The ventral visual pathway: An expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 26-49

  Kravitz, Dwight J ^a   Saleem, Kadharbatcha S ^a   Baker, Chris I ^a   Ungerleider, Leslie G ^a   Mishkin, Mortimer ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK EFFECTS; FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES; NEURAL REPRESENTATIONS; OBJECT REPRESENTATIONS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

VISION;

AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; COGNITION; CORPUS STRIATUM; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM GYRUS; HUMAN; INFERIOR TEMPORAL CORTEX; LEARNING; MEMORY; NEOSTRIATUM; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROANATOMY; NONHUMAN; PARIETAL CORTEX; RECEPTIVE FIELD; REVIEW; SECONDARY VISUAL CORTEX; STRIATE CORTEX; SUBCORTEX; THALAMUS VENTRAL NUCLEUS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VENTRAL VISUAL PATHWAY; VENTROMEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; VISUAL AREA V3; VISUAL AREA V4; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; NERVE NET; OCCIPITAL LOBE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 84871721471     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.011     Document Type: Review

References (313)

1. Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. Analysis of Visual Behavior 1982, 549-586. MIT Press. D.J. Ingle (Ed.).
2. Mishkin M., et al. Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends Neurosci. 1983, 6:414-417.
3. Macko K.A., et al. Mapping the primate visual system with [2-14C]deoxyglucose. Science 1982, 218:394-397.
4. Goodale M.A., et al. Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Curr. Biol. 1994, 4:604-610.
5. Kravitz D.J., et al. A new neural framework for visuospatial processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2011, 12:217-230.
6. de Haan E.H., Cowey A. On the usefulness of 'what' and 'where' pathways in vision. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15:460-466.
7. Serre T., et al. A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:6424-6429.
8. Bussey T.J., Saksida L.M. The organization of visual object representations: a connectionist model of effects of lesions in perirhinal cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2002, 15:355-364.
9. Rousselet G.A., et al. How parallel is visual processing in the ventral pathway?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:363-370.
10. Yau J.M., et al. Curvature processing dynamics in macaque area V4. Cereb. Cortex 2012, 10.1093/cercor/bhs004.
11. Brincat S.L., Connor C.E. Underlying principles of visual shape selectivity in posterior inferotemporal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:880-886.
12. DiCarlo J.J., et al. How does the brain solve visual object recognition?. Neuron 2012, 73:415-434.
13. Riesenhuber M., Poggio T. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2:1019-1025.
14. Rockland K.S., Pandya D.N. Laminar origins and terminations of cortical connections of the occipital lobe in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 1979, 179:3-20.
15. Distler C., et al. Cortical connections of inferior temporal area TEO in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 1993, 334:125-150.
16. Kondo H., et al. Differential connections of the temporal pole with the orbital and medial prefrontal networks in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 2003, 465:499-523.
17. Rockland K.S., Virga A. Organization of individual cortical axons projecting from area V1 (area 17) to V2 (area 18) in the macaque monkey. Vis. Neurosci. 1990, 4:11-28.
18. Rockland K.S. Configuration, in serial reconstruction, of individual axons projecting from area V2 to V4 in the macaque monkey. Cereb. Cortex 1992, 2:353-374.
19. Saleem K.S., et al. Specific and columnar projection from area TEO to TE in the macaque inferotemporal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 1993, 3:454-464.
20. Kuypers H.G., et al. Occipitotemporal corticocortical connections in the rhesus monkey. Exp. Neurol. 1965, 11:245-262.
21. Zeki S.M. The cortical projections of foveal striate cortex in the rhesus monkey. J. Physiol. 1978, 277:227-244.
22. Felleman D.J., Van Essen D.C. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 1991, 1:1-47.
23. Van Essen D.C., et al. The projections from striate cortex (V1) to areas V2 and V3 in the macaque monkey: asymmetries, areal boundaries, and patchy connections. J. Comp. Neurol. 1986, 244:451-480.
24. Ungerleider L.G., et al. Cortical connections of area V4 in the macaque. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:477-499.
25. Baizer J.S., et al. Organization of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques. J. Neurosci. 1991, 11:168-190.
26. Shipp S. Structure and function of the cerebral cortex. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:R443-R449.
27. Nakamura H., et al. The modular organization of projections from areas V1 and V2 to areas V4 and TEO in macaques. J. Neurosci. 1993, 13:3681-3691.
28. Maunsell J.H., van Essen D.C. The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey. J. Neurosci. 1983, 3:2563-2586.
29. Ungerleider L.G., Desimone R. Cortical connections of visual area MT in the macaque. J. Comp. Neurol. 1986, 248:190-222.
30. Shipp S., Zeki S. The organization of connections between areas V5 and V1 in macaque monkey visual cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1989, 1:309-332.
31. Sincich L.C., Horton J.C. Independent projection streams from macaque striate cortex to the second visual area and middle temporal area. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:5684-5692.
32. Webster M.J., et al. Connections of inferior temporal areas TE and TEO with medial temporal-lobe structures in infant and adult monkeys. J. Neurosci. 1991, 11:1095-1116.
33. Saleem K.S., et al. Connections between anterior inferotemporal cortex and superior temporal sulcus regions in the macaque monkey. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20:5083-5101.
