Action relations facilitate the identification of briefly-presented objects

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 597-612

  Roberts, Katherine L ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action; Affordance; Grouping attention and perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79951944279     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-010-0043-0     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Biederman, I. (1972). Perceiving real world scenes. Science, 177, 77-80.
2. Binkofski, F., and Buccino, G. (2006). The role of ventral premotor cortex in action execution and action understanding. Journal of Physiology - Paris, 99, 396-405.
3. Chao, L. L., and Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable manmade objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12, 478-484.
4. Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Umiltà, C. A., and Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Evidence for visuomotor priming effect. NeuroReport, 8, 347-349.
5. Creem-Regehr, S. H., and Lee, J. N. (2005). Neural representations of graspable objects: Are tools special? Cognitive Brain Resesarch, 22, 457-469.
6. Culham, J. C., Cavina-Pratesi, C., and Singhal, A. (2006). The role of the parietal cortex in visuomotor control: What have we learned from neuroimaging? Neuropsychologia, 44, 2668-2684.
7. Deubel, H., Schneider, W. X., and Paprotta, I. (1998). Selective dorsal and ventral processing: Evidence for a common attentional mechanisms in reaching and perception. Visual Cognition, 5, 81-107.
8. di Pellegrino, G., Rafal, R., and Tipper, S. P. (2005). Implicitly evoked actions modulate visual selection: Evidence from parietal extinction. Current Biology, 15, 1469-1472.
9. Freeman, E. and Driver, J (2008). Voluntary control of long-range motion integration via selective attention to context. Journal of Vision 8(11):18, 1-22.
10. Freeman, E., Driver, J., Sagi, D., and Zhaoping, L. (2003). Top-down modulation of lateral interactions in early vision: Does attention affect integration of the whole or just perception of the parts? Current Biology, 13, 985-989.
11. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Gilchrist, D., Humphreys, G. W., and Riddoch, M. J. (1996). Grouping and extinction: Evidence for low-level modulation of visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 1223-1249.
13. Goldsmith, M., and Yeari, M. (2003). Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 897-918.
14. Green, C., and Hummel, J. E. (2006). Familiar interacting object pairs are perceptually grouped. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1107-1119.
15. Grèzes, J., and Decety, J. (2002). Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 212-222.
16. Grèzes, J., Tucker, M., Armony, J., Ellis, R., and Passingham, R. E. (2003). Objects automatically potentiate action: An fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 2735-2740.
17. Grill-Spector, K. (2003). The neural basis of object perception. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 159-166.
18. Handy, T. C., Grafton, S. T., Shroff, N. M., Ketay, S., and Gazzaniga, M. S. (2003). Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 421-427.
19. Handy, T. C., and Tipper, C. M. (2007). Attentional orienting to graspable objects: What triggers the response? Neuro Report, 18, 941-944.
20. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., and Fortt, H. (2006). Action relations, semantic relations, and familiarity of spatial position in Balint's syndrome: Crossover effects on perceptual report and on localization. Cognitive Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, 236-245.
21. Humphreys, G. W., Wulff, M., Yoon, E. Y., and Riddoch, M. J. (2010). Neuropsychological evidence for visual- and motor-based affordance: Effects of reference frame and object-hand congruence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 36, 659-670.
22. Lawson, R., and Jolicoeur, P. (1998). The effects of plane rotation on the recognition of brief masked pictures of familiar objects. Memory and Cognition, 26, 791-803.
23. Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25-45.
24. Nicol, J. R., and Shore, D. I. (2007). Perceptual grouping impairs temporal resolution. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 141-148.
25. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
26. Petit, L. S., Pegna, A. J., Harris, I. M., and Michel, C. M. (2006). Automatic motor cortex activation for natural as compared to awkward grips of a manipulable object. Experimental Brain Research, 168, 120-130.
27. Phillips, J. C., and Ward, R. (2002). S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation. Visual Cognition, 9, 540-558.
28. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Edwards, S., Baker, T., and Willson, K. (2003). Seeing the action: Neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 82-89.
29. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Heslop, J., and Castermans, E. (2002). Dissociations between object knowledge and everyday action. Neurocase, 8, 100-110.
30. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Hickman, M., Clift, J., Daly, A., and Colin, J. (2006). I can see what you are doing: Action familiarity and affordance promote recovery from extinction. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 583-605.
31. Roberts, K. L., and Humphreys, G. W. (2010a). Action relationships concatenate representations of separate objects in the ventral visual system. NeuroImage, 52, 1541-1548.
32. Roberts, K. L., and Humphreys, G. W. (2010b). The one that does leads: Action relations influence the perceived temporal order of graspable objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 776-780.
33. Solodkin, A., Hlustik, P., Noll, D. C., and Small, S. L. (2001). Lateralization of motor circuits and handedness during finger movements. European Journal of Neurology, 8, 425-434.
34. Tipper, S. P., Paul, M. A., and Hayes, A. E. (2006). Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state onaffordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 493-498.
35. Tipples, J. (2002). Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 314-318.
36. Tucker, M., and Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830-846.
37. Tzourio, N., Crivello, F., Mellet, E., Nkanga-Ngila, B., and Mazoyer, B. (1998). Functional anatomy of dominance for speech comprehension in left handers vs. right handers. NeuroImage, 8, 1-16.
38. Yoon, E. Y., and Humphreys, G. W. (2007). Dissociative effects of viewpoint and semantic priming on action and semantic decisions: Evidence for dual routes to action from vision. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 601-623.
39. Yoon, E. Y., Humphreys, G. W., and Riddoch, M. J. (2005). Action naming with impaired semantics: Neuropsychological evidence contrasting naming and reading for objects and verbs. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 753-767