantic processing of musical tension-resolution patterns. Cereb. Cortex. 18: 1169-1178.
66. Fitch, W.T. 2006. The biology and evolution of music: a comparative perspective. Cognition 100: 173-215.
67. Fitch, W.T. 2013. Rhythmic cognition in humans and animals: distinguishing meter and pulse perception. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7: 1-16.
68. Abrams, D.A., et al. 2011. Decoding temporal structure in music and speech relies on shared brain resources but elicits different fine-scale spatial patterns. Cereb. Cortex. 21: 1507-1518.
69. Rogalsky, C., et al. 2011. Functional anatomy of language and music perception: temporal and structural factors investigated using functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 31: 3843-3852.
70. Fedorenko, E., M.K. Behr & N. Kanwisher 2011. Functional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 108: 16428-16433.
71. Chen, J.L., R.J. Zatorre & V.B. Penhune 2008. Moving on time: brain network for auditory-motor synchronization is modulated by rhythm complexity and musical training. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20: 226-239.
72. Grahn, J.A. 2012. Neural mechanisms of rhythm perception: current findings and future perspectives. Top. Cogn. Sci. 4: 585-606.
73. Grahn, J.A. & M. Brett 2007. Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19: 893-906.
74. Wymbs, N.F. & S.T. Grafton 2013. Contributions from the left PMd and the SMA during sequence retrieval as determined by depth of training. Exp. Brain Res. 224: 49-58.
75. Janata, P. & S.T. Grafton 2003. Swinging in the brain: shared neural substrates for behaviors related to sequencing and music. Nat. Neurosci. 6: 682-687.
76. Madison, G. 2006. Experiencing groove induced by music: consistency and phenomenology. Music Percept. 24: 201-208.
77. Janata, P., S.T. Tomic & J.M. Haberman 2012. Sensorimotor coupling in music and the psychology of the groove. J. Exp. Psychol.: General. 141: 54-75.
78. Liberman, A.M. & I.G. Mattingly 1985. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21: 1-36.
79. Diehl, R.L., A.J. Lotto & L.L. Holt 2004. Speech perception. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 55: 149-179.
80. Martin, A., et al. 1996. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 379: 649-652.
81. Tranel, D., et al. 2003. Neural correlate of conceptual knowledge for actions. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 20: 409-432.
82. Arbib, M.A. 2002. The mirror system, imitation, and the evolution of language. In Imitation in Animals and Artifacts. C. Nehaniv & K. Dautenhahn, Eds.: 229-280. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83. Arbib, M.A. 2005. From monkey-like action recognition to human language: an evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behav. Brain Sci. 28: 105-167.
84. Rizzolatti, G. & M.A. Arbib 1998. Language within our grasp. Trends Neurosci. 21: 188-194.
85. Condillac, É.B.D. 1971 (1747). Essai sur l'origine des Connaissances Humaines. Gainesville, FL: Scholar's Facsimiles and Reprints.
86. Corballis, M.C. 2002. From Hand to Mouth: the Origins of Language. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
87. Hewes, G.W. 1973. Primate communication and the gestural origin of language. Curr. Anthropol. 14: 5-24.
88. Emmorey, K. 2005. Sign languages are problematic for a gestural origins theory of language evolution. Behav. Brain Sci. 28: 130-131.
89. Kendon, A. 1991. Some considerations for a theory of language origins. Man 26: 199-221.
90. MacNeilage, P.F. & B.L. Davis 2005. The frame/content theory of evolution of speech: a comparison with a gestural-origins alternative. Interact. Stud. 6: 173-199.
91. Toni, I., et al. 2008. Language beyond action. J. Physiol. 102: 71-79.
92. Fitch, W.T. 2010. The Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93. Mukamel, R., et al. 2010. Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Curr. Biol. 20: 750-756.
94. Rogalsky, C., et al. 2011. Are mirror neurons the basis of speech perception? Evidence from five cases with damage to the purported human mirror system. Neurocase 17: 178-187.
95. Gervain, J., et al. 2008. The neonate brain detects speech structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 105: 14222-14227.
96. Koelsch, S., et al. 2002. Bach speaks: a cortical "language-network" serves the processing of music. NeuroImage. 17: 956-966.
97. Koechlin, E. & T. Jubault 2006. Broca's area and the hierarchical organization of human behavior. Neuron 50: 963-974.
98. Dehaene, S. & J.-P. Changeux 1997. A hierarchical neuronal network for planning behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 94: 13293-13298.
99. Berg, W.K., et al. 2010. Deconstructing the tower: parameters and predictors of problem difficulty on the Tower of London task. Brain Cogn. 72: 472-482.