34. Boussaoud D., et al. Pathways for motion analysis: cortical connections of the medial superior temporal and fundus of the superior temporal visual areas in the macaque. J. Comp. Neurol. 1990, 296:462-495.
35. Webster M.J., et al. Subcortical connections of inferior temporal areas TE and TEO in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 1993, 335:73-91.
36. Suzuki W.A., Amaral D.G. Topographic organization of the reciprocal connections between the monkey entorhinal cortex and the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices. J. Neurosci. 1994, 14:1856-1877.
37. Bertini G., et al. Visual responses to targets and distracters by inferior temporal neurons after lesions of extrastriate areas V4 and TEO. Neuroreport 2004, 15:1611-1615.
38. Buffalo E.A., et al. Impaired filtering of distracter stimuli by TE neurons following V4 and TEO lesions in macaques. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:141-151.
39. Mishkin M. Cortical visual areas and their interactions. Brain and Human Behavior 1972, Springer-Verlag. A.G. Karczmar, J.C. Eccles (Eds.).
40. Hegde J., Van Essen D.C. A comparative study of shape representation in macaque visual areas v2 and v4. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:1100-1116.
41. Yamane Y., et al. A neural code for three-dimensional object shape in macaque inferotemporal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:1352-1360.
42. Kravitz D.J., et al. High-level object representations are constrained by position. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:2916-2925.
43. Afraz A., et al. Spatial heterogeneity in the perception of face and form attributes. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:2112-2116.
44. Chan A.W., et al. Cortical representations of bodies and faces are strongest in commonly experienced configurations. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13:417-418.
45. Kravitz D.J., et al. How position dependent is visual object recognition?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:114-122.
46. Lavidor M., Walsh V. The nature of foveal representation. Nat. Rev. 2004, 5:729-735.
47. Wandell B.A., et al. Visual field maps in human cortex. Neuron 2007, 56:366-383.
48. Fize D., et al. The retinotopic organization of primate dorsal V4 and surrounding areas: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in awake monkeys. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:7395-7406.
49. Brewer A.A., et al. Visual areas in macaque cortex measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22:10416-10426.
50. Orban G.A., et al. Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:315-324.
51. Kolster H., et al. The retinotopic organization of the human middle temporal area MT/V5 and its cortical neighbors. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:9801-9820.
52. Winawer J., et al. Mapping hV4 and ventral occipital cortex: the venous eclipse. J. Vis. 2010, 10:1.
53. Hansen K.A., et al. Topographic organization in and near human visual area V4. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:11896-11911.
54. Brewer A.A., et al. Visual field maps and stimulus selectivity in human ventral occipital cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1102-1109.
55. Hemond C.C., et al. A preference for contralateral stimuli in human object- and face-selective cortex. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e574.
56. Niemeier M., et al. A contralateral preference in the lateral occipital area: sensory and attentional mechanisms. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:325-331.
57. Swisher J.D., et al. Visual topography of human intraparietal sulcus. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:5326-5337.
58. Boussaoud D., et al. Visual topography of area TEO in the macaque. J. Comp. Neurol. 1991, 306:554-575.
59. Kobatake E., Tanaka K. Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral-cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1994, 71:856-867.
60. Tanaka K., et al. Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 1991, 66:170-189.
61. Desimone R., Gross C.G. Visual areas in the temporal cortex of the macaque. Brain Res. 1979, 178:363-380.
62. Op De Beeck H., Vogels R. Spatial sensitivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 2000, 426:505-518.
63. Merigan W.H., Saunders R.C. Unilateral deficits in visual perception and learning after unilateral inferotemporal cortex lesions in macaques. Cereb. Cortex 2004, 14:863-871.
64. Cichy R.M., et al. Encoding the identity and location of objects in human LOC. Neuroimage 2011, 54:2297-2307.
65. Sayres R., Grill-Spector K. Relating retinotopic and object-selective responses in human lateral occipital cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2008, 100:249-267.
66. Larsson J., Heeger D.J. Two retinotopic visual areas in human lateral occipital cortex. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:13128-13142.
67. Hasson U., et al. Eccentricity bias as an organizing principle for human high-order object areas. Neuron 2002, 34:479-490.
68. Levy I., et al. Center-periphery organization of human object areas. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:533-539.
69. Sato N., Nakamura K. Visual response properties of neurons in the parahippocampal cortex of monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 2003, 90:876-886.
70. Park S., et al. Disentangling scene content from spatial boundary: complementary roles for the parahippocampal place area and lateral occipital complex in representing real-world scenes. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:1333-1340.
71. Kravitz D.J., et al. Real-world scene representations in high-level visual cortex - it's the spaces not the places. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:7322-7333.
72. Dehaene S., Cohen L. The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15:254-262.
73. Konkle T., Oliva A. A real-world size organization of object responses in occipito-temporal cortex. Neuron 2012, 74:1114-1124.
74. Taylor J.C., Downing P.E. Division of labor between lateral and ventral extrastriate representations of faces, bodies, and objects. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:4122-4137.
75. Malach R., et al. Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92:8135-8139.
76. Schwarzlose R.F., et al. The distribution of category and location information across object-selective regions in human visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:4447-4452.
