Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 721-727

  van Vlijmen, Olivier J C ^a,b   Rangel, Frits A ^a,b   Bergé, Stefaan J ^a,b   Bronkhorst, Ewald M ^a   Becking, Alfred G ^c   Kuijpers Jagtman, Anne Marie ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b 3D Facial Imaging Research Group Nijmegen Bruges (3D FIRG)   (Netherlands)

^c Kennemer Gasthuis ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cephalometry; Cone beam CT; Maxillofacial; Orthodontics; Three dimensional imaging; X ray computed

Indexed keywords

ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HARD PALATE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INCISOR; INSTRUMENTATION; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NASAL BONE; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORBIT; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELLA TURCICA; SKULL; SPHENOID; STANDARD; TEMPORAL BONE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ANATOMIC LANDMARKS; CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL OCCLUSION; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INCISOR; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MAXILLA; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MOLAR; NASAL BONE; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORBIT; PALATE, HARD; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELLA TURCICA; SKULL; SPHENOID BONE; TEMPORAL BONE; TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 80052685559     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0440-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Broadbent BH (1931) A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1: 45-66.
2. Hofrath H (1931) Bedeutung der Röntgenfern und Abstands Aufnahme für die Diagnostik der Kieferanomalien. Fortschr Orthod 1: 231-258.
3. Rangel FA, Maal TJ, Bergé SJ, van Vlijmen OJ, Plooij JM, Schutyser F, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (2008) Integration of digital dental casts in 3-dimensional facial photographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134: 820-826.
4. Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E (2008) Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133(640): e1-e5.
5. Hajeer MY, Ayoub AF, Millett DT, Bock M, Siebert JP (2002) Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery: the clinical application of a new method. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 17: 318-330.
6. Swennen GRJ, Schutyser F (2007) Three-dimensional virtual approach to diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillo-facial deformity. In: Bell WH, Guerrero CA (eds) Distraction Osteogenesis of the Facial Skeleton. BC Decker Inc, Hamilton, pp 55-79.
7. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB (2006) Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and I-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35: 219-226.
8. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M (2008) Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106: 106-114.
9. Greiner M, Greiner A, Hirschfelder U (2007) Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs. J Orofac Orthop 68: 290-298.
10. Kumar V, Ludlow JB, Mol A, Cevidanes L (2007) Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 36: 263-269.
11. Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG (2007) Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132: 550-560.
12. van Vlijmen OJC, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Swennen GRJ, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (2009) Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67: 92-97.
13. Cattaneo PM, Bloch CB, Calmar D, Hjortshoj M, Melsen B (2008) Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134: 798-802.
14. van Vlijmen OJ, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Swennen GR, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (2009) A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38: 773-778.
15. van Vlijmen OJ, Maal TJ, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (2009) A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls. Eur J Oral Sci 117: 300-305.
16. van Vlijmen OJ, Maal TJ, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (2010) A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39: 156-160.
17. Houston WJ (1983) The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 83: 382-390.
18. Grauer D, Cevidanes LS, Styner MA, Heulfe I, Harmon ET, Zhu H, Proffit WR (2010) Accuracy and landmark error calculation using cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms. Angle Orthod 80: 286-294.
19. Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C (2007) Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104: 402-411.
20. Muramatsu A, Nawa H, Kimura M, Yoshida K, Maeda M, Katsumata A, Ariji E, Goto S (2008) Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method. Angle Orthod 78: 396-402.