Understanding the distributed practice effect: Strong effects on weak theoretical grounds

Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology

Volumn 222, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 71-81

  Küpper Tetzel, Carolina E ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Applied memory research; Distributed practice; Educational practice; Review; Theories

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898847374     PISSN: 21908370     EISSN: 21512604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000168     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Ambridge, B., Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V., & Tomasello, M. (2006). The distributed learning effect for children's acquisition of an abstract syntactic construction. Cognitive Development, 21, 174-193. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2005. 09.003
2. Appleton-Knapp, S. L., Bjork, R. A., & Wickens, T. D. (2005). Examining the spacing effect in advertising: Encoding variability, retrieval processes, and their interaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 266-276. doi: 10.1086/432236
3. Austin, S. D. M. (1921). A study in logical memory. The American Journal of Psychology, 32, 370-403. doi: 10.2307/1414001
4. Ausubel, D. P. (1966). Early versus delayed review in meaningful learning. Psychology in the Schools, 3, 195-198. doi: 10.1002/1520-6807(196607)3:3195::AID-PITS231003030 23.0.CO;2-X
5. Bahrick, H. P. (1979). Maintenance of knowledge: Questions about memory we forgot to ask. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 296-308. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.296
6. Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, L. E., Bahrick, A. S., & Bahrick, P. E. (1993). Maintenance of foreign language vocabulary and the spacing effect. Psychological Science, 4, 316-321. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00571.x
7. Bahrick, H. P., & Hall, L. K. (2005). The importance of retrieval failures to long-term retention: A metacognitive explanation of the spacing effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 566-577. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.012
8. Bahrick, H. P., & Phelps, E. (1987). Retention of Spanish vocabulary over 8 years. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 344-349. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.13.2.344
9. Bellezza, F. S., & Young, D. R. (1989). Chunking of repeated events in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 990-997. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.990
10. Benjamin, A. S., & Tullis, J. (2010). What makes distributed practice effective? Cognitive Psychology, 61, 228-247. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.05.004
11. Bird, S. (2010). Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 635-650. doi: 10.1017/S0142716410000172
12. Bloom, K. C., & Shuell, T. J. (1981). Effects of massed and distributed practice on the learning and retention of secondlanguage vocabulary. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 245-248.
13. Braun, K., & Rubin, D. C. (1998). The spacing effect depends on an encoding deficit, retrieval, and time in working memory: Evidence from once-presented words. Memory, 6, 37-65. doi: 10.1080/741941599
14. Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., & Cepeda, N. J. (2009). Using tests to enhance 8th grade students retention of U.S. history facts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 760-771. doi: 10.1002/acp.1507
15. Carpenter, S., Cepeda, N., Rohrer, D., Kang, S. K., & Pashler, H. (2012). Using spacing to enhance diverse forms of learning: Review of recent research and implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 369-378. doi: 10.1007/s10648-012-9205-z
16. Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633-642. doi: 10.3758/ BF03202713
17. Castillo, M. (2013, January 10). What's the best way to learn? Psychologists tackle studying techniques. CBS News. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/whatsthe-best-way-to-learn-psychologists-tackle-studying-techniques/
18. Cepeda, N. J., Coburn, N., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., Mozer, M. C., & Pashler, H. (2009). Optimizing distributed practice: Theoretical analysis and practical implications. Experimental Psychology, 56, 236-246. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.236
19. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354-380. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
20. Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H. (2008). Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19, 1095-1102. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x
21. Cohen, M. S., Yan, V. X., Halamish, V., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). Do students think that difficult or valuable materials should be restudied sooner rather than later? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1682-1696. doi: 10.1037/a0032425
22. Cook, T. W. (1934). Massed and distributed practice in puzzle solving. Psychological Review, 41, 330-355. doi: 10.1037/ h0074350
23. Cull, W. L. (2000). Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 215-235. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200005/06)14:3215::AID-ACP6403.0.CO;2-1
24. Delaney, P. F., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., & Spirgel, A. (2010). Spacing and testing effects: A deeply critical, lengthy, and at times discursive review of the literature. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 63-147). London, UK: Academic Press.
25. Dempster, F. N. (1987). Effects of variable encoding and spaced presentations on vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 162-170. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.79.2.162
26. Dempster, F. N. (1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist, 43, 627-634. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.43.8.627
27. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4-58. doi: 10.1177/ 1529100612453266
28. Durgunoglu, A. Y., Mir, M., & Arino-Marti, S. (1993). Effects of repeated readings on bilingual and monolingual memory for text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 294-317. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1993.1022
29. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Oxford, UK: Dover.
