The genomics education partnership: Successful integration of research into laboratory classes at a diverse group of undergraduate institutions

CBE Life Sciences Education

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 55-69

  Shaffer, Christopher D ^a   Alvarez, Consuelo ^b   Bailey, Cheryl ^c   Barnard, Daron ^d   Bhalla, Satish ^e   Chandrasekaran, Chitra ^f   Chandrasekaran, Vidya ^g   Chung, Hui Min ^h   Dorer, Douglas R ⁱ   Du, Chunguang ^j   Eckdahl, Todd T ^k   Poet, Jeff L ^k   Frohlich, Donald ^l   Goodman, Anya L ^m   Gosser, Yuying ⁿ   Hauser, Charles ^o   Hoopes, Laura L M ^p   Johnson, Diana ^q   Jones, Christopher J ^r   Kaehler, Marian ^s   Kokan, Nighat ^t   Kopp, Olga R ^u   Kuleck, Gary A ^v   McNeil, Gerard ^w   Moss, Robert ^x   Myka, Jennifer L ^y   Nagengast, Alexis ^z   Morris, Robert ^z   Overvoorde, Paul J ^aa   Shoop, Elizabeth ^aa   Parrish, Susan ^ab   Reed, Kelynne ^ac   Regisford, E Gloria ^ad   Revie, Dennis ^ae   Rosenwald, Anne G ^af   Saville, Ken ^ag   Schroeder, Stephanie ^ah   Shaw, Mary ^ai   Skuse, Gary ^aj   Smith, Christopher ^ak   Smith, Mary ^al   Spana, Eric P ^am   Spratt, Mary ^an   Stamm, Joyce ^ao   Thompson, Jeff S ^ap   Wawersik, Matthew ^aq   Wilson, Barbara A ^ar   Youngblom, Jim ^as   Leung, Wilson ^a   Buhler, Jeremy ^at   Mardis, Elaine R ^au   Lopatto, David ^av   Elgin, Sarah C R ^a   more..

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LONGWOOD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^d WORCESTER STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e JOHNSON C SMITH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f TEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA   (United States)

ⁱ HARTWICK COLLEGE   (United States)

^j MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS   (United States)

^m CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁿ City University of New York   (United States)

^o ST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^p POMONA COLLEGE   (United States)

^q GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^r MORAVIAN COLLEGE   (United States)

^s LUTHER COLLEGE   (United States)

^t CARDINAL STRITCH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^u UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^v LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^w CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^x WOFFORD COLLEGE   (United States)

^y Galen College of Nursing   (United States)

^z WIDENER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^aa MACALESTER COLLEGE   (United States)

^ab MCDANIEL COLLEGE   (United States)

^ac AUSTIN COLLEGE   (United States)

^ad PRAIRIE VIEW A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^ae CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^af GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^ag ALBION COLLEGE   (United States)

^ah WEBSTER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^ai NEW MEXICO HIGHLANDS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^aj ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^ak SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^al NORTH CAROLINA A AND T STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^am DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^an William Woods University   (United States)

^ao UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE   (United States)

^ap DENISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^aq The College of William and Mary   (United States)

^ar Jackson State University   (United States)