100. Newman, S.D., J.A. Greco & D. Lee 2009. An fMRI study of the Tower of London: a look at problem structure differences. Brain Res. 1286: 123-132.
101. Jäger, G. & J. Rogers 2012. Formal language theory: refining the Chomsky Hierarchy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 267: 1956-1970.
102. Gersting, J.L. 1999. Mathematical Structures for Computer Science. New York: W H Freeman.
103. Hopcroft, J.E., R. Motwani & J.D. Ullman 2000. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
104. Linz, P. 2001. An Introduction to Formal Languages and Automata. Sudbury, Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett.
105. Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
106. Levelt, W.J.M. 2008. Formal Grammars in Linguistics and Psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
107. Stabler, E.P. 2004. Varieties of crossing dependencies: structure dependence and mild context sensitivity. Cogn. Sci. 28: 699-720.
108. Stabler, E.P. 2013. The epicenter of linguistic behavior. In Language Down the Garden Path: The Cognitive and Biological Basis of Linguistic Structures. M. Sanz, I. Laka & M.K. Tanenhaus, Eds.: 316-323. New York: Oxford University Press.
109. Rohrmeier, M. 2011. Towards a generative syntax of tonal harmony. J. Math. Music. 5: 35-53.
110. Uddén, J. & J. Bahlmann 2012. A rostro-caudal gradient of structured sequence processing in the left inferior frontal gyrus. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 367: 2023-2032.
111. Braver, T.S., et al. 1997. A Parametric Study of Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Human Working Memory. NeuroImage. 5: 49-52.
112. Petersson, K.M., V. Folia & P. Hagoort 2010. What artificial grammar learning reveals about the neurobiology of syntax. Brain Lang. 120: 83-95.
113. Koelsch, S. 2012. Brain and Music. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
114. Miller, G.A. & N. Chomsky 1963. Finitary models of language users. In Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. Vol. 35. R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush & E. Galanter, Eds.: 419-492. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
115. Bach, E., C. Brown & W. Marslen-Wilson 1986. Crossed and nested dependencies in German and Dutch: a psycholinguistic study. Lang. Cogn. Process. 1: 249-262.
116. ten Cate, C. & K. Okanoya 2012. Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 367: 1984-1994.
117. Stobbe, N., et al. 2012. Visual artificial grammar learning: comparative research on humans, kea (Nestor notabilis) and pigeons (Columba livia). Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 367: 1995-2006.
118. Miller, G.A. 1967. Project Grammarama. In Psychology of Communication. G.A. Miller, Ed. New York: Basic Books.
119. Fitch, W.T., A.D. Friederici & P. Hagoort 2012. Pattern perception and computational complexity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 367: 1925-1932.
120. Fitch, W.T. Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition. Phys. Life Rev. In press.
121. Fitch, W.T. & A.D. Friederici 2012. Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 367: 1933-1955.
122. Morgan, J.L., R.P. Meier & E.L. Newport 1987. Structural packaging in the input to language learning: contributions of prosodic and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language. Cogn. Psychol. 19: 498-550.
123. Fodor, J.A., T.G. Bever & M.F. Garrett 1974. The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill.
124. Ravignani, A., et al. 2013. Action at a distance: dependency sensitivity in a New World primate. Biol. Lett. 9: 20130852.
125. van Heijningen, C.A.A., et al. 2009. Simple rules can explain discrimination of putative recursive syntactic structures by a songbird species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 106: 20538-20543.
126. Beckers, G.J.L., et al. 2012. Birdsong neurolinguistics: songbird context-free grammar claim is premature. NeuroReport. 23: 139-145.
127. Petkov, C.I. & E.D. Jarvis 2012. Birds, primates, and spoken language origins: behavioral phenotypes and neurobiological substrates. Front. Evol. Neurosci. 4: e12.
128. Gentner, T.Q., et al. 2006. Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds. Nature 440: 1204-1207.
129. Hausberger, M., et al. 1995. Song sharing reflects the social organization in a captive group of European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). J. Comp. Psychol. 109: 222-241.
130. Saffran, J., et al. 2008. Grammatical pattern learning by human infants and cotton-top tamarin monkeys. Cognition 107: 479-500.
131. Saffran, J.R., R.N. Aslin & E.L. Newport 1996. Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274: 1926-1928.
132. de Vries, M.H., et al. 2008. Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: the learnability of embedded hierarchical structures. Cognition 107: 763-774.
