The effects of scenario-based communication training on nurses' communication competence and self-efficacy and myocardial infarction knowledge

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 356-364

  Hsu, Li Ling ^a   Huang, Ya Hsuan ^b   Hsieh, Suh Ing ^c  

^a NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

^b TAIPEI CITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Communication competence; Communication performance; Communication self efficacy; Experimental design; Learning satisfaction; Myocardial infarction knowledge; Nurse; Randomized controlled trial (RCT); Simulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; MALE; NURSING EDUCATION; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; SATISFACTION; SELF CONCEPT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION; EDUCATION; EDUCATION, NURSING, CONTINUING; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; NURSING STAFF; PATIENT SIMULATION; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF EFFICACY;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION; EDUCATION, NURSING, CONTINUING; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; NURSING STAFF; PATIENT SIMULATION; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SELF EFFICACY;

EID: 84899924905     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Smeltzer S.C., Bare B.G., Hinkle J.L., Cheever K.H. Brunner and Suddarth's textbook of medical surgical nursing 2006, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
2. Ahyana S., Kritpracha C., Thaniwattananon P. Cardiac rehabilitation enhancing programs in patients with myocardial infarction: a literature review. Nurs Med J Nurs 2013, 3:541-556.
3. World Health Organization World Health Organization: cardiovascular disease 2009, Author, USA.
4. DOH (Department of Health) The top 10 causes of death 2011, http://www.doh.gov.tw/cht2006/index_populace.aspx.
5. Yusuf S., Hawken S., Ôunpuu S., Dans T., Avezum A., Lanas F., et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 2004, 364:937-952.
6. Edelman L.C., Mandle C.L. Health promotion throughout the life span 2006, Mosby, St Louis, MO.
7. Sheldon L.K., Barrett R., Ellington L. Difficult communication in nursing. J Nurs Scholarsh 2006, 38:141-147.
8. Garding B.S., Kerr J.C., Bay K. Effectiveness of a program of information and support for myocardial infarction patients recovering at home. Heart Lung 1988, 17:355-362.
9. Xanthos T., Pantazopoulos I., Vlachos I., Stroumpoulis K., Barouxis D., Kitsou V., et al. Factors influencing arrival of patients with acute myocardial infarction at emergency departments: implications for community nursing interventions. J Adv Nurs 2010, 66:1469-1477.
10. Lyons A.C., Fanshawe C., Lip G.Y. Knowledge, communication and expectancies of cardiac catheterization: the patient's perspective. Psychol Health Med 2002, 7:461-467.
11. Smith J., Liles C. Information needs before hospital discharge of myocardial infarction patients: a comparative, descriptive study. J Clin Nurs 2007, 16:662-671.
12. Wilkinson S., Linsel L., Perry R., Blanchard K. Communication skills training for nurses working with patients with heart disease. Br J Card Nurs 2008, 3:475-481.
13. Wilkinson S., Perry R., Linsell L., Blanchard K. Effectiveness of a three-day communication skills course in changing nurses' communication skills with cancer/palliative care patients: a randomized controlled trial. Palliat Med 2008, 22:365-367.
14. Marshall S., Harrison J., Flanagan B. The teaching of a structured tool improves the clarity and content of interprofessional clinical communication. Qual Saf Health Care 2009, 18:137-140.
15. Wagner D., Bear M., Sander J. Turning simulation into reality: increasing student competence and confidence. J Nurs Educ 2009, 48:465-467.
16. Cioffi J., Purcal N., Arundell F. A pilot study to investigate the effect of a simulation strategy on the clinical decision making of midwifery students. J Nurs Educ 2005, 44:131-134.
17. Nagle B.M., McHale J.M., Alexander G.A., French B.M. Incorporating scenario-based simulation into a hospital nursing education program. J Contin Educ Nurs 2009, 40:18-25.
18. Kneebone R.L., Kidd J., Nestel D., Barnet A., Lo B., King R., et al. Blurring the boundaries: scenario-based simulation in a clinical setting. Med Educ 2005, 39:580-587.
19. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A.G., Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007, 39:175-191.
20. Jadad A.R., Enkin M.W. Randomized control trials: questions, answers and musings 2007, Blackwell, Malden, MA.
21. Jeffries P.R. Simulation in nursing education: from conceptualization to evaluation 2012, National League for Nursing, New York, NY.
22. Burnard P. Counselling skills for health professionals 1994, Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
23. Egan G. The skilled helper: a problem-management approach to helping 1994, Brookes/Cole, Monterey, CA.
24. Rogers C. Client centred therapy: its current practice, implications and theory 1951, Constable, London, UK.
25. Bowler M., Blake A. Specialist cardiology nurses audit post-MI community aftercare. Br J Community Nurs 2011, 12:194-202.
26. Funk M. Ashealth care technology advances: benefits and risk. Am J Crit Care 2011, 20:285-291.
27. Funk M., May J., Rose L. Substandard quality of electrocardiographic monitoring in current clinical practice: baseline results of the pulse trial. Am J Crit Care 2010, 19:16.
28. Marshall K. Acute coronary syndrome: diagnosis, risk assessment and management. Nurs Stand Spec Suppl 2011, 25:47-57.
29. Noble K.A. Coronary syndrome: evidence-based practice in action. J Perianesth Nurs 2011, 26:284-289.
