The project ownership survey: Measuring differences in scientific inquiry experiences

CBE Life Sciences Education

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 149-158

  Hanauer, David I ^a,b   Dolan, Erin L ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c University of Georgia   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LABORATORY; MALE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOMETRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCIENCE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DATA COLLECTION; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABORATORIES; MALE; OWNERSHIP; PSYCHOMETRICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCIENCE;

EID: 84897592089     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19317913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.13-06-0123     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adedokun O. A, Bessenbacher AB, Parker LC, Kirkham LL, Burgess WD (2013). Research skills and STEM undergraduate research students' aspirations for research careers: mediating effects of research self-efficacy. J Res Sci Teach 50, 940-951.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (2011). Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action, Washington, DC.
3. Bachman L. (2004). Statistical Analyses for Language Assessment, Cambridge, U. K: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bauer K. W, Bennett JS (2003). Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. J High Educ 74, 210-230.
5. Caruso S. M, Sandoz J, Kelsey J (2009). Non-STEM undergraduates become enthusiastic phage-hunters. CBE Life Sci Educ 8, 278-282.
6. Chung H., Rodes P, Knapczyk D (1998). Using web conferencing to promote ownership in distance education coursework. Paper presented at the Third AnnualWorld Conference of theWWW, Internet, and Intranet, held 7-12 November 1998, in Orlando, FL.
7. Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychol Bull 112, 155-159.
8. Desai K. V, Gatson SN, Stiles TW, Stewart RH, Laine GA, Quick CM (2008). Integrating research and education at research-extensive universities with research-intensive communities. Adv Physiol Educ 32, 136-141.
9. Dolan E. L, Lally DJ, Brooks E, Tax FE. (2008). PREPping students for authentic science. The Science Teacher, 75, 38-43.
10. Downie M., Moore P (1998). Closing the gap: schools forge a bridge to community-in California: comprehensive services and realistic planning. Perspect Educ Deafness 16, 15-27.
11. Drew J. C, Triplett EW (2008). Whole genome sequencing in the undergraduate classroom: outcomes and lessons from a pilot course. J Microbiol Biol Educ 9, 3-11.
12. Eagan M. K, Hurtado S, Chang MJ, Garcia GA (2013). Making a difference in science education: the impact of undergraduate research programs. Am Educ Res J 50, 463-713.
13. Goodner B. W, Wheeler CA, Hall PJ, Slater SC (2003). Massively parallel undergraduates for bacterial genome finishing. Am SocMicrobiol News 69, 584-585.
14. Guilford J. P (1953). The correlation of an item with a composite of the remaining items in a test. Educ Psychol Measurement 13, 87-93.
15. Hanauer D. I, Frederick J, Fotinakes B, Strobel SA (2012). Linguistic analysis of project ownership for undergraduate research experiences. CBE Life Sci Educ 11, 378-385.
16. Hatfull G. F (2010). Bacteriophage research: gateway to learning science. Microbe 4, 243-250.
17. Hatfull G. F, et al. (2006). Exploring the mycobacteriophage metaproteome: phage genomics as an educational platform. PLoS Genet 2, e92.
18. Hathaway R. S, Nagda BA, Gregerman SR (2002). The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: an empirical study. J Coll Stud Dev 43, 614-631.
19. Hunter A-B, Laursen SL, Seymour E (2007). Becoming a scientist: the role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development. Sci Educ 91, 36-74.
20. Hunter A-B, Weston TJ, Laursen SL, Thiry H (2009). URSSA: evaluating student gains from undergraduate research in the sciences. Counc Undergrad Res Q 29, 15-19.
21. Izard C. E (1993). The Differential Emotions Scale: DES IV: AMethod of Measuring the Meaning of Subjective Experience of Discrete Emotions, Newark: University of Delaware Press.
22. Kardash C. M(2000). Evaluation of an undergraduate research experience: perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty mentors. J Educ Psychol 92, 191-201.
23. KennedyM(1994). The Ownership Project: an experiment in student equity. Soc Stud Rev 33, 24-31.
24. Kremer J. F, Bringle RG (1990). The effects of an intensive research experience on the careers of talented undergraduates. J Res Dev Educ 24, 1-5.
25. Laursen S., Hunter A-B, Seymour E, ThiryH, MeltonG (2010). Undergraduate Research in the Sciences: Engaging Students in Real Science, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26. Lopatto D. (2003). The essential features of undergraduate research. Counc Undergrad Res Q 24, 139-142.
27. Lopatto D. (2004). Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): first findings. Cell Biol Educ 3, 270-277.
28. Lopatto D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE Life Sci Educ 6, 297-306.
29. Lopatto D. (2010). Science in solution: the impact of undergraduate research on student learning. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation for Science Advancement. www.rescorp.org/gdresources/ downloads/Science_in_Solution_Lopatto.pdf.
30. LopattoDet al. (2008). Undergraduate research: Genomics Education Partnership. Science 322, 684-685.
31. Mason C. Y, McGahee-Kovac M, Johnson L (2004). How to help students lead their IEP meetings. Teach Except Child 36, 18-25.
32. Milner-Bolotin M. (2001). The effects of topic choice in project based instruction on undergraduate physical science students' interest, ownership, and motivation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Austin: University of Texas at Austin.
33. Nail M. H (2007). Reaching out to families with student-created newsletters. Kappa Delta Pi Record 44, 39.
34. Netemeyer R. G, Bearden WO, Sharma S (2003). Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35. Rauckhorst W. H, Czaja JA, Baxter Magolda M (2001) Measuring the impact of the undergraduate research experience on student intellectual development. Paper presented at Project Kaleidoscope Summer Institute, held 18-21 July, in Snowbird, UT.
36. Rietveld T., Van Hout R (1993). Statistical Techniques for the Study of Language and Language Behaviour, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
37. Russell S. H, Hancock MP, McCullough J (2007). The pipeline: benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science 316, 548-549.
38. Sadler T. D, Burgin S, McKinney L, Ponjuan L (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: a critical review of the literature. J Res Sci Teach 47, 235-256.
39. Seymour E. L, Hunter AB, Laursen S, De Antoni T (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates: first findings from a three-year study. Sci Educ 88, 493-594.
40. Shaffer C. D et al. (2010). The Genomics Education Partnership: successful integration of research into laboratory classes at a diverse group of undergraduate institutions. CBE Life Sci Educ 9, 55-69.
41. Thiry H., Laursen SL (2011). The role of student-advisor interactions in apprenticing undergraduate researchers into a scientific community of practice. J Sci Educ Technol 20, 771-784.
42. Thompson B. (2004). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
43. Wei A., Woodin T (2011). Undergraduate research experiences in biology: alternatives to the apprenticeship model. CBE Life Sci Educ 10, 123-130.
44. Wiley J. (2009). Student ownership of learning: an analysis. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Manoa: University of Hawaii.
45. Wood W. B (2003). Inquiry-based undergraduate teaching in the life sciences at large research universities: a perspective on the Boyer Commission report. Cell Biol Educ 2, 112-116.