Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 263-275

  Schlicher, Will ^a   Nielsen, Ib ^a   Huang, John C ^a   Maki, Koutaro ^b   Hatcher, David C ^a   Miller, A J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SHOWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; STANDARD; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANATOMIC LANDMARKS; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; OBSERVER VARIATION; SOFTWARE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861647924     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq144     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baumrind S, Frantz R C 1971a The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. American Journal of Orthodontics 60: 111-127
2. Baumrind S, Frantz R C 1971b The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. American Journal of Orthodontics 60: 505-517
3. Broadbent B 1931 A new x-ray technique and its application in orthodontia. Angle Orthodontist 51: 93-114
4. Brown A A, Scarfe W C, Scheetz J P, Silveira A M, Farman A G 2009 Linear accuracy of cone beam CT-derived 3D images. Angle Orthodontist 79: 150-157
5. Cevidanes L H, Styner M A, Proffit W R 2006 Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 129: 611-618
6. Cevidanes L H et al. 2005 Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 34: 369-375
7. Cevidanes L H et al. 2007 Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of mandibular changes after orthognathic surgery. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 131: 44-50
8. de Oliveira A E, Cevidanes L H, Phillips C, Motta A, Burke B, Tyndall D 2009 Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 107: 256-265
9. Haynes S, Chau M N 1993 Inter- and intra-observer identification of landmarks used in the Delaire analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics 15: 79-84
10. Haney E et al. 2010 Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted cuspids. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 137: 590-597
11. Kragskov J, Bosch C, Gyldensted C, Sindet-Pedersen S 1997 Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 34: 111-116
12. Kumar V, Ludlow J B, Mol A, Cevidanes L 2007 Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 36: 263-269
13. Kumar V, Ludlow J, Cevidanes L H S, Mol A 2008 In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthodontist 78: 873-879
14. Lagravere M O, Major P W 2005 Proposed reference point for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with cone-beam computerized tomography. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 128: 657-660
15. Lagravere M O, Carey J, Toogood R W, Major P W 2008 Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 134: 112-116
16. Leonardi R, Annunziata A, Caltabiano M 2008 Landmark identification error in posteroanterior cephalometric radiography. A systematic review. Angle Orthodontist 78: 761-765
17. Lou L, Lagravere M O, Compton S, Major P W, Flores-Mir C 2007 Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 104: 402-411
18. Major P W, Johnson D E, Hesse K L, Glover K E 1994 Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics. Angle Orthodontist 64: 447-454
19. Moerenhout B A, Gelaude F, Swennen G R, Casselman J W, Van Der Sloten J, Mommaerts M Y 2009 Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup. Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery 37: 18-23
20. Park S H, Yu H S, Kim K D, Lee K J, Baik H S 2006 A proposal for a new analysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional computed tomography. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 129: 600 e623-e634
21. Periago D R, Scarfe W C, Moshiri M, Scheetz J P, Silveira A M, Farman A G 2008 Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthodontist 78: 387-395
22. Perillo M et al. 2000 Effect of landmark identification on cephalometric measurements: guidelines for cephalometric analyses. Clinical Orthodontic Research 3: 29-36
23. Richardson A 1966 An investigation into the reproducibility of some points, planes, and lines used in cephalometric analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics 52: 637-651
24. Schlicher W 2008 Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three dimensions. Thesis. University of California at San Francisco Solow B 1966 The pattern of craniofacial associations. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 24: 26-36
25. Stabrun A E, Danielsen K 1982 Precision in cephalometric landmark identification. European Journal of Orthodontics 4: 185-196
26. Stratemann S A, Huang J C, Maki K, Hatcher D C, Miller A J 2010 Evaluating the human mandible using cone beam computed tomography. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 137: S58-S570
27. Stratemann S A, Huang J C, Maki K, Miller A J, Hatcher D C 2008 Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 37: 80-93
28. Tng T T, Chan T C, Hägg U, Cooke M S 1994 Validity of cephalometric landmarks. An experimental study on human skulls. European Journal of Orthodontics 16: 110-120
29. Trpkova B, Major P, Prasad N, Nebbe B 1997 Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: a meta analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 112: 165-170
30. van Vlijmen O J, Maal T J, Berge S J, Bronkhorst E M, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman A M 2009 A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls. European Journal of Oral Sciences 117: 300-305