Nanometer-scale features on micrometer-scale surface texturing: A bone histological, gene expression, and nanomechanical study

Bone

Volumn 65, Issue , 2014, Pages 25-32

  Coelho, Paulo G ^a   Takayama, Tadahiro ^a   Yoo, Daniel ^a   Jimbo, Ryo ^b   Karunagaran, Sanjay ^c   Tovar, Nick ^a   Janal, Malvin N ^d   Yamano, Seiichi ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gene expression; Nanomechanics; Nanotopography; Osseointegration

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN TYPE 1; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOPONTIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR RUNX2; PRIMER DNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE IMPLANT; BONE MINERALIZATION; BONE TISSUE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COL 1 GENE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HARDNESS; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; MICROMETER SCALE TEXTURE; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MORPHOMETRICS; NANOMETER SCALE TEXTURE; NONHUMAN; OCN GENE; OPN GENE; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOBLAST; OSTEOPROGENITOR CELL; OSTERIX GENE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAT; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RODENT; RUNX 2 GENE; SURFACE PROPERTY; UPREGULATION; YOUNG MODULUS; ANIMAL; BONE; METABOLISM; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BONE AND BONES; DNA PRIMERS; GENE EXPRESSION; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84901059817     PISSN: 87563282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Jimbo R., Coelho P.G., Bryington M., Baldassarri M., Tovar N., Currie F., et al. Nano hydroxyapatite-coated implants improve bone nanomechanical properties. J Dent Res 2012, 91:1172-1177.
2. Albrektsson T., Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 2-review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2004, 17:544-564.
3. Albrektsson T., Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 1-review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004, 17:536-543.
4. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010, 25:63-74.
5. Hulshoff J.E., van Dijk K., van der Waerden J.P., Wolke J.G., Kalk W., Jansen J.A. Evaluation of plasma-spray and magnetron-sputter Ca-P-coated implants: an in vivo experiment using rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 1996, 31:329-337.
6. Coelho P.G., Freire J.N., Granato R., Marin C., Bonfante E.A., Gil J.N., et al. Bone mineral apposition rates at early implantation times around differently prepared titanium surfaces: a study in beagle dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011, 26:63-69.
7. Junker R., Manders P.J., Wolke J., Borisov Y., Jansen J.A. Bone-supportive behavior of microplasma-sprayed CaP-coated implants: mechanical and histological outcome in the goat. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010, 21:189-200.
8. Giavaresi G., Fini M., Cigada A., Chiesa R., Rondelli G., Rimondini L., et al. Histomorphometric and microhardness assessments of sheep cortical bone surrounding titanium implants with different surface treatments. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003, 67:112-120.
9. Albrektsson T. Hydroxyapatite-coated implants: a case against their use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998, 56:1312-1326.
10. Johnson B.W. HA-coated dental implants: long-term consequences. J Calif Dent Assoc 1992, 20:33-41.
11. Gottlander M., Johansson C.B., Albrektsson T. Short- and long-term animal studies with a plasma-sprayed calcium phosphate-coated implant. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997, 8:345-351.
12. Mendes V.C., Moineddin R., Davies J.E. The effect of discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone-bonding to titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 2007, 28:4748-4755.
13. Yang Y., Kim K.H., Ong J.L. A review on calcium phosphate coatings produced using a sputtering process-an alternative to plasma spraying. Biomaterials 2005, 26:327-337.
14. Lacefield W.R. Current status of ceramic coatings for dental implants. Implant Dent 1998, 7:315-322.
15. Coelho P.G., Granato R., Marin C., Jimbo R., Lin S., Witek L., et al. Effect of Si addition on Ca- and P-impregnated implant surfaces with nanometer-scale roughness: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012, 23:373-378.
16. Bonfante E.A., Granato R., Marin C., Jimbo R., Giro G., Suzuki M., et al. Biomechanical testing of microblasted, acid-etched/microblasted, anodized, and discrete crystalline deposition surfaces: an experimental study in beagle dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013, 28:136-142.
17. Coelho P.G., Granato R., Marin C., Bonfante E.A., Janal M.N., Suzuki M. Biomechanical and bone histomorphologic evaluation of four surfaces on plateau root form implants: an experimental study in dogs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010, 109:e39-e45.
18. Burgess A.V., Story B.J., Wagner W.R., Trisi P., Pikos M.A., Guttenberg S.A. Highly crystalline MP-1 hydroxylapatite coating. Part II: in vivo performance on endosseous root implants in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999, 10:257-266.
19. Coelho P.G., Suzuki M. Evaluation of an IBAD thin-film process as an alternative method for surface incorporation of bioceramics on dental implants: a study in dogs. J Appl Oral Sci 2005, 13:87-92.
20. Lemons J.E. Biomaterials, biomechanics, tissue healing, and immediate-function dental implants. J Oral Implantol 2004, 30:318-324.
