Abnormal dynamics of activation of object use information in apraxia: Evidence from eyetracking

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 13-26

  Lee, Chia Iin ^a   Mirman, Daniel ^b,c   Buxbaum, Laurel J ^b  

^a Graduate Institute of Brain and Mind Sciences   (Taiwan)

^b MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Apraxia; Eye tracking; Object use; Parietal; Temporal

Indexed keywords

AGED; APRAXIA; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; GESTURE; HUMAN; INFERIOR PARIETAL LOBULE; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBJECT MANIPULATION; OBJECT RELATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; STROKE PATIENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VERY ELDERLY; VISUAL ORIENTATION; ADULT; APRAXIAS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPLICATION; EYE MOVEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; OCULOGRAPHY; PARIETAL LOBE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISION;

ADULT; AGED; APRAXIAS; EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PARIETAL LOBE; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STROKE; TEMPORAL LOBE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84899848231     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (135)

1. Allport D. Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. Current perspectives in dysphasia 1985, 207-244. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.
2. Auchterlonie S., Phillips N.A., Chertkow H. Behavioral and electrical brain measures of semantic priming in patients with Alzheimer's disease: Implications for access failure versus deterioration hypotheses. Brain and Cognition 2002, 48(2-3):264-267.
3. Avants B.B., Schoenemann P.T., Gee J.C. Lagrangian frame diffeomorphic image registration: Morphometric comparison of human and chimpanzee cortex. Medical Image Analysis 2006, 10(3):397-412.
4. Bach P., Peelen M.V., Tipper S.P. On the role of object information in action observation: An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991) 2010, 20(12):2798-2809.
5. Barbieri C., De Renzi E. The executive and ideational components of apraxia. Cortex 1988, 24(4):535-543.
6. Barr D.J., Levy R., Scheepers C., Tily H.J. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 2013, 68(3):255-278.
7. Barsalou L.W. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59(1):617-645.
8. Blakemore S.-J., Boyer P., Pachot-Clouard M., Meltzoff A., Segebarth C., Decety J. The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991) 2003, 13(8):837-844.
9. Blumstein S.E., Milberg W., Shrier R. Semantic processing in aphasia: Evidence from an auditory lexical decision task. Brain and Language 1982, 17(2):301-315.
10. Borghi A.M., Scorolli C. Language comprehension and dominant hand motion simulation. Human Movement Science 2009, 28(1):12-27.
11. Boronat C.B., Buxbaum L.J., Coslett H.B., Tang K., Saffran E.M., Kimberg D.Y., et al. Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 23(2-3):361-373.
12. Bouillaud J.-B. Recherches cliniques propres à démontrer que la perte de la parole correspond à la lésion des lobules antérieurs du cerveau, et à confirmer l'opinion de Gall, sur le siège du langage articulé. Migneret 1825.
13. Brambati S.M., Peters F., Belleville S., Joubert S. Lack of semantic priming effects in famous person recognition in Mild Cognitive Impairment. Cortex 2012, 48(4):414-420.
14. Buccino, Riggio L., Melli G., Binkofski F., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G. Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 24(3):355-363.
15. Buxbaum, Shapiro, & Coslett. Critical brain regions for tool-related and imitative actions: A componential analysis. Brain, in Press.
16. Buxbaum L.J. Ideomotor apraxia: A call to action. Neurocase 2001, 7:445-458.
17. Buxbaum L.J., Coslett H.B. Spatio-motor representations in reaching: Evidence for subtypes of optic ataxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1998, 15(3):279-312.
18. Buxbaum L.J., Johnson-Frey S.H., Bartlett-Williams M. Deficient internal models for planning hand-object interactions in apraxia. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43(6):917-929.
19. Buxbaum L.J., Kyle K.M., Grossman M., Coslett H.B. Left inferior parietal representations for skilled hand-object interactions: Evidence from stroke and corticobasal degeneration. Cortex 2007, 43(3):411-423.
20. Buxbaum L.J., Kyle K.M., Menon R. On beyond mirror neurons: Internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 25(1):226-239.
21. Buxbaum L.J., Kyle K.M., Tang K., Detre J.M. Neural substrates of knowledge of hand postures for object grasping and functional object use: Evidence from fMRI. Brain Research 2006, 1117(1):175-185.
22. Buxbaum L.J., Saffran E.M. Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: Dissociations in apraxic and non-apraxic subjects. Brain and Language 2002, 82:179-199.
23. Buxbaum L.J., Sirigu A., Schwartz M.F., Klatzky R. Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:1091-1113.
24. Buxbaum L.J., Veramonti T., Schwartz M.F. Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: Knowing "what for" but not "how". Neurocase 2000, 6(2):83-97.
