Retraction Note to: Molecular taxonomic tools provide more accurate estimates of species richness at less cost than traditional morphology-based taxonomic practices in a vegetation survey (Biodiversity and Conservation, (2014), 23, (1411-1424), 10.1007/s10531-014-0672-z);Molecular taxonomic tools provide more accurate estimates of species richness at less cost than traditional morphology-based taxonomic practices in a vegetation survey

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1411-1424

  Thompson, Ken A ^a   Newmaster, Steven G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Community inventory; DNA barcoding; DNA taxonomy; Ecological survey; Environmental impact assessment; Plant identification

Indexed keywords

DNA; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; HABITAT CONSERVATION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PLANT; POLICY MAKING; SPECIES RICHNESS; SPECIMEN BANK; TAXONOMY;

CANADA; ONTARIO [CANADA];

EID: 84900027227     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: 15729710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-021-02316-2     Document Type: Erratum

References (80)

1. Archaux F (2009) Could we obtain better estimates of plot species richness from multiple-observer plant censuses? J Veg Sci 20: 603-611.
2. Austin MP, Heyligers PC (1989) Vegetation survey design for conservation: gradsect sampling of forests in North-eastern New South Wales. Biol Conserv 50: 13-32.
3. Balmford A, Gaston KJ, Rodrigues ASL, James A (2000) Integrating costs of conservation into international priority setting. Conserv Biol 14: 597-605.
4. Beanlands GE, Duinker PN (1983) An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment in Canada. Institute for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie.
5. Begerow D, Nilsson H, Unterseher M, Maier W (2010) Current state and perspectives of fungal DNA barcoding and rapid identification procedures. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87: 99-108.
6. Bell F, Parton J, Stocker N, Joyce D (2008) Developing a silvicultural framework and definitions for use in forest management planning and practice. Forest Chron 84: 678-693.
7. Campbell JB (1959) Flowering sequence of a local flora. J Range Manag 12: 127-132.
8. CBOL Plant Working Group (2009) A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 12794-12797.
9. Chase M, Fay M, Devey D et al (2006) Multigene analyses of monocot relationships: a summary. Aliso 22: 62-74.
10. Chen S, Yao H, Han J et al (2010) Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS ONE 5: e8613.
11. Claridge MF, Dawah HA, Wilson MR (1997) Species: The units of biodiversity. Chapman & Hall, London.
12. Core Team R (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Austria, Vienna.
13. Costa GC, Nogueira C, Machado RB, Colli GR (2010) Sampling bias and the use of ecological niche modeling in conservation planning: a field evaluation in a biodiversity hotspot. Biodivers Conserv 19: 883-899.
14. Curtis JT (1959) The vegetation of Wisconsin: an ordination of plant communities. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
15. de Boer HJ, Ouarghidi A, Martin G et al (2014) DNA barcoding reveals limited accuracy of identifications based on folk taxonomy. PLoS ONE 9: e84291.
16. de Carvalho MR, Bockmann FA, Amorim DS et al (2005) Revisiting the taxonomic impediment. Science 307: 353.
17. de Mattia F, Gentili R, Bruni I et al (2012) A multi-marker DNA barcoding approach to save time and resources in vegetation surveys. Bot J Linn Soc 169: 518-529.
18. Dubois A (2003) The relationships between taxonomy and conservation biology in the century of extinctions. C R Biol 326: 9-21.
19. Ensing DJ, Moffat CE, Pither J (2012) Taxonomic identification errors generate misleading ecological niche model predictions of an invasive hawkweed. Botany 91: 137-147.
20. Fazekas AJ, Burgess KS, Kesanakurti PR et al (2008) Multiple multilocus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well. PLoS ONE 3: e2802.
21. Fazekas AJ, Kuzmina ML, Newmaster SG, Hollingsworth PM (2012) DNA barcoding methods for land plants. In: Kress WJ, Erickson (ed) DNA barcodes: methods and protocols. Methods Mol Bol 853: 223-252.
22. Frézal L, Leblois R (2008) Four years of DNA barcoding: current advances and prospects. Infect Genet Evol 8: 727-736.
