Biomechanical testing of microblasted, acid-etched/microblasted, anodized, and discrete crystalline deposition surfaces: An Experimental Study in Beagle Dogs

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 136-142

  Bonfante, Estevam A ^a   Granato, Rodrigo ^a   Marin, Charles ^a   Jimbo, Ryo ^b   Giro, Gabriela ^c   Suzuki, Marcelo ^d   Coelho, Paulo G ^c,e  

^a Inst Ciencias Exatas e da Natureza   (Brazil)

^b Malmö University   (Brazil)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^e NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental implant; Histology; In vivo; Osseointegration; Surface properties

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; DENTAL SURGERY; DEVICE REMOVAL; DOG; INTERFEROMETRY; MALE; RADIUS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOOTH IMPLANT; TORQUE; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

ANIMALS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DEVICE REMOVAL; DOGS; INTERFEROMETRY; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; RADIUS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TORQUE;

TOOTH IMPLANT;

EID: 84893351746     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2331     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J 2001; 10(suppl 2):S96-101.
2. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: Clinical significance. Int J Prosthodont 1993; 6: 95-105.
3. Brånemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969; 3: 81-100.
4. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1-Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 536-543.
5. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2-Review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 544-564.
6. Lemons J, Dietch-Misch F. Biomaterials for dental implants. In: Misch CE (ed). Contemporary Implant Denstistry. St Louis: Mosby, 1999:271-302.
7. Lemons JE. Biomaterials, biomechanics, tissue healing, and immediatefunction dental implants. J Oral Implantol 2004; 30: 318-324.
8. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Coelho PG, Kang BS, Sul YT, Albrektsson T. Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: Materials, chemistry and topography. Trends Biotechnol 2010; 28: 198-206.
9. Coelho PG, Granjeiro JM, Romanos GE, et al. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 88: 579-596.
10. Marin C, Granato R, Suzuki M, Gil JN, Piattelli A, Coelho PG. Removal torque and histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic grit-blasted/ acid-etched and dual acid-etched implant surfaces: An experimental study in dogs. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 1942-1949.
11. Telleman G, Albrektsson T, Hoffman M, et al. Peri-implant endosseous healing properties of dual acid-etched mini-implants with a nanometer-sized deposition of CaP: A histological and histomorphometric human study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 12: 153-160.
12. Vignoletti F, Johansson C, Albrektsson T, De Sanctis M, San Roman F, Sanz M. Early healing of implants placed into fresh extraction sockets:An experimental study in the beagle dog. De novo bone formation. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36: 265-277.
13. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Petronis S, et al. Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: The oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 491-501.
14. Elias CN, Oshida Y, Lima JH, Muller CA. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2008; 1: 234-242.
15. Shibli JA, Grassi S, Piattelli A, et al. Histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic molecular impregnated and dual acid-etched implant surfaces in the human posterior maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010 Dec;12(4): 281-288.
16. Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. Discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystalline deposition enhances osteoconduction on titanium-based implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 90: 577-585.
17. Leach R. Surface topography characterisatio. In: Fundamental Principles of Engineering Nanometrology, ed 1. Amsterdam: William Andrew Pub, 2009:211-258.
18. Stout K, Sullivan P, Dong W, et al. Development of methods for the characterisation of roughness in three dimensions. Luxembourg, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000.
19. Coelho PG, Lemons JE. Physico/chemical characterization and in vivo evaluation of nanothickness bioceramic depositions on aluminablasted/ acid-etched Ti-6Al-4V implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 90: 351-361.
20. Granato R, Marin C, Suzuki M, Gil JN, Janal MN, Coelho PG. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of a thin ion beam bioceramic deposition on plateau root form implants: an experimental study in dogs. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 90: 396-403.
21. Coelho PG, Suzuki M, Guimaraes MV, et al. Early bone healing around different implant bulk designs and surgical techniques: A study in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 12: 202-208.
22. Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Sage-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11: 318-326.
23. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, de Wild M, Wieland M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 76: 323-334.
24. Lee JE, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK, Han CH, Lee SJ. Healing response of cortical and cancellous bone around titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 655-662.
25. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 381-392.
26. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, Lindhe J. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 251-262.
27. Leonard G, Coelho P, Polyzois I, Stassen L, Claffey N. A study of the bone healing kinetics of plateau versus screw root design titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 232-239.
28. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous ja. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977; 16: 1-132.
29. Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. The effect of discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone-bonding to titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 4748-4755.
30. Coelho PG, Cardaropoli G, Suzuki M, Lemons JE. Early healing of nanothickness bioceramic coatings on dental implants. An experimental study in dogs. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 88: 387-393.
31. Jimbo R, Sawase T, Baba K, Kurogi T, Shibata Y, Atsuta M. Enhanced initial cell responses to chemically modified anodized titanium. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008; 10: 55-61.
32. Meirelles L, Arvidsson A, Andersson M, Kjellin P, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Nano hydroxyapatite structures influence early bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008; 87: 299-307.
33. Ogawa T, Ozawa S, Shih JH, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of osseous implants having different surface topographies in rats. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 1857-1863.