Critical brain regions for action recognition: Lesion symptom mapping in left hemisphere stroke

Brain

Volumn 133, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 3269-3280

  Kalénine, Solne ^a   Buxbaum, Laurel J ^a   Coslett, Harry Branch ^b  

^a MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

action; apraxia; recognition; stroke; voxel based lesion symptom mapping

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; BODY POSTURE; BRAIN REGION; BRAIN SIZE; CINGULATE GYRUS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; FOIL; GESTURE; HUMAN; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEMANTIC MEMORY; STROKE; STROKE PATIENT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 78049469963     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: 14602156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awq210     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Assmus A, Giessing C, Weiss PH, Fink GR. Functional interactions during the retrieval of conceptual action knowledge: an fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 2007; 19: 1004-12.
2. Avants BB, Schoenemann PT, Gee JC. Lagrangian frame diffeomorphic image registration: Morphometric comparison of human and chimpanzee cortex. Med Image Anal 2006; 10: 397-412.
3. Bach P, Peelen MV, Tipper SP. On the role of object information in action observation: an fMRI study. Cereb Cortex. doi: 10.1093/ cercor/bhq026 (15 March 2010, date last accessed).
4. Badre D. Cognitive control, hierarchy, and the rostro-caudal organization of the frontal lobes. Trends Cogn Sci 2008; 12: 193-200.
5. Badre D, Wagner AD. Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory. Neuropsychologia 2007; 45: 2883-901.
6. Beauchamp MS, Martin A. Grounding object concepts in perception and action: evidence from fMRI studies of tools. Cortex 2007; 43: 461-8.
7. Binder JR, Desai RH, Graves WW, Conant LL. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroi-maging studies. Cereb Cortex 2009; 19: 2767-96.
8. Binkofski F, Buccino G. The role of ventral premotor cortex in action execution and action understanding. J Physiol Paris 2006; 99: 396-405.
9. Boronat CB, Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB, Tang K, Saffran EM, Kimberg DY, et al. Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2005; 23: 361-73.
10. Brett M, Johnsrude IS, Owen AM. The problem of functional localization in the human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002; 3: 243-9.
11. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somato-topic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 2001; 13: 400-4.
12. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Riggio L. The mirror neuron system and action recognition. Brain Lang 2004a; 89: 370-6.
13. Buccino G, Vogt S, Ritzl A, Fink GR, Zilles K, Freund HJ, et al. Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: an event-related fMRI study. Neuron 2004b; 42: 323-34.
14. Buxbaum LJ. Ideomotor apraxia: A call to action. Neurocase 2001; 7: 445-58.
15. Buxbaum LJ, Kalenine S. Action knowledge, visuomotor activation, and embodiment in the two action systems. Ann NY Acad Sci 2010; 1191: 201-18.
16. Buxbaum LJ, Kyle K, Grossman M, Coslett HB. Left inferior parietal representations for skilled hand-object interactions: evidence from stroke and corticobasal degeneration. Cortex 2007; 43: 411-23.
17. Buxbaum LJ, Kyle KM, Menon R. On beyond mirror neurons: internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2005; 25: 226-39.
18. Caspers S, Zilles K, Laird AR, Eickhoff SB. ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. Neuroimage 2010; 50: 1148-67.
19. Chouinard PA, Goodale MA. Category-specific neural processing for naming pictures of animals and naming pictures of tools: an ALE meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 2010; 48: 409-18.
20. Decety J, Grezes J, Costes N, Perani D, Jeannerod M, Procyk E, et al. Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy. Brain 1997; 120 (Pt 10): 1763-77.
21. Fadiga L, Craighero L, D'Ausilio A. Broca's area in language, action, and music. Ann NY Acad Sci 2009; 1169: 448-58.
22. Fazio P, Cantagallo A, Craighero L, D'Ausilio A, Roy AC, Pozzo T, et al. Encoding of human action in Broca's area. Brain 2009; 132: 1980-8.