77. Arcaro M.J., et al. Retinotopic organization of human ventral visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:10638-10652.
78. Brown L.E., et al. Peripheral vision for perception and action. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 165:97-106.
79. Khan M.A., Lawrence G.P. Differences in visuomotor control between the upper and lower visual fields. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 164:395-398.
80. Danckert J., Goodale M.A. Superior performance for visually guided pointing in the lower visual field. Exp. Brain Res. 2001, 137:303-308.
81. Edelman S., Intrator N. (Coarse coding of shape fragments) + (retinotopy) approximately = representation of structure. Spat. Vis. 2000, 13:255-264.
82. Bell A.H., et al. Relationship between functional magnetic resonance imaging-identified regions and neuronal category selectivity. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:12229-12240.
83. Tsao D.Y., et al. Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:19514-19519.
84. Downing P.E., et al. Domain specificity in visual cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 16:1453-1461.
85. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392:598-601.
86. Mahon B.Z., et al. Action-related properties shape object representations in the ventral stream. Neuron 2007, 55:507-520.
87. Conway B.R., et al. Specialized color modules in macaque extrastriate cortex. Neuron 2007, 56:560-573.
88. Murphey D.K., et al. Perception matches selectivity in the human anterior color center. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:216-220.
89. Fox C.J., et al. Perceptual and anatomic patterns of selective deficits in facial identity and expression processing. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:3188-3200.
90. Barton J.J., et al. Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia. Neurology 2002, 58:71-78.
91. Pitcher D., et al. Triple dissociation of faces, bodies, and objects in extrastriate cortex. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:319-324.
92. Afraz S.R., et al. Microstimulation of inferotemporal cortex influences face categorization. Nature 2006, 442:692-695.
93. Op de Beeck H.P., et al. Interpreting fMRI data: maps, modules and dimensions. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9:123-135.
94. Kourtzi Z., Connor C.E. Neural representations for object perception: structure, category, and adaptive coding. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2011, 34:45-67.
95. Chklovskii D.B., Koulakov A.A. Maps in the brain: what can we learn from them?. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 27:369-392.
96. Kanwisher N. Functional specificity in the human brain: a window into the functional architecture of the mind. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:11163-11170.
97. Baker C.I., et al. Visual word processing and experiential origins of functional selectivity in human extrastriate cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:9087-9092.
98. Srihasam K., et al. Behavioral and anatomical consequences of early versus late symbol training in macaques. Neuron 2012, 73:608-619.
99. Martin A. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2007, 58:25-45.
100. Haxby J.V., et al. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:223-233.
101. Plaut D.C., Behrmann M. Complementary neural representations for faces and words: a computational exploration. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 2011, 28:251-275.
102. Werth R. Visual functions without the occipital lobe or after cerebral hemispherectomy in infancy. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006, 24:2932-2944.
103. Thomas C., et al. Reduced structural connectivity in ventral visual cortex in congenital prosopagnosia. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12:29-31.
104. Polk T.A., et al. Nature versus nurture in ventral visual cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of twins. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:13921-13925.
105. Saygin Z.M., et al. Anatomical connectivity patterns predict face selectivity in the fusiform gyrus. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 15:321-327.
106. Pitcher D., et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation disrupts the perception and embodiment of facial expressions. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:8929-8933.
107. Moeller S., et al. Patches with links: a unified system for processing faces in the macaque temporal lobe. Science 2008, 320:1355-1359.
108. Liu H., et al. Timing, timing, timing: fast decoding of object information from intracranial field potentials in human visual cortex. Neuron 2009, 62:281-290.
109. Lamme V.A., Roelfsema P.R. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends Neurosci. 2000, 23:571-579.
110. Gandhi S.P., et al. Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96:3314-3319.
111. Shomstein S., Behrmann M. Cortical systems mediating visual attention to both objects and spatial locations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:11387-11392.
112. Maunsell J.H., Treue S. Feature-based attention in visual cortex. Trends Neurosci. 2006, 29:317-322.
113. Reynolds J.H., Heeger D.J. The normalization model of attention. Neuron 2009, 61:168-185.
114. Muller N.G., Kleinschmidt A. Dynamic interaction of object- and space-based attention in retinotopic visual areas. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:9812-9816.
115. Kravitz D.J., Behrmann M. Space-, object-, and feature-based attention interact to organize visual scenes. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2011, 73:2434-2447.
116. Kravitz D.J., Behrmann M. The space of an object: object attention alters the spatial gradient in the surround. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2008, 34:298-309.
117. Simons D.J., et al. Change blindness in the absence of a visual disruption. Perception 2000, 29:1143-1154.
118. Levin D.T., Simons D.J. Failure to detect changes to people in a real-world interaction. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1998, 5:644-649.
119. Triesch J., et al. What you see is what you need. J. Vis. 2003, 3:86-94.
120. Beck D.M., et al. Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:645-650.
121. Murray S.O., et al. The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9:429-434.
122. Fang F., et al. Attention-dependent representation of a size illusion in human V1. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1707-1712.
123. Lee T.S., et al. Neural activity in early visual cortex reflects behavioral experience and higher-order perceptual saliency. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5:589-597.