30. Huang Y.C., Hsu L.L., Hsieh S.I. The effect of a scenario-based communications course on self-confidence in novice nurse communications. J Nurs 2011, 58:53-62. [non-English reference].
31. Barbara A., Mullan B.A., Kothe E.J. Evaluating a nursing communication skills training course: the relationships between self-rated ability, satisfaction, and actual performance. Nurse Educ Pract 2010, 10:374-378.
32. Doyle D., Copeland H.L., Bush D., Stein L., Thompson S. A course for nurses to handle difficult communication situations: a randomized controlled trial of impact on self-efficacy and performance. Patient Educ Couns 2011, 82:100-109.
33. Ammentorp J., Sabroe S., Kofoed P.E., Mainz J. The effect of training in communication skills on medical doctors' and nurses' self-efficacy: a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2007, 66:270-277.
34. Kameg K., Clochesy J., Mitchell A.M., Suresky J.M. The impact of high fidelity human simulation on self-efficacy of communication skills. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2010, 31:315-323.
35. Makoul G. Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the kalamazoo consensus statement. Acad Med 2001, 76:390-393.
36. Schirmer J.M., Mauksch L., Lang F., Marvel M.K., Zoppi K., Epstein R.M., et al. Assessing communication competence: a review of current tools. Fam Med 2005, 37:184-192.
37. Fonarow G.C., Gheorghiade M., Abraham W.T. Importance of in-hospital initiation of evidence-based medical therapies for heart failure - a review. Am J Cardiol 2004, 94:1155-1160.
38. Koelling T.D., Johnson M.L., Cody R.J., Aaronson K.D. Discharge education improves clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation 2005, 111:179-185.
39. Allen J.K., Scott L.B. Alternative models in the delivery of primary and secondary prevention programs. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2003, 18:150-156.
40. Yedidia M.J., Gillespie C.C., Kachur E., Schwartz M.D., Ockene J., Chepaitis A.E., et al. Effect of communications training on medical student performance. J Am Med Assoc 2003, 290:1157-1165.
41. Timmins F., Kaliszer M. Information needs of myocardial infarction patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2003, 2:57-65.
42. Zoppi K., Epstein R.M. Is communication a skill communication behaviors and being in relation. Fam Med 2002, 34:319-324.
43. Campbell S.H., Daley K.M. Simulation scenarios for nurse educators: making it real 2013, Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY.
44. Shama M.E., Meky F.A., Abou El Enein N.Y., Mahdy M.Y. The effect of a training program in communication skills on primary health care physicians' knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy. J Egypt Public Health Assoc 2009, 84:261-283.
45. Hammond C., Feinstein L. The effects of adult learning on self-efficacy. Lond Rev Educ 2005, 3:265-287.
46. Raica D.A. Effect of action-oriented communication training on nurses' communication self-efficacy. Med Surg Nurs 2009, 18:343-360.
47. Bambini D., Washburn J., Perkins R. Outcomes of clinical simulation for novice nursing students: communication, confidence, clinical judgment. Nurs Educ Perspect 2009, 30:79-82.
48. Cohen S.R., Cragin L., Wong B., Walker D.M. Self-efficacy change with low-tech, high-fidelity obstetric simulation training for midwives and nurses in Mexico. Clin Simul Nurs 2012, 8:15-24.
49. Smith S.J., Roehrs C.J. High-fidelity simulation: factors correlated with nursing student satisfaction and self-confidence. Nurs Educ Perspect 2009, 30:74-78.
50. Benner P. From novice to expert: excellence and power in clinical nursing practice 1984, Addison-Wesley, CA.
51. O'Leary J. Comparison of self-assessed competence and experience among critical care nurses. J Nurs Manage 2012, 20:607-614.
52. Kneebone R. Evaluating clinical simulations for learning procedural skills: a theory-based approach. Acad Med 2005, 80:549-553.
53. Cannick G.F., Horowitz A.M., Garr D.R., Reed S.G., Neville B.W., Day T.A., et al. Use of the OSCE to evaluated brief communication skills training for dental students. J Dent Educ 2007, 71:1203-1209.
54. Brannick M.T., Erol-Korkmaz H.T., Prewett M. A systematic review of the reliability of objective structured clinical examination scores. Med Educ 2011, 45:1181-1189.
55. Rushforth H.E. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): review of literature and implications for nursing education. Nurs Educ Today 2007, 27:481-490.
56. Baerheim A., Hjortdahl P., Holen A., Anvik T., Fasmer O.B., Grimstad H., et al. Curriculum factors influencing knowledge of communication skills among medical students. BMC Med Educ 2007, 7:35-40.
57. Sun B., Xu L.D., Pei X., Li H. Scenario-based knowledge representation in case-based reasoning systems. Expert Syst 2003, 20:92-99.
58. Clark R.C. Building expertise: cognitive methods for training and performance improvement 2003, Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA.
59. Zendejas B., Cook D.A., Farley D.R. Teaching first or teaching last: does the timing matter in simulation-based surgical scenarios. J Surg Educ 2010, 67:432-438.
60. Mann S., Robertson I. Why should training evaluations evaluate. J Eur Ind Train 1996, 20:14-20.
61. Lee Y.J. A study of the influence of instructional innovation on learning satisfaction and study achievement. J Hum Resour Adult Learn 2008, 4:43-54. [non-English reference].
62. Knowles M.S. The adult learner: a neglected species 1989, Gulf Publishing Co., Houston.
63. Rogers C. Freedom to learn for the 80s 1983, Merill Publishing Co., USA.
64. Jeffries P.R., Rizzolo M.A. Designing and implementing models for the innovative use of simulation to teach nursing care of ill adults and children: a national, multi-site, multi-method study 2006, National League for Nursing, New York, NY.