Functional relations trump implied motion in recovery from extinction: Evidence from the effects of animacy on extinction

Neurocase

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-10

  Riddoch, M Jane ^a   Riveros, Rodrigo ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action relations; Category effects; Extinction; Grouping; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CASE REPORT; FEMALE; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; MALE; MOTION; PARIETAL LOBE; STROKE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY;

AGED; BRAIN MAPPING; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MENTAL STATUS SCHEDULE; MOTION PERCEPTION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE;

EID: 78751617255     PISSN: 13554794     EISSN: 14653656     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13554791003785919     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Berg, E. A. (1948). A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. Journal of General Psychology, 39, 15-22.
2. Borghi, A., Bonfiglio, C., Lugli, L., Ricciardelli, P., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2005). Visual hand primes and manipulable objects. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou & M. Bucciarelli (Eds), Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society 2005 (pp. 322-327). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlabaum Associates, Inc.
3. Borghi, A., Bonfiglioli, C., Lugli, L., Ricciardelli, P., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2007). Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with hand primes. Neuroscience Letters, 411, 17-21.
4. Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12, 478-484.
5. Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Neural representations of graspable objects: Are tools special? Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 457-469.
6. Di Pellegrino, G., Rafal, R., & Tipper, S. P. (2005). Implicitly evoked actions modulate visual selection: Evidence from parietal extinction. Current Biology, 15, 1469-1472.
7. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). 'Mini Mental State' - a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
8. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9. Grafton, S. T., Fadiga, L., Arbib, M. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage, 6, 231-236.
10. Green, C., & Hummel, J. E. (2006). Familiar interacting pairs of objects are perceptually grouped. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1107-1119.
11. Grèzes, J., & Decety, J. (2002). Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 212-222.
12. Grèzes, J., Tucker, M., Armory, J., Ellis, R., & Passingham, R. E. (2003). Objects automatically potentiate action: An fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 2235-2740.
13. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Fortt, H. (2006). Action relations, semantic relations and familiarity of spatial position in Balint's syndrome: Cross-over effects on perceptual report and localisation. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioural Neuroscience, 6, 236-245.
14. Pavese, A., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2002). Action matters: The role of action plans and object affordances in selection for action. Visual Cognition, 9, 559-590.
15. Phillips, J. A., Humphreys, G. W., Noppeney, U., & Price, C. J. (2002). The neural substrates of action retrieval: An examination of semantic and visual routes to action. Visual Cognition, 9, 662-684.
16. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1993). BORB: The Birmingham Object Recognition Battery. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Edwards, S., Baker, T., & Willson, K. (2003). Seeing the action: Neuropsychologial evidence for multiple object selection. Nature Neuroscience., 6, 82-89.
18. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Hinkman, M., Clift, J., Daly, A., & Collin, J. (2006). I can see what you are doing: Action familiarity and affordance promote recovery from extinction. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 583-605.
19. Riddoch, M. J., Bodley Scott, S., & Humphreys, G. W. (2010). No direction home: Extinction is affected by implicit motion. Cortex, 46, 678-684.
20. Robertson, I. H., & Halligan, P. W. (1999). Spatial neglect: A clinical handbook for diagnosis and treatment. Hove: Psychology Press.
21. Sirigu, A., Cohen, L., Duhamel, J. R., Pillon, B., Dubois, B., & Agid, Y. (1995). A selective impairment of hand posture for object utilisation in apraxia. Cortex, 31 (1), 41-55.
22. Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., & Houghton, G. (1998). Action based mechanisms of attention. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society B, 353, 1385-1393.
23. Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998a). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24 (3), 830-846.
24. Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998b). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830-846.
25. Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2001). The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition, 8 (6), 769-800.
26. Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica, 116, 185-203.
27. Vainio, L., Symes, E., Ellis, R., Tucker, M., & Ottoboni, G. (2008). On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects. Cognition, 108, 444-465.
28. Warrington, E. K. (1984). Recognition Memory Test. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
29. Wilson, B. A., Cockburn, J., & Halligan, P. (1987). Behavioural Inattention Test. Titchfield, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.