124. Zipser K., et al. Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16:7376-7389.
125. Bacon-Mace N., et al. The time course of visual processing: backward masking and natural scene categorisation. Vision Res. 2005, 45:1459-1469.
126. Grill-Spector K., et al. The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3:837-843.
127. Rolls E.T., et al. The neurophysiology of backward visual masking: information analysis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1999, 11:300-311.
128. Super H., et al. Two distinct modes of sensory processing observed in monkey primary visual cortex (V1). Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:304-310.
129. Kovacs G., et al. Cortical correlate of pattern backward masking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92:5587-5591.
130. Keysers C., Perrett D.I. Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2002, 6:120-125.
131. Fahrenfort J.J., et al. Masking disrupts reentrant processing in human visual cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2007, 19:1488-1497.
132. Aggleton J.P. Multiple anatomical systems embedded within the primate medial temporal lobe: implications for hippocampal function. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2012, 36:1579-1596.
133. Van Hoesen G.W., et al. Temporal cortical projections to the olfactory tubercle in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 1976, 109:375-381.
134. Van Hoesen G.W., et al. Widespread corticostriate projections from temporal cortex of the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 1981, 199:205-219.
135. Saint-Cyr J.A., et al. Organization of visual cortical inputs to the striatum and subsequent outputs to the pallido-nigral complex in the monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 1990, 298:129-156.
136. Baizer J.S., et al. Comparison of subcortical connections of inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in monkeys. Vis. Neurosci. 1993, 10:59-72.
137. Yeterian E.H., Pandya D.N. Corticostriatal connections of extrastriate visual areas in rhesus monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 1995, 352:436-457.
138. Cheng K., et al. Organization of corticostriatal and corticoamygdalar projections arising from the anterior inferotemporal area TE of the macaque monkey: a Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin study. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17:7902-7925.
139. Jung Y., Hong S. Ventral striatal connections of unimodal and multimodal cortex of the superior temporal sulcus in the macaque monkeys. Korean J. Biol. Sci. 2004, 8:319-328.
140. Middleton F.A., Strick P.L. Basal ganglia and cerebellar loops: motor and cognitive circuits. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 2000, 31:236-250.
141. Seger C.A. How do the basal ganglia contribute to categorization? Their roles in generalization, response selection, and learning via feedback. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2008, 32:265-278.
142. Seger C.A., Miller E.K. Category learning in the brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 33:203-219.
143. Voytek B., Knight R.T. Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia contributions to visual working memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:18167-18172.
144. Shohamy D. Learning and motivation in the human striatum. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2011, 21:408-414.
145. Turner R.S., Desmurget M. Basal ganglia contributions to motor control: a vigorous tutor. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2010, 20:704-716.
146. Stocco A., et al. Conditional routing of information to the cortex: a model of the basal ganglia's role in cognitive coordination. Psychol. Rev. 2010, 117:541-574.
147. Fernandez-Ruiz J., et al. Visual habit formation in monkeys with neurotoxic lesions of the ventrocaudal neostriatum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:4196-4201.
148. Ashby F.G., Maddox W.T. Human category learning. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2005, 56:149-178.
149. Divac I., et al. Behavioral effects of selective ablation of the caudate nucleus. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1967, 63:184-190.
150. Buerger A.A., et al. Effects of ventral putamen lesions on discrimination learning by monkeys. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1974, 86:440-446.
151. Teng E., et al. Contrasting effects on discrimination learning after hippocampal lesions and conjoint hippocampal-caudate lesions in monkeys. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20:3853-3863.
152. Brown V.J., et al. Responses of cells in the tail of the caudate nucleus during visual discrimination learning. J. Neurophysiol. 1995, 74:1083-1094.
153. Yamamoto S., et al. What and where information in the caudate tail guides saccades to visual objects. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:11005-11016.
154. Muhammad R., et al. A comparison of abstract rules in the prefrontal cortex, premotor cortex, inferior temporal cortex, and striatum. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:974-989.
155. Pasupathy A., Miller E.K. Different time courses of learning-related activity in the prefrontal cortex and striatum. Nature 2005, 433:873-876.
156. Williams Z.M., Eskandar E.N. Selective enhancement of associative learning by microstimulation of the anterior caudate. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9:562-568.
157. Levy R., et al. Differential activation of the caudate nucleus in primates performing spatial and nonspatial working memory tasks. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17:3870-3882.
158. Ongur D., Price J.L. The organization of networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans. Cereb. Cortex 2000, 10:206-219.
159. Haber S.N., et al. The orbital and medial prefrontal circuit through the primate basal ganglia. J. Neurosci. 1995, 15:4851-4867.
160. Haber S.N., McFarland N.R. The concept of the ventral striatum in nonhuman primates. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1999, 877:33-48.
161. Ferry A.T., et al. Prefrontal cortical projections to the striatum in macaque monkeys: evidence for an organization related to prefrontal networks. J. Comp. Neurol. 2000, 425:447-470.
162. Freedman L.J., et al. Subcortical projections of area 25 (subgenual cortex) of the macaque monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 2000, 421:172-188.