25. Campanella F., Mondani M., Skrap M., Shallice T. Semantic Access Dysphasia Resulting from Left Temporal Lobe Tumours. Brain 2009, 132(1):87-102.
26. Campanella F., Shallice T. Refractoriness and the healthy brain: A behavioural study on semantic access. Cognition 2011, 118(3):417-431.
27. Campanella F., Shallice T. Manipulability and object recognition: Is manipulability a semantic feature?. Experimental Brain Research 2011, 208(3):369-383.
28. Caspers S., Zilles K., Laird A.R., Eickhoff S.B. ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. NeuroImage 2010, 50(3):1148-1167.
29. Castelli F., Happé F., Frith U., Frith C. Movement and mind: A functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. NeuroImage 2000, 12(3):314-325.
30. Chao L., Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in teh dorsal stream. NeuroImage 2000, 12:478-484.
31. Chatterjee A. The neural organization of spatial thought and language. Seminars in Speech and Language 2008, 29(3):226-252.
32. Clark M.A., Merians A.S., Kothari A., Poizner H., Macauley B., Rothi L.J.G., et al. Spatial planning deficits in limb apraxia. Brain 1994, 117(5):1093-1106.
33. Colangelo A., Stephenson K., Westbury C., Buchanan L. Word associations in deep dyslexia. Brain and Cognition 2003, 53(2):166-170.
34. Corbett F., Jefferies E., Lambon Ralph M.A. Deregulated semantic cognition follows prefrontal and temporo-parietal damage: Evidence from the impact of task constraint on nonverbal object use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23(5):1125-1135.
35. Connell L., Lynott D., Dreyer F. A Functional Role for Modality-Specific Perceptual Systems in Conceptual Representations. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(3):e33321.
36. Damasio A.R. Category-related recognition defects as a clue to the neural substrates of knowledge. Trends in the Neurosciences 1990, 13:95-98.
37. De Renzi E., Lucchelli F. Are semantic systems separately represented in the brain? The case of living category impairment. Cortex 1994, 30(1):3-25.
38. Di Pellegrino G., Rafal R., Tipper S.P. Implicitly evoked actions modulate visual selection: Evidence from parietal extinction. Current Biology 2005, 15(16):1469-1472.
39. Faglioni P., Basso A., Botti C., Aglioti S., Saetti C. Gestural learning and apraxia. Attention and performance. XIII. Motor representation and control 1990, 837-856. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (NJ).
40. Frak V., Nazir T., Goyette M., Cohen H., Jeannerod M. Grip force is part of the semantic representation of manual action verbs. PLoS One 2010, 5(3):e9728.
41. Garcea Frank E., Mary Dombovy, Bradford Z.Mahon Preserved tool knowledge in the context of impaired action knowledge: Implications for models of semantic memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013, 7.
42. Geschwind N. The apraxias: Neural mechanisms of disorders of learned movement: The anatomical organization of the language areas and motor systems of the human brain clarifies apraxic disorders and throws new light on cerebral dominance. American Scientist 1975, 63(2):188-195.
43. Giese M.A., Poggio T. Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2003, 4(3):179-192.
44. Goldenberg G. Apraxia and the parietal lobes. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(6):1449-1459.
45. Goldenberg G., Spatt J. The neural basis of tool use. Brain 2009, 132(6):1645-1655.
46. Grafton S.T. Embodied cognition and the simulation of action to understand others. Annals of the New York Academy Sciences 2009, 1156(1):97-117.
47. Green C., Hummel J.E. Familiar interacting object pairs are perceptually grouped. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32(5):1107-1119.
48. Griffiths D., Tipper S.P. When far becomes near: Shared environments activate action simulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006) 2012, 65(7):1241-1249.
49. Haaland K.Y., Harrington D.L., Knight R.T. Neural representations of skilled movement. Brain 2000, 123(Pt 11):2306-2313.
50. Haaland Kathleen Y., Flaherty D. The different types of limb apraxia errors made by patients with left vs. right hemisphere damage. Brain and Cognition 1984, 3(4):370-384.
51. Haaland Kathleen Y., Harrington D.L., Knight R.T. Spatial deficits in ideomotor limb apraxia A kinematic analysis of aiming movements. Brain 1999, 122(6):1169-1182.
52. Hauk O., Johnsrude I., Pulvermüller F. Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 2004, 41(2):301-307.
53. Heilman K.M., Rothi L.J.G. Apraxia. Clinical neuropsychology 1993, 141-150. Oxford University Press, New York, (Clinical Neuropsychology (pp. 141-150). K.M. Heilman, E. Valenstein (Eds.).
