Healthcare students' perceptions of electronic feedback through grademark®

Journal of Information Technology Education:Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 27-47

  Watkins, Dianne ^a   Dummer, Paul ^a   Hawthorne, Kamila ^a   Cousins, Judy ^a   Emmett, Catherine ^a   Johnson, Mike ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electronic feedback; Quality feedback; Student per ceptions

Indexed keywords

GRADING;

ELECTRONIC FEEDBACK; ELECTRONIC TOOLS; ENHANCE LEARNING; INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET ACCESS; QUALITY FEEDBACKS; QUALITY OF FEEDBACKS; STUDENTS' PERSPECTIVES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84900035472     PISSN: 15479714     EISSN: 15393585     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.28945/1945     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adcroft, A. (2010). Speaking the same language? Perceptions of feedback amongst academic staffand students in a school of law. The Law Teacher, 44(3), 250-266.
2. Agius, N. M., and Wilkinson, A. (in press). Students' and teachers' views of written feedback at undergradu-ate level: A literature review. Nurse Education Today. Retrieved January 12th, 2014, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.005
3. Archer, J. C. (2010). State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedback. Medical Education, 44(1), 101-108.
4. Ball, E. C. (2010). Annotation an effective device for student feedback: A critical review. Nurse Education in Practice, 10(3), 138-143.
5. Ball, E. C., Franks, H., Jenkins, J., McGrath, M., and Leigh, J. (2009). Annotation is a valuable tool to en-hance learning and assessment in student essays. Nurse Education Today, 29(3), 284-291.
6. Beals, M. H. (2012). Electronic annotation of student essays (without GradeMark). Retrieved February 17th, 2014, from http://mhbeals.com/electronic-annotation-of-student-essays-without-grademark/
7. Beaumont, C., O'Doherty, M., and Shannon, L. (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 671-687.
8. Blayney, P., and Freeman, M. (2004). Automated formative feedback and summative assessment using indi-vidualized spreadsheet assignments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 209-231.
9. Boud, D., and Associates. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher edu-cation. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
10. Boud, D., and Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. As-sessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-15. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698-712.]
11. Bridge, P., and Appleyard, R. (2008). A comparison of electronic and paper-based assignment submission and feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 644-650.
12. Burns, K. E. A., Duffet, M., Kho, M.E., Meade, M. O., Adhikari, N. K.J., Sinuff, T, and Cook. D. J. (2008). A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. Canadian Medical Asso-ciation Journal, 179(3), 245-252.
13. Burrows, S., and Shortis, M. (2011). An evaluation of semi-automated, collaborative marking and feedback systems: Academic staffperspectives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7), 1135-1154.
14. Byrnes, R., and Ellis, A. (2006). The prevalence and characteristics of online assessment in Australian Uni-versities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 104-125.
15. Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219-233.
16. Chang, N., Watson, A. B., Bakerson, M. A., Williams, E. E., McGoron, F. X., and Spitzer, B. (2012). Elec-tronic feedback or handwritten feedback: What do undergraduate students prefer and why. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 1(1), 1-23.
17. Clynes, M. P., and Raftery, S. E. C. (2008). Feedback: An essential element of student learning in clinical practice. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(6), 405-411.
18. Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
19. Fotheringham, D. (2011). The role of expert judgement and feedback in sustainable assessment: A discus-sion paper. Nurse Education Today, 31(8), e47-e50.
20. Freeman, M., and McKenzie, J. (2002). SPARK, A confidential web-based template for self and peer as-sessment of student teamwork: Benefits of evaluating across different subjects. British Journal of Edu-cational Technology, 33(5), 551-569.
21. Gibbs, G., and Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning. Learn-ing and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 1-31.
22. Hanna, K. J., and Yearwood, D. (2012). The impact of technology on student perceptions of instructor com-ments. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 1(1), 24-34.
23. Hatziapostolou, T., and Paraskakis, I. (2010). Enhancing the impact of formative feedback on student learn-ing through an online feedback system. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 8(2), 111-122.
24. Heinrich, E., Milne, J., and Moore, M. (2009). An investigation into E-Tool use for formative assignment assessment - status and recommendations. Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 176-192.
25. Henderson, P. (2008). Electronic grading and marking: A note on Turnitin's GradeMark function. History Australia, 5(1), 11.1-11.2.
26. Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2010). Effective assessment in a digital age: A guide to technology-enhanced assessment and feedback. London: The Stationery Office.
27. Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2012). National student survey. Retrieved July 20th, 2013, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/newsarchive/2012/name,75522,en.html
28. Joughin, G. (Ed.). (2008). Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education. London: Springer.
29. Knight, P. T., and Yorke, M. (2003). Assessment, learning and employability. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
30. Li, J., and Barnard, R. (2011). Academic tutors' beliefs about and practices of giving feedback on students' written assignments: A New Zealand case study. Assessing Writing, 16(2) 137-148.
31. McKimm, J. (2009). Giving effective feedback. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 70(3), 158-161.
32. Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed). London: Sage.
33. Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher edu-cation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501-517.
34. Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done. As-sessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3) 301-314.
35. Parboteeah, S., and Mohamed. A. (2009). Thematic analysis of written assignment feedback: Implications for nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 29(7), 753-757.
36. Price, M., Handley, K., and Millar, J. (2011). Feedback - Focussing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879-896.
37. Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., and O'Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort but what is the effect. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277-289.
38. Pope, C., Zieblend, S., and Mays, N. (2000). Qualitative research in healthcare: Analyzing qualitative data. British Medical Journal, 320(7227), 114-116.
39. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2006) Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education. Section 6: Assessment of students. London: The Stationery Office.
40. Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535-550.
41. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research 78(1), 153.
42. Stevens, K., and Jamieson, R. (2002). The introduction and assessment of three teaching tools (WebCT, Mindtrail, EVE) into a post-graduate course. Journal of Information Technology Education, 1(4), 233-252. Retrieved from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol1/v1n4p233-252.pdf
43. Sue, V. M., and Ritter, L. A. (2012). Conducting online surveys (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
44. Upson-Saia, K., and Scott, S. (2013). Using iAnnotate to enhance feedback on written work. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 2(2), 43-59.
45. Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors' written responses. As-sessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379-394.
46. Wyatt, C. J. (2000). When to use web-based surveys. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Asso-ciation, 7(4), 426-430.