The benefit of generating errors during learning

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 143, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 644-667

  Potts, Rosalind ^a   Shanks, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Education; Errors; Generation; Learning; Metacognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASSOCIATION; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; RECALL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CUES; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84897528886     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0033194     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A.,&Estes, W. K. (1969). Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 463-470.
2. Arnold, K. M.,&McDermott, K. B. (2013). Test-potentiated learning: Distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 940-945.
3. Baddeley, A.,&Wilson, B. A. (1994). When implicit memory fails: Amnesia and the problem of error elimination. Neuropsychologia, 32, 53-68.
4. Bahrick, H. P.,&Hall, L. K. (2005). The importance of retrieval failures to long-term retention: A metacognitive explanation of the spacing effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 566-577.
5. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., . . . Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445-459.
6. Begg, I., Vinski, E., Frankovich, L.,&Holgate, B. (1991). Generating makes words memorable, but so does effective reading. Memory & Cognition, 19, 487-497.
7. Berlyne, D. E., Carey, S. T., Lazare, S. A., Parlow, J.,&Tiberius, R. (1968). Effects of prior guessing on intentional and incidental pairedassociate learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 750-759.
8. Berlyne, D. E.,&Normore, L. F. (1972). Effects of prior uncertainty on incidental free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 96, 43-48.
9. Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier. In R. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 123-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe&A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185-205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Bjork, R. A.,&Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In A. Healy, S. Kosslyn,&R. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 35-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Butler, A. C.,&Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 514-527.
13. Butler, A. C.,&Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple choice testing. Memory&Cognition, 36, 604-616.
14. Butterfield, B.,&Metcalfe, J. (2001). Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1491-1494.
15. Butterfield, B.,&Metcalfe, J. (2006). The correction of errors committed with high confidence. Metacognition&Learning, 1, 69-84.
16. Carpenter, S. K.,&DeLosh, E. L. (2005). Application of the testing and spacing effects to name learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 619-636.
17. Carpenter, S. K.,&DeLosh, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory&Cognition, 34, 268-276.
18. Carrier, M.,&Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory&Cognition, 20, 633-642.
19. Castel, A. D., McCabe, D. P.,&Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: Evidence from judgments of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 107-111.
20. Clare, L.,&Jones, R. S. P. (2008). Errorless learning in the rehabilitation of memory impairment: A critical review. Neuropsychology Review, 18, 1-23.
21. Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A. Human Experimental Psychology, 33, 497-505.
22. Dunlosky, J., Serra, M. J., Matvey, G.,&Rawson, K. A. (2005). Second order judgments about judgments of learning. Journal of General Psychology, 132, 335-346.
23. Ellis, H. C., Thomas, R. L.,&Rodriguez, I. A. (1984). Emotional mood states and memory: Elaborative encoding, semantic processing, and cognitive effort. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 470-482.
24. Fazio, L. K.,&Marsh, E. J. (2009). Surprising feedback improves later memory. Psychonomic Bulletin&Review, 16, 88-92.
25. Fischhoff, B. (1977). Perceived informativeness of facts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 349-358.
26. Forlano, G.,&Hoffman, N. M. H. (1937). Guessing and telling methods in learning words of a foreign language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 28, 632-636.
27. Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., Bjork, R. A., Gelman, R.,&Wickens, T. D. (2000). When further learning fails: Stability and change following repeated presentation of text. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 493-511.
28. Glover, J. A. (1989). The "testing" phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 392-399.
29. Grimaldi, P. J.,&Karpicke, J. D. (2012). When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding? Memory&Cognition, 40, 505-513.
30. Hammer, A., Kordon, A., Heldmann, M., Zurowski, B.,&Munte, T. F. (2009). Brain potentials of conflict and error-likelihood following errorful and errorless learning in obsessive-compulsive disorder. PLoS One, 4, e6553.
31. Haslam, C., Hodder, K. I.,&Yates, P. J. (2011). Errorless learning and spaced retrieval: How do these methods fare in healthy and clinical populations? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33, 432-447.
32. Haslam, C., Moss, Z.,&Hodder, K. (2010). Are two methods better than one? Evaluating the effectiveness of combining errorless learning with vanishing cues. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32, 973-985.
33. Hays, M. J., Kornell, N.,&Bjork, R. A. (2013). When and why a failed test potentiates the effectiveness of subsequent study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 290-296.
34. Hertzog, C., Dunlosky, J., Robinson, A. E.,&Kidder, D. P. (2003). Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 22-34.
35. Hogan, R. M.,&Kintsch, W. (1971). Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 562-567.
36. Howard, M. C.,&Kahana, M. J. (2002). When does semantic similarity aid episodic retrieval? Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 85-98.
