Mechanisms of reinforcement in natural and simulated polymorphic populations

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 305-319

  Nosil, Patrik ^a   Yukilevich, Roman ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Migration modification; Reproductive isolation; Simulation model; Speciation; Timema walking stick

Indexed keywords

ASSORTATIVE MATING; DIVERGENCE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; HYBRID; INSECT; MIGRATION; NATURAL SELECTION; POLYMORPHISM; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

PHASMATODEA; TIMEMA; TIMEMA CRISTINAE;

EID: 53249119371     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01048.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Balkau BJ, Feldman MW. 1973. Selection for migration modification. Genetics 74 : 171 174.
2. Barluenga M, Stölting K, Salzburger W, Muschick M, Meyer A. 2006. Sympatric speciation in Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fish. Nature 439 : 719 723.
3. Bernays EA, Funk DJ. 1999. Specialists make faster decisions than generalists: experiments with aphids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 266 : 151 156.
4. Bernays EA, Wcislo WT. 1994. Sensory capabilities, information processing, and resource specialization. Quarterly Review of Biology 69 : 187 204.
5. Cain ML, Andreasen V, Howard DJ. 1999. Reinforcing selection is effective under a relatively broad set of conditions in a mosaic hybrid zone. Evolution 53 : 1343 1353.
6. Carriere Y. 1998. Constraints on the evolution of host choice by phytophagous insects. Oikos 82 : 401 406.
7. Coyne JA, Orr HA. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland, MA : Sinauer.
8. Crespi BJ, Sandoval CP. 2000. Phylogenetic evidence for the evolution of ecological specialization in Timema walking-sticks. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13 : 249 262.
9. Cruz R, Vilas C, Mosquera J, Garcia C. 2004. Relative contribution of dispersal and natural selection to the maintenance of a hybrid zone in Littorina. Evolution 58 : 2724 2746.
10. Day T. 2000. Sexual selection and the evolution of costly female preferences: spatial effects. Evolution 54 : 715 730.
11. Dobzhansky T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. New York, NY : Columbia University Press.
12. Felsenstein J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35 : 124 138.
13. Fisher RA. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford : Claredon.
14. Funk DJ, Filchak KE, Feder JL. 2002. Herbivorous insects: model systems for the comparative study of speciation ecology. Genetica 116 : 251 267.
15. Gavrilets S. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
16. Gavrilets S, Vose A, Barluenga M, Salzburger W, Meyer A. 2007. Case studies and mathematical models of ecological speciation. 1. Cichlids in a crater. Molecular Ecology 16 : 2893 2909.
17. Gavrilets S, Vose S. 2007. Case studies and mathematical models of ecological speciation. 2. Palms on an oceanic island. Molecular Ecology 16 : 2910 2921.
18. Hendry AP. 2004. Selection against migrants contributes to the rapid evolution of ecologically-dependent reproductive isolation. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6 : 1219 1236.
19. Higgie M, Chenoweth S, Blows MW. 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290 : 519 521.
20. Hoskin CJ, Higgie M, McDonald KR, Moritz C. 2005. Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature 437 : 1353 1356.
21. Jaenike J. 1990. Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21 : 243 273.
22. Janz N, Nylin S. 1997. The role of female search behaviour in determining host plant range in plant feeding insects: a test of the information processing hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 264 : 701 707.
23. Jiggins CD, Estrada C, Rodrigues A. 2004. Mimicry and the evolution of pre-mating isolation in Heliconius melpomene. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17 : 680 691.
24. Jiggins CD, Naisbit RE, Coe RL, Mallet J. 2001. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411 : 302 305.
25. Johnson PA, Hoppensteadt FC, Smith JJ, Bush GL. 1996. Conditions for sympatric speciation: a diploid model incorporating habitat fidelity and non-habitat assortative mating. Evolutionary Ecology 10 : 187 205.
26. Kirkpatrick M. 2000. Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 267 : 1649 1655.
27. Kirkpatrick M, Ravigné V. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. American Naturalist 159 : S22 S35.
28. Kondrashov AS, Kondrashov FA. 1999. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400 : 351 354.
29. Lemmon AR, Smadja C, Kirkpatrick M. 2004. Reproductive character displacement is not the only possible outcome of reinforcement. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17 : 177 183.
30. Liou LW, Price TD. 1994. Speciation by reinforcement of pre-mating isolation. Evolution 48 : 1451 1459.
31. Lukhtanov VA, Kandul NP, Plotkin J, Dantchenko AV, Haig D, Pierce NE. 2005. Reinforcement of pre-zygotic isolation and karyotype diversification in Agrodiaetus blue butterflies. Nature 436 : 385 389.