163. Humphries M.D., Prescott T.J. The ventral basal ganglia, a selection mechanism at the crossroads of space, strategy, and reward. Prog. Neurobiol. 2010, 90:385-417.
164. Williams G.V., et al. Neuronal responses in the ventral striatum of the behaving macaque. Behav. Brain Res. 1993, 55:243-252.
165. Cromwell H.C., Schultz W. Effects of expectations for different reward magnitudes on neuronal activity in primate striatum. J. Neurophysiol. 2003, 89:2823-2838.
166. Apicella P., et al. Responses to reward in monkey dorsal and ventral striatum. Exp. Brain Res. 1991, 85:491-500.
167. Hassani O.K., et al. Influence of expectation of different rewards on behavior-related neuronal activity in the striatum. J. Neurophysiol. 2001, 85:2477-2489.
168. Schultz W., et al. Neuronal activity in monkey ventral striatum related to the expectation of reward. J. Neurosci. 1992, 12:4595-4610.
169. Cai X., et al. Heterogeneous coding of temporally discounted values in the dorsal and ventral striatum during intertemporal choice. Neuron 2011, 69:170-182.
170. Day J.J., et al. Nucleus accumbens neurons encode predicted and ongoing reward costs in rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2011, 33:308-321.
171. Shidara M., et al. Neuronal signals in the monkey ventral striatum related to progress through a predictable series of trials. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18:2613-2625.
172. Cardinal R.N., et al. Effects of selective excitotoxic lesions of the nucleus accumbens core, anterior cingulate cortex, and central nucleus of the amygdala on autoshaping performance in rats. Behav. Neurosci. 2002, 116:553-567.
173. Christakou A., et al. Prefrontal cortical-ventral striatal interactions involved in affective modulation of attentional performance: implications for corticostriatal circuit function. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:773-780.
174. Cole B.J., Robbins T.W. Effects of 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens septi on performance of a 5-choice serial reaction time task in rats: implications for theories of selective attention and arousal. Behav. Brain Res. 1989, 33:165-179.
175. Stern C.E., Passingham R.E. The nucleus accumbens in monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). III. Reversal learning. Exp. Brain Res. 1995, 106:239-247.
176. Liu X., et al. Common and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2011, 35:1219-1236.
177. Britton J.C., et al. Neural correlates of social and nonsocial emotions: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2006, 31:397-409.
178. Axmacher N., et al. Intracranial EEG correlates of expectancy and memory formation in the human hippocampus and nucleus accumbens. Neuron 2010, 65:541-549.
179. Sabatinelli D., et al. Pleasure rather than salience activates human nucleus accumbens and medial prefrontal cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 98:1374-1379.
180. Iwai E., Yukie M. Amygdalofugal and amygdalopetal connections with modality-specific visual cortical areas in macaques (Macaca fuscata, M. mulatta, and M. fascicularis). J. Comp. Neurol. 1987, 261:362-387.
181. Amaral D.G., et al. Topographic organization of projections from the amygdala to the visual cortex in the macaque monkey. Neuroscience 2003, 118:1099-1120.
182. Stefanacci L., Amaral D.G. Some observations on cortical inputs to the macaque monkey amygdala: an anterograde tracing study. J. Comp. Neurol. 2002, 451:301-323.
183. Freese J.L., Amaral D.G. The organization of projections from the amygdala to visual cortical areas TE and V1 in the macaque monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 2005, 486:295-317.
184. Bzdok D., et al. An investigation of the structural, connectional, and functional subspecialization in the human amygdala. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2012, 10.1002/hbm.22138.
185. Morrison S.E., Salzman C.D. Re-valuing the amygdala. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2010, 20:221-230.
186. Pessoa L. Emotion and cognition and the amygdala: from " what is it?." to " what's to be done?." Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3416-3429.
187. Pessoa L., Adolphs R. Emotion processing and the amygdala: from a 'low road' to 'many roads' of evaluating biological significance. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11:773-783.
188. Nishijo H., et al. Topographic distribution of modality-specific amygdalar neurons in alert monkey. J. Neurosci. 1988, 8:3556-3569.
189. Mosher C.P., et al. Response characteristics of basolateral and centromedial neurons in the primate amygdala. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:16197-16207.
190. Gothard K.M., et al. Neural responses to facial expression and face identity in the monkey amygdala. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 97:1671-1683.
191. Paton J.J., et al. The primate amygdala represents the positive and negative value of visual stimuli during learning. Nature 2006, 439:865-870.
192. Izquierdo A., Murray E.A. Selective bilateral amygdala lesions in rhesus monkeys fail to disrupt object reversal learning. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:1054-1062.
193. Kazama A.M., Bachevalier J. Preserved stimulus-reward and reversal learning after selective neonatal orbital frontal areas 11/13 or amygdala lesions in monkeys. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 2:363-380.
194. Murray E.A., et al. Neural substrates of visual stimulus-stimulus association in rhesus monkeys. J. Neurosci. 1993, 13:4549-4561.
195. Bliss-Moreau E., et al. Neonatal amygdala lesions alter responsiveness to objects in juvenile macaques. Neuroscience 2011, 178:123-132.
196. Murray E.A., Wise S.P. Interactions between orbital prefrontal cortex and amygdala: advanced cognition, learned responses and instinctive behaviors. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2010, 20:212-220.
