Multisensory perception of action in posterior temporal and parietal cortices

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 108-114

  James, Thomas W ^a   VanDerKlok, Ross M ^a   Stevenson, Ryan A ^a,b   James, Karin Harman ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory; Event perception; FMRI; Object recognition; Visual

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN REGION; CINGULATE GYRUS; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INSULA; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; RECOGNITION; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OXYGEN; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650197877     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.10.030     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Amedi A., Jacobson G., Hendler T., Malach R., Zohary E. Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. Cerebral Cortex 2002, 12:1202-1212.
2. Amedi A., Malach R., Hendler T., Peled S., Zohary E. Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4(3):324-330.
3. Beauchamp M.S., Lee K.E., Argall B.D., Martin A. Integration of auditory and visual information about objects in superior temporal sulcus. Neuron 2004, 41(5):809-823.
4. Beauchamp M.S., Martin A. Grounding object concepts in perception and action: Evidence from fMRI studies of tools. Cortex 2007, 43(3):461-468.
5. Binkofski F., Buccino G., Posse S., Seitz R.J., Rizzolatti G., Freund H.J. A fronto-parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: Evidence from an fMRI-study. European Journal of Neuroscience 1999, 11:3276-3286.
6. Binkofski F., Kunesch E., Classen J., Seitz R.J., Freund H.J. Tactile apraxia: Unimodal apractic disorder of tactile object exploration associated with parietal lobe lesions. Brain 2001, 124(1):132-144.
7. Bodegard A., Geyer S., Grefkes C., Zilles K., Roland P.E. Hierarchical processing of tactile shape in the human brain. Neuron 2001, 31:317-328.
8. Bohlhalter S., Fretz C., Weder B. Hierarchical versus parallel processing in tactile object recognition: A behavioural-neuroanatomical study of aperceptive tactile agnosia. Brain 2002, 125:2537-2548.
9. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10(4):433-436.
10. Calvert G.A., Campbell R., Brammer M.J. Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex. Current Biology 2000, 10(11):649-657.
11. Caspers S., Zilles K., Laird A.R., Eickhoff S.B. ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. Neuroimage 2010, 50(3):1148-1167.
12. Culham J.C., Valyear K.F. Human parietal cortex in action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2006, 16(2):205-212.
13. De Gelder B., Bertelson P. Multisensory integration, perception and ecological validity. Trends in Cognitive Science 2003, 7(10):460-467.
14. Doehrmann O., Naumer M.J., Volz S., Kaiser J., Altmann C.F. Probing category selectivity for environmental sounds in the human auditory brain. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(11):2776-2786.
15. Fabbri-Destro M., Rizzolatti G. Mirror neurons and mirror systems in monkeys and humans. Physiology (Bethesda) 2008, 23:171-179.
16. Forman S.D., Cohen J.D., Fitzgerald M., Eddy W.F., Mintun M.A., Noll D.C. Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magnetic Resonance Medicine 1995, 33(5):636-647.
17. Gaver W.W. What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecological Psychology 1993, 5(1):1-29.
18. Glover G.H. Deconvolution of impulse response in event-related BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage 1999, 9(4):416-429.
19. Grill-Spector K., Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Research 2001, 41(10-11):1409-1422.
20. Grossman E.D., Blake R. Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron 2002, 35(6):1167-1175.
21. Iacoboni M. Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology 2009, 60:653-670.
22. James T.W., Culham J.C., Humphrey G.K., Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: An fMRI study. Brain 2003, 126:2463-2475.
23. James T.W., Humphrey G.K., Gati J.S., Servos P., Menon R.S., Goodale M.A. Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:1706-1714.
24. Kim S., James T.W. Enhanced effectiveness in visuo-haptic object-selective brain regions with increasing stimulus salience. Human Brain Mapping 2010, 31:678-693.
25. Lewis J.W., Brefczynski J.A., Phinney R.E., Janik J.J., DeYoe E.A. Distinct cortical pathways for processing tool versus animal sounds. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25(21):5148-5158.
26. Lewis J.W., Wightman F.L., Brefczynski J.A., Phinney R.E., Binder J.R., DeYoe E.A. Human brain regions involved in recognizing environmental sounds. Cerebral Cortex 2004, 14(9):1008-1021.
27. Malach R., Reppas J.B., Benson R.R., Kwong K.K., Jiang H., Kennedy W.A., et al. Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1995, 92(18):8135-8139.
28. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10(4):437-442.
29. Puce A., Perrett D. Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society of London B: Biological Science 2003, 358(1431):435-445.
30. Repp B.H. Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12(6):969-992.
31. Stein B., Stanford T., Ramachandran R., Perrault T., Rowland B. Challenges in quantifying multisensory integration: alternative criteria, models, and inverse effectiveness. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 198(2):113-126.
32. Stevenson R.A., Geoghegan M.L., James T.W. Superadditive BOLD activation in superior temporal sulcus with threshold non-speech objects. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 179(1):85-95.
33. Stevenson R.A., James T.W. Audiovisual integration in human superior temporal sulcus: Inverse effectiveness and the neural processing of speech and object recognition. Neuroimage 2009, 44(3):1210-1223.
34. Stevenson R.A., Kim S., James T.W. An additive-factors design to disambiguate neuronal and areal convergence: Measuring multisensory interactions between audio, visual, and haptic sensory streams using fMRI. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 198(2-3):183-194.
35. Stilla R., Sathian K. Selective visuo-haptic processing of shape and texture. Human Brain Mapping 2008, 29(10):1123-1138.
36. Thirion B., Pinel P., Mèriaux S., Roche A., Dehaene S., Poline J.-B. Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: Statistical and methodological issues for group analyses. NeuroImage 2007, 35(1):105-120.
37. Valyear K.F., Culham J.C. Observing learned object-specific functional grasps preferentially activates the ventral stream. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22(5):970-984.