Reinforcement in chorus frogs: Lifetime fitness estimates including intrinsic natural selection and sexual selection against hybrids

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1748-1761

  Lemmon, Emily Moriarty ^a,b   Lemmon, Alan R ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Hybrid incompatibility; Hybrid inviability; Hybrid sterility; Hybridization; Pseudacris; Reproductive character displacement

Indexed keywords

CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT; FITNESS; FROG; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INCOMPATIBILITY; LIFE CYCLE; MATING SUCCESS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; STERILITY; VIABILITY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FROGS AND TOADS; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; MATE CHOICE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; ANURA; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

ANIMALS; ANURA; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC SPECIATION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; SELECTION, GENETIC;

ANURA; PSEUDACRIS; PSEUDACRIS FERIARUM; PSEUDACRIS NIGRITA;

EID: 77953877671     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00955.x     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Alatalo R V, Gustafsson L, Lundberg A. Hybridization and breeding success of collared and pied flycatchers on the island of Gotland. Auk 1982, 99:285-291.
2. Alatalo R V, Eriksson D, Gustafsson L, Lundberg A. Hybridization between pied and collared flycatchers-sexual selection and speciation theory. J. Evol. Biol. 1990, 3:375-389.
3. Altwegg R, Reyer H-U. Patterns of natural selection on size at metamorphosis in water frogs. Evolution 2003, 57:872-882.
4. Anderson K. Chromosome evolution in Holarctic Hyla treefrogs. Amphibian cytogenetics and evolution 1991, 299-312. Green D MSessions S K. Pp, , eds, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
5. Berset-Brändli L, Dubey J Jaquithomamp, Perrin N. A sex-specific marker reveals male heterogamety in European tree frogs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23:1104-1106.
6. Bolnick D I, Turelli M, López-Fernández H, Wainwright P C, Near T J. Accelerated mitochondrial evolution and " Darwin's Corollary": asymmetric viability of reciprocal F1 hybrids in Centrarchid fishes. Genetics 2008, 178:1037-1048.
7. Borge T, Lindroos K, Nádvorník P, Syvänen A-C, Sætre G-P. Amount of introgression in flycatcher hybrid zones reflects regional differences in pre and post-zygotic barriers to gene exchange. J. Evol. Biol. 2005, 18:1416-1424.
8. Bridle J R, Saldamando C I, Koning W, Butlin R K. Assortative preferences and discrimination by females against hybrid male song in the grasshoppers Chorthippus brunneus and Chorthippus jacobsi (Orthoptera: Acrididae). J. Evol. Biol. 2006, 19:1248-1256.
9. Brown W L, Wilson E O. Character displacement. Syst. Zool. 1956, 5:49-64.
10. Caldwell J P. Demography and life history of two species of chorus frogs (Anura: Hylidae) in South Carolina. Copeia 1987, 1987:114-127.
11. Coyne J A, Orr H A. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 1989, 43:362-381.
12. Coyne J A, Orr H A. " Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 1997, 51:295-303.
13. Coyne J A, Orr H A. The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 1998, 353:287-305.
14. Coyne J A, Orr H A. Speciation 2004, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA
15. Dobzhansky T. Genetics and the origin of species 1937, Columbia Univ. Press, NY
16. Dobzhansky T. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat. 1940, 74:312-321.
17. Fouquette M J. Speciation in chorus frogs. I. Reproductive character displacement in the Pseudacris nigrita complex. Syst. Zool. 1975, 24:16-22.
18. Good J M, Handel M A, Nachman M W. Asymmetry and polymorphism of hybrid male sterility during the early stages of speciation in house mice. Evolution 2007, 62:50-65.
19. Gröning J, Hochkirch A. Reproductive interference between animal species. Q. Rev. Biol. 2008, 83:257-282.
20. Haavie J, Borge T, Bures S, Garamszegi L Z, Lampe H M, Moreno J, Qvarnström A, Török J, Saetre G-P. Flycatcher song in allopatry and sympatry-convergence, divergence, and reinforcement. J. Evol. Biol. 2004, 17:227-237.
21. Haldane J B S. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 1922, 12:101-109.
22. Harrison R G. Hybrid zones: windows on evolutionary process. Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology 1990, Volume 7:69-128. Futuyma D JAntonovics J. Pp, , eds, Oxford Univ. Press, New York
23. Harrison R G. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process 1993, ed, Oxford Univ. Press, New York
24. Hastings W K. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 1970, 57:97-109.
25. Hatfield T, Schluter D. Ecological speciation in sticklebacks: environment-dependent hybrid fitness. Evolution 1999, 53:866-873.
26. Higgie M, Chenoweth S, Blows M W. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 2000, 290:519-521.
27. Höbel G, Gerhardt H C. Reproductive character displacement in the acoustic communication system of green tree frogs (Hyla cinerea). Evolution 2003, 57:894-904.
28. Hoskin C J, Higgie M, McDonald K R, Moritz C. Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature 2005, 437:1353-1356.
