Repeatability and reproducibility of landmarks - A three-dimensional computed tomography study

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 276-286

  Titiz, Irem ^a   Laubinger, Michala ^a   Keller, Thomas ^b   Hertrich, Klaus ^a   Hirschfelder, Ursula ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b ACOMED Statistik   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; STANDARD; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANATOMIC LANDMARKS; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 84861607567     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq190     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Baumrind S, Frantz R C 1971 The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. American Journal of Orthodontics 60: 111-127
2. Bland M 2000 An introduction to medical statistics, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 177-179
3. Boldt F, Weinzierl C, Hertrich K, Hirschfelder U 2009 Comparison of the spatial landmark scatter of various 3D digitalization methods. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 70: 247-263
4. Brown A A, Scarfe W C, Scheetz J P, Silveira A M, Farman A G 2009 Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthodontist 79: 150-157
5. Cavalcanti M G, Rocha S S, Vannier M W 2004 Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications. DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology 33: 170-176
6. Chan H J, Woods M, Stella D 2007 Three-dimensional computed craniofacial tomography (3D-CT): potential uses and limitations. Australian Orthodontic Journal 23: 55-64
7. Chien P, Parks E, Eraso F, Hartsfield J, Roberts W, Ofner S 2009 Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo. DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology 38: 262-273
8. Connor S E, Arscott T, Berry J, Greene L, O'Gorman R 2007 Precision and accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of skull landmarks. DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology 36: 270-276
9. De Oliveira A E, Cevidanes L H, Phillips C, Motta A, Burke B, Tyndall D 2009 Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 107: 256-265
10. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen G R 2009 Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 38: 609-625
11. Dvortsin D P, Sandham A, Pruim G J, Dijkstra P U 2008 A comparison of the reproducibility of manual tracing and on-screen digitization for cephalometric profile variables. European Journal of Orthodontics 30: 586-591
12. Greiner M, Greiner A, Hirschfelder U 2007 Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 68: 290-298
13. Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Sanderink G 2009 Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position. European Journal of Orthodontics 31: 129-134
14. Hirschfelder U, Piechot E, Schulte M, Leher A 2004 Abnormalities of the TMJ and the musculature in the oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum (OAV). A CT study. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 65: 204-216
15. Houston W J, Maher R E, McElroy D, Sherriff M 1986 Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs. European Journal of Orthodontics 8: 149-151
16. JCGM. 2008 "International vocabulary of metrology-basic and general concepts and associated terms, and associated terms, VIM", 3rd edn. (http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/vim.html (4 April 2011, date last accessed))
17. Jonas I 1976 The influence of training on the accuracy of roentgenographic cephalometric tracings (author's transl). Radiologe 16: 427-431
18. Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Maeda M, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Langlais R P 2005 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 99: 212-220
19. Kitai N et al. 2004 Craniofacial morphology in an unusual case with nasal aplasia studied by roentgencephalometry and three-dimensional CT scanning. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 41: 208-213
20. Kragskov J, Bosch C, Gyldensted C, Sindet-Pedersen S 1997 Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 34: 111-116
21. Krarup S, Darvann T A, Larsen P, Marsh J L, Kreiborg S 2005 Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular growth and tooth eruption. Journal of Anatomy 207: 669-682
22. Kusnoto B, Evans C A, BeGole E A, de Rijk W 1999 Assessment of 3-dimensional computer-generated cephalometric measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 116: 390-399
23. Lagravere M O, Hansen L, Harzer W, Major P W 2006 Plane orientation for standardization in 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with computerized tomography imaging. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 129: 601-604
24. Legrell P E, Nyquist H, Isberg A 2000 Validity of identification of gonion and antegonion in frontal cephalograms. Angle Orthodontist 70: 157-164
25. Lou L, Lagravere M O, Compton S, Major P W, Flores-Mir C 2007 Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 104: 402-411
26. Ludlow J B, Ivanovic M 2008 Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 106: 106-114
27. Maeda M et al. 2006 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with maxillofacial deformities. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 102: 382-390
28. Moshiri M, Scarfe W C, Hilgers M L, Scheetz J P, Silveira A M, Farman A G 2007 Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 132: 550-560
29. Olszewski R, Reychler H, Cosnard G, Denis J M, Vynckier S, Zech F 2008 Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph. DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology 37: 261-267
30. Papadopoulos M A et al. 2005 Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 33: 229-237
31. Park S H, Yu H S, Kim K D, Lee K J, Baik H S 2006 A proposal for a new analysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional computed tomography. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 129: 623-634
32. Periago D R, Scarfe W C, Moshiri M, Scheetz J P, Silveira A M, Farman A G 2008 Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthodontist 78: 387-395
33. Phillips C, Greer J, Vig P, Matteson S 1984 Photocephalometry: errors of projection and landmark location. American Journal of Orthodontics 86: 233-243
34. Piechot E 2005 Kondyläre und faziale Fehlentwicklungen bei Anomalien des oculo-auriculo-vertebralen Spektrums. University of Erlangen-Nürnberg: Med. Dissertation
35. Plooij J M et al. 2009 Evaluation of reproducibility and reliability of 3D soft tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 38: 267-273
36. Rasch D, Herrendörfer G, Bock J, Victor N, Guiard V 1996 Verfahrensbibliothek Versuchsplanung und-auswertung, 2nd edn. Oldenbourg, München. pp. 486
37. Richardson A 1966 An investigation into the reproducibility of some points, planes, and lines used in cephalometric analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics 52: 637-651
38. Rouas P, Nancy J, Bar D 2007 Identification of double mandibular canals: literature review and three case reports with CT scans and cone beam CT. DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology 36: 34-38
39. Sawyer A R, See M, Nduka C 2009 Assessment of the reproducibility of facial expressions with 3-D stereophotogrammetry. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 140: 76-81
40. Sayinsu K, Isik F, Trakyali G, Arun T 2007 An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings. European Journal of Orthodontics 29: 105-108
41. Stauber I et al. 2008 Three-dimensional analysis of facial symmetry in cleft lip and palate patients using optical surface data. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 69: 268-282
42. Swennen G R et al. 2009 A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 20: 297-307
43. Toma A M, Zhurov A, Playle R, Ong E, Richmond S 2009 Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on 3D laser-scanned facial images. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research 12: 33-42