197. Duncan S., Barrett L.F. The role of the amygdala in visual awareness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11:190-192.
198. Vuilleumier P., et al. Distant influences of amygdala lesion on visual cortical activation during emotional face processing. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:1271-1278.
199. Saleem K.S., Tanaka K. Divergent projections from the anterior inferotemporal area TE to the perirhinal and entorhinal cortices in the macaque monkey. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16:4757-4775.
200. Kondo H., et al. Differential connections of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex with the orbital and medial prefrontal networks in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 2005, 493:479-509.
201. Yoshida M., et al. Anatomical organization of forward fiber projections from area TE to perirhinal neurons representing visual long-term memory in monkeys. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:4257-4262.
202. Insausti R., et al. The entorhinal cortex of the monkey: II. Cortical afferents. J. Comp. Neurol. 1987, 264:356-395.
203. Insausti R., Amaral D.G. Entorhinal cortex of the monkey: IV. Topographical and laminar organization of cortical afferents. J. Comp. Neurol. 2008, 509:608-641.
204. Leonard B.W., et al. Transient memory impairment in monkeys with bilateral lesions of the entorhinal cortex. J. Neurosci. 1995, 15:5637-5659.
205. Witter M.P., et al. Topographical organization of the entorhinal projection to the dentate gyrus of the monkey. J. Neurosci. 1989, 9:216-228.
206. Witter M.P., Amaral D.G. Entorhinal cortex of the monkey: V. Projections to the dentate gyrus, hippocampus, and subicular complex. J. Comp. Neurol. 1991, 307:437-459.
207. Quiroga R.Q., et al. Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain. Nature 2005, 435:1102-1107.
208. Barense M.D., et al. Intact memory for irrelevant information impairs perception in amnesia. Neuron 2012, 75:157-167.
209. Knutson A.R., et al. Visual discrimination performance, memory, and medial temporal lobe function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:13106-13111.
210. Yukie M. Connections between the medial temporal cortex and the CA1 subfield of the hippocampal formation in the Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata). J. Comp. Neurol. 2000, 423:282-298.
211. Zhong Y.M., Rockland K.S. Connections between the anterior inferotemporal cortex (area TE) and CA1 of the hippocampus in monkey. Exp. Brain Res. 2004, 155:311-319.
212. Ichinohe N., Rockland K.S. Zinc-enriched amygdalo- and hippocampo-cortical connections to the inferotemporal cortices in macaque monkey. Neurosci. Res. 2005, 53:57-68.
213. Corkin S. What's new with the amnesic patient H.M.?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:153-160.
214. Moscovitch M., et al. Functional neuroanatomy of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory: a unified account based on multiple trace theory. J. Anat. 2005, 207:35-66.
215. Meunier M., et al. Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys. J. Neurosci. 1993, 13:5418-5432.
216. Murray E.A., Bussey T.J. Perceptual-mnemonic functions of the perirhinal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1999, 3:142-151.
217. Murray E.A., Richmond B.J. Role of perirhinal cortex in object perception, memory, and associations. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2001, 11:188-193.
218. Eichenbaum H., et al. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 30:123-152.
219. Sauvage M.M., et al. Recognition memory: opposite effects of hippocampal damage on recollection and familiarity. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:16-18.
220. Wixted J.T., Squire L.R. The medial temporal lobe and the attributes of memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15:210-217.
221. Wixted J.T., Squire L.R. The role of the human hippocampus in familiarity-based and recollection-based recognition memory. Behav. Brain Res. 2010, 215:197-208.
222. Squire L.R., Wixted J.T. The cognitive neuroscience of human memory since H.M. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2011, 34:259-288.
223. Smith C.N., et al. The hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:15693-15702.
224. Bakker A., et al. Pattern separation in the human hippocampal CA3 and dentate gyrus. Science 2008, 319:1640-1642.
225. Sahay A., et al. Increasing adult hippocampal neurogenesis is sufficient to improve pattern separation. Nature 2011, 472:466-470.
226. Lee I., Solivan F. Dentate gyrus is necessary for disambiguating similar object-place representations. Learn. Mem. 2010, 17:252-258.
227. Aimone J.B., et al. Resolving new memories: a critical look at the dentate gyrus, adult neurogenesis, and pattern separation. Neuron 2011, 70:589-596.
228. Yassa M.A., Stark C.E. Pattern separation in the hippocampus. Trends Neurosci. 2011, 34:515-525.
229. Saleem K.S., et al. Complementary circuits connecting the orbital and medial prefrontal networks with the temporal, insular, and opercular cortex in the macaque monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 2008, 506:659-693.
230. Webster M.J., et al. Connections of inferior temporal areas TEO and TE with parietal and frontal cortex in macaque monkeys. Cereb. Cortex 1994, 4:470-483.
231. Barbas H. Anatomic organization of basoventral and mediodorsal visual recipient prefrontal regions in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 1988, 276:313-342.
232. Critchley H.D., Rolls E.T. Hunger and satiety modify the responses of olfactory and visual neurons in the primate orbitofrontal cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1996, 75:1673-1686.
