Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 493-498

  Tipper, Steven P ^a   Paul, Matthew A ^a   Hayes, Amy E ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247634927     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193875     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. DI PELLEGRINO, G., FADIGA, L., FOGASSI, L., GALLESE, V., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176-180.
2. ELLIS, R., & TUCKER, M. (2000). Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 451-471.
3. FERRARI, P. F., Rozzi, S., & FOGASSI, L. (2005). Mirror neurons responding to observation of actions made with tools in monkey ventral premotor cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 212-226.
4. GIBSON, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
5. HOMMEL, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268.
6. HOMMEL, B. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 764-775.
7. KOHLER, E., KEYSERS, C, UMILTÀ, M. A., FOGASSI, L., GALLESE, V., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: Action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 297, 846-848.
8. LHERMITTE, F. (1983). "Utilization behaviour" and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain, 106, 237-255.
9. MICHAELS, C. F. (1988). S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: Evidence of the detection of affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 231-240.
10. PHILLIPS, J. C., & WARD, R. (2002). S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation. Visual Cognition, 9, 540-558.
11. PRINZ, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 167-201). Berlin: Springer.
12. PRINZ, W., & HOMMEL, B. (Eos.) (2002). Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. RIZZOLATTI, G., & CRAIGHERO, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
14. SIMON, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.
15. TUCKER, M., & ELLIS, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 830-846.
16. TUCKER, M., & ELLIS, R. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica, 116, 185-203.
17. UMILTÀ, M. A., KOHLER, E., GALLESE, V., FOGASSI, L., FADIGA, L., KEYSERS, C., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (2001). I know what you are doing: A neurophysiological study. Neuron, 31, 155-165.