Mechanical property assessment of bone healing around a titanium-zirconium alloy dental implant

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 913-919

  Anchieta, Rodolfo B ^a,b   Baldassarri, Marta ^a   Guastaldi, Fernando ^a,b   Tovar, Nick ^a   Janal, Malvin N ^a   Gottlow, Jan ^c   Dard, Michel ^a   Jimbo, Ryo ^d   Coelho, Paulo G ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^d MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Animal model; Biomechanics; Bone; Dental endosteal implants; Nanoindentation

Indexed keywords

ALLOY; DENTAL MATERIAL; TI-ZR ALLOY; TITANIUM; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; BONE IMPLANT INTERFACE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE REMODELING; CHEMISTRY; FEMALE; HARDNESS; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; MINIPIG; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PIG; TOOTH IMPLANT; WOUND HEALING; YOUNG MODULUS;

ALLOYS; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BONE REMODELING; BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; ELASTIC MODULUS; FEMALE; HARDNESS; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OSSEOINTEGRATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SWINE; SWINE, MINIATURE; TITANIUM; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84922768412     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12061     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Rungsiyakull C, Li Q, Sun G, Li W, Swain MV. Surface morphology optimization for osseointegration of coated implants. Biomaterials 2010; 31:7196-7204.
2. Kutty MG, Bhaduri S, Bhaduri SB. Gradient surface porosity in titanium dental implants: relation between processing parameters and microstructure. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004; 15:145-150.
3. Branemark PI, Adell R, Albrektsson T, Lekholm U, Lundkvist S, Rockler B. Osseointegrated titanium fixtures in the treatment of edentulousness. Biomaterials 1983; 4:25-28.
4. Shen H, Li H, Brinson LC. Effect of microstructural configurations on the mechanical responses of porous titanium: a numerical design of experiment analysis for orthopedic applications. Mech Mater 2008; 40:708-720.
5. Niinomi M. Mechanical biocompatibilities of titanium alloys for biomedical applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2008; 1:30-42.
6. Butz F, Aita H, Wang CJ, Ogawa T. Harder and stiffer bone osseointegrated to roughened titanium. J Dent Res 2006; 85:560-565.
7. Johansson CB, Hansson HA, Albrektsson T. Qualitative interfacial study between bone and tantalum, niobium or commercially pure titanium. Biomaterials 1990; 11:277-280.
8. Helsingen AL, Lyberg T. Comparative surface analysis and clinical performance studies of Branemark implants and related clones. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9:422-430.
9. McCracken M. Dental implant materials: commercially pure titanium and titanium alloys. J Prosthodont 1999; 8:40-43.
10. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5:347-359.
11. Balshi TJ. An analysis and management of fractured implants: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11:660-666.
12. Saulacic N, Bosshardt DD, Bornstein MM, Berner S, Buser D. Bone apposition to a titanium-zirconium alloy implant, as compared to two other titanium-containing implants. Eur Cell Mater 2012; 23:273-286. discussion 286-278.
13. Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. The effect of discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone-bonding to titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 2007; 28:4748-4755.
14. Browaeys H, Vandeweghe S, Johansson CB, Jimbo R, Deschepper E, De Bruyn H. The histological evaluation of osseointegration of surface enhanced microimplants immediately loaded in conjunction with sinuslifting in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24:36-44.
15. Stenport VF, Johansson CB. Evaluations of bone tissue integration to pure and alloyed titanium implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008; 10:191-199.
16. Grandin HM, Berner S, Dard M. A review of titanium zirconium (TiZr) alloys for use in endosseous dental implants. Materials 2012; 5:1348-1360.
17. Gottlow J, Dard M, Kjellson F, Obrecht M, Sennerby L. Evaluation of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14:538-545.
18. Thoma DS, Jones AA, Dard M, Grize L, Obrecht M, Cochran DL. Tissue integration of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine. J Periodontol 2011; 82:1453-1461.
19. Baldassarri M, Bonfante E, Suzuki M, etal. Mechanical properties of human bone surrounding plateau root form implants retrieved after 0.3-24 years of function. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2012; 100B:2015-2021.
20. Jimbo R, Coelho PG, Bryington M, etal. Nano hydroxyapatite-coated implants improve bone nanomechanical properties. J Dent Res 2012; 91:1172-1177.
21. Doerner MF, Nix WD. A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments. J Mater Res 1986; 1:601-609.
22. Hoffler CE, Guo XE, Zysset PK, Goldstein SA. An application of nanoindentation technique to measure bone tissue Lamellae properties. J Biomech Eng 2005; 127:1046-1053.
23. Hoffler CE, Moore KE, Kozloff K, Zysset PK, Brown MB, Goldstein SA. Heterogeneity of bone lamellar-level elastic moduli. Bone 2000; 26:603-609.
24. Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce SG. Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cell Mater 2007; 13:1-10.
25. Bernhard N, Berner S, De Wild M, Wieland M. The binary TiZr alloy - a newly developed Ti alloy for use in dental implants. Forum Implantologicum 2009; 5:30-39.
26. Wennerberg A, Svanborg LM, Berner S, Andersson M. Spontaneously formed nanostructures on titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24:203-209.
27. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981; 52:155-170.
28. Schwartz Z, Lohmann CH, Oefinger J, Bonewald LF, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Implant surface characteristics modulate differentiation behavior of cells in the osteoblastic lineage. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13:38-48.
29. Vayron R, Barthel E, Mathieu V, Soffer E, Anagnostou F, Haiat G. Variation of biomechanical properties of newly formed bone tissue determined by nanoindentation as a function of healing time. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2011; 14:139-140.