^as CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^at WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^au WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^av GRINNELL COLLEGE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77749280570     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19317913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/09-11-0087     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bauer, K. W., and Bennett, J. S. (2003). Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. J. High. Educ. 2, 210-230.
2. Campbell, A. M., Eckdahl, T. T., Fowlks, E., Heyer, L. J., Hoopes, L.L.M., Ledbetter, M. L., and Rosenwald, A. G. (2006). Genome Consortium for Active Teaching (GCAT). Science 311, 1103-1104.
3. Campbell, A. M., Ledbetter, M. L., Hoopes, L. L., Eckdahl, T. T., Heyer, L. J., Rosenwald, A., Fowlks, E., Tonidandel, S., Bucholtz, B., and Gottfried, G. (2007). Genome Consortium for Active Teaching: meeting the goals of BIO2010. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 2, 109-118.
4. Clark, A. G., et al. (2007). Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny. Nature 450, 203-218.
5. Doyle, M. P. (2000). Academic Excellence: The Role of Research in the Physical Sciences at Undergraduate Institutions, Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
6. Elgren, T., and Hensel, N. (2006). Undergraduate research experiences: synergies between scholarship and teaching. Peer Rev. 1, 4.
7. Goins, G. D., White, C. D., Foushee, D. B., Smith, M. A., Whittaker, J. J., and Byrd, G. S. (2009). HBCUs Model for Success. Successful Models for Effectively Retaining and Graduating Students at North Carolina A&T State University, New York: Thurgood Marshall College Fund Book.
8. Goodner, B. W., Wheeler, C. A., Hall, P. J., and Slater, S. C. (2003). Massively parallel undergraduates for bacterial genome finishing. ASM News 12, 584-585.
9. Goodner, B. W., et al. (2001). Genome sequence of the plant pathogen and biotechnology agent Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58. Science 294,2323-2328.
10. Gordon, D. (2003). Viewing and editing assembled sequences using Consed. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics, Unit 11.2.
11. Gordon, D., Abajian, C., and Green, P. (1998). Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 3, 195-202.
12. Hacisalihoglu, G., Hilgert, U., Nash, E. B., and Micklos, D. A. (2008). An innovative plant genomics and gene annotation program for high school, community college, and university faculty. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 3, 310-316.
13. Hatfull, G. F., et al. (2006). Exploring the mycobacteriophage metaproteome: phage genomics as an educational platform. PLoS Genet. 6, e92.
14. Hathaway, R., Nagda, B., and Gregerman, S. (2002). The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: an empirical study. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 5, 614-631.
15. Karolchik, D., et al. (2008). The UCSC Genome Browser Database: 2008 update. Nucleic Acids Res. Database issue, D773-9.
16. Kerfeld, C. A., and Simons, R. W. (2007). The undergraduate genomics research initiative. PloS Biol. 5, 980-983.
17. Locks, A. M., and Gregerman, S. R. (2008). Undergraduate research as an institutional retention strategy: The University of Michigan model. In: Creating Effective Undergraduate Research Programs in Science, ed. R. Taraban and R. L. Blanton, New York: Teachers College Press, 11-32.
18. Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): first findings. Cell Biol. Educ. 4, 270-277.
19. Lopatto, D. (2006). Undergraduate research experiences: undergraduate research as a catalyst for liberal learning. Peer Rev. 1, 1-7.
20. Lopatto, D. (2008). Exploring the benefits of undergraduate research: The SURE survey. In: Creating Effective Undergraduate Research Programs in Science, ed. R. Taraban and R. L. Blanton, New York: Teachers College Press, 112-132.
21. Lopatto, D., et al. (2008). Undergraduate research: genomics education partnership. Science 322, 684-685.
22. Miklos, D., Ware, D., and Hilgert, U. (2006). Dynamic Gene. http://dynamicgene.dnalc.org/index.html (accessed 3 November 2009).
23. Nagda, B. A., Gregerman, S. R., Jonides, J., Von Hippel, W., and Lerner, J. S. (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. Rev. High. Educ. 1, 55-72.
24. National Research Council (2003). Bio 2010, transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists, Washington DC: National Academies Press.
25. Pettersson, E., Lundeberg, J., and Ahmadian, A. (2009). Generations of sequencing technologies. Genomics 2, 105-111.
26. Piano, F., and Cherbas, P. (2008). A Proposal for Comparative Genomics in Support the modENCODE Project. http://flybase.org/static_pages/news/articles/2008_10/ModEncWP.pdf (accessed 3 November 2009).
27. Slawson, E. E., et al. (2006). Comparison of dot chromosome sequences from D. melanogaster and D. virilis reveals an enrichment of DNA transposon sequences in heterochromatic domains. Genome Biol. 2, R15.
28. The Genome Center at Washington University (2004). Sequence Improvement Mouse Finishing Rules. http://genome.wustl.edu/platforms/sequence_improvement/mouse_finishing_rules (accessed 16 October 2009).