23. Gallese V. Before and below 'theory of mind': embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 2007; 362: 659-69.
24. Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 1996; 119 (Pt 2): 593-609.
25. Goghari VM, MacDonald AW 3rd. The neural basis of cognitive control: response selection and inhibition. Brain Cogn 2009; 71: 72-83.
26. Goldenberg G. Apraxia and the parietal lobes. Neuropsychologia 2009; 47: 1449-59.
27. Goldenberg G, Hagmann S. The meaning of meaningless gestures: A study of visuo-imitative apraxia. Neuropsychologia 1997; 35: 333-41.
28. Goldenberg G, Karnath HO. The neural basis of imitation is body part specific. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 6282-7.
29. Goldenberg G, Spatt J. The neural basis of tool use. Brain 2009; 132: 1645-55.
30. Grafton ST, Arbib MA, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G. Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography: 2. Observation compared with imagination. Exp Brain Res 1996; 112: 103-11.
31. Grezes J, Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 2001; 12: 1-19.
32. Grodzinsky Y, Santi A. The battle for Broca's region. Trends Cogn Sci 2008; 12: 474-80.
33. Haaland KY, Flaherty D. The different types of limb apraxia errors madeby patients with left vs. right hemisphere damage. Brain Cogn 1984; 3: 370-84.
34. Haaland KY, Harrington DL, Knight RT. Neural representations of skilled movement. Brain 2000; 123: 2306-13.
35. Halsband U, Schmitt J, Weyers M, Binkofski F, Grutzner G, Freund HJ. Recognition and imitation of pantomimed motor acts after unilateral parietal and premotor lesions: A perspective on apraxia. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 200-16.
36. Hamzei F, Rijntjes M, Dettmers C, Glauche V, Weiller C, Buchel C. The human action recognition system and its relationship to Broca's area: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2003; 19: 637-44.
37. Heilman KM, Rothi LJ, Valenstein E. Two forms of ideomotor apraxia. Neurology 1982; 32: 342-6.
38. Hickok G. Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans. J Cogn Neurosci 2009; 21: 1229-43.
39. Holmes CJ, Hoge R, Collins L, Woods R, Toga AW, Evans AC. Enhancement of MR images using registration for signal averaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22: 324-33.
40. Iacoboni M. Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annu Rev Psychol 2009; 60: 653-70.
41. Iacoboni M, Mazziotta JC. Mirror neuron system: basic findings and clinical applications. Ann Neurol 2007; 62: 213-8.
42. Iacoboni M, Woods RP, Brass M, Bekkering H, Mazziotta JC, Rizzolatti G. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 1999; 286: 2526-8.
43. Johnson-Frey SH. The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends Cogn Sci 2004; 8: 71-8.
44. Kable JW, Kan IP, Wilson A, Thompson-Schill SL, Chatterjee A. Conceptual representations of action in the lateral temporal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 2005; 17: 1855-70.
45. Kellenbach ML, Brett M, Patterson K. Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. J Cogn Neurosci 2003; 15: 30-46.
46. Kiefer M, Sim EJ, Liebich S, Hauk O, Tanaka J. Experience-dependent plasticity of conceptual representations in human sensory-motor areas. J Cogn Neurosci 2007; 19: 525-42.
47. Kilner JM, Neal A, Weiskopf N, Friston KJ, Frith CD. Evidence of mirror neurons in human inferior frontal gyrus. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 10153-9.
48. Koechlin E, Ody C, Kouneiher F. The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science 2003; 302: 1181-5.
49. Kolb B, Milner B. Performance of complex arm and facial movements after focal brain lesions. Neuropsychologia 1981; 19: 491-503.
50. Lau EF, Phillips C, Poeppel D. A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008; 9: 920-33.
51. Mahon BZ, Caramazza A. A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. J Physiol Paris 2008; 102: 59-70.
52. Martin A. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annu Rev Psychol 2007; 58: 25-45.
53. Milner AD, Goodale MA. The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
54. Negri GA, Rumiati RI, Zadini A, Ukmar M, Mahon BZ, Caramazza A. What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia. Cogn Neuropsychol 2007; 24: 795-816.
55. Noppeney U. The neural systems of tool and action semantics: A perspective from functional imaging. J Physiol Paris 2008; 102: 40-9.
