Industrial robust yeast isolates with great potential for fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 161, Issue , 2014, Pages 192-199

  Pereira, Francisco B ^a   Romaní, Aloia ^a   Ruiz, Héctor A ^b   Teixeira, José A ^a   Domingues, Lucília ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE COAHUILA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Bio ethanol; Inhibitor kinetics; Lignocellulose fermentation; PE 2; Pre treatment

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDES; BIOETHANOL; DETOXIFICATION; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FURFURAL;

BIO-ETHANOLS; INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTS; KLUYVEROMYCES MARXIANUS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC MATERIAL; PE-2; PRE-TREATMENT; SECOND GENERATION BIOETHANOL;

YEAST;

5 HYDROXYMETHYLFURFURAL; ACETIC ACID; ALCOHOL; CARBOHYDRATE DERIVATIVE; FURFURAL; HYDROTHERMAL HYDROLYSATE; LIGNOCELLULOSE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; 5-HYDROXYMETHYLFURFURAL; BIOFUEL; LIGNIN;

BIOMASS; FERMENTATION; INHIBITOR; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MONOCOTYLEDON; WOOD; YEAST;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; BIOMASS FERMENTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGRADATION KINETICS; DETOXIFICATION; ENVIRONMENT; EUCALYPTUS GLOBULUS; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS ISOLATION; INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENT; KLUYVEROMYCES MARXIANUS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WOOD; YEAST; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; EUCALYPTUS; FERMENTATION; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; KLUYVEROMYCES; METABOLISM;

BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; BIOREACTORS; ETHANOL; EUCALYPTUS; FERMENTATION; FURALDEHYDE; KLUYVEROMYCES; LIGNIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84897450938     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.043     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Almeida J.R.M., Bertilsson M., Gorwa-Grauslund M.F., Gorsich S., Lidén G. Metabolic effects of furaldehydes and impacts on biotechnological process. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82:625-638.
2. Amorim H.V., Lopes M.L., De Castro Oliveira J.V., Buckeridge M.S., Goldman G.H. Scientific challenges of bioethanol production in Brazil. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 91(5):1267-1275.
3. Basso L.C., De Amorim H.V., De Oliveira A.J., Lopes M.L. Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008, 8(7):1155-1163.
4. Brandberg T., Franzén C.J., Gustafsson L. The fermentation performance of nine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch and fed-batch cultures in dilute-acid wood hydrolysate. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2004, 98(2):122-125.
5. Conde E., Moure A., Domínguez H., Parajó J.C. Production of antioxidants by non-isothermal autohydrolysis of lignocellulosic waste. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44(2):436-442.
6. Della-Bianca B.E., Basso T.O., Stambuk B.U., Basso L.C., Gombert A.K. What do we know about the yeast strains from the Brazilian fuel ethanol industry?. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97(3):979-991.
7. Favaro L., Basaglia M., van Zyl W.H., Casella S. Using an efficient fermenting yeast enhances ethanol production from unfiltered wheat bran hydrolysates. Appl. Energy 2013, 102:170-178.
8. Fonseca G.G., Heinzle E., Wittmann C., Gombert A.K. The yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus and its biotechnological potential. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 79:339-354.
9. Garrote G., Yáñez R., Alonso J.L., Parajó J.C. Coproduction of oligosaccharides and glucose from corncobs by hydrothermanl processing and enzymatic hydrolysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47:1336-1345.
10. Hawkins G.M., Doran-Peterson J. A strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae evolved for fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass displays improved growth and fermentative ability in high solids concentrations and in the presence of inhibitory compounds. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2011, 4:49.
11. Hojo O., Hokka C.O., Maior A.M.S. Ethanol production by a flocculant yeast strain in a CSTR type fermentor with cell recycling. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1999, 77-79:535-546.
12. Kasavi C., Finore I., Lama L., Nicolaus B., Oliver S.G., Toksoy Oner E., Kirdar B. Evaluation of industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for ethanol production from biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 45:230-238.
13. Klinke H.B., Thomsen A.B., Ahring B.K. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 66:10-26.
14. Landaeta R., Aroca G., Acevedo F., Teixeira J.A., Mussatto S.I. Adaptation of a flocculent Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain to lignocellulosic inhibitors by cell recycle batch fermentation. Appl. Energy 2013, 102:124-130.
15. Lavoie J.M., Capek-Menard E., Gauvin H., Chornet E. Production of pulp from Salix viminalis energy crops using the FIRSST process. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4940-4946.
16. Liu Z.L. Genomic adaptation of ethanologenic yeast to biomass conversion inhibitors. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 73:27-36.
17. Liu Z.L. Molecular mechanisms of yeast tolerance and in situ detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 90(3):809-825.
18. Liu Z.L., Slininger P.J., Dien B.S., Berhow M.A., Kurtzman C.P., Gorsich S.W. Adaptive response of yeast to furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and new chemical evidence for HMF conversion to 2,5-bis-hydroxymethylfuran. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 31:345-352.
19. Modig T., Almeida J.R.M., Gorwa-Grauslund M.F., Lindén G. Variability of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains to lignocellulose hydrolysate. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 100(3):423-429.
20. Moshkelani M., Marinova M., Perrier M., Paris J. The forest biorefinery and its implementation in the pulp and paper industry: energy overview. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2013, 50(2):1427-1436.
21. Mussatto S.I., Dragone G., Guimarães P.M.R., Silva J.P.A., Carneiro L.M., Roberto I.C., Vicente A., Domingues L., Teixeira J.A. Technological trends, global market, and challenges of bio-ethanol production. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28(6):817-830.
22. Palmqvist E., Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 74(1):17-24.
23. Pereira F.B., Gomes D.G., Guimarães P.M.R., Teixiera J.A., Domingues L. Cell recycling during repeated very high gravity bio-ethanol fermentations using the industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain PE-2. Biotechnol. Lett. 2012, 34(1):45-53.
24. Pereira F.B., Guimarães P.M.R., Gomes D.G., Mira N.P., Teixeira M.C., Sá-Correia I., Domingues L. Identification of candidate genes for yeast engineering to improve bioethanol production in very high gravity and lignocellulosic biomass industrial fermentation. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2011, 4:57.
25. Pereira F.B., Guimarães P.M.R., Teixeira J.A., Domingues L. Selection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for efficient very high gravity bio-ethanol fermentation processes. Biotechnol. Lett. 2010, 32(11):1655-1661.
26. Pereira F.B., Guimarães P.M.R., Teixeira J.A., Domingues L. Robust industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for very high gravity bio-ethanol fermentations. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2011, 112(2):130-136.
27. Pereira M., Schwan R., Teixeira J. Isolation, screening and characterisation of flocculating and pectinase producing Kluyveromyces strains. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 1999, 37(4):257-261.
28. Phillips R.B., Jameel H., Chang H.M. Integration of pulp and paper technology with bioethanol production. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013, 6:13.
29. Purwadi R., Brandberg T., Taherzadeh J.M. A possible industrial solution to ferment lignocellulosic hydrolyzate to ethanol: continuous cultivation with flocculating yeast. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2007, 8:920-932.
30. Ribeiro O., Gombert A.K., Teixeira J.A., Domingues L. Application of the Cre-loxP system for multiple gene disruption in the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 131:20-26.
31. Romaní A., Garrote G., Alonso J.L., Parajó J.C. Bioethanol production from hydrothermally pretreated Eucalyptus globulus wood. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(22):8706-8712.
32. Ruiz H.A., Rodríguez-Jasso R.M., Fernandes B.D., Vicente A.A., Teixeira J.A. Hydrothermal processing, as an alternative for upgrading agriculture residues and marine biomass according to the biorefinery concept: A review. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2013, 21:35-51.
33. Tian S., Zhou G., Yan F., Yu Y., Yang X. Yeast strains for ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysate during in situ detoxification. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27:656-660.
34. Westman J.O., Taherzadeh M.J., Franzén C.J. Inhibitor tolerance and flocculation of a yeast strain suitable for second generation bioethanol production. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 15(3).