37. Huelser, B. J.,&Metcalfe, J. (2012). Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it. Memory&Cognition, 40, 514-527.
38. Izawa, C. (1970). Optimal potentiating effects and forgetting-prevention effects of tests in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 340-344.
39. Kane, J. H.,&Anderson, R. C. (1978). Depth of processing and interference effects in the learning and remembering of sentences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 626-635.
40. Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T.,&Camerer, C. F. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20, 963-973.
41. Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B.,&Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 528-558.
42. Kang, S. H. K., Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Rohrer, D., Carpenter, S. K., & Mozer, M. C. (2011). Does incorrect guessing impair fact learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 48-59.
43. Karpicke, J. D.,&Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319, 966-968.
44. Kay, H. (1955). Learning and retaining verbal material. British Journal of Psychology, 46, 81-100.
45. Kessels, R. P. C., Boekhorst, S. T.,&Postma, A. (2005). The contribution of implicit and explicit memory to the effects of errorless learning: A comparison between young and older adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 144-151.
46. Knight, J. B., Ball, B. H., Brewer, G. A., DeWitt, M. R.,&Marsh, R. L. (2012). Testing unsuccessfully: A specification of the underlying mechanisms supporting its influence on retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 731-746.
47. Koriat, A. (2008). Easy comes, easy goes? The link between learning and remembering and its exploitation in metacognition. Memory&Cognition, 36, 416-428.
48. Kornell, N., Hays, M. J.,&Bjork, R. A. (2009). Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 989-998.
49. Kucera, H.,&Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
50. Kuo, T.,&Hirshman, E. (1996). Investigations of the testing effect. The American Journal of Psychology, 109, 451-464.
51. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W.,&Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
52. Matvey, G., Dunlosky, J.,&Guttentag, R. (2001). Fluency of retrieval at study affects judgments of learning (JOLs): An analytic or nonanalytic basis for JOLs? Memory&Cognition, 29, 222-233.
53. McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, J. L., Derbish, M. H.,&Morisette, N. (2007). Testing the testing effect in the classroom. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 494-513.
54. McDaniel, M. A., Wildman, K. M.,&Anderson, J. L. (2012). Using quizzes to enhance summative-assessment performance in a web-based class: An experimental study. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 18-26.
55. McElroy, L. A.,&Slamecka, N. J. (1982). Memorial consequences of generating non-words: Implications of semantic memory interpretations of the generation effect. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 249-259.
56. Middleton, E. L.,&Schwartz, M. F. (2012). Errorless learning in cognitive rehabilitation: A critical review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: An International Journal, 22, 138-168.
57. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133.
58. Nelson, T. O. (1993). Judgments of learning and the allocation of study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 269-273.
59. Pashler, H., Bain, P. M., Bottge, B. A., Graesser, A., McDaniel, M. A., & Metcalfe, J. (2007). Organizing instruction and study to improve student learning (NCER Publication No. 2007-2004). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
60. Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T.,&Rohrer, D. (2005). when does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 3-8.
61. Pashler, H., Zarow, G.,&Triplett, B. (2003). Is temporal spacing of tests helpful even when it inflates error rates? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1051-1057.
62. Pressley, M., Tanenbaum, R., McDaniel, M. A.,&Wood, E. (1990). What happens when university students try to answer prequestions that accompany textbook material? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 27-35.
63. Pyc, M. A.,&Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 437-447.
64. Pyc, M. A.,&Rawson, K. A. (2010). Why testing improves memory: Mediator effectiveness hypothesis. Science, 330, 335.
65. Rescorla, R. A.,&Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black&W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
66. Richland, L. E., Kornell, N.,&Kao, L. S. (2009). The pretesting effect: Do unsuccessful tests enhance learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 243-257.
67. Roediger, H. L., III.,&Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181-210.
68. Roediger, H. L., III.,&Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255.
69. Roediger, H. L., III.,&Marsh, E. J. (2005). The positive and negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1155-1159.
70. Schwartz, B. L., Benjamin, A. S.,&Bjork, R. A. (1997). The inferential and experiential bases of memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 132-137.
71. Slamecka, N. J.,&Fevreiski, J. (1983). The generation effect when generation fails. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 153-163.
72. Slamecka, N. J.,&Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.
73. Slamecka, N. J.,&Katsaiti, L. T. (1987). The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 589-607.
74. Tyler, S. W., Hertel, P. T., McCallum, M. C.,&Ellis, H. C. (1979). Cognitive effort and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 607-617.
75. Whitten, W. B.,&Bjork, R. A. (1977). Learning from tests: The effects of spacing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 465-478.
76. Zaromb, F. M., Karpicke, J. D.,&Roediger, H. L., III. (2010). Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: Effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 552-557.