29. Howard D J. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process 1993, 46-69. Harrison R G. , ed, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
30. Jaenike J, Dyer K A, Cornish C, Minhas M S. Asymmetrical reinforcement and Wolbachia infection in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:1852-1862.
31. Kawamura T, Nishioka M. Aspects of the reproductive biology of Japanese anurans. The reproductive biology of amphibians 1977, 103-139. Taylor D H, Guttman S I. Pp, , eds, Plenum, NY
32. Kay K M, Schemske D W. Natural selection reinforces speciation in a radiation of neotropical rainforest plants. Evolution 2008, 62:2628-2642.
33. Kirkpatrick M. Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2000, 267:1649-1655.
34. Kirkpatrick M. Reinforcement during ecological speciation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2001, 268:1-5.
35. Kirkpatrick M, Servedio M R. The reinforcement of mating preferences on an island. Genetics 1999, 151:865-884.
36. Kronforst M R, Young L G, Gilbert L E. Reinforcement of mate preferences among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:278-285.
37. Lemmon A R. Analytical, computational, and statistical approaches to studying speciation. 2007, Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX
38. Lemmon E M. Diversification of conspecific signals in sympatry: geographic overlap drives multidimensional reproductive character displacement in frogs. Evolution 2009, 63:1155-1170.
39. Lemmon E M, Lemmon A R, Collins J T, Lee-Yaw J A, Cannatella D C. Phylogeny-based delimitation of species boundaries and contact zones in the trilling chorus frogs (Pseudacris). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007a, 44:1068-1082.
40. Lemmon E M, Lemmon A R, Cannatella D C. Geological and climatic forces driving speciation in the continentally distributed trilling chorus frogs (Pseudacris). Evolution 2007b, 61:2086-2103.
41. Liou L W, Price T D. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution 1994, 48:1451-1459.
42. López-Fernández H, Bolnick D I. What causes partial F1 hybrid viability? Incomplete penetrance versus genetic variation. PLoS one 2007, 12:e1294.
43. Lynch K S, Crews D, Ryan M J, Wilczynski W. Hormonal state influences aspects of female mate choice in the Túngara Frog (Physalaemus pustulosus). Horm. Behav. 2006, 49:450-457.
44. Malone J H, Fontenot B E. Patterns of reproductive isolation in toads. PLoS one 2008, 3:e3900.
45. Mendelson T C. Sexual isolation evolves faster than hybrid inviability in a diverse and sexually dimorphic genus of fish (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 2003, 57:317-327.
46. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth A W, Rosenbluth M N, Teller A H, Teller E. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 1953, 21:1087-1091.
47. Naisbit R E, Jiggins C D, Mallet J. Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2001, 268:1849-1854.
48. Noor M. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 1995, 375:674-675.
49. Nosil P, Crespi B J, Sandoval C P. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2003, 270:1911-1918.
50. Nosil P, Crespi B J, Gries R, Gries G. Natural selection and divergence in mate preference during speciation. Genetica 2007, 129:309-327.
51. Orr H A. Haldane's Rule. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1997, 28:195-218.
52. Ortiz-Barrientos D, Counterman B A, Noor M A F. The genetics of speciation by reinforcement. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2:2256-2263.
53. Ortiz-Barrientos D, Grealy A, Nosil P. The genetics and ecology of reinforcement, implications for the evolution of prezygotic isolation in sympatry and beyond. The year in evolutionary biology 2009. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2009, 1168:156-182.
54. Parris M J. Hybridization in leopard frogs (Rana pipiens complex): larval fitness components in single-genotype populations and mixtures. Evolution 1999, 53:1872-1883.
55. Parris M J. Hybridization in leopard frogs (Rana pipiens complex): terrestrial performance of newly metamorphosed hybrid and parental genotypes in field enclosures. Can. J. Zool. 2001a, 79:1552-1558.
56. Parris M J. Hybridization in leopard frogs (Rana pipiens complex): variation in interspecific hybrid larval fitness components along a natural contact zone. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2001b, 3:91-105.
57. Parris M J. High larval performance of leopard frog hybrids (Rana pipiens complex): effects of environment-dependent selection. Ecology 2001c, 82:3001-3009.
58. Parris M J, Semlitsch R D, Sage R D. Experimental analysis of the evolutionary potential of hybridization in leopard frogs (Anura:Ranidae). J. Evol. Biol. 1999, 12:662-671.
59. Peterson M A, Honchak B M, Locke S E, Beeman T E, Mendoza J, Green J, Buckingham K J, White M A, Monsen K J. Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone. Evolution 2005, 59:2639-2655.
60. Pfennig K S. Female spadefoot toads compromise on mate quality to ensure conspecific matings. Behav. Ecol. 2000, 11:220-227.
61. Pfennig K S. A test of alternative hypotheses for the evolution of reproductive isolation between spadefoot toads: support for the reinforcement hypothesis. Evolution 2003, 57:2842-2851.
