Linguistic analysis of project ownership for undergraduate research experiences

CBE Life Sciences Education

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 378-385

  Hanauer, D I ^a,b   Frederick, J ^c   Fotinakes, B ^a   Strobel, S A ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH; STUDENT;

CURRICULUM; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; OWNERSHIP; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH; STUDENTS;

EID: 84871356190     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19317913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.12-04-0043     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alpers GW, et al. (2005). Evaluations of computerized text analysis in an internet breast cancer support group. Comput Hum Behav 21, 361-376.
2. Cech T, Kennedy D (2005). Editorial: doing more for Kate. Science 310, 1741.
3. Chung H, Rodes P, Knapczyk D (1998). Using Web Conferencing to Promote Ownership in Distance Education Coursework. Paper presented at the Third AnnualWorld Conference of theWWW, Internet, and Intranet, Orlando, FL, November 7-12, 1998.
4. Dickinson VL, Flick LB (1998). Beating the system: course structure and student strategies in a traditional introductory undergraduate physics course. Sch Sci Math 5, 238-246.
5. Downie M, Moore P (1998). Closing the gap: schools forge a bridge to community-in California: comprehensive services and realistic planning. Perspect Educ Deafness 16, 15-27.
6. Hake R (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditionalmethods: a six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am J Physics 66, 64-74.
7. Hanauer DI, Hatfull GF, Jacobs-Sera D (2009). Active Assessment: Assessing Scientific Inquiry, New York: Springer.
8. Hatfull GF (2010). Bacteriophage research: gateway to learning science. Microbe 4, 243-250.
9. Hunston S (2002). Corpora in Applied Linguistics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Jones MT, Barlow AE, Villarejo M (2010). The importance of undergraduate research to persistence in biology. JHigher Educ 81, 82-115.
11. Kahn JH, Tobin RM, Massey AE, Anderson JA (2007). Measuring emotional expression with the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Am J Psychol 120, 263-286.
12. Kennedy M (1994). The Ownership Project: an experiment in student equity. Soc Stud Rev 33, 24-31.
13. Krippendorf K (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to a Methodology, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159-174.
15. Mason CY, McGahee-Kovac M, Johnson L (2004). How to help students lead their IEP meetings. Teach Except Child 36, 18-25.
16. Milner-Bolotin M (2001). The effects of topic choice in projectbased instruction on undergraduate physical science students' interest, ownership, and motivation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Austin: University of Texas at Austin.
17. Nagda BA, Gregerman SR, Jonides J, von Hippel W, Lerner JS (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. Rev Higher Educ 22, 55-72.
18. Nail MH (2007). Reaching out to families with student-created newsletters. Kappa Delta Pi Record 44, 39.
19. National Research Council (2003). BIO2010: Transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists, Committee on Undergraduate Biology Education to Prepare Research Scientists for the 21st Century, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
20. Neuendorf KA (2002). The Content Analysis Guidebook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Pennebaker JW, Booth RJ, Martha FE (2007). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2007, Austin, TX: LIWC.
22. Seymour E, Hunter AB, Laursen SL, DeAntoni T (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: first findings from a three-year study. Sci Educ 88, 493-534.
23. Stemler S (2001). An overview of content analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval 7.
24. Stewart ED (1994). On developing gifts and talents: the Laureate Learning Cycle. J Secondary Gifted Educ 6, 1-7.
25. Tausczik YR, Pennebaker JW (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J Lang Soc Psychol 29, 24-54.
26. Thiry H, Laursen SL, Hunter AB (2011). What experiences help students become scientists? A comparative study of research and other sources of personal and professional gains forSTEMundergraduates. J Higher Educ 82, 357-388.
27. Villarejo M, Barlow AEL, Kogan D, Veazey BD, Sweeney JK (2008). Encouraging minority undergraduates to choose science careers: career paths survey results. CBE Life Sci Educ 7, 394-409.
28. Wenning C (2005). Levels of inquiry: hierarchies of pedagogical practices and inquiry processes. J Phys Teach Educ Online 2, 3-11.
29. Wenning C (2007). Assessing inquiry skills as a component of scientific literacy. J Phys Teach Educ Online 4, 21-24.
30. Wiley J (2009). Student ownership of learning: an analysis. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Hawaii, Manoa.