Predictors and outcomes of trust in teams

Trust in Military Teams

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 31-47

  Lyons, Joseph B ^a   Stokes, Charlene K ^a   Schneider, Tamera R ^b  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901160816     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., and Judge, T.A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30.
2. Barrick, M.R., Stewart, G.L., Neubert, M.J., and Mount, M.K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391.
3. Begue, L. (2002). Beliefs in justice and faith in people: Just world, religiosity, and interpersonal trust. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 375-382.
4. Bigley, G.A. and Pearce, J.L. (1998). Straining for shared meaning in organizations science: Problems of trust and distrust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 405-421.
5. Burke, C.S., Stagl, K.C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., and Kendall, D. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1189-1207.
6. Carroll, J.B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cohen, S.G. and Bailey, D.E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
8. Aubert, B.A. and Kelsey, B.L. (2003). Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 34, 575-618.
9. Colquitt, J.A., Scott, B.A., and LePine, J.A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 900-927.
10. Couch, L.L. and Jones, W.H. (1997). Measuring levels of trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 319-366.
11. Cummings, L.L. and Bromiley, P. (1996). The organizational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. In R.M. Kramer and T.R. Tyler (eds), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, 302-330. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Dirks, K.T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 445-455.
13. Dirks, K.T. and Ferrin, D.L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organizational Science, 12, 450-467.
14. Dirks, K.T. and Ferrin, D.L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611-628.
15. Drasgow, F. (2003). Intelligence and the workplace. In W.C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, and R. J. Klimoski (eds), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12, 107-130. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
16. Ferrin, D.L., Dirks, K.T., and Shah, P.P. (2006). Direct and indirect effects on third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 870-883.
17. Fuller, M.A., Mayer, R.C., and Pike, R.E. (2008). Media and familiarity effects on assessing trustworthiness: 'What did they mean by that?' In L.L. Brennan and V.E. Johnson (eds), Computer-mediated Relationships and Trust: Managerial and Organizational Effects, 56-74, Hershey, NY: Information Science Reference.
18. Gallagher, M.E. (2005, November). High rolling leaders: The 'Big Five' Model of personality and risk-taking during war. http://www6.miami.edu/maia/ISAS05/papers/Gallagher_ISAS05.pdf, accessed October 31, 2007.
19. Gallupe, R.B., DeSanctis, G., and Dickson, G.W. (1988). Computer-based support for group problem finding: An experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly, 12, 277-298.
20. Goldberg, L.R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
21. Hertel, G., Geister, S., and Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of the current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69-95.
22. Hollenbeck, J.R., Moon, H., Ellis, A.P.J., West, B.J., Ilgen, D.R., Sheppard, L., Porter, C.O.L.H., and Wagner, J.A. (2002). Structural contingency theory and individual differences: Examination of external and internal person-team fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 599-606.
23. International Personality Item Pool: A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences. http://ipip.ori.org/, accessed 21 June, 2005.
24. Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Leidner, D.E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organizational Science, 10, 791-815.
25. Kimmerle, J., Cress, U., and Hesse, F.W. (2007). An interactional perspective on group awareness: Alleviating the information-exchange dilemma (for everybody?). International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 899-910.
26. Kowert, P.A. and Hermann, M.G. (1997). Who takes risks? Daring and caution in foreign policy making. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41, 611-637.
27. Kozlowski, S.W.J. and Bell, B.S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. Borman and D. Ilgen (eds), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12, 333-375. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
28. Levin, D.Z., Whitener, E.M., and Cross, R. (2006). Perceived trustworthiness of knowledge sources: The moderating impact of relationship length. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1163-1171.
29. Lewis, J.D. and Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63, 967-985.
30. Lyons, J.B., Stokes, C.K., Palumbo, M., Boyle, E., Seyba, J., and Ames, D. (2008). Bringing logistics into the laboratory: The development of a team-based logistics task. Air Force Journal of Logistics, 31, 49-55.
31. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., and Schoorman, F.D. (1995). An integration model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
32. McCrae, R.R. and Costa, Jr., P.T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
33. McCrae, R.R. and Costa, Jr., P.T. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586-595.
34. McCrae, R.R. and John, O.P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
35. McAllister, D.J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59.
36. Merritt, S.M. and Ilgen, D.R. (2008). Not all trust is created equal: Dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions. Human Factors, 50, 194-210.
37. Miller, J.D., Lyman, D., Zimmerman, R.S., Logan, T.K., Leukefeld, C., and Clayton, R. (2004). The utility of the Five-Factor Model in understanding risky sexual behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1611-1626.
38. Moss, S.A., Garivaldis, F.J., and Toukhsati, S.R. (2007). The perceived similarity of other individuals: The contaminating effects of familiarity and neuroticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 401-412.
39. Mount, M.K., Barrick, M.R., and Stewart, G.L. (1998). Five-Factor Model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human Performance, 11, 145-167.
40. Mullen, B. and Cooper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.
41. Nam, C.S., Lyons, J.B., Hwang, H., and Kim, S. (2009). The process of team communication in multi-cultural contexts: An empirical study using Bales' interaction process analysis (IPA). International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39, 771-782.
42. Nauqin, C.E. and Paulson, G.D. (2003). Online bargaining and interpersonal trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 113-120.
43. Neuman, G.A. and Wright, J. (1999). Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 376-389.
44. Nicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton-O'Creevy, M., and William, P. (2005). Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8, 157-176.
45. Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., and Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 612-624.
46. Rotter, J.B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1-7.
47. Schmidt, F.L. and Hunter, J.E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
48. Schneider, T.R. (2004). The role of neuroticism on psychological and physiological stress responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 795-804.
49. Spearman, C. (1927). The Abilities of Man. New York: MacMillan.
50. Staples, S.D. and Webster, J. (2008). Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams. Information Systems, 18, 617-640.
51. Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group Processes and Productivity. New York: Academic Press.
52. Stevens, M.J. and Campion, M.A. (1999). Staffing work teams: Development and validation of a selection test for teamwork settings. Journal of Management, 25, 207-228.
53. Straus, S.G. (1997). Technology, group process, and group outcomes: Testing the connections in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 227-266.
54. Williams, W.M. and Sternberg, R.J. (1988). Group intelligence: Why some groups are better than others. Intelligence, 12, 351-377.
55. Wonderlic, C. (1983). Wonderlic Personnel Test Manual, Northfield, IL: E.F. Wonderlic and Associates.