62. Pfennig K S. Facultative mate choice drives adaptive hybridization. Science 2007, 318:965-967.
63. Pfennig K S, Pfennig D W. Character displacement: ecological and reproductive responses to a common evolutionary problem. Q. Rev. Biol. 2009, 84:253-276.
64. Pfennig K S, Simovich M A. Differential selection to avoid hybridization in two toad species. Evolution 2002, 56:1840-1848.
65. Pfennig K S, Chunco A J, Lackey A C R. Ecological selection and hybrid fitness: hybrids succeed on parental resources. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2007, 9:341-354.
66. Presgraves D C. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in Lepidoptera. Evolution 2002, 56:1168-1183.
67. Qvarnström A. Genotype-by-environment interactions in the determination of the size of a secondary sexual character in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). Evolution 1999, 53:1564-1572.
68. Qvarnström A, Haavie J, Saether S A, Eriksson D, Pärt T. Song similarity predicts hybridization in flycatchers. J. Evol. Biol. 2006, 19:1202-1209.
69. Rice W R. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 1989, 43:223-225.
70. Rundle H D. A test of ecologically dependent postmating isolation between sympatric sticklebacks. Evolution 2002, 56:322-329.
71. Rundle H D, Schluter D. Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 1998, 52:200-208.
72. Saether S A, Saetre G-P, Borge T, Wiley C, Svedin N, Andersson G, Veen T, Haavie J, Servedio M R, Bures S. Sex chromosome-linked species recognition and evolution of reproductive isolation in flycatchers. Science 2007, 318:95-97.
73. Saetre G, Moum T, Bures S, Kral M, Adamjan M, Moreno J. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 1997, 387:589-592.
74. Saetre G-P, Král M, Bures S, Ims R A. Dynamics of a clinal hybrid zone and a comparison with island hybrid zones of flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca and F. albicollis). J. Zool., Lond. 1999, 247:53-64.
75. Saetre G-P, Borge T, Lindroos K, Haavie J, Sheldon B C, Primmer C, Syvänen A-C. Sex chromosome evolution and speciation in Ficedula flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2002, 270:53-59.
76. Sasa M M, Chippindale P T, Johnson N A. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in frogs. Evolution 1998, 52:1811-1820.
77. Schmid M, Steinlein C. Chromosome banding in Amphibia. XXIX. The primitive XY/XX sex chromosomes of Hyla femoralis (Anura, Hylidae). Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2003, 101:74-79.
78. Servedio M R. Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating. Evolution 2000, 54:21-29.
79. Servedio M R. The evolution of premating isolation: local adaptation and natural and sexual selection against hybrids. Evolution 2004, 58:913-924.
80. Servedio M R, Noor M A F. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2003, 34:339-364.
81. Simovich M A. Analysis of a hybrid zone between the spadefoot toads Scaphiopus multiplicatus and Scaphiopus bombifrons. 1985, Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. California, Riverside, CA
82. Simovich M A, Sassaman C A, Chovnick A. Postmating selection of hybrid toads (Scaphiopus multiplicatus and Scaphiopus bombifrons). Proc. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 1991, 1991:1-6.
83. Smadja C, Ganem G. Asymmetrical reproductive character displacement in the house mouse. J. Evol. Biol. 2005, 18:1485-1493.
84. Stratton G E, Uetz G W. The inheritance of courtship behavior and its role as a reproductive isolationg mechanism in two species of Schizocosa wolf spiders (Araneae; Lycosidae). Evolution 1986, 40:129-141.
85. Svedin N, Wiley C, Veen T, Gustafsson L. Natural and sexual selection against hybrid flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2008, 275:735-744.
86. Urbanelli S, Porretta D. Evidence of reinforcement of premating isolation between two species of the genus Ochthebius (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae). Evolution 2008, 62:1520-1527.
87. Vamosi S M, Schluter D. Sexual selection against hybrids between sympatric stickleback species: evidence from a field experiment. Evolution 1999, 53:874-879.
88. Veen T, Borge T, Griffith S C, Saetre G-P, Bures S, Gustafsson L, Sheldon B C. Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers. Nature 2001, 411:45-50.
89. Veen T, Svedin N, Forsman J T, Hjernquist M B, Qvarnström A, Thurman Hjernquist K A, Träff J, Klaassen M. Does migration of hybrids contribute to post-zygotic isolation in flycatchers? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2007, 274:707-712.
90. Veen T, Träff J, Weissing F J, Sheldon B C. Reduced costs of mixed-species pairings in flycatchers: by-product or female strategy. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2009, 63:329-337.
91. Wiley J E. Replication banding and FISH analysis reveal the origin of the Hyla femoralis karyotype and XY/XX chromosomes. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2003, 101:80-83.
92. Wiley C, Qvarnstrom A, Andersson G, Borge T, Saetre G-P. Postzygotic isolation over multiple generations of hybrid descendents in a natural hybrid zone: how well do single-generation estimates reflect reproductive isolation?. Evolution 2009, 63:1731-1739.