30. Erdfelder, E., Auer, T.-S., Hilbig, B. E., Aßfalg, A., Moshagen, M., & Nadarevic, L. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 217, 108-124. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.108
31. Estes, W. K. (1955). Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. Psychological Review, 62, 369-377. doi: 10.1037/h0046888
32. Gay, L. R. (1973). Temporal position of reviews and its effect on the retention of mathematical rules. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 171-182. doi: 10.1037/h0034595
33. Gerbier, E., & Koenig, O. (2012). Influence of multiple-day temporal distribution of repetitions on memory: A comparison of uniform, expanding, and contracting schedules. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 514-525. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.600806
34. Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 95-112. doi: 10.3758/BF03197590
35. Glenberg, A. M., & Lehmann, T. S. (1980). Spacing repetitions over 1 week. Memory & Cognition, 8, 528-538. doi: 10.3758/BF03213772
36. Glover, J. A., & Corkill, A. J. (1987). Influence of paraphrased repetitions on the spacing effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 198-199. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.79.2.198
37. Gordon, K. (1925). Class results with spaced and unspaced memorizing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 8, 337-343. doi: 10.1037/h0064623
38. Grote, M. G. (1995). Distributed versus massed practice in high school physics. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 97-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15736.x
39. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 metaanalyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
40. Helsdingen, A. S., van Gog, T., & van Merriünboer, J. J. G. (2011). The effects of practice schedule on learning a complex judgment task. Learning and Instruction, 21, 126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.12.001
41. Hintzman, D. L. (1974). Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. Oxford, UK: Erlbaum.
42. Koedinger, K. R., Booth, J. L., & Klahr, D. (2013). Instructional complexity and the science to constrain it. Science, 342, 935-937. doi: 10.1126/science.1238056
43. Kornell, N. (2009). Optimising learning using flashcards: Spacing is more effective than cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1297-1317. doi: 10.1002/acp.1537
44. Kornell, N., & Metcalfe, J. (2006). Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 609-622. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.609
45. Krug, D., Davis, T., & Glover, J. A. (1990). Massed versus distributed repeated reading: A case of forgetting helping recall? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 366-371. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.366
46. Küpper-Tetzel, C. E., & Erdfelder, E. (2012). Encoding, maintenance, and retrieval processes in the lag effect: A multinomial processing tree analysis. Memory, 20, 37-47. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.631550
47. Küpper-Tetzel, C. E., Erdfelder, E.,&Dickhuser, O. (2013). The lag effect in secondary school classrooms: Enhancing students' memory for vocabulary. Instructional Science. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s11251-013-9285-2
48. Küpper-Tetzel, C. E., Kapler, I. V., & Wiseheart, M. (2014). Expanding, contracting, and equal learning schedules? The optimal distribution of learning sessions depends on retention interval. Memory & Cognition. Advance online publication. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0394-1
49. Lawton, T. W., Cronin, J. B., & Lindsell, R. P. (2006). Effect of interrepetition rest intervals on weight training repetition power output. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 20, 172-176.
50. Lindsey, R., Mozer, M. C., Cepeda, N. J., & Pashler, H. (2009). Optimizing memory retention with cognitive models. In A. Howes, D. Peebles, & R. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (ICCM 2009). Manchester, UK: ICCM.
51. Lindsey, R. V., Shroyer, J. D., Pashler, H., & Mozer, M. C. (2014). Improving students' long-term knowledge retention through personalized review. Psychological Science. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/09567976135 04302
52. Magliero, A. (1983). Pupil dilations following pairs of identical and related to-be-remembered words. Memory & Cognition, 11, 609-615. doi: 10.3758/BF03198285
53. Maki, R. H., & Hasher, L. (1975). Encoding variability: A role in immediate and long-term memory? The American Journal of Psychology, 88, 217-231.
54. Mayfield, K. H., & Chase, P. N. (2002). The effects of cumulative practice on mathematics problem solving. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 105-123. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-105
55. Moulton, C.-A. E., Dubrowski, A., Macrae, H., Graham, B., Grober, E., & Reznick, R. (2006). Teaching surgical skills: What kind of practice makes perfect? A randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Surgery, 244, 400-409. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000234808.85789.6a
56. Mozer, M. C., Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Lindsey, R., & Vul, E. (2009). Predicting the optimal spacing of study: A multiscale context model of memory. In Y. Bengio, D. Schuurmans, J. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, & A. Culotta (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 1321-1329). La Jolla, CA: NIPS Foundation.
