Architecture and assembly of the archaeal Cdc48·20S proteasome

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 17, 2014, Pages

  Barthelme, Dominik ^a   Chen, James Z ^a,b   Grabenstatter, Jonathan ^a   Baker, Tania A ^a   Sauer, Robert T ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic wobbling model; P97 VCP

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; ARCHAEAL PROTEIN; CDC48 20S PROTEIN; PROTEASOME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR CLONING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN HYDROLYSIS; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; THERMOPLASMA ACIDOPHILUM;

AAA+ PROTEASE; DYNAMIC WOBBLING MODEL; P97/VCP;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CROSS-LINKING REAGENTS; ENZYME STABILITY; HYDROLYSIS; MICE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NEGATIVE STAINING; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; THERMOPLASMA;

EID: 84899644000     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1404823111     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Finley D (2009) Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu Rev Biochem 78:477-513.
2. Voges D, Zwickl P, Baumeister W (1999) The 26S proteasome: A molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu Rev Biochem 68:1015-1068.
3. Groll M, et al. (2000) A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat Struct Biol 7(11):1062-1067.
4. Kish-Trier E, Hill CP (2013) Structural biology of the proteasome. Annu Rev Biophys 42:29-49.
5. Maupin-Furlow J (2012) Proteasomes and protein conjugation across domains of life. Nat Rev Microbiol 10(2):100-111.
6. Sauer RT, Baker TA (2011) AAA+ proteases: ATP-fueled machines of protein destruction. Annu Rev Biochem 80:587-612.
7. Barthelme D, Sauer RT (2013) Bipartite determinants mediate an evolutionarily conserved interaction between Cdc48 and the 20S peptidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(9):3327-3332.
8. Barthelme D, Sauer RT (2012) Identification of the Cdc48·20S proteasome as an ancient AAA+ proteolytic machine. Science 337(6096):843-846.
9. Baek GH, et al. (2013) Cdc48: A Swiss army knife of cell biology. J Amino Acids 2013: 183421.
10. Allers T, Barak S, Liddell S, Wardell K, Mevarech M (2010) Improved strains and plasmid vectors for conditional overexpression of His-tagged proteins in Haloferax volcanii. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(6):1759-1769.
11. DeLaBarre B, Brunger AT (2003) Complete structure of p97/valosin- containing protein reveals communication between nucleotide domains. Nat Struct Biol 10(10):856-863.
12. Walz J, et al. (1998) 26S proteasome structure revealed by three-dimensional electron microscopy. J Struct Biol 121(1):19-29.
13. Smith DM, et al. (2005) ATP binding to PAN or the 26S ATPases causes association with the 20S proteasome, gate opening, and translocation of unfolded proteins. Mol Cell 20(5):687-698.
14. Smith DM, Fraga H, Reis C, Kafri G, Goldberg AL (2011) ATP binds to proteasomal ATPases in pairs with distinct functional effects, implying an ordered reaction cycle. Cell 144(4):526-538.
15. Matyskiela ME, Lander GC, Martin A (2013) Conformational switching of the 26S proteasome enables substrate degradation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20(7):781-788.
16. Rouiller I, et al. (2002) Conformational changes of the multifunction p97 AAA ATPase during its ATPase cycle. Nat Struct Biol 9(12):950-957.
17. Tang WK, et al. (2010) A novel ATP-dependent conformation in p97 N-D1 fragment revealed by crystal structures of disease-related mutants. EMBO J 29(13):2217-2229.
18. DeLaBarre B, Brunger AT (2005) Nucleotide dependent motion and mechanism of action of p97/VCP. J Mol Biol 347(2):437-452.
19. Gerega A, et al. (2005) VAT, the thermoplasma homolog of mammalian p97/VCP, is an N domain-regulated protein unfoldase. J Biol Chem 280(52):42856-42862.
20. Förster A, Masters EI, Whitby FG, Robinson H, Hill CP (2005) The 1.9 A structure of a proteasome-11S activator complex and implications for proteasome-PAN/PA700 interactions. Mol Cell 18(5):589-599.
21. Rockel B, et al. (1999) Structure of VAT, a CDC48/p97 ATPase homologue from the archaeon Thermoplasma acidophilum as studied by electron tomography. FEBS Lett 451(1):27-32.
22. Rockel B, Jakana J, Chiu W, BaumeisterW(2002) Electron cryo-microscopy of VAT, the archaeal p97/CDC48 homologue from Thermoplasma acidophilum. J Mol Biol 317(5): 673-681.
23. Niwa H, et al. (2012) The role of the N-domain in the ATPase activity of the mammalian AAA ATPase p97/VCP. J Biol Chem 287(11):8561-8570.
24. Beckwith R, Estrin E, Worden EJ, Martin A (2013) Reconstitution of the 26S proteasome reveals functional asymmetries in its AAA+ unfoldase. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20(10):1164-1172.
25. Wendler P, et al. (2009) Motor mechanism for protein threading through Hsp104. Mol Cell 34(1):81-92.
26. Haslberger T, et al. (2008) Protein disaggregation by the AAA+ chaperone ClpB involves partial threading of looped polypeptide segments. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15(6): 641-650.
27. Glynn SE, Nager AR, Baker TA, Sauer RT (2012) Dynamic and static components power unfolding in topologically closed rings of a AAA+ proteolytic machine. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19(6):616-622.
28. Nager AR, Baker TA, Sauer RT (2011) Stepwise unfolding of a β barrel protein by the AAA+ ClpXP protease. J Mol Biol 413(1):4-16.
29. Yu Y, et al. (2010) Interactions of PAN's C-termini with archaeal 20S proteasome and implications for the eukaryotic proteasome-ATPase interactions. EMBO J 29(3):692-702.
30. Dombkowski AA (2003) Disulfide by Design: A computational method for the rational design of disulfide bonds in proteins. Bioinformatics 19(14):1852-1853.
31. Stadtmueller BM, et al. (2010) Structural models for interactions between the 20S proteasome and its PAN/19S activators. J Biol Chem 285(1):13-17.