Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis in orthodontics: A systematic review

Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 69-91

  Pittayapat, P ^a,b   Limchaichana Bolstad, N ^c   Willems, G ^d   Jacobs, R ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF IMAGING AND PATHOLOGY   (Belgium)

^b CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cephalometry; Cone beam computed tomography; Orthodontics; Spiral computed tomography; Three dimensional imaging

Indexed keywords

ANATOMIC LANDMARK; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; ORTHODONTICS; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANATOMIC LANDMARKS; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 84897965835     PISSN: 16016335     EISSN: 16016343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12034     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Hofrath H. Bedeutung der Röntgenfern und Abstands Aufnahme für die Diagnostik der Kieferanomalien. Fortschr Orthod 1931;1:231-58.
2. Broadbent BH. A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthodontists 1931;1:45-66.
3. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. Am J Orthod 1971;60:505-17.
4. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 1971;60:111-27.
5. Bjork A, Solow B. Measurement on radiographs. J Dent Res 1962;41:672-83.
6. Connor SE, Arscott T, Berry J, Greene L, O'Gorman R. Precision and accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of skull landmarks. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:270-6.
7. Olszewski R, Reychler H, Cosnard G, Denis JM, Vynckier S, Zech F. Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:261-7.
8. Olszewski R, Frison L, Wisniewski M, Denis JM, Vynckier S, Cosnard G et al. Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:285-92.
9. Kumar V, Ludlow JB, Mol A, Cevidanes L. Comparison of conventional and cone-beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:263-9.
10. Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:550-60.
11. Cattaneo PM, Bloch CB, Calmar D, Hjortshoj M, Melsen B. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:798-802.
12. van Vlijmen OJ, Berge SJ, Swennen GR, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:92-7.
13. Kumar V, Ludlow J, Soares Cevidanes LH, Mol A. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthod 2008;78:873-9.
14. Grayson B, Cutting C, Bookstein FL, Kim H, McCarthy JG. The three-dimensional cephalogram: theory, technique, and clinical application. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:327-37.
15. Adams GL, Gansky SA, Miller AJ, Harrell WE Jr, Hatcher DC. Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:397-409.
16. Chenin DL. 3D cephalometrics: the new norm. Alpha Omegan 2010;103:51-6.
17. Swennen GR, Schutyser F, Barth EL, De Groeve P, De Mey A. A new method of 3-D cephalometry Part I: the anatomic Cartesian 3-D reference system. J Craniofac Surg 2006;17:314-25.
18. Farronato G, Farronato D, Toma L, Bellincioni F. A synthetic three-dimensional craniofacial analysis. J Clin Orthod. 2010;44:673-8; quiz 88.
19. Kau CH, Richmond S, Palomo JM, Hans MG. Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics. J Orthod 2005;32:282-93.
20. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 1991;11:88-94.
21. Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Gatsonis C, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. Version 1.0: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2010. Available from: http://srdta.cochrane.org/handbook-dta-reviews.
22. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/.
23. Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994;271:389-91.
24. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994;271:703-7.
25. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:25.
26. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.
27. Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthod 2009;79:150-7.
28. Cavalcanti MG, Rocha SS, Vannier MW. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:170-6.
29. Chien PC, Parks ET, Eraso F, Hartsfield JK, Roberts WE, Ofner S. Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:262-73.
30. Damstra J, Fourie Z, De Wit M, Ren Y. A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:285-94.
31. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y. Reliability and the smallest detectable difference of measurements on 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:e107-14.
32. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Ren Y. Comparison between two-dimensional and midsagittal three-dimensional cephalometric measurements of dry human skulls. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;49:392-5.
33. de Oliveira AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C, Motta A, Burke B, Tyndall D. Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:256-65.
34. Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Frazao DC, McNamara JA Jr, Manzi FR. Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans. Angle Orthod 2011;81:26-35.
35. Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Manzi FR, Brooks SL, McNamara JA Jr. From 2D to 3D: an algorithm to derive normal values for 3-dimensional computerized assessment. Angle Orthod 2011;81:3-10.
36. Hassan B, Nijkamp P, Verheij H, Tairie J, Vink C, Stelt PV et al. Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivo. Eur J Orthod 2013;35:38-44.
37. Lagravère MO, Gordon JM, Flores-Mir C, Carey J, Heo G, Major PW. Cranial base foramen location accuracy and reliability in cone-beam computerized tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e203-10.
38. Lagravère MO, Gordon JM, Guedes IH, Flores-Mir C, Carey JP, Heo G et al. Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments. Angle Orthod 2009;79:1047-56.
39. Lagravère MO, Low C, Flores-Mir C, Chung R, Carey JP, Heo G et al. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:598-604.
40. Lopes PM, Moreira CR, Perrella A, Antunes JL, Cavalcanti MG. 3-D volume rendering maxillofacial analysis of angular measurements by multislice CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:224-30.
41. Ludlow JB, Gubler M, Cevidanes L, Mol A. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136: 312 e1-10; discussion 12-3.
42. Tyndall DA, Kohltfarber H. Application of cone beam volumetric tomography in endodontics. Austral Dent J 2012;57(Suppl 1):72-81.
43. Fullmer JM, Scarfe WC, Kushner GM, Alpert B, Farman AG. Cone beam computed tomographic findings in refractory chronic suppurative osteomyelitis of the mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;45:364-71.
44. Olszewski R, Tanesy O, Cosnard G, Zech F, Reychler H. Reproducibility of osseous landmarks used for computed tomography based three-dimensional cephalometric analyses. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2010;38:214-21.
45. Olszewski R, Zech F, Cosnard G, Nicolas V, Macq B, Reychler H. Three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometric craniofacial analysis: experimental validation in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:828-33.
46. Park SH, Yu HS, Kim KD, Lee KJ, Baik HS. A proposal for a new analysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129(600):e23-34.
47. Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod 2008;78:387-95.
48. Richtsmeier JT, Paik CH, Elfert PC, Cole TM 3rd, Dahlman HR. Precision, repeatability, and validation of the localization of cranial landmarks using computed tomography scans. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1995;32:217-27.
49. Shibata M, Nawa H, Kise Y, Fuyamada M, Yoshida K, Katsumata A et al. Reproducibility of three-dimensional coordinate systems based on craniofacial landmarks. Angle Orthod 2012;82:776-84.
50. Schlicher W, Nielsen I, Huang JC, Maki K, Hatcher DC, Miller AJ. Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:263-75.
51. Titiz I, Laubinger M, Keller T, Hertrich K, Hirschfelder U. Repeatability and reproducibility of landmarks-a three-dimensional computed tomography study. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:276-86.
52. Tulunoglu O, Esenlik E, Gulsen A, Tulunoglu I. A comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional cephalometric evaluations of children with cleft lip and palate. Eur J Dent 2011;5:451-8.
53. van Vlijmen OJ, Maal TJ, Berge SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:300-5.
54. van Vlijmen OJ, Maal T, Berge SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;39:156-60.
55. van Vlijmen OJ, Rangel FA, Berge SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Becking AG, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15:721-7.
56. Waitzman AA, Posnick JC, Armstrong DC, Pron GE. Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography: Part II. Normal values and growth trends. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:118-28.
57. Yanez-Vico RM, Iglesias-Linares A, Torres-Lagares D, Gutierrez-Perez JL, Solano-Reina E. Three-dimensional evaluation of craniofacial asymmetry: an analysis using computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15:729-36.
58. Zamora N, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17:e678-88.
59. European Commission. Guidelines on CBCT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology: Evidence Based Guidelines: Radiation Protection Publication; 2012. Available from: http://www.sedentexct.eu/content/guidelines-cbct-dental-and-maxillofacial-radiology.
60. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontic treatment. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;116:238-57.
61. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:267-71.
62. Theodorakou C, Walker A, Horner K, Pauwels R, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R et al. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. Br J Radiol 2012;85:153-60.