57. Paul, A. M. (2011, September 11). The trouble with homework. The New York Times, p. SR6. Retrieved from http://www. nytimes.com/2011/09/11/opinion/sunday/quality-homeworka-smart-idea.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
58. Postman, L., & Knecht, K. (1983). Encoding variability and retention. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 133-152. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90101-9
59. Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 437-447. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.01. 004
60. Raaijmakers, J. G. (2003). Spacing and repetition effects in human memory: Application of the SAM model. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27, 431-452. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2703_5
61. Rawson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (2005). Rereading effects depend on time of test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 70-80. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.70
62. Reynolds, J. H., & Glaser, R. (1964). Effects of repetition and spaced review upon retention of a complex learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 297-308. doi: 10.1037/h0040734
63. Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1995). A multinomial modeling analysis of the recognition-failure paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 23, 611-630. doi: 10.3758/ BF03197263
64. Riefer, D. M., & Rouder, J. N. (1992). A multinomial modeling analysis of the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery. Memory & Cognition, 20, 601-611. doi: 10.3758/ BF03202710
65. Roediger, H. L., & Pyc, M. A. (2012). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 242-248. doi: 10.1016/ j.jarmac.2012.09.002
66. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255. doi: 10.1111/ j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
67. Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2006). The effects of overlearning and distributed practise on the retention of mathematics knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1209-1224. doi: 10.1002/acp.1266
68. Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2007). The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning. Instructional Science, 35, 481-498. doi: 10.1007/s11251-007-9015-8
69. Seabrook, R., Brown, G. D., & Solity, J. E. (2005). Distributed and massed practice: From laboratory to classroom. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 107-122. doi: 10.1002/acp.1066
70. Shea, C. H., Lai, Q., Black, C., & Park, J.-H. (2000). Spacing practice sessions across days benefits the learning of motor skills. Human Movement Science, 19, 737-760. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9457(00)00021-X
71. Simmons, A. L. (2012). Distributed practice and procedural memory consolidation in musicians' skill learning. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 357-368. doi: 10.1177/ 0022429411424798
72. Simone, P. M., Bell, M. C., & Cepeda, N. J. (2012). Diminished but not forgotten: Effects of aging on magnitude of spacing effect benefits. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68, 674-680. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs096
73. Sobel, H. S., Cepeda, N. J., & Kapler, I. V. (2011). Spacing effects in real-world classroom vocabulary learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 763-767. doi: 10.1002/acp.1747
74. Son, L. K. (2010). Metacognitive control and the spacing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 255-262. doi: 10.1037/a0017892
75. Staddon, J. E. R., Chelaru, I. M., & Higa, J. J. (2002). Habituation, memory and the brain: The dynamics of interval timing. Behavioural Processes, 57, 71-88. doi: 10.1016/ S0376-6357(02)00006-2
76. Taylor, K., & Rohrer, D. (2010). The effects of interleaved practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 837-848. doi: 10.1002/acp.1598
77. Thios, S. J., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1976). Effects of repetition as a function of study-phase retrieval. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 529-536. doi: 10.1016/ 0022-5371(76)90047-5
78. Toppino, T. C., Hara, Y., & Hackman, J. (2002). The spacing effect in the free recall of homogeneous lists: Present and accounted for. Memory & Cognition, 30, 601-606. doi: 10.3758/BF03194961
79. Tsai, L. S. (1927). The relation of retention to the distribution of relearning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 10, 30-39. doi: 10.1037/h0071614
80. Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & zsoy, B. (2008). Distributed rereading can hurt the spacing effect in text memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 685-695. doi: 10.1002/acp.1388
81. Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2004). Detrimental influence of contextual change on spacing effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 796-800. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.796
82. Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2005). Limitations to the spacing effect: Demonstration of an inverted u-shaped relationship between interrepetition spacing and free recall. Experimental Psychology, 52, 257-263. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.4.257
83. Vlach, H. A., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2012). Distributing learning over time: The spacing effect in children's acquisition and generalization of science concepts. Child Development, 83, 1137-1144. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01781.x
84. Wahlheim, C. N., Maddox, G. B., & Jacoby, L. L. (2014). The role of reminding in the effects of spaced repetitions on cued recall: Sufficient but not necessary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40, 94-105. doi: 10.1037/a0034055
85. Yazdani, M. A., & Zebrowski, E. (2006). Spaced reinforcement: An effective approach to enhance the achievement in plane geometry. Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Mathematics Education, 1, 37-43.
86. Young, D. R., & Bellezza, F. S. (1982). Encoding variability, memory organization, and the repetition effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 545-559. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.8.6.545