Learning a locomotor task: With or without errors?

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Marchal Crespo, Laura ^a,c   Schneider, Jasmin ^a   Jaeger, Lukas ^a,b,c   Riener, Robert ^a,c  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c BALGRIST UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Error amplification; Haptic guidance; Locomotor rehabilitation; Motor learning; MRI compatible robot; Noise disturbance; Simple task

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; ELECTRODE; ELECTROMYOGRAM; ELECTROMYOGRAPH; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FORCE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; LEARNING; LEG MOVEMENT; LEG MUSCLE; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; ROBOTICS; SKILL RETENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING; ALGORITHM; BRAIN; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; SKELETAL MUSCLE; YOUNG ADULT;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; ROBOTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84898538699     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-25     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Human-robot cooperative movement training: learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed. Emken JL, Benitez R, Reinkensmeyer DJ, J Neuroengin Rehab 2007 4 8 10.1186/1743-0003-4-8 (Pubitemid 46553680)
2. A robot and control algorithm that can synchronously assist in naturalistic motion during body weight supported gait training following neurologic injury. Aoyagi D, Ichinose WE, Harkema SJ, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Bobrow JE, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007 15 3 387 400 17894271 (Pubitemid 47460412)
3. Design and evaluation of the LOPES exoskeleton robot for interactive gait rehabilitation. Veneman JF, Kruidhof R, Hekman EEG, Ekkelenkamp R, van Asseldonk EHF, van der Kooij H, EEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007 15 3 379 386 (Pubitemid 47460425)
4. Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results. Riener R, Lunenburger L, Jezernik S, Anderschitz JM, Colombo G, Dietz V, EEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005 13 3 380 394 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.848628 (Pubitemid 41416018)
5. Locomotor Training After Human Spinal Cord Injury: A Series of Case Studies. Behrman AL, Harkema SJ, Phys Therapy July 2000 80 7 688 700 (Pubitemid 30441698)
6. Influence of a locomotor training approach on walking speed and distance in people with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. Field-Fote EC, Roach KE, Phys Therapy 2011 91 48 60 10.2522/ptj.20090359
7. New conceptualizations of practice: common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Schmidt RA, Bjork RA, Psychol Sci 1992 3 4 207 217 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00029.x
8. Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. Lotze M, Braun C, Birbaumer N, Anders S, Cohen LG, Brain 2003 126 4 866 872 10.1093/brain/awg079 12615644 (Pubitemid 36372985)
9. Metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns during robotic- and therapist-assisted treadmill walking in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Israel JF, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Hornby TG, Phys Therapy 2006 86 11 1466 78 10.2522/ptj.20050266 (Pubitemid 44672536)
10. Robotic movement training as an optimization problem: designing a controller that assists only as needed. Emken JL, Bobrow JE, Reinkensmeyer DJ, IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR Chicago, Illinois: ICORR 2005 307 312 (Pubitemid 44017816)
11. Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Patton JL, Stoykov ME, Kovic M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Exp Brain Res 2006 168 3 368 383 10.1007/s00221-005-0097-8 16249912 (Pubitemid 41830946)
12. Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill can improve walking symmetry post-stroke. Reisman DS, Wityk R, Silver K, Bastian AJ, Brain 2007 130 7 1861 1872 10.1093/brain/awm035 17405765 (Pubitemid 47343789)
13. Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification. Emken JL, Reinkensmeyer DJ, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005 13 33 39 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.843173 15813404 (Pubitemid 40469220)
14. Contribution of feedback and feedforward strategies to locomotor adaptations. Lam T, Anderschitz M, Dietz V, J Neurophysiol February 2006 95 2 766 773 (Pubitemid 44699081)
