Impaired access to manipulation features in Apraxia: Evidence from eyetracking and semantic judgment tasks

Brain and Language

Volumn 112, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 101-112

  Myung, Jong yoon ^a   Blumstein, Sheila E ^a,f,g,h   Yee, Eiling ^c   Sedivy, Julie C ^a,b   Thompson Schill, Sharon L ^c,d   Buxbaum, Laurel J ^d,e  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f PROVIDENCE VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h VA BOSTON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Apraxia; Implicit vs. explicit tasks; Lexical semantic representation; Manipulation knowledge; Perceptuomotor experiences

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APRAXIA; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DISEASE SEVERITY; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL TASK; OBJECT MANIPULATION; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADULT; AGED; APRAXIAS; BRAIN; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SEMANTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 75549084614     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: 10902155     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Allport D.A. Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. Current perspectives in dysphasia 1985, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. S.K. Newman, R. Epstein (Eds.).
2. Altmann G., Kamide Y. Now you see it, now you don't: Mediating the mapping between language and the visual world. The interface of language, vision and action 2004, Psychology Press. F. Ferreira, J. Henderson (Eds.).
3. Barsalou L.W. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22:577-660.
4. Barsalou L.W., Simmons W.K., Barbey A.K., Wilson C.D. Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7(2):84-91.
5. Blumstein S., Milberg W., Shrier R. Semantic processing in aphasia: Evidence from an auditory lexical decision task. Brain and Language 1982, 17:301-315.
6. Boronat C., Buxbaum L.J., Coslett H.B., Tang K., Saffran E.M., Kimberg D.Y., Detre J.A. Distinctions between function and manipulation knowledge of objects: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 23:361-373.
7. Boulenger V., Mechtouff L., Thobois S., Broussolle E., Jeannerod M., Nazir T.A. Word processing in Parkinson's disease is impaired for action verbs but not for concrete nouns. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:743-756.
8. Buxbaum L.J. Ideomotor apraxia: A call to action. Neurocase 2001, 7:445-458.
9. Buxbaum L.J., Saffran E.M. Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: Dissociations in apraxic and non-apraxic subjects. Brain and Language 2002, 82:179-199.
10. Buxbaum L.J., Veramonti T., Schwartz M.F. Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: Knowing " what for" but not " how" Neurocase 2000, 6:83-97.
11. Chao L.L., Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 2000, 12:478-484.
12. Fischer M.H., Zwaan R.A. Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61:825-850.
13. Garbarini F., Adenzato M. At the root of embodied cognition: Cognitive science meets neurophysiology. Brain and Cognition 2004, 56:100-106.
14. Goodglass H., Kaplan E. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders 1972, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.
15. Kan I.P., Barsalou L.W., Solomon K.O., Minor J.K., Thompson-Schill S.L. Role of mental imagery in a property verification task: fMRI evidence for perceptual representations of conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2003, 20:525-540.
16. Kellenbach M.L., Brett M., Pattern K. Actions speak louder than functions. The importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15:30-46.
17. Koski L., Iacoboni M., Mazziotta J.C. Deconstructing apraxia: Understanding disorders of intentional movement after stroke. Current Opinion in Neurology 2002, 15:71-77.
18. Lissauer H. Ein Fall von Seelenblindheit nebst einem Beitrag zur Theorie derselben. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheit 1890, 21:222-270. [Edited and reprinted in translation by Shallice, T., & Jackson, M. (1988). Lissauer on agnosia. , 157-192].
19. Milberg W., Blumstein S.E. Lexical decision and aphasia: Evidence for semantic processing. Brain and Language 1981, 14:371-385.
20. Myung J., Blumstein S.E., Sedivy J.C. Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: Manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition 2006, 98:223-243.
21. Pecher D., Zeelenberg R., Barsalou L.W. Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: Modality-specific effects of prior activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:164-167.
22. Rossion B., Pourtois G. Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic level object recognition. Perception 2004, 33:217-236.
23. Rothi, L. J. G., Raymer, A. M., Ochipa, C., Maher, L. M., Greenwald, M. L., & Heilman, K. M. (1992). Florida apraxia battery, experimental edition.
24. Taylor, J. R. (2005). On the perceptual basis of semantic memory: Representation, process, and attentional control revealed by behavior and event-related potentials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Brown University, Providence, May 2005.
25. Yee E., Blumstein S.E., Sedivy J.C. Lexical-semantic activation in Broca's and Wernicke's Aphasia: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:592-612.
26. Yee E., et al. fMRI-adaptation evidence of overlapping neural representations for objects related to function or manipulation. NeuroImage 2009, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.036.
27. Zwaan R.A., Stanfield R.A., Yaxley R.H. Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science 2002, 13:168-171.