Comparison between two-dimensional and midsagittal three-dimensional cephalometric measurements of dry human skulls

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 392-395

  Damstra, Janalt ^a   Fourie, Zacharias ^a   Ren, Yijin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

3D cephalometry; Cone beam computer tomography; Lateral cephalogram

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; RELIABILITY; SKULL; SKULL RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL CEPHALOMETRY; TWO DIMENSIONAL CEPHALOMETRY;

CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EAR CANAL; FIDUCIAL MARKERS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MAXILLA; NASAL BONE; ORBIT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SKULL;

EID: 79959310027     PISSN: 02664356     EISSN: 15321940     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Cevidanes LHS, Styner MA, Proffit WR. Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006;129:611-8. (Pubitemid 43648271)
2. Van Vlijmen OJ, Maal T, Berge J, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;39:156-60.
3. Marci V, Athanasiou AE. Sources of error in lateral cephalometry. In: Athanasiou AE, editor. Orthodontic cephalometry. London: Mosby-Wolfe; 1995. p. 125-40.
4. Nalçaci R, Öztürk F, Sökücü O. A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010;39:100-6.
5. Bholsithi W, Tharanon W, Chintakanon K, Komolpis R, Sinthanayothin C. 3D vs. 2D cephalometric analysis with repeated measurements from 20 Thai males and 20 Thai females. Biomed Imaging Interventional J 2009;5:e21.
6. Van Vlijmen OJ, Berge J, Swennen GR, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:92-7.
7. Kumar V, Ludlow JB, Mol A, Cevidanes LHS. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:263-9. (Pubitemid 47218404)
8. Kumar V, Ludlow JB, Cevidanes LHS, Mol A. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthod 2008;78:873-9.
9. Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983;83:382-90.
10. Hajeer MY, Ayoub AF, Millett DT. Three-dimensional assessment of facial soft-tissue asymmetry before and after orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;42:396-404. (Pubitemid 39186041)
11. Hwang HS, Hwang CH, Lee KH, Kang BC. Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006;130:779-85. (Pubitemid 44880589)
12. Baek SH, Cho IS, Chang YI, Kim MJ. Skeletodental factors affecting chin point deviation in female patients with class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry: a three-dimensional analysis using computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:628-39.