Metacognition in teams and organizations

Social Metacognition

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 283-302

  Thompson, Leigh ^a   Cohen, Taya R ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897959694     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203865989     Document Type: Chapter

References (71)

1. Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235.
2. Ancona, D., & Bresman, H. (2006). Begging, borrowing, and building on ideas from the outside to create pulsed innovation inside teams. In L. Thompson & H. S. Choi (Eds.), Creativity and innovation in organizational teams(pp. 183–198). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Ancona, D., Henrik B., & Katrin, K. (2002). The comparative advantage of X-teams. Sloan Management Review,43(3), 33–39.
4. Bartel, C. A., Wrzesniewski, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2007). The struggle to establish organi-zational membership and identification in remote work contexts. In C. A. Bartel, S. Blader, & A. Wrzesniewski (Eds.), Identity and the modern organization (pp. 119– 133). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Briñol, P., DeMarree, K. G., & Petty, R. E. (2010). Processes by which confidence (vs. doubt) influences the self. In R. M. Arkin, K. C. Oleson, & P. J. Carroll (Eds.), Handbook of the uncertain self(pp. 13–35). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
6. Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., Valle, C., Rucker, D. D., & Becerra, A. (2007). The effects of mes-sage recipients’ power before and after persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1040–1053.
7. Brown, V. R., & Paulus, P. B. (2002). Making group brainstorming more effective: Recommendations from an associative memory perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 208–212.
8. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Caldwell, D. F., Chatman, J. A., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1990). Building organizational commit-ment: A multiform study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 245–261.
10. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E. (1995). Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations(pp. 333–380). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. Carter, S. M., & West, M. A. (1998). Reflexivity, effectiveness, and mental health in BBC-TV production teams. Small Group Research, 29(5), 583–601.
12. Choi, H. S., & Thompson, L. (2005). Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,98, 121–132.
13. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.
14. DeMarree, K. G., Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2007). Self-certainty: Parallels to attitude cer-tainty. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 7, 159–188.
15. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly,44, 350–383.
16. Gino, F., Argote, L., Miron-Spektor, E., & Todorova, G. (2010). First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,111(2), 102–115.
17. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
18. Gruenfeld, D. H., & Fan, E. T. (1999). What newcomers see and what old-timers say: Discontinuities in knowledge exchange. In L. Thompson, J. Levine, & D. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge(pp. 245– 266). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87–106.
20. Hargadon, A. B. (2006). Bridging and building: Towards a microsociology of creativity. In L. Thompson & H. S. Choi (Eds.), Creativity and innovation in groups and organiza-tions (pp. 199–216). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21. Hecht, T. D., Allen N. J., Klammer, J. D., & Kelly, E. C. (2002). Group beliefs, ability and performance: The potency of group potency. Group dynamics: Theory, research and practice, 6(2), 143–152.
22. Higgins, E. T. (1999). “Saying is believing” effects: When sharing reality about something biases knowledge and evaluations. In L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge(pp. 33–48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Higgins, E. T., King, G. A., & Mavin, G. H. (1982). Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 35–47.
24. Hinsz, V. B. (2004). Metacognition and mental models in groups: An illustration with metamemory of group recognition memory. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance(pp. 33–58). Washington, DC: American Psycological Association.
25. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43–64.
26. Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition(pp. 283–307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
27. Janis, I. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
28. Jehn, K. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 223–228.
29. Jordan, M. H., Field, H. S., & Armenakis, A. A. (2002). The relationship of group process variables and team performance. Small Group Research, 33(1), 121–150.
30. Jung, D. I., & Sosik, J. J. (2003). Group potency and collective efficacy: Examining their predictive validity, level of analysis, and effects of performance feedback on future group performance. Group and Organization Management, 28, 366–391.
31. Kessler, T., & Hollbach, S. (2005). Group-based emotions as determinants of ingroup iden-tification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 677–685.
32. Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1997). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403–437.
33. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regu-lation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490–517.
34. Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 342–369.
35. Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569–598.
36. Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1996). Social psychological models of interpersonal com-munication. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles(pp. 655–701). New York, NY: Guilford.
37. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1999). Knowledge transmission in work groups: Helping newcomers to succeed. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge(pp. 267–296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating factor of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384–393.
