Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 137, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 598-604

  Lagravère, Manuel O ^a   Low, Corey ^b   Flores Mir, Carlos ^a   Chung, Raymund ^a   Carey, Jason P ^a   Heo, Giseon ^a   Major, Paul W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CANAL; CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FORAMEN MAGNUM; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INCISOR; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MAXILLA; NASAL BONE; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORBIT; STATISTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH ROOT; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EAR CANAL; FORAMEN MAGNUM; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INCISOR; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MAXILLA; NASAL BONE; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORBIT; TOOTH APEX;

EID: 77954670876     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Athanasiou AE. Orthodontic cephalometry. London, United Kingdom, and Baltimore, Md: Mosby-Wolfe; 1995.
2. Major PW, Johnson DE, Hesse KL, Glover KE. Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics. Angle Orthod 1994;64:447-54.
3. Ziegler CM,Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:126-30.
4. Mah J, Hatcher D. Three-dimensional craniofacial imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:308-9.
5. Mah J. 3-dimensional visualization of impacted maxillary cuspids. AADMRT Newsletter; Winter 2003.
6. Kragskov J, Bosch C, Gyldensted C, Sindet-Pedersen S. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997;34:111-6.
7. Lou L, Lagravère MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:402-11.
8. Gross Portney L, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research applications to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health; 2000.
9. Kamoen A, Dermaut L, Verbeeck R. The clinical significance of error measurement in the interpretation of treatment results. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:569-78.
10. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Yao JC, Chang HF. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometricmeasurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry. AngleOrthod 2004;74:155-61.
11. Gravely JF, Benzies PM. The clinical significance of tracing error in cephalometry. Br J Orthod 1974;1:95-101.
12. Cohen AM. Uncertainty in cephalometrics. Br J Orthod 1984;11: 44-8.
13. McWilliam JS, Welander U. The effect of image quality on the identification of cephalometric landmarks. Angle Orthod 1978; 48:49-56.
14. Houston WJ, Maher RE, McElroy D, Sherriff M. Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs. Eur J Orthod 1986;8:149-51.
15. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 1971;60:111-27.
16. Savage AW, Showfety KJ, Yancey J. Repeated measures analysis of geometrically constructed and directly determined cephalometric points. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:295-9.
17. Chen YJ, Chen SK, HuangHW, Yao CC, Chang HF. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:301-6.
18. Waitzman AA, Posnick JC, Armstrong DC, Pron GE. Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography: part II. Normal values and growth trends. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:118-28.
19. Matteson SR, Bechtold W, Phillips C, Staab EV. A method for three-dimensional image reformation for quantitative cephalometric analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;47:1053-61.
20. Tyndall DA, Renner JB, Phillips C, Matteson SR. Positional changes of the mandibular condyle assessed by threedimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:1164-72.
21. Hildebolt CF, Vannier MW, Knapp RH. Validation study of skull three-dimensional computerized tomography measurements. Am J Phys Anthropol 1990;82:283-94.
22. Klinge B, Petersson A, Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:327-32.
23. Aaron A, Weinstein D, Thickman D, Eilert R. Comparison of orthoroentgenography and computed tomography in the measurement of limb-length discrepancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74:897-902.
24. Broch J, Slagsvold O, Rosler M. Error in landmark identification in lateral radiographic headplates. Eur J Orthod 1981;3:9-13.
25. Lagravère MO, Hansen L, HarzerW, Major PW. Plane orientation for standardization in 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with computerized tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:601-4.