233. Rolls E.T. The orbitofrontal cortex and reward. Cereb. Cortex 2000, 10:284-294.
234. Schultz W., et al. Reward processing in primate orbitofrontal cortex and basal ganglia. Cereb. Cortex 2000, 10:272-284.
235. Hikosaka K., Watanabe M. Delay activity of orbital and lateral prefrontal neurons of the monkey varying with different rewards. Cereb. Cortex 2000, 10:263-271.
236. Rudebeck P.H., Murray E.A. Balkanizing the primate orbitofrontal cortex: distinct subregions for comparing and contrasting values. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1239:1-13.
237. Walton M.E., et al. Giving credit where credit is due: orbitofrontal cortex and valuation in an uncertain world. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1239:14-24.
238. Young J.J., Shapiro M.L. The orbitofrontal cortex and response selection. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1239:25-32.
239. Balleine B.W., et al. The orbitofrontal cortex, predicted value, and choice. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1239:43-50.
240. Fellows L.K. Orbitofrontal contributions to value-based decision making: evidence from humans with frontal lobe damage. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1239:51-58.
241. Rygula R., et al. Differential contributions of the primate ventrolateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortex to serial reversal learning. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:14552-14559.
242. Clarke H.F., et al. Lesions of the medial striatum in monkeys produce perseverative impairments during reversal learning similar to those produced by lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:10972-10982.
243. Hornak J., et al. Reward-related reversal learning after surgical excisions in orbito-frontal or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2004, 16:463-478.
244. Tsuchida A., et al. Beyond reversal: a critical role for human orbitofrontal cortex in flexible learning from probabilistic feedback. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:16868-16875.
245. Kennerley S.W., et al. Double dissociation of value computations in orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14:1581-1589.
246. Kazama A., Bachevalier J. Selective aspiration or neurotoxic lesions of orbital frontal areas 11 and 13 spared monkeys' performance on the object discrimination reversal task. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:2794-2804.
247. Rudebeck P.H., Murray E.A. Dissociable effects of subtotal lesions within the macaque orbital prefrontal cortex on reward-guided behavior. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:10569-10578.
248. Walton M.E., et al. Separable learning systems in the macaque brain and the role of orbitofrontal cortex in contingent learning. Neuron 2010, 65:927-939.
249. Noonan M.P., et al. Separate value comparison and learning mechanisms in macaque medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:20547-20552.
250. West E.A., et al. Transient inactivation of orbitofrontal cortex blocks reinforcer devaluation in macaques. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:15128-15135.
251. Noonan M.P., et al. Distinct roles of three frontal cortical areas in reward-guided behavior. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:14399-14412.
252. Gerbella M., et al. Cortical connections of the macaque caudal ventrolateral prefrontal areas 45A and 45B. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:141-168.
253. Borra E., et al. Anatomical evidence for the involvement of the macaque ventrolateral prefrontal area 12r in controlling goal-directed actions. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:12351-12363.
254. Rushworth M.F., et al. Attentional selection and action selection in the ventral and orbital prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:11628-11636.
255. Muller N.G., et al. Contributions of subregions of the prefrontal cortex to working memory: evidence from brain lesions in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2002, 14:673-686.
256. du Boisgueheneuc F., et al. Functions of the left superior frontal gyrus in humans: a lesion study. Brain 2006, 129:3315-3328.
257. Volle E., et al. The functional architecture of the left posterior and lateral prefrontal cortex in humans. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:2460-2469.
258. Rossi A.F., et al. Top down attentional deficits in macaques with lesions of lateral prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:11306-11314.
259. O'Reilly R.C. The what and how of prefrontal cortical organization. Trends Neurosci. 2010, 33:355-361.
260. Petrides M. Lateral prefrontal cortex: architectonic and functional organization. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2005, 360:781-795.
261. Miller E.K., Cohen J.D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 24:167-202.
262. Minamimoto T., et al. Monkeys quickly learn and generalize visual categories without lateral prefrontal cortex. Neuron 2010, 66:501-507.
263. Miller E.K. The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2000, 1:59-65.
264. Rao S.C., et al. Integration of what and where in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science 1997, 276:821-824.
265. Romanski L.M. Domain specificity in the primate prefrontal cortex. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2004, 4:421-429.
266. Scalaidhe S.P., et al. Face-selective neurons during passive viewing and working memory performance of rhesus monkeys: evidence for intrinsic specialization of neuronal coding. Cereb. Cortex 1999, 9:459-475.
267. Nelissen K., et al. Observing others: multiple action representation in the frontal lobe. Science 2005, 310:332-336.
268. Wilson F.A., et al. Dissociation of object and spatial processing domains in primate prefrontal cortex. Science 1993, 260:1955-1958.
269. Levy R., Goldman-Rakic P.S. Segregation of working memory functions within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 2000, 133:23-32.
270. Passingham R.E., et al. Specialisation within the prefrontal cortex: the ventral prefrontal cortex and associative learning. Exp. Brain Res. 2000, 133:103-113.
271. Genovesio A., et al. Prefrontal cortex activity during the discrimination of relative distance. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:3968-3980.
272. Meyer T., et al. Stimulus selectivity in dorsal and ventral prefrontal cortex after training in working memory tasks. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:6266-6276.