21. Ong J.L., Carnes D.L., Bessho K. Evaluation of titanium plasma-sprayed and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite implants in vivo. Biomaterials 2004, 25:4601-4606.
22. Orsini G., Piattelli M., Scarano A., Petrone G., Kenealy J., Piattelli A., et al. Randomized, controlled histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of implants with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate added to the dual acid-etched surface in the human posterior maxilla. J Periodontol 2007, 78:209-218.
23. Park Y.S., Yi K.Y., Lee I.S., Han C.H., Jung Y.C. The effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the grit-blasted surface of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005, 20:31-38.
24. Huang S., Ingber D.E. Shape-dependent control of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis: switching between attractors in cell regulatory networks. Exp Cell Res 2000, 261:91-103.
25. Gittens R.A., McLachlan T., Olivares-Navarrete R., Cai Y., Berner S., Tannenbaum R., et al. The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation. Biomaterials 2011, 32:3395-3403.
26. Guida L., Annunziata M., Rocci A., Contaldo M., Rullo R., Oliva A. Biological response of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to fluoride-modified titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010, 21:1234-1241.
27. Jimbo R., Coelho P.G., Vandeweghe S., Schwartz-Filho H.O., Hayashi M., Ono D., et al. Histological and three-dimensional evaluation of osseointegration to nanostructured calcium phosphate-coated implants. Acta Biomater 2011, 7:4229-4234.
28. Ellingsen J.E., Johansson C.B., Wennerberg A., Holmen A. Improved retention and bone-to-implant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004, 19:659-666.
29. Jimbo R., Xue Y., Hayashi M., Schwartz-Filho H.O., Andersson M., Mustafa K., et al. Genetic responses to nanostructured calcium-phosphate-coated implants. J Dent Res 2011, 90:1422-1427.
30. Hayashi M., Jimbo R., Xue Y., Mustafa K., Andersson M., Wennerberg A. Photocatalytically induced hydrophilicity influences bone remodelling at longer healing periods: a rabbit study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2014, 25:749-754.
31. Donath K., Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Sage-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 1982, 11:318-326.
32. Butz F., Aita H., Wang C.J., Ogawa T. Harder and stiffer bone osseointegrated to roughened titanium. J Dent Res 2006, 85:560-565.
33. Hoffler C.E., Guo X.E., Zysset P.K., Goldstein S.A. An application of nanoindentation technique to measure bone tissue Lamellae properties. J Biomech Eng 2005, 127:1046-1053.
34. Hoffler C.E., Moore K.E., Kozloff K., Zysset P.K., Brown M.B., Goldstein S.A. Heterogeneity of bone lamellar-level elastic moduli. Bone 2000, 26:603-609.
35. Lee K.L., Sobieraj M., Baldassarri M., Gupta N., Pinisetty D., Janal M.N., et al. The effects of loading conditions and specimen environment on the nanomechanical response of canine cortical bone. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2013, 33:4582-4586.
36. Jimbo R., Anchieta R., Baldassarri M., Granato R., Marin C., Teixeira H.S., et al. Histomorphometry and bone mechanical property evolution around different implant systems at early healing stages: an experimental study in dogs. Implant Dent 2013, 22:596-603.
37. Bougas K., Jimbo R., Vandeweghe S., Tovar N., Baldassarri M., Alenezi A., et al. In vivo evaluation of a novel implant coating agent: laminin-1. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013.
38. Anchieta R.B., Baldassarri M., Guastaldi F., Tovar N., Janal M.N., Gottlow J., et al. Mechanical property assessment of bone healing around a titanium-zirconium alloy dental implant. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013.
39. Baldassarri M., Bonfante E., Suzuki M., Marin C., Granato R., Tovar N., et al. Mechanical properties of human bone surrounding plateau root form implants retrieved after 0.3-24years of function. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2012, 100:2015-2021.
40. Yamano S., Al-Sowygh Z.H., Gallucci G.O., Wada K., Weber H.-P., Sukotjo C. Early peri-implant tissue reactions on different titanium surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011, 22:815-819.
41. Yamano S., Haku K., Yamanaka T., Dai J., Takayama T., Shohara R., et al. The effect of a bioactive collagen membrane releasing PDGF or GDF-5 on bone regeneration. Biomaterials 2014, 35:2446-2453.
42. Bryington M.S., Hayashi M., Kozai Y., Vandeweghe S., Andersson M., Wennerberg A., et al. The influence of nano hydroxyapatite coating on osseointegration after extended healing periods. Dent Mater 2013, 29:514-520.
43. Meirelles L., Arvidsson A., Andersson M., Kjellin P., Albrektsson T., Wennerberg A. Nano hydroxyapatite structures influence early bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008, 87:299-307.
44. Hansson S., Norton M. The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model. J Biomech 1999, 32:829-836.
45. Schwartz Z., Nasazky E., Boyan B.D. Surface microtopography regulates osteointegration: the role of implant surface microtopography in osteointegration. Alpha Omegan 2005, 98:9-19.
