Corrigendum to Efficient distinction of invasive aquatic plant species from non-invasive related species using DNA barcoding [Molecular Ecology Resources 13 (2015) 21-31] doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12020;Efficient distinction of invasive aquatic plant species from non-invasive related species using DNA barcoding

Molecular Ecology Resources

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 21-31

  Ghahramanzadeh, R ^a,b   Esselink, G ^a   Kodde, L P ^a   Duistermaat, H ^c   van Valkenburg, J L C H ^a   Marashi, S H ^d   Smulders, M J M ^a   van de Wiel, C C M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MOHAGHEGH ARDABILI   (Iran)

^c NATURALIS BIODIVERSITY CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d FERDOWSI UNIVERSITY OF MASHHAD   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cabomba; Hydrocharitaceae; Ludwigia; matK; Myriophyllum; rbcL; trnH psbA

Indexed keywords

CABOMBA; HYDROCHARITACEAE; LUDWIGIA; MYRIOPHYLLUM;

EID: 84870893572     PISSN: 1755098X     EISSN: 17550998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12346     Document Type: Erratum

References (33)

1. Baars JR, Coetzee JA, Martin G, Hill MP, Caffrey JM (2010) Natural enemies from South Africa for biological control of Lagarosiphon major (Ridl.) Moss ex Wager (Hydrocharitaceae) in Europe. Hydrobiologia, 656, 149-158.
2. Chase MW, Salamin N, Wilkinson M et al. (2005) Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 360, 1889-1895.
3. Chase MW, Cowan RS, Hollingsworth PM et al. (2007) A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon, 56, 295-299.
4. Chen S, Yao H, Han J et al. (2010) Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS One, 5, e8613.
5. Costion C, Ford A, Cross H, Crayn D, Harrington M, Lowe A (2011) Plant DNA barcodes can accurately estimate species richness in poorly known floras. PLoS One, 6, e26841.
6. Dandelot S, Robles C, Pech N, Cazaubon A, Verlaque R (2008) Allelopathic potential of two invasive alien Ludwigia spp. Aquatic Botany, 88, 311-316.
7. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, 12, 13-15.
8. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, de Waard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 270, 313-321.
9. Hollingsworth PM, Forrest LL, Spouge JL et al. (2009) A DNA barcode for land plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 12794-12797.
10. Hollingsworth PM, Graham SW, Little DP (2011) Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. PLoS One, 6, e19254.
11. Kress WJ, Erickson DL (2007) A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS One, 2007, e508.
12. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH (2005) Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 8369-8374.
13. Lahaye R, Van der Bank M, Bogarin D et al. (2008) DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 2923-2928.
14. Little DP (2011) DNA barcode sequence identification incorporating taxonomic hierarchy and within taxon variability. PLoS One, 6, e20552.
15. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications, 10, 689-710.
16. Mackey AP, Swarbrick JT (1997) The biology of Australian weeds 32. Cabomba caroliniana Gray. Plant Protection Quarterly, 12, 154-165.
17. McNeely JA, Mooney HA, Neville LE, Schei P, Waage JK (2001) A Global Strategy on Invasive Alien Species, X + 50 pp. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK.
18. Meier R, Zhang GY, Ali F (2008) POINTS OF VIEW - The use of mean instead of smallest interspecific distances exaggerates the size of the "barcoding gap" and leads to misidentification. Systematic Biology, 57, 809-813.
19. Meyer CP, Paulay G (2005) DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biology, 3, 2229-2238.
20. Moody ML, Les DH (2010) Systematics of the aquatic Angiosperm genus Myriophyllum (Haloragaceae). Systematic Botany, 35, 121-139.
21. Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (2000) Invasive Species in a Changing World. Island Press, Washington, DC, 457 pp.
22. Orchard AE (1985) Myriophyll (Haloragaceae) in Australasia. II. The Australian species. Brunonia, 8, 173-291.
23. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics, 52, 273-288.
24. Pryer KM, Schuettpelz E, Huiet L et al. (2010) DNA barcoding exposes a case of mistaken identity in the fern horticultural trade. Molecular Ecology Resources, 10, 979-985.
25. Roy S, Tyagi A, Shukla V et al. (2010) Universal plant DNA barcode loci may not work in complex groups: a case study with Indian Berberis species. PLoS One, 5, e13674.
26. Savolainen V, Cowan RS, Vogler AP, Roderick GK, Lane R (2005) Towards writing the encyclopaedia of life: an introduction to DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 360, 1805-1811.
27. Sims GE, Jun SR, Wua GA, Kim SH (2009) Alignment-free genome comparison with feature frequency profiles (FFP) and optimal resolutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 2677-2682.
28. Siti-Munirah MY, Chew MY (2010) Cabombaceae, a new family record for Peninsular Malaysia. Malayan Nature Journal, 62, 241-248.
29. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24, 1596-1599.
30. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL-W - Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22, 4673-4680.
31. Thum RA, Mercer AT, Wcisel DJ (2012) Loopholes in the regulation of invasive species: genetic identifications identify mislabeling of prohibited aquarium plants. Biological Invasions, 14, 929-937.
32. Van de Wiel CCM, Van der Schoot J, Van Valkenburg JLCH, Duistermaat H, Smulders MJM (2009) DNA barcoding discriminates the noxious invasive plant species, floating pennywort (Hydrocotyle ranunculoides L.f.), from non-invasive relatives. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9, 1086-1091.
33. Van Valkenburg JLCH (2011) Invasieve Waterplanten in Nederland. Veldgids Nieuwe Voedsel en Waren Autoriteit, Wageningen, 48 pp. (in Dutch).