39. MacMillan, J., Entin, E. E., & Serfaty, D. (2004). Communication overhead: The hidden cost of team cognition. In E. Salas, S. M. Fiore, & J. A. Cannon-Bowers (Eds.), Team cognition: Process and performance at the inter- and intraindividual level. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
40. McIntyre, R. M., & Salas, E. (1995). Team performance in complex environments: What we have learned so far. In R. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations(pp. 9–45). San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
41. Menon, T., & Thompson, L. L. (2007). Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful: Self-enhancing biases in threat appraisal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 45–60.
42. Menon, T., Thompson, L. L. & Choi, H. (2006). Tainted knowledge versus tempting knowl-edge: People avoid knowledge from internal rivals and seek knowledge from external rivals. Management Science, 52(8), 1129–1144.
43. Moreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L. Thompson, D. Messick, & J. Levine (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge(pp. 3–31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. Moreland, R. L., & Levine J. M. (2000). Socialization in organizations and work groups. In M. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research(pp. 69–112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing(pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Orasanu, J., & Salas, E. (1993). Team decision making in complex environments. In G. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods(pp. 327–345). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
47. Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2007). Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: A cognitive-social-motivational perspective of brainstorming. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 248–265.
48. Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. New York, NY: Basic Books.
49. Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., Tormala, Z. L., & Wegener, D. T. (2007). The role of metacognition in social judgment. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (Vol. 2, pp. 254–284). New York, NY: Guilford.
50. Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51. Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and com-mon-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 484–493.
52. Rentsch, J. R., & Woehr, D. J. (2004). Quantifying congruence in cognition: Social relations modeling and team member schema similarity. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance(pp. 11–31). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
53. Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S., Halevy, N., & Eidelson, R. (2008). Toward a unifying model of identification with groups: Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 280–306.
54. Sanna, L. J., Parks, C. D., Chang, E. C., & Carter, S. E. (2005). The hourglass is half full or half empty: Temporal framing and the group planning fallacy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9, 173–188.
55. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202.
56. Schwarz, N., Sanna, L. J., Skurnik, I., & Yoon, C. (2007). Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: Implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 127–161.
57. Shea, G. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1987). Group effectiveness: What really matters? Sloan Management Review, 28(3), 25–31.
58. Spataro, S., & Chatman, J. (2007). The effects of interorganizational competition on individual commitment: A cross-level investigation. In C. Bartel, S. Blader, & A. Wrzesniewski (Eds.), Identity and the modern organization. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
59. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. 1985. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1478.
60. Swann, W. B., Milton, L. P., & Polzer, J. T. (2000). Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 238–250.
61. Sycara, K., & Lewis, M. (2004). Integrating intelligent agents into human teams. In E. Salas & S. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
62. Tucker, A. L., Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. (2006). Implementing new practices: An empirical study of organizational learning in hospital intensive care units. Management Science, 53, 894–907.
63. Van Boven, L., & Thompson, L. (2003). A look into the mind of the negotiator: Mental models in negotiation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 387–404.
64. Vorauer, J. D., Main, K. J., & O’Connell, G. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 917–937.
65. Weaver, K., Garcia, S. M., Schwarz, N., & Miller, D. T. (2007). Inferring the popularity of an opinion from its familiarity: A repetitive voice can sound like a chorus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 821–833.
66. Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naïve theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36–51.
67. Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior(pp. 185–208). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
68. Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. (1995). Cognitive interdependence in close rela-tionships. In W. J. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 253– 276). New York: Springer-Verlag.
69. West, M. A. (Ed.) (1996). The handbook of work group psychology. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
70. West, M. A., Patterson, M. G., & Dawson, J. F. (1999). A path to profit? Teamwork at the top. CentrePiece, 4(3), 6–11.
71. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Judd, C. M., & Muller, D. (2008). How do they see us? The vicissitudes of metaperception in intergroup relations. In S. Demoulin, J.-P. Leyens, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities(pp. 63–83). New York, NY: Psychology Press.