273. Mishkin M., Manning F.J. Non-spatial memory after selective prefrontal lesions in monkeys. Brain Res. 1978, 143:313-323.
274. Tsao D.Y., et al. Patches of face-selective cortex in the macaque frontal lobe. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:877-879.
275. Romanski L.M., Diehl M.M. Neurons responsive to face-view in the primate ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience 2011, 189:223-235.
276. Chan A.W., Downing P.E. Faces and eyes in human lateral prefrontal cortex. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2011, 5:51.
277. Malkova L., et al. Long-term effects of selective neonatal temporal lobe lesions on learning and memory in monkeys. Behav. Neurosci. 1995, 109:212-226.
278. Op de Beeck H.P., Baker C.I. The neural basis of visual object learning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:22-30.
279. Schall J.D., et al. Topography of visual cortex connections with frontal eye field in macaque: convergence and segregation of processing streams. J. Neurosci. 1995, 15:4464-4487.
280. Kourtzi Z., et al. Development of visually evoked cortical activity in infant macaque monkeys studied longitudinally with fMRI. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006, 24:359-366.
281. Hikosaka K. Responsiveness of neurons in the posterior inferotemporal cortex to visual patterns in the macaque monkey. Behav. Brain Res. 1997, 89:275-283.
282. Weisberg J., et al. A neural system for learning about object function. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:513-521.
283. Dehaene S. The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics 2011, Oxford University Press.
284. Harvey C.D., et al. Choice-specific sequences in parietal cortex during a virtual-navigation decision task. Nature 2012, 484:62-68.
285. Rogalsky C., et al. Functional anatomy of language and music perception: temporal and structural factors investigated using functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:3843-3852.
286. Kristensen L.B., et al. The interface between language and attention: prosodic focus marking recruits a general attention network in spoken language comprehension. Cereb. Cortex 2012, 10.1093/cercor/bhs164.
287. Saleem K.S., et al. Cytoarchitectonic and chemoarchitectonic subdivisions of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 2007, 500:973-1006.
288. Saleem K.S., Logothetis N.K. A combined MRI and histology atlas of the rhesus monkey brain in stereotaxic coordinates 2012, Elsevier/Academic Press, San Diego. 2nd edn.
289. Olman C.A., et al. Distortion and signal loss in medial temporal lobe. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e8160.
290. Visser M., et al. Semantic processing in the anterior temporal lobes: a meta-analysis of the functional neuroimaging literature. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22:1083-1094.
291. McIntosh A.R., et al. Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET. J. Neurosci. 1994, 14:655-666.
292. Skipper L.M., et al. Sensory and semantic category subdivisions within the anterior temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:3419-3429.
293. Anzellotti S., et al. Differential activity for animals and manipulable objects in the anterior temporal lobes. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:2059-2067.
294. Rajimehr R., et al. An anterior temporal face patch in human cortex, predicted by macaque maps. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:1995-2000.
295. Simmons W.K., et al. The selectivity and functional connectivity of the anterior temporal lobes. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:813-825.
296. Kriegeskorte N., et al. Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:20600-20605.
297. Williams M.A., et al. Abnormal configural face perception in a patient with right anterior temporal lobe atrophy. Neurocase 2006, 12:286-291.
298. Gainotti G. Different patterns of famous people recognition disorders in patients with right and left anterior temporal lesions: a systematic review. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:1591-1607.
299. Snowden J.S., et al. Famous people knowledge and the right and left temporal lobes. Behav. Neurol. 2012, 25:35-44.
300. Rotshtein P., et al. Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:107-113.
301. Carmichael S.T., Price J.L. Architectonic subdivision of the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex in the macaque monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 1994, 346:366-402.
302. Born R.T., Bradley D.C. Structure and function of visual area MT. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 28:157-189.
303. Anzai A., DeAngelis G.C. Neural computations underlying depth perception. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2010, 20:367-375.
304. Mysore S.G., et al. The selectivity of neurons in the macaque fundus of the superior temporal area for three-dimensional structure from motion. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:15491-15508.
305. Orban G.A., et al. Extracting 3D structure from disparity. Trends Neurosci. 2006, 29:466-473.
306. Farivar R., et al. Dorsal-ventral integration in the recognition of motion-defined unfamiliar faces. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:5336-5342.
307. Konen C.S., Kastner S. Two hierarchically organized neural systems for object information in human visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:224-231.
308. Konen C.S., et al. The functional neuroanatomy of object agnosia: a case study. Neuron 2011, 71:49-60.
309. Srivastava S., et al. A distinct representation of three-dimensional shape in macaque anterior intraparietal area: fast, metric, and coarse. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:10613-10626.
310. Aguirre G.K., D'Esposito M. Topographical disorientation: a synthesis and taxonomy. Brain 1999, 122:1613-1628.
311. Harel A., et al. Deconstructing visual scenes in cortex: gradients of object and spatial layout information. Cereb. Cortex 2012, 10.1093/cercor/bhs091.
312. Barrash J., et al. The neuroanatomical correlates of route learning impairment. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:820-836.
313. Deco G., Lee T.S. The role of early visual cortex in visual integration: a neural model of recurrent interaction. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004, 20:1089-1100.