23. García-Robledo C, Erickson DL, Staines CL et al (2013) Tropical plant-herbivore networks: reconstructing species interactions using DNA barcodes. PLoS ONE 8: e52967.
24. Ghahramanzadeh R, Esselink G, Kodde LP et al (2013) Efficient distinction of invasive aquatic plant species from non-invasive related species using DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour 13: 21-31.
25. Gonzalez MA, Baraloto C, Engel J et al (2009) Identification of Amazonian trees with DNA barcodes. PLoS ONE 4: e7483.
26. Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4: 379-391.
27. Gurevitch J, Padilla DK (2004) Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? Trends Ecol Evol 19: 470-474.
28. Hajibabaei M, Shokralla S, Zhou X et al (2011) Environmental barcoding: a next-generation sequencing approach for biomonitoring applications using river benthos. PLoS ONE 6: e17497.
29. Harrell Jr FE, Dupont MC (2012) Hmisc: Harrell miscellaneous. R package version 3. 10-1. [http://CRAN. R-project. org/package=Hmisc].
30. Hebert PDN, Gregory TR (2005) The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst Biol 54: 852-859.
31. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc London Series B Biol Sci 270: 313-321.
32. Hill SR (2003) Conservation assessment for Barren strawberry (Waldsteinia fragarioides ssp. fragarioides). United States Forest Service, Washington, DC.
33. Hill MO, Gauch HG (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47-58.
34. Ivanova NV, Grainger C (2006) Pre-made frozen PCR and sequencing plates. [www. dnabarcoding. ca/CCDB_DOCS/CCDB_Advances_Methods_Release_No4_Dec1st_2006. pdf].
35. Ivanova NV, DeWaard JR, Hajibabaei M, Hebert PDN (2005) Protocols for high volume DNA barcoding; [http://www. dnabarcoding. ca/].
36. Ivanova NV, Fazekas AJ, Hebert PDN (2008) Semi-automated, membrane-based protocol for DNA isolation from plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 26: 186-198.
37. Ivanova NV, Kuzmina ML, Fazekas AJ (2011) CCDB Protocols. Manual protocol employing centrifugation: Glass fiber plate DNA extraction protocol for plants, fungi, echinoderms, and mollusks. [http://www. ccdb. ca/CCDB_DOCS/CCDB_DNA_Extraction-Plants. pdf].
38. Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
39. Kesanakurti PR, Fazekas AJ, Burgess KS et al (2011) Spatial patterns of plant diversity below-ground as revealed by DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol 20: 1289-1302.
40. Kool A, de Boer HJ, Krüger Å et al (2012) Molecular identification of commercialized medicinal plants in southern Morocco. PLoS ONE 7: e39459.
41. Kress WJ, Erickson DL (2007) A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS ONE 2: e508.
42. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA et al (2005) Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 8369-8374.
43. Kress WJ, Erickson DL, Jones FA et al (2009) Plant DNA barcodes and a community phylogeny of a tropical forest dynamics plot in Panama. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 18621-18626.
44. Kress WJ, Erickson DL, Swenson NG et al (2010) Advances in the use of DNA barcodes to build a community phylogeny for tropical trees in a Puerto Rican forest dynamics plot. PLoS ONE 5: e15409.
45. Kuzmina ML, Ivanova NV (2011a) PCR amplification for plants and fungi. [http://www. ccdb. ca/CCDB_DOCS/CCDB_Amplification-Plants. pdf].
46. Kuzmina ML, Ivanova NV (2011b) CCDB Protocols. [http://www. ccdb. ca/CCDB_DOCS/CCDB_PrimerSets-Plants. pdf].
47. Kuzmina ML, Johnson KL, Barron HR, Hebert PDN (2012) Identification of the vascular plants of Churchill, Manitoba, using a DNA barcode library. BMC Ecol 12: 25.
48. Laiou A, Mandolini LA, Piredda R et al (2013) DNA barcoding as a complementary tool for conservation and valorisation of forest resources. Zookeys 213: 197-213.
49. Lawrence DP (2003) Environmental impact assessment. Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
50. Lepš J, Hadincová V (1992) How reliable are our vegetation analyses? J Veg Sci 3: 119-124.
51. Levin RA, Wagner WL, Hoch PC et al (2003) Family-level relationships of Onagraceae based on chloroplast rbcL and ndhF data. Am J Bot 90: 107-115.
52. Li D-Z, Gao L-M, Li H-T et al (2011) Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108: 19641-19646.