46. Liu H., Webster T.J. Nanomedicine for implants: a review of studies and necessary experimental tools. Biomaterials 2007, 28:354-369.
47. Lamolle S.F., Monjo M., Rubert M., Haugen H.J., Lyngstadaas S.P., Ellingsen J.E. The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of titanium surface on nanostructural and chemical changes and the growth of MC3T3-E1 cells. Biomaterials 2009, 30:736-742.
48. Zhao L., Mei S., Chu P.K., Zhang Y., Wu Z. The influence of hierarchical hybrid micro/nano-textured titanium surface with titania nanotubes on osteoblast functions. Biomaterials 2010, 31:5072-5082.
49. Schwartz Z., Olivares-Navarrete R., Wieland M., Cochran D.L., Boyan B.D. Mechanisms regulating increased production of osteoprotegerin by osteoblasts cultured on microstructured titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 2009, 30:3390-3396.
50. Ogawa T., Sukotjo C., Nishimura I. Modulated bone matrix-related gene expression is associated with differences in interfacial strength of different implant surface roughness. J Prosthodont 2002, 11:241-247.
51. Takeuchi K., Saruwatari L., Nakamura H.K., Yang J.M., Ogawa T. Enhanced intrinsic biomechanical properties of osteoblastic mineralized tissue on roughened titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005, 72:296-305.
52. Davies J.E. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003, 67:932-949.
53. Xu B., Zhang J., Brewer E., Tu Q., Yu L., Tang J., et al. Osterix enhances BMSC-associated osseointegration of implants. J Dent Res 2009, 88:1003-1007.
54. Park J.-W., Kim Y.-J., Jang J.-H., Song H. Positive modulation of osteogenesis- and osteoclastogenesis-related gene expression with strontium-containing microstructured Ti implants in rabbit cancellous bone. J Biomed Mater Res A 2013, 101A:298-306.
55. 2 nanonodular structures in a micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy model. Biomaterials 2009, 30:5319-5329.
56. Nakashima K., Zhou X., Kunkel G., Zhang Z., Deng J.M., Behringer R.R., et al. The novel zinc finger-containing transcription factor osterix is required for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Cell 2002, 108:17-29.
57. Miron R.J., Saulacic N., Buser D., Iizuka T., Sculean A. Osteoblast proliferation and differentiation on a barrier membrane in combination with BMP2 and TGFβ1. Clin Oral Investig 2012, 17:981-988.
58. Huang W., Yang S., Shao J., Li Y.P. Signaling and transcriptional regulation in osteoblast commitment and differentiation. Front Biosci 2007, 12:3068-3092.
59. Cowles E.A., DeRome M.E., Pastizzo G., Brailey L.L., Gronowicz G.A. Mineralization and the expression of matrix proteins during in vivo bone development. Calcif Tissue Int 1998, 62:74-82.
60. Yonezawa T., Lee J.W., Hibino A., Asai M., Hojo H., Cha B.Y., et al. Harmine promotes osteoblast differentiation through bone morphogenetic protein signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2011, 409:260-265.
61. Boivin G., Morel G., Lian J.B., Anthoine-Terrier C., Dubois P.M., Meunier P.J. Localization of endogenous osteocalcin in neonatal rat bone and its absence in articular cartilage: effect of warfarin treatment. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1990, 417:505-512.
62. Komori T., Kishimoto T. Cbfa1 in bone development. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1998, 8:494-499.
63. Ma H.P., Ming L.G., Ge B.F., Zhai Y.K., Song P., Xian C.J., et al. Icariin is more potent than genistein in promoting osteoblast differentiation and mineralization in vitro. J Cell Biochem 2011, 112:916-923.
64. Pinzone J.J., Hall B.M., Thudi N.K., Vonau M., Qiang Y.W., Rosol T.J., et al. The role of Dickkopf-1 in bone development, homeostasis, and disease. Blood 2009, 113:517-525.
65. Suzuki A., Ghayor C., Guicheux J., Magne D., Quillard S., Kakita A., et al. Enhanced expression of the inorganic phosphate transporter Pit-1 is involved in BMP-2-induced matrix mineralization in osteoblast-like cells. J Bone Miner Res 2006, 21:674-683.
66. Hoemann C.D., El-Gabalawy H., McKee M.D. In vitro osteogenesis assays: influence of the primary cell source on alkaline phosphatase activity and mineralization. Pathol Biol (Paris) 2009, 57:318-323.
67. Breding K., Jimbo R., Hayashi M., Xue Y., Mustafa K., Andersson M. The effect of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals on osseointegration of titanium implants: an in vivo rabbit study. Int J Dent 2014, 2014:1-9.
68. Watts N.B. Clinical utility of biochemical markers of bone remodeling. Clin Chem 1999, 45:1359-1368.