56. Pazzaglia M, Smania N, Corato E, Aglioti SM. Neural underpinnings of gesture discrimination in patients with limb apraxia. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 3030-41.
57. Pisella L, Binkofski F, Lasek K, Toni I, Rossetti Y. No double-dissociation between optic ataxia and visual agnosia: multiple sub-streams for multiple visuo-manual integrations. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44: 2734-48.
58. Price CJ. The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neu-roimaging. J Anat 2000; 197 (Pt 3): 335-59.
59. Rajah MN, Ames B, D'Esposito M. Prefrontal contributions to domain-general executive control processes during temporal context retrieval. Neuropsychologia 2008; 46: 1088-103.
60. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 2004; 27: 169-92.
61. Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1996; 3: 131-41.
62. Rizzolatti G, Matelli M. Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions. Exp Brain Res 2003; 153: 146-57.
63. Saygin AP, Wilson SM, Dronkers NF, Bates E. Action comprehension in aphasia: linguistic and non-linguistic deficits and their lesion correlates. Neuropsychologia 2004; 42: 1788-804.
64. Schnur TT, Schwartz MF, Kimberg DY, Hirshorn E, Coslett HB, Thompson-Schill SL. Localizing interference during naming: convergent neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence for the function of Broca's area. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 322-7.
65. Schubotz RI, von Cramon DY. Predicting perceptual events activates corresponding motor schemes in lateral premotor cortex: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2002; 15: 787-96.
66. Schwartz MF, Brecher AR, Whyte J, Klein MG. A patient registry for cognitive rehabilitation research: A strategy for balancing patients' privacy rights with researchers' need for access. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1807-14.
67. Schwartz MF, Kimberg DY, Walker GM, Faseyitan O, Brecher A, Dell GS, et al. Anterior temporal involvement in semantic word retrieval: voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping evidence from aphasia. Brain 2009; 132: 3411-27.
68. Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn 1980; 6: 174-215.
69. Tessari A, Canessa N, Ukmar M, Rumiati RI. Neuropsychological evidence for a strategic control of multiple routes in imitation. Brain 2007; 130: 1111-26.
70. Thompson-Schill SL, D'Esposito M, Aguirre GK, Farah MJ. Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A re-evaluation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 14792-7.
71. Tranel D, Kemmerer D, Adolphs R, Damasio H, Damasio AR. Neural correlates of conceptual knowledge for actions. Cogn Neuropsychol 2003; 20: 409-32.
72. Tranel D, Manzel K, Asp E, Kemmerer D. Naming dynamic and static actions: neuropsychological evidence. J Physiol Paris 2008; 102: 80-94.
73. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002; 15: 273-89.
74. Vingerhoets G, Acke F, Vandemaele P, Achten E. Tool responsive regions in the posterior parietal cortex: effect of differences in motor goal and target object during imagined transitive movements. Neuroimage 2009; 47: 1832-43.
75. Warrington E. 'Two categorical stages of object recognition': A retrospective. Perception 2009; 38: 933-9.
76. Warrington EK, Taylor AM. Two categorical stages of object recognition. Perception 1978; 7: 695-705.
77. Weisberg J, van Turennout M, Martin A. A neural system for learning about object function. Cereb Cortex 2007; 17: 513-21.
78. Weiss PH, Dohle C, Binkofski F, Schnitzler A, Freund HJ, Hefter H. Motor impairment in patients with parietal lesions: disturbances of meaningless arm movement sequences. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 397-405.
79. Weiss PH, Rahbari NN, Hesse MD, Fink GR. Deficient sequencing of pantomimes in apraxia. Neurology 2008; 70: 834-40.
80. Willems RM, Ozyurek A, Hagoort P. Differential roles for left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in multimodal integration of action and language. Neuroimage 2009; 47: 1992-2004.
81. Xu J, Gannon PJ, Emmorey K, Smith JF, Braun AR. Symbolic gestures and spoken language are processed by a common neural system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 20664-9.