54. Heilman K.M., Rothi L.J.G., Valenstein E. Two forms of ideomotor apraxia. Neurology 1982, 32(4). (342-342).
55. Holmes C.J., Hoge R., Collins L., Woods R., Toga A.W., Evans A.C. Enhancement of MR images using registration for signal averaging. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1998, 22(2):324-333.
56. Huettig F., Altmann G.T.M. Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition 2005, 96(1):B23-B32.
57. Huettig F., Altmann G.T.M. Visual-shape competition during language-mediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness. Visual Cognition 2007, 15:985-1018.
58. Ishibashi R., Lambon Ralph M.A., Saito S., Pobric G. Different roles of lateral anterior temporal lobe and inferior parietal lobule in coding function and manipulation tool knowledge: Evidence from an rTMS study. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49(5):1128-1135.
59. James T.W., Vanderklok R.M., Stevenson R.A., James K.H. Multisensory perception of action in posterior temporal and parietal cortices. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49(1):108-114.
60. Jarry C., Osiurak F., Delafuys D., Chauviré V., Etcharry-Bouyx F., Le Gall D. Apraxia of tool use: More evidence for the technical reasoning hypothesis. Cortex 2013, 49(9):2322-2333.
61. Jax S.A., Buxbaum L.J. Response interference between functional and structural object-related actions is increased in patients with ideomotor apraxia. Journal of Neuropsychology 2013, 7(1):12-18.
62. Jax S.A., Buxbaum L.J., Moll A.D. Deficits in movement planning and intrinsic coordinate control in ideomotor apraxia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18(12):2063-2076.
63. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage 2001, 14(1):S103-S109.
64. Jefferies E., Baker S.S., Doran M., Ralph M.A.L. Refractory effects in stroke aphasia: A consequence of poor semantic control. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(5):1065-1079.
65. Jefferies E., Lambon Ralph M. Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: A case-series comparison. Brain 2006, 129(8):2132-2147.
66. Jefferies E., Patterson K., Lambon Ralph M.A. Deficits of knowledge vs. executive control in semantic cognition: Insights from cued naming. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(2):649-658.
67. Kable J.W., Kan I.P., Wilson A., Thompson-Schill S.L., Chatterjee A. Conceptual representations of action in the lateral temporal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17(12):1855-1870.
68. Kalénine S., Buxbaum L.J., Coslett H.B. Critical brain regions for action recognition: Lesion symptom mapping in left hemisphere stroke. Brain 2010, 133(11):3269-3280.
69. Kalénine S., Mirman D., Buxbaum L.J. A combination of thematic and similarity-based semantic processes confers resistance to deficit following left hemisphere stroke. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2012, 6:106.
70. Kalénine S., Mirman D., Middleton E.L., Buxbaum L.J. Temporal dynamics of activation of thematic and functional knowledge during conceptual processing of manipulable artifacts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2012, 38(5):1274-1295.
71. Kellenbach M.L., Brett M., Patterson K. Actions speak louder than functions: The importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15(1):30-46.
72. Kertesz A. Western Aphasia battery test manual. [manual] 1982, The Psychological Corporation.
73. Knutson K.M., Krueger F., Dal Monte O., Raymont V., Snyder A.D., Kirsch H.E., et al. Gustatory cortical lesions affect motivation for snack foods. Cognitive Neuroscience 2012, 3(2):131-138.
74. Knutson Kristine M, Rakowsky S.T., Solomon J., Krueger F., Raymont V., Tierney M.C., et al. Injured brain regions associated with anxiety in Vietnam veterans. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51(4):686-694.
75. Lee C.L., Middleton E., Mirman D., Kalénine S., Buxbaum L.J. Incidental and context-responsive activation of structure- and function-based action features during object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2012, 39(1):257-270.
76. Lieberman M.D., Cunningham W.A. Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: Re-balancing the scale. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2009, 4(4):423-428.
77. Liepmann H. The left hemisphere and action 1905, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
78. Lordat J. Analyse de la parole, pour servir à la théorie de divers cas d'alalie et de paralalie (de mutisme et d'imperfection du parler) que les nosologistes ont mal connus. L. Castel 1843.
79. Marshall J.C., Halligan P.W. Blindsight and insight in visuo-spatial neglect. Nature 1988, 336(6201):766-767.
80. Martin A., Wiggs C.L., Ungerleider L.G., Haxby J.V. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 1996, 379(6566):649-652.
