Evolution of cytochrome b and the molecular systematics of Ammocrypta (Percidae: Etheostomatinae)

Copeia

Volumn , Issue 3, 2000, Pages 701-711

  Near, Thomas J ^a   Porterfield, Jean C ^b   Page, Lawrence M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CENTRE COLLEGE   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMMOCRYPTA; AMMOCRYPTA CLARA; AMMOCRYPTA PELLUCIDA; ETHEOSTOMA;

EID: 0034604401     PISSN: 00458511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1643/0045-8511(2000)000[0701:EOCBAT]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. BAILEY, R. M., AND D. A. ETNIER. 1988. Comments on the subgenera of darters (Percidae) with descriptions of two new species of Etheostoma (Ulacentra) from southeastern United States. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 175:1-48.
2. _, AND W. A. GOSLINE. 1955. Variation and systematic significance of vertebral counts in the American fishes of the family Percidae. Ibid. 93:1-44.
3. _, H. E. WINN, AND C. L. SMITH. 1954. Fishes from the Escambia River, Alabama and Florida, with ecological and taxonomic notes. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 106:109-164.
4. EDWARDS, S. V. 1997. Relevance of microevolutionary processes to higher level molecular systematics, p. 251-278. In: Avian molecular evolution and systematics. D. P. Mindell (ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
5. ETNIER, D. A., AND W. C. STARNES. 1993. The fishes of Tennessee. Univ. of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.
6. FARRIS, J. S., M. KALLERSJO, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
7. _, M. KALLERSJO, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44:570-572.
8. HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, AND T. YANO. 1985. Dating the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22:160-174.
9. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1997. Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 437-466.
10. JENKINS, R. E., AND N. M. BURKHEAD. 1994. Fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
11. JORDAN, D. S., B. W. EVERMANN, AND H. W. CLARK. 1930. Checklist of the fish and fishlike vertebrates of North and Middle America north of the boundary of Venezuela and Columbia. Rep. U.S. Comm. Fish., App. 10, Washington, DC.
12. KISHINO, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 31:151-160.
13. KLUGE, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:7-25.
14. KOCHER, T. D., AND K. L. CARLETON. 1997. Base substitution in fish mitochondrial DNA: patterns and rates, p. 13-24. In: Molecular systematics of fishes. T. D. Kocher and C. A. Stepien (eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
15. MAYDEN, R. L. 1987. Pleistocene glaciation and historical biogeography of North American central-highland fishes, p. 141-151. In: Quaternary environments of Kansas. W. C. Johnson (ed.). Kansas Geological Survey, Guidebook Series 5, Lawrence, KS.
16. METTEE, M. F., P. E. O'NEIL, AND J. M. PIERSON. 1996. Fishes of Alabama and the Mobile Basin. Oxmoor House, Birmingham, AL.
17. MILLER, R. J., AND H. W. ROBISON. 1973. The fishes of Oklahoma. Oklahoma State Univ. Press, Stillwater.
18. MINDELL, D. P., A. KNIGHT, C. BAER, AND C. J. HUDDLESTON. 1996. Slow rates of molecular evolution in birds and the metabolic rate and body temperature hypothesis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:422-426.
19. _, M. D. SORENSON, C. J. HUDDLESTON, H. C. MIRANDA JR., A. KNIGHT, S. J. SAWCHUCK, AND T. YURI. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships among and within select avian orders based on mitochondrial DNA, p. 213-247. In: Avian molecular evolution and systematics. D. P. Mindell (ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
20. MOORE, G. A. 1968. Fishes, p. 21-165. In: Vertebrates of the United States. W. F. Blair, A. P. Blair, F. Brodkorb, F. R. Cagle, and G. A. Moore (eds.). McGraw-Hill Co., New York.
21. MORITZ, C., C. J. SCHNEIDER, AND D. B. WAKE. 1992. Evolutionary relationships within the Ensatina eschscholtzii complex confirm the ring species interpretation. Syst. Biol. 41:273-291.
22. PAGE, L. M. 1981. The genera and subgenera of darters. Occ. Pap. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kans. 90:1-69.
23. _, AND D. L. SWOFFORD. 1984. Morphological correlates of ecological specialization in darters. Environ. Biol. Fish. 11:139-159.
24. PFLIEGER, W. L. 1971. A distributional study of Missouri fishes. Univ. Kans. Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist. 20: 225-570.
25. PORTERFIELD, J. C., L. M. PAGE, AND T. J. NEAR. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among fantail darters (Percidae: Etheostoma: Catonotus): total evidence analysis of morphological and molecular data. Copeia 1999:551-564.
26. SIMON, T. P., E. J. TYBERGHEIN, K. J. SCHEIDEGGER, AND C. E. JOHNSTON. 1992. Descriptions of protolarvae of the sand darters (Percidae: Ammocrypta and Crystallaria) with comments on systematic relationships. Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters 3:347-358.
27. SIMONS, A. M. 1991. Phylogenetic relationships of the crystal darter, Crystallaria asprella (Teleostei: Percidae). Copeia 1991:927-936.
28. _. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of the Boleosoma species group (Percidae: Etheostoma), p. 268-292. In: Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. R. L. Mayden (ed.). Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, CA.
29. SONG, C. B., T. J. NEAR, AND L. M. PAGE. 1998. Phylogenetic relations among percid fishes as inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b DNA sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10:343-353.
30. STARNES, W. C., D. A. ETNIER, L. B. STARNES, AND N. H. DOUGLAS. 1977. Zoogeographic implications of the rediscovery of the percid genus Ammocrypta in the Tennessee River drainage. Copeia 1977:783-786.
31. STRANGE, R. M., AND B. M. BURR. 1997. Intraspecific phylogeography of North American highland fishes: a test of the Pleistocene vicariance hypothesis. Evolution 51:885-897.
32. TEMPLETON, A. R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the humans and apes. Ibid. 37:221-244.
33. WILEY, E. O., AND R. H. HAGEN. 1997. Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation among the sand darters (Percidae: Teleostei), p. 75-96. In: Molecular systematics of fishes. T. D. Kocher and C. A. Stepien (eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
34. _, AND R. L. MAYDEN. 1985. Species and speciation in phylogenetic systematics, with examples from the North American fish fauna. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 72:596-635.
35. _, AND D. SIEGEL-CAUSEY. 1994. A phylogenetic analysis of the Lythrurus roseipinnis species group (Teleostei: Cyprinidae), with comments on the relationships of other Lythrurus. Occ. Pap. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kans. 171:1-20.
36. WILLIAMS, J. D. 1975. Systematics of the percid fishes of the subgenus Ammocrypta, genus Ammocrypta, with descriptions of two new species. Bull. Ala. Mus. Nat. Hist. 1:1-56.
37. WOOD, R. M., AND R. L. MAYDEN. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of selected darter subgenera (Teleostei: Percidae) as inferred from analysis of allozymes. Copeia 1997:265-274.
38. YANG, Z. 1996. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:367-372.