53. Li CP, Yu ZG, Han GS, Chu KH (2012a) Analyzing multi-locus plant barcoding datasets with a composition vector method based on adjustable weighted distance. PLoS ONE 7: e42154.
54. Li H-Q, Chen J-Y, Wang S, Xiong S-Z (2012b) Evaluation of six candidate DNA barcoding loci in Ficus (Moraceae) of China. Mol Ecol Resour 12: 783-790.
55. Liu Z, Zeng X, Yang D et al (2012) Identification of medicinal vines by ITS2 using complementary discrimination methods. J Ethnopharmacol 141: 242-249.
56. Mace GM (2004) The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359: 711-719.
57. Margules CR, Austin MP, Mollison D, Smith F (1994) Biological models for monitoring species decline: the construction and use of data bases [and discussion]. Philos Trans R Soc London Series B Biol Sci 344: 69-75.
58. McCune B, Dey JP, Peck JE et al (1997) Repeatability of community data: species richness versus gradient scores in large-scale lichen studies. Bryologist 100: 40-46.
59. Murdoch W, Polasky S, Wilson KA et al (2007) Maximizing return on investment in conservation. Biol Conserv 139: 375-388.
60. Newmaster SG, Ragupathy S (2013) Flora Ontario Integrated Botanical Information System (FOIBIS). BIO/OAC Herbarium, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph. [http://www. uoguelph. ca/foibis].
61. Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Ragupathy S (2006) DNA barcoding in land plants: evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tiered approach. Botany 341: 335-341.
62. Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Steeves RAD, Janovec J (2008) Testing candidate plant barcode regions in the Myristicaceae. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 480-490.
63. Newmaster SG, Ragupathy S, Dhivya S et al (2013a) Genomic valorization of the fine scale classification of small millet landraces in southern India. Genome 56: 123-127.
64. Newmaster SG, Grguric M, Shanmughanandhan D et al (2013b) DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products. BMC Med 11: 222.
65. Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH et al (1993) Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365: 335-337.
66. Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN (2007) BOLD: The barcode of life data system. Mol Ecol Notes 7: 355-364. http://www. boldsystems. org.
67. Resh V, Unzicker J (1975) Water quality monitoring and aquatic organisms: the importance of species identification. Water Pollut Control Fed 47: 9-19.
68. Sandionigi A, Galimberti A, Labra M et al (2012) Analytical approaches for DNA barcoding data-how to find a way for plants? Plant Biosyst 146: 803-813.
69. Schemske DW, Husband BC, Ruckelshaus MH et al (1994) Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75: 584-606.
70. Schuster SC (2008) Next-generation sequencing transforms today's biology. Nat Methods 5: 16-18.
71. Scott WA, Hallam CJ (2003) Assessing species misidentification rates through quality assurance of vegetation monitoring. Plant Ecol 165: 101-115.
72. Su JC, Debinski DM, Jakubauskas ME, Kindscher K (2004) Beyond species richness: community similarity as a measure of cross-taxon congruence for coarse-filter conservation. Conserv Biol 18: 167-173.
73. Tautz D, Arctander P, Minelli A et al (2003) A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 70-74.
74. ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167-1179.
75. Ter Braak, CJF, Smilauer P (2012) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 5. 0). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca.
76. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE et al (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427: 145-148.
77. Vences M, Thomas M, van der Meijden A et al (2005) Comparative performance of the 16S rRNA gene in DNA barcoding of amphibians. Front Zool 2: 5.
78. von Cräutlein M, Korpelainen H, Pietiläinen M, Rikkinen J (2011) DNA barcoding: a tool for improved taxon identification and detection of species diversity. Biodivers Conserv 20: 373-389.
79. Yao H, Song J, Liu C et al (2010) Use of ITS2 region as the universal DNA barcode for plants and animals. PLoS ONE 5: e13102.
80. Zhang C-Y, Wang F-Y, Yan H-F et al (2012) Testing DNA barcoding in closely related groups of Lysimachia L. (Myrsinaceae). Mol Ecol Resour 12: 98-108.