32. Mayr E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. New York, NY : Columbia University Press.
33. Mayr E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
34. Noor MAF. 1995. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375 : 674 675.
35. Nosil P. 2004. Reproductive isolation caused by visual predation on migrants between divergent environments. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 271 : 1521 1528.
36. Nosil P. 2007. Divergent host-plant adaptation and reproductive isolation between ecotypes of Timema cristinae walking-sticks. American Naturalist 169 : 151 162.
37. Nosil P, Crespi BJ. 2006. Experimental evidence that predation promotes divergence in adaptive radiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 : 9090 9095.
38. Nosil P, Crespi BJ. 2004. Does gene flow constrain adaptive divergence or vice versa? A test using ecomorphology and sexual isolation in Timema cristinae walking-sticks. Evolution 58 : 102 112.
39. Nosil P, Crespi BJ, Gries R, Gries G. 2007. Natural selection and divergence in mate preference during speciation. Genetica 128 : 309 327.
40. Nosil P, Crespi BJ, Sandoval CP. 2003. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 270 : 1911 1918.
41. Nosil P, Crespi BJ, Sandoval CP. 2002. Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature 417 : 441 443.
42. Nosil P, Crespi BJ, Sandoval CP. 2006a. The evolution of host preference in allopatric versus parapatric populations of T. cristinae walking-sticks. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19 : 929 942.
43. Nosil P, Crespi BJ, Sandoval CP, Kirkpatrick M. 2006b. Migration and the genetic covariance between habitat preference and performance. American Naturalist 167 : E66 E78.
44. Nosil P, Egan SP, Funk DJ. 2008. Heterogeneous genomic divergence between walking-stick ecotypes: 'isolation-by-adaptation' and multiple roles for divergent selection. Evolution 62 : 316 336.
45. Nosil P, Vines TH, Funk DJ. 2005. Perspective: reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants from divergent habitats. Evolution 59 : 705 719.
46. Ortiz-Barrientos D, Counterman BA, Noor MAF. 2004. The genetics of speciation by reinforcement. PLoS Biology 2 : e416.
47. Ortiz-Barrientos D, Noor MAF. 2005. Evidence for a one-allele assortative mating locus. Science 310 : 1467 1467.
48. Pfennig KS. 2003. A test of alternative hypotheses for the evolution of reproductive isolation between spadefoot toads: support for the reinforcement hypothesis. Evolution 12 : 2842 2851
49. Rolan-Alvarez E, Erlandsson J, Johannesson K, Cruz R. 1999. Mechanisms of incomplete prezygotic reproductive isolation in an intertidal snail: testing behavioural models in wild populations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12 : 879 890.
50. Rundle HD, Schluter D. 1998. Reinforcement of stickleback mating preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 52 : 200 208.
51. Sandoval CP. 1993. Geographic, ecological and behavioral factors affecting spatial variation in color or morph frequency in the walking-stick Timema cristinae. Ph.D. Thesis. University of California, Santa Barbara.
52. Sandoval CP. 1994a. The effects of relative geographic scales of gene flow and selection on morph frequencies in the walking stick Timema cristinae. Evolution 48 : 1866 1879.
53. Sandoval CP. 1994b. Differential visual predation on morphs of Timema cristinae (Phasmatodeae: Timemidae) and its consequences for host range. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 52 : 341 356.
54. Sandoval CP. 2000. Presence of a walking-stick population (Phasmatoptera: Timematodea) after a wildfire. Southwestern Naturalist 45 : 19 25.
55. Savolainen V, Anstett MC, Lexer C, Hutton I, Clarkson JJ, Norup MV, Powell MP, Springate D, Salamin N, Baker WJ. 2006. Sympatric speciation in palms on an oceanic island. Nature 441 : 210 213.
56. Servedio M, Noor M. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 34 : 339 364.
57. Servedio MR. 2000. Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating. Evolution 54 : 21 29.
58. Servedio MR. 2001. Beyond reinforcement: the evolution of pre-mating isolation by direct selection on preferences and postmating, prezygotic incompatibilities. Evolution 55 : 1909 1920.
59. Servedio MR. 2004. The evolution of pre-mating isolation: local adaptation and natural and sexual selection against hybrids. Evolution 58 : 913 924.
60. Servedio MR, Kirkpatrick M. 1997. The effects of gene flow on reinforcement. Evolution 51 : 1764 1772.
61. Sezer M, Butlin RK. 1998. The genetic basis of oviposition preference differences between sympatric host races of the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 265 : 2399 2405.
62. Yukilevich R, True JR. 2006. Divergent outcomes of reinforcement speciation: the relative importance of assortative mating and migration modification. American Naturalist 167 : 636 652.
63. Zouros E, d'Entremont CJ. 1980. Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis: response to pressure from a related species. Evolution 34 : 421 430.