133. Fitch, W.T. & M.D. Hauser 2004. Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science 303: 377-380.
134. Uddén, J., et al. 2012. Implicit acquisition of grammars with crossed and nested non-adjacent dependencies: investigating the push-down stack model. Cogn. Sci. 2012: 1-24.
135. Byrne, R.W. 2007. Clues to the origin of the human mind from primate observational field data. Jpn. J. Anim. Psychol. 57: 1-14.
136. Hauser, M., N. Chomsky & W.T. Fitch 2002. The language faculty: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569-1579.
137. Johnson-Pynn, J., et al. 1999. Strategies used to combine seriated cups by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), and capuchins (Cebus apella). J. Comp. Psychol. 113: 137-148.
138. Sanz, C., J. Call & D.B. Morgan 2009. Design complexity in termite-fishing tools of chimpanzees. Biol. Lett. 5: 293-296.
139. Mandelbrot, B.B. 1977. The fractal geometry of nature. New York: Freeman.
140. O'Donnell, T.J., M.D. Hauser & W.T. Fitch 2005. Using mathematical models of language experimentally. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9: 284-289.
141. Fitch, W.T. 2010. Three meanings of "recursion": key distinctions for biolinguistics. In The Evolution of Human Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives. R. Larson, V. Déprez & H. Yamakido, Eds.: 73-90. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
142. Fitch, W.T., M.D. Hauser & N. Chomsky 2005. The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and Implications. Cognition. 97: 179-210.
143. Martins, M.D. 2012. Specific signatures of recursion. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 367: 2055-2064.
144. Van der Hulst, H. 2010. Recursion and Human Language. Berlin: De Gruyter/Mouton.
145. Huxley, T.H. 1863. Man's Place in Nature. Mineola, NY: Dover.
146. Jerison, H.J. 1961. Quantitative analysis of evolution of the brain in mammals. Science 133: 1012-1014.
147. Stephan, H., H. Frahm & G. Baron 1981. New and revised data on volumes of brain structures in insectivores and primates. Folia. Primatol. 35: 1-29.
148. Deacon, T.W. 1990. Rethinking mammalian brain evolution. Am. Zool. 30: 629-705.
149. Jerison, H.J. 1973. Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence. New York: Academic Press.
150. Holloway, R.L. 1996. Evolution of the human brain. In Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution. A. Lock & C.R. Peters, Eds.: 74-108. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
151. Semendeferi, K., et al. 2002. Humans and great apes share a large frontal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 5: 272-276.
152. Deaner, R.O., C.P. van Schaik & V. Johnson 2006. Do some taxa have better domain-general cognition than others? A meta-analysis of nonhuman primate studies. Evol. Psychol. 4: 149-196.
153. Schoenemann, P.T., M.J. Sheehan & L.D. Glotzer 2005. Prefrontal white matter volume is disproportionately larger in humans than in other primates. Nat. Neurosci. 8: 242-253.
154. Barton, R.A. & C. Venditti 2013. Human frontal lobes are not relatively large. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 110: 9000-9006.
155. Sakai, T., et al. 2011. Differential prefrontal white matter development in chimpanzees and humans. Curr. Biol. 21: 1397-1402.
156. Sherwood, C.C., R.L. Holloway, K. Semendeferi & P.R. Hof. 2005. Is prefrontal white matter enlargement a human evolutionary specialization? Nat. Neurosci. 8: 537-538.
157. Smaers, J.B., et al. 2010. Frontal white matter volume is associated with brain enlargement and higher structural connectivity in anthropoid primates. PLoS One. 5: e9123.
158. Schenker, N.M., et al. 2010. Broca's area homologue in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): probabilistic mapping, asymmetry and comparison to humans. Cereb. Cortex. 20: 730-742.
159. Amunts, K., et al. 1999. Broca's region revisited: cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability. J. Comp. Neurol. 412: 319-341.
160. Koch, M.A., D.G. Norris & M. Hund-Georgiadis 2002. An investigation of functional and anatomical connectivity using magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 16: 241-250.
161. Rilling, J.K., et al. 2008. The evolution of the arcuate fasciculus revealed with comparative DTI. Nat. Neurosci. 11: 426-428.
162. Catani, M. & M. Mesulam 2008. The arcuate fasciculus and the disconnection theme in language and aphasia: history and current state. Cortex 44: 953-961.
163. Goodall, J. 1986. The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
164. McGrew, W.C. & L.F. Marchant 2001. Ethological studies of manual laterality in the chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains, Tanzania. Behaviour 138: 329-358.
165. Sugiyama, Y. & J. Koman 1979. Tool-using and tool-making behavior in wild chimpanzees at Bossou, Guinea. Primates 20: 513-524.