15. Locomotor adaptations and aftereffects to resistance during walking in individuals with spinal cord injury. Houldin A, Luttin K, Lam T, J Neurophysiol 2011 106 247 258 10.1152/jn.00753.2010 21543755
16. Schmit B: Locomotor adaptation to resistance during treadmill training transfers to overground walking. Yen SC, Schmit BD, Landry JM, Roth H, Wu M, Exp Brain Res 2012 216 3 473 482 10.1007/s00221-011-2950-2 22108702
17. Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. Marchal-Crespo L, Reinkensmeyer D, J NeuroEng Rehab 2009 6 20 10.1186/1743-0003-6-20
18. On the use of divergent force fields in robot-mediated neurorehabilitation. Cesqui B, Aliboni S, Mazzoleni S, Carrozza M, Posteraro F, Micera S, Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2008. BioRob 2008. 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on. AZ, USA 2008 854 861
19. Comparison of error amplification and haptic guidance training techniques for learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy individuals. Milot M, Marchal-Crespo L, Cramer S, Reinkensmeyer D, Exp Brain Res 2010 201 2 119 31 10.1007/s00221-009-2014-z 19787345
20. Effects of haptic guidance and disturbance on motor learning: potential advantage of haptic disturbance. Lee J, Choi S, Haptics Symposium, 2010 IEEE Waltham, Massachusetts, USA 2010 335 342
21. Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review. Sigrist R, Rauter G, Riener R, Wolf P, Psychon Bull Rev 2012 20 1 1 33
22. Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Wulf G, Shea CH, Psychon Bull Rev 2002 9 2 185 211 10.3758/BF03196276 12120783
23. Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective. Huang V, Krakauer J, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009 6 5 10.1186/1743-0003-6-5 19243614
24. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: Role of use versus learning. Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ, Neurobiol Learn Mem 2000 74 27 55 10.1006/nlme.1999.3934 10873519 (Pubitemid 30470907)
25. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Krakauer JW, Curr Opin Neurol 2006 19 84 90 10.1097/01.wco.0000200544.29915.cc 16415682 (Pubitemid 43172710)
26. An fMRI pilot study to evaluate brain activation associated with locomotion adaptation. Marchal-Crespo L, Hollnagel C, Bruegger M, Kollias S, Riener R, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR 2011) Zurich, Switzerland 2011
27. Non-linear adaptive controllers for an over-actuated pneumatic MR-compatible stepper. Hollnagel C, Vallery H, Schädler R, López IG, Jaeger L, Wolf P, Riener R, Marchal-Crespo L, Med Biol Eng Comput 2013 51 7 799 809 10.1007/s11517-013-1050-9 23430329
28. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedure. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G, J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2000 10 361 374 10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4 11018445
29. A survey of iterative learning control. Bristow D, Tharayil M, Alleyne A, Control Syst IEEE 2006 26 3 96 114
30. Feasibility of manual teach-and-replay and continuous impedance shaping for robotic locomotor training following spinal cord injury. Emken JL, Harkema SJ, Beres-Jones J, Ferreira CK, Reinkensmeyer DJ, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008 55 322 334 18232376 (Pubitemid 350308425)
31. Block-oriented approximate feedback linearization for control of pneumatic actuator system. Xiang F, Wikander J, Control Eng Prac 2004 12 4 387 399 10.1016/S0967-0661(03)00104-7 (Pubitemid 38204540)
32. Measuring handedness with questionnaires. Bryden M, Neuropsychologia 1977 15 4-5 617 624 896019
33. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Guadagnoli M, Lee T, J Mot Behav 2004 36 2 212 224 10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224 15130871 (Pubitemid 38580119)
34. The effect of haptic guidance, aging, and initial skill level on motor learning of a steering task. Marchal-Crespo L, McHughen S, Cramer S, Reinkensmeyer D, Exp Brain Res 2010 201 2 209 20 10.1007/s00221-009-2026-8 19820920
35. The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task. Marchal-Crespo L, van Raai M, Rauter G, Wolf P, Riener R, Exp Brain Res 2013 231 3 277 291 10.1007/s00221-013-3690-2 24013789
36. Motor learning characterizes habilitation of children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Krebs HI, Fasoli SE, Dipietro L, Fragala-Pinkham M, Hughes R, Stein J, Hogan N, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012 26 7 855 860 10.1177/1545968311433427 22331211