Histomorphometry and bone mechanical property evolution around different implant systems at early healing stages: An experimental study in dogs

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 596-603

  Jimbo, Ryo ^a   Anchieta, Rodolfo ^b   Baldassarri, Marta ^b   Granato, Rodrigo ^c   Marin, Charles ^d   Teixeira, Hellen S ^e   Tovar, Nick ^b   Vandeweghe, Stefan ^f   Janal, Malvin N ^b   Coelho, Paulo G ^b  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina ^*

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^e Inst Ciencias Exatas e da Natureza   (Brazil)

^f GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

histology; nanoindentation; osseointegration

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DOG; PROCEDURES; SURGERY; TIBIA; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DOGS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; TIBIA; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84888128913     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31829f1f4b     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Hansson S, Norton M. The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model. J Biomech. 1999; 32:829-836.
2. Halldin A, Jimbo R, Johansson CB, et al. The effect of static bone strain on implant stability and bone remodeling. Bone. 2011;49:783-789.
3. Coelho PG, Granato R, Marin C, et al. The effect of different implant macrogeometries and surface treatment in early biomechanical fixation: An experimental study in dogs. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4:1974-1981.
4. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Ulrich H, et al. An optical three-dimensional technique for topographical descriptions of surgical implants. J Biomed Eng. 1992; 14:412-418.
5. Valverde GB, Jimbo R, Teixeira HS, et al. Evaluation of surface roughness as a function of multiple blasting processing variables. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24: 238-242.
6. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1dReview focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:536-543.
7. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res. 2004;83:529-533.
8. Sul YT. Electrochemical growth behavior, surface properties, and enhanced in vivo bone response of TiO2 nanotubes on microstructured surfaces of blasted, screw-shaped titanium implants. Int J Nanomedicine. 2010; 5:87-100.
9. Sul YT, Kang BS, Johansson C, et al. The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;89: 942-950.
10. Hayashi M, Jimbo R, Lindh L, et al. In vitro characterization and osteoblast responses to nanostructured photocatalytic TiO2 coated surfaces. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:2411-2416.
11. Sawase T, Jimbo R, Wennerberg A, et al. A novel characteristic of porous titanium oxide implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:680-685.
12. Vouros ID, Kalpidis CD, Horvath A, et al. Systematic assessment of clinical outcomes in bone-level and tissue-level endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:1359-1374.
13. Jimbo R, Fernandez-Rodriguez J, Sul YT, et al. Principal component analysis: A novel analysis to evaluate the characteristics of osseointegration of different implant surfaces. Implant Dent. 2011;20: 364-368.
14. Johansson CB, Gretzer C, Jimbo R, et al. Enhanced implant integration with hierarchically structured implants: A pilot study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:943-953.
15. Pessoa RS, Coelho PG, Muraru L, et al. Influence of implant design on the biomechanical environment of immediately placed implants: Computed tomographybased nonlinear three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:1279-1287.
16. Jimbo R, Coelho PG, Vandeweghe S, et al. Histological and three-dimensional evaluation of osseointegration to nanostructured calcium phosphate-coated implants. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:4229-4234.
17. Jimbo R, Xue Y, Hayashi M, et al. Genetic responses to nanostructured calcium-phosphate-coated implants. J Dent Res. 2011;90:1422-1427.
18. Omar O, Suska F, Lenneras M, et al. The influence of bone type on the gene expression in normal bone and at the bone-implant interface: Experiments in animal model. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13:146-156.
19. Omar O, Svensson S, Zoric N, et al. In vivo gene expression in response to anodically oxidized versus machined titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;92:1552-1566.
20. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, et al. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoridemodified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:659-666.
21. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, et al. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: A pilot study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34:78-86.
22. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, et al. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA titanium implants: Preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18: 481-488.
23. Cooper LF, Zhou Y, Takebe J, et al. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 gritblasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials. 2006;27:926-936.
24. Xu HH, Smith DT, Jahanmir S, et al. Indentation damage and mechanical properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res. 1998;77:472-480.
25. Wallace JM. Applications of atomic force microscopy for the assessment of nanoscale morphological and mechanical properties of bone. Bone. 2012;50: 420-427.
26. Oliver WC, Pharr GM. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic-modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res. 1992;7:1564-1583.
27. Hoffler CE, Moore KE, Kozloff K, et al. Heterogeneity of bone lamellar-level elastic moduli. Bone. 2000;26:603-609.
28. Hoffler CE, Guo XE, Zysset PK, et al. An application of nanoindentation technique to measure bone tissue lamellae properties. J Biomech Eng. 2005;127: 1046-1053.
29. Oliver WC, Pharr GM. A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments. J Mater Res. 1992;1:601-609.
30. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:172-184.
31. Grizon F, Aguado E, Hure G, et al. Enhanced bone integration of implants with increased surface roughness: A long term study in the sheep. J Dent. 2002;30: 195-203.
32. Kohal RJ, Weng D, Bachle M, et al. Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: An animal experiment. J Periodontol. 2004;75:1262-1268.
33. Zysset PK, Guo XE, Hoffler CE, et al. Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur. J Biomech. 1999;32:1005-1012.
34. Ascenzi A, Baschieri P, Benvenuti A. The bending properties of single osteons. J Biomech. 1990;23:763-771.
35. Ascenzi A, Bonucci E. The tensile properties of single osteons. Anat Rec. 1967;158:375-386.
36. Evans GP, Behiri JC, Currey JD, et al. Microhardness and Young's modulus in cortical bone exhibiting a wide range of mineral volume fractions, and in a bone analogue. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1990;1:38-43.
37. Hengsberger S, Kulik A, Zysset P. Nanoindentation discriminates the elastic properties of individual human bone lamellae under dry and physiological conditions. Bone. 2002;30:178-184.
38. Viswanath B, Raghavan R, Gurao NP, et al. Mechanical properties of tricalcium phosphate single crystals grown by molten salt synthesis. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:1448-1454.
39. Nagisa N, Nakano T, Hashiguchi N, et al. Analysis of biological apatite orientation in rat mandibles. Oral Sci Int. 2009;7: 19-25.
40. Hansson S, Werke M. The implant thread as a retention element in cortical bone: The effect of thread size and thread profile: A finite element study. J Biomech. 2003;36:1247-1258.
41. Cordey J, Blumlein H, Ziegler W, et al. [Study of the behavior in the course of time of the holding power of cortical screws in vivo]. Acta Orthop Belg. 1976; 42:75-87.
42. Albrektsson T. Hard tissue implant interface. Aust Dent J. 2008;53:S34-S38.