81. Mcdonald S., Tate R.L., Rigby J. Error types in ideomotor apraxia: A qualitative analysis. Brain and Cognition 1994, 25(2):250-270.
82. Milberg W., Blumstein S.E. Lexical decision and aphasia: Evidence for semantic processing. Brain and Language 1981, 14(2):371-385.
83. Mirman D. Growth curve analysis and visualization using R 2014, Chapman & Hall/CRC.
84. Mirman, D., Britt, A., & Cho, P. W. (2012). Aggregating fixation data across trials of different durations. Retrieved from. http://www.danmirman.org/pdfs/LCDL-TR2012.04_Aggregation.pdf.
85. Mirman D., Britt A.E. What we talk about when we talk about access deficits. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2014, 369:1634.
86. Mirman D., Graziano K.M. Damage to temporo-parietal cortex decreases incidental activation of thematic relations during spoken word comprehension. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50(8):1990-1997.
87. Mirman D., Magnuson J.S. Dynamics of activation of semantically similar concepts during spoken word recognition. Memory & Cognition 2009, 37:1026-1039.
88. Mirman D., Yee E., Blumstein S.E., Magnuson J.S. Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in Aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling. Brain and Language 2011, 117(2):53-68.
89. Mizelle J.C., Wheaton Lewis A. The neuroscience of storing and molding tool action concepts: How "plastic" is grounded cognition?. Frontiers in Psychology 2010, 1:195.
90. Morlaas J. Contribution aỳ l'étude de l'apraxie. Paris: Legrand 1928, Legrand, Paris.
91. Myung J., Blumstein S.E., Sedivy J.C. Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: Manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition 2006, 98(3):223-243.
92. Myung J., Blumstein S.E., Yee E., Sedivy J.C., Thompson-Schill S.L., Buxbaum L.J. Impaired access to manipulation features in apraxia: Evidence from eyetracking and semantic judgment tasks. Brain and Language 2010, 112(2):101-112.
93. Peeters R.R., Rizzolatti G., Orban G.A. Functional properties of the left parietal tool use region. NeuroImage 2013, 78C:83-93.
94. Pelgrims B., Olivier E., Andres M. Dissociation between manipulation and conceptual knowledge of object use in the supramarginalis gyrus. Human Brain Mapping 2011, 32(11):1802-1810.
95. Predovan D., Gandini D., Montembeault M., Rouleau I., Bherer L., Joubert S., Brambati S.M Loss of person-specific knowledge in Alzheimer's disease: Evidence from priming. Neurocase 2014, 20(3):263-268.
96. Poizner H., Clark M., Merians A.S., Macauley B., Rothi L.J.G., Heilman K.M. Joint coordination deficits in limb apraxia. Brain 1995, 118(1):227-242.
97. Poppel E., Held R., Frost D. Residual visual function after brain wounds involving the central visual pathways in man. Nature 1973, 243(5405):295-296.
98. Puce A., Perrett D. Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2003, 358(1431):435-445.
99. Pulvermüller F. Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2005, 6(7):576-582.
100. Rafal R., Ward R., Danziger S. Selection for action and selection for awareness: Evidence from hemispatial neglect. Brain Research 2006, 1080(1):2-8.
101. Randerath J., Goldenberg G., Spijkers W., Li Y., Hermsdörfer J. Different left brain regions are essential for grasping a tool compared with its subsequent use. NeuroImage 2010, 53(1):171-180.
102. Randerath J., Li Y., Goldenberg G., Hermsdörfer J. Grasping tools: Effects of task and apraxia. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(2):497-505.
103. Renzi E.D., Lucchelli F. Ideational apraxia. Brain 1988, 111(5):1173-1185.
104. Reilly J., Peelle J.E., Antonucci S.M., Grossman M. Anomia as a marker of distinct semantic memory impairments in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia. Neuropsychology 2011, 25(4):413-426.
105. Riddoch M.J., Riveros R., Humphreys G.W. Functional relations trump implied motion in recovery from extinction: Evidence from the effects of animacy on extinction. Neurocase 2011, 17(1):1-10.
106. Roberts K.L., Humphreys G.W. Action relations facilitate the identification of briefly-presented objects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2011, 73(2):597-612.
107. Rothi L.J.G., Heilman K.M. Ideomotor apraxia: Gestural learning and memory. Neuropsychological studies in apraxia and related disorders 1985, 65-74. Oxford University Press, New York. E.A. Roy (Ed.).
108. Sakreida K., Scorolli C., Menz M.M., Heim S., Borghi A.M. Are abstract action words embodied? An fMRI investigation at the interface between language and motor cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013, 7:125.
109. Schnur T.T., Schwartz M.F., Kimberg D.Y., Hirshorn E., Coslett H.B., Thompson-Schill S.L. Localizing interference during naming: Convergent neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence for the function of Broca's area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106(1):322-327.
110. Schuil K.D.I., Smits M., Zwaan R.A. Sentential context modulates the involvement of the motor cortex in action language processing: An fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013, 7:100.
111. Schultz J., Friston K.J., O'doherty J., Wolpert D.M., Frith C.D. Activation in posterior superior Temporal sulcus parallels parameter inducing the percept of animacy. Neuron 2005, 45(4):625-635.
112. Schwartz M.F., Brecher A.R., Whyte J., Klein M.G. A patient registry for cognitive rehabilitation research: A strategy for balancing patients' privacy rights with researchers' need for access. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005, 86(9):1807-1814.
113. Shallice T. Specialization within the semantic system. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1988, 5:133-142.
114. Sirigu A., Cohen L., Duhamel J.R., Pillon B., Dubois B., Agid Y. A selective impairment of hand posture for object utilization in apraxia. Cortex 1995, 31:41-55.
115. Sirigu A., Duhamel J.-R., Cohen L., Pillon B., Dubois B., Agid Y. The mental representation of hand movements after Parietal cortex damage. Science 1996, 273(5281):1564-1568.
116. Smania N., Aglioti S.M., Girardi F., Tinazzi M., Fiaschi A., Cosentino A., et al. Rehabilitation of limb apraxia improves daily life activities in patients with stroke. Neurology 2006, 67(11):2050-2052.
117. Smania N., Girardi F., Domenicali C., Lora E., Aglioti S. The rehabilitation of limb apraxia: A study in left-brain-damaged patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000, 81(4):379-388.
118. Springer A., Huttenlocher A., Prinz W. Language-induced modulation during the prediction of others' actions. Psychological Research 2012, 76(4):456-466.
119. Stamenova V., Roy E.A., Black S.E. Associations and dissociations of transitive and intransitive gestures in left and right hemisphere stroke patients. Brain and Cognition 2010, 72(3):483-490.
120. Tettamanti M., Buccino G., Saccuman M.C., Gallese V., Danna M., Scifo P., et al. Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor Circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 17(2):273-281.
121. Tidoni E., Borgomaneri S., Pellegrino G.di, Avenanti A. Action simulation plays a critical role in deceptive action recognition. Journal of Neuroscience 2013, 33(2):611-623.
122. Tipper S.P., Paul M.A., Hayes A.E. Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13(3):493-498. (5).
123. Tyler L.K., Ostrin R.K. The processing of simple and complex words in an agrammatic patient: Evidence from priming. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32(8):1001-1013.
124. Vanbellingen T., Bohlhalter S. Apraxia in neurorehabilitation: Classification, assessment, and treatment. Neurorehabilitation 2011, 28:91-98.
125. Vingerhoets G., Acke F., Vandemaele P., Achten E. Tool responsive regions in the posterior parietal cortex: Effect of differences in motor goal and target object during imagined transitive movements. NeuroImage 2009, 47(4):1832-1843.
126. Warrington E.K., Mccarthy R.A. Categories of knowledge: Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain 1987, 110:1273-1296.
127. Warrington E.K., Shallice T. Category specific semantic impairments. Brain 1984, 107:829-853.
128. Warrington Elizabeth K., Shallice T. Semantic access Dyslexia. Brain 1979, 102(1):43-63.
129. Watson C.E., Cardillo E.R., Ianni G.R., Chatterjee A. Action concepts in the brain: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2013, 25(8):1191-1205.
130. Witt J.K., Kemmerer D., Linkenauger S.A., Culham J. A functional role for motor simulation in identifying tools. Psychological Science 2010, 21(9):1215-1219.
131. Wu D.H., Waller S., Chatterjee A. The functional neuroanatomy of thematic role and locative relational knowledge. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2007, 19(9):1542-1555.
132. Yee E., Blumstein S.E., Sedivy J.C. Lexical-semantic activation in Broca's and Wernicke's Aphasia: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2007, 20(4):592-612.
133. Yee E., Chrysikou E.G., Hoffman E., Thompson-Schill S.L. Manual experience shapes object representations. Psychological Science 2013, 24:909-919.
134. Yee E., Sedivy J.C. Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32(1):1-14.
135. Zwinkels A., Geusgens C., Sande P.van de, Heugten C.van Assessment of apraxia: Inter-rater reliability of a new apraxia test, association between apraxia and other cognitive deficits and prevalence of apraxia in a rehabilitation setting. Clinical